Cited by 302DNA Repair MechanismsCancer therapeutics and mechanismsGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

The TopoVIB-Like protein family is required for meiotic DNA double-strand break formation

Robert, T., Nore, A., Brun, C., Maffre, C., Crimi, B., Guichard, V., Bourbon, H.-M., de Massy, B.·2016·Science

Abstract

A partner protein for meiotic snip: Eukaryotes generate germ cells through meiotic recombination. This process initiates through breaks in genomic DNA catalyzed by the SPO11 protein. Vrielynck et al. and Robert et al. discover that SPO11, like topoisomerase VI enzymes, interacts with a partner protein (see the Perspective by Bouuaert and Keeney). This partner is required for proper meiotic recombination and is found in a wide range of eukaryotes, suggesting that it is a universal feature of the essential recombination step. Science , this issue p. 939 , 943 ; see also p. 916

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aad5309

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The model clarifies the Spo11 portion of the Rec102-Spo11 interface, which was not well structured in previous homology models.

    “The model clarifies the Spo11 portion of this interface, which was not well structured in previous homology models (27,31).”

    From Computed structures of core eukaryotic protein complexes (2021) · cites this paper as [31]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robert, T., Nore, A., Brun, C., Maffre, C., Crimi, B., Guichard, V., Bourbon, H.-M., & de Massy, B.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Centre de Biologie du Développement (FR)
  • Institute of Human Genetics, UPR 1142 CNRS, University of Montpellier, 141 Rue de la Cardonille, 34396 Montpellier cedex 05, France.
Corresponding author
Bourbon, H.-M.
Venue
Science
Published
2016-02-26
Volume
351
Issue
6276
Pages
943-949
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2275186331
Cited by
302
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 14
FWCI
16.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • CNRS
  • European Research Council
  • European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (322788)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
meiotic recombination, Spo11, protein complex formation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Drosophila melanogaster, mice
MeSH terms
Meiotic Recombination Protein SPO11, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Catalysis, Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone, DNA Topoisomerases, Type II, DNA-Binding Proteins, Endodeoxyribonucleases, Meiosis, Molecular Sequence Data, Plant Proteins, Sequence Alignment, Conserved Sequence, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Archaeal Proteins, Protein Interaction Mapping, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Drosophila Proteins, Recombinases, Mice, DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review