Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 408

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Protective monotherapy against lethal Ebola virus infection by a potently neutralizing antibody

Corti, Davide, Misasi, John, Mulangu, Sabue, Stanley, Daphne A., Kanekiyo, Masaru, Wollen, Suzanne, Ploquin, Aurélie, Doria-Rose, Nicole A., Staupe, Ryan P., Bailey, Michael, Shi, Wei, Choe, Misook, Marcus, Hadar, Thompson, Emily A., Cagigi, Alberto, Silacci, Chiara, Fernandez-Rodriguez, Blanca, Perez, Laurent, Sallusto, Federica, Vanzetta, Fabrizia, Agatic, Gloria, Cameroni, Elisabetta, Kisalu, Neville, Gordon, Ingelise, Ledgerwood, Julie E., Mascola, John R., Graham, Barney S., Muyembe-Tamfun, Jean-Jacques, Trefry, John C., Lanzavecchia, Antonio, Sullivan, Nancy J.·2016·Science

Abstract

Antibodies block Ebola virus entry: The recent Ebola virus outbreak in West Africa illustrates the need for both an effective vaccine and therapies to treat infected individuals. Corti et al. isolated two monoclonal antibodies from a survivor of the 1995 Kikwit outbreak and demonstrated their therapeutic efficacy in Ebola virus–infected macaques. In fact, one antibody protected macaques when it was given up to 5 days after infection. Misasi et al. solved the crystal structures of fragments of the two antibodies bound to the Ebola virus glycoprotein (GP), which mediates viral cell entry. The two antibodies targeted different regions of GP, but in both cases blocked steps required for viral entry. Science , this issue pp. 1339 & 1343

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aad5224

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 408

Metadata

Authors
Corti, D., Misasi, J., Mulangu, S., Stanley, D. A., Kanekiyo, M., Wollen, S., Ploquin, A., Doria-Rose, N. A., Staupe, R. P., Bailey, M., Shi, W., Choe, M., Marcus, H., Thompson, E. A., Cagigi, A., Silacci, C., Fernandez-Rodriguez, B., Perez, L., Sallusto, F., Vanzetta, F., Agatic, G., Cameroni, E., Kisalu, N., Gordon, I., Ledgerwood, J. E., Mascola, J. R., Graham, B. S., Muyembe-Tamfun, J.-J., Trefry, J. C., Lanzavecchia, A., & Sullivan, N. J.
Venue
Science
Published
2016-03-18
Volume
351
Issue
6279
Pages
1339-1342
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2288202420
Cited by
408
References
22
FWCI
40.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protective monotherapy against lethal Ebola virus infection by a potently neutralizing antibody. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.aad5224
The paper
Corti, D., Misasi, J., Mulangu, S., Stanley, D. A., Kanekiyo, M., Wollen, S., Ploquin, A., Doria-Rose, N. A., Staupe, R. P., Bailey, M., Shi, W., Choe, M., Marcus, H., Thompson, E. A., Cagigi, A., Silacci, C., Fernandez-Rodriguez, B., Perez, L., Sallusto, F., . . . Sullivan, N. J. (2016). Protective monotherapy against lethal Ebola virus infection by a potently neutralizing antibody. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad5224

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.