Cited by 87DNA Repair MechanismsGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsCancer therapeutics and mechanisms

Structural and functional characterization of the Spo11 core complex

Open access
Claeys Bouuaert, Corentin, Tischfield, Sam E., Pu, Stephen, Mimitou, Eleni P., Arias-Palomo, Ernesto, Berger, James M., Keeney, Scott·2021·Nature Structural & Molecular Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Spo11, which makes DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) that are essential for meiotic recombination, has long been recalcitrant to biochemical study. We provide molecular analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Spo11 purified with partners Rec102, Rec104 and Ski8. Rec102 and Rec104 jointly resemble the B subunit of archaeal topoisomerase VI, with Rec104 occupying a position similar to the Top6B GHKL-type ATPase domain. Unexpectedly, the Spo11 complex is monomeric (1:1:1:1 stoichiometry), consistent with dimerization controlling DSB formation. Reconstitution of DNA binding reveals topoisomerase-like preferences for duplex-duplex junctions and bent DNA. Spo11 also binds noncovalently but with high affinity to DNA ends mimicking cleavage products, suggesting a mechanism to cap DSB ends. Mutations that reduce DNA binding in vitro attenuate DSB formation, alter DSB processing and reshape the DSB landscape in vivo. Our data reveal structural and functional similarities between the Spo11 core complex and Topo VI, but also highlight differences reflecting their distinct biological roles.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41594-020-00534-w

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The model of Spo11-Ski8 resembles a previous model based on the Ski3-Ski8 complex, with Ski8 contacting a sequence in Ski3 similar to QREIF380 in Spo11, but suggests a more extensive interaction surface involving an insertion in Ski8 present in Saccharomyces species but not in Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Sordaria macrospora.

    “Our model resembles a previous model based on the Ski3–Ski8 complex, with Ski8 contacting a sequence in Ski3 that is similar to the sequence QREIF380 in Spo11 (27,28) (fig. S17A), but suggests a more extensive interaction surface than previously appreciated, involving an insertion in Ski8 that is present in Saccharomyces species but not in Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Sordaria macrospora, where”

    From Computed structures of core eukaryotic protein complexes (2021) · cites this paper as [27]

  • The model clarifies the Spo11 portion of the Rec102-Spo11 interface, which was not well structured in previous homology models.

    “The model clarifies the Spo11 portion of this interface, which was not well structured in previous homology models (27,31).”

    From Computed structures of core eukaryotic protein complexes (2021) · cites this paper as [27]

  • The predicted Spo11-Ski8 structure is supported by crosslinking and mutagenesis data.

    “The predicted Spo11–Ski8 structure is supported by crosslinking and mutagenesis data (26,27).”

    From Computed structures of core eukaryotic protein complexes (2021) · cites this paper as [27]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [57]Johnson D Concerted cutting by Spo11 illuminates DNA break mechanisms and initiates gap repair during meiosis. bioRxiv, 2019.12.18.881268 (2019).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Claeys Bouuaert, C., Tischfield, S. E., Pu, S., Mimitou, E. P., Arias-Palomo, E., Berger, J. M., & Keeney, S.
Affiliations
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Keeney, Scott
Venue
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
Published
2021-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
92-102
ISSN
  • 1545-9985 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-9993
OpenAlex
W3120715541
Cited by
87
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3
FWCI
4.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (P30 CA08748)
  • Yale University
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (P30-CA08748)
  • National Institutes of Health (2r01ca077373-22, CA08748)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01-CA077373, P30-CA-08748, CA08748, CA0777373, P30CA008748)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM118092)
  • National Center for Research Resources (S10RR023748)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms
Keywords
Spo11, DNA double-strand breaks, meiotic recombination, protein complex stoichiometry, protein-DNA interactions, bent DNA, Saccharomyces cerevisiae
MeSH terms
Meiotic Recombination Protein SPO11, DNA Topoisomerases, Type II, DNA-Binding Proteins, Endodeoxyribonucleases, Meiosis, Mutation, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Microscopy, Atomic Force, Archaeal Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Recombinases, DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review