The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiprocess 3D printing for increasing component functionality
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) printing, known more formally as additive manufacturing, has become the focus of media and public attention in recent years as the decades-old technology has at last approached the performance necessary for direct production of end-use devices. The most popular forms of standard 3D printing include vat photopolymerization, powder bed fusion, material extrusion, sheet lamination, directed energy deposition, material jetting, and binder jetting, each creating parts layer by layer and offering different options in terms of cost, feature detail, and materials. Whereas traditional manufacturing technologies, such as casting, forging, machining, and injection molding, are well suited for mass production of identical commodity items, 3D printing allows for the creation of complex geometric shapes that can be mass-customized, because no die or mold is required and design concepts are translated into products through direct digital manufacturing. Furthermore, the additively layered approach enables the merging of multiple components into a single piece, which removes the requirement for subsequent assembly operations. Recently, the patents for the original 3D printing processes have begun to expire, which is resulting in a burgeoning number of low-cost desktop systems that provide increased accessibility to society at large. Industry has recognized the manufacturing advantages of these technologies and is investing in production systems to make complex components for jet engines, customized bodies for cars, and even pharmaceuticals. Although standard 3D printing technologies have advanced so that it is now possible to print in a wide range of materials including metals, ceramics, and polymers, the resulting structures are generally limited to a single material, or, at best, a limited number of compatible materials. ADVANCES: For the technology to become more widely adopted in mainstream manufacturing, 3D printing must provide end-use products by fabricating more than just simple structures with sufficient mechanical strength to retain shape. Recently, research has resulted in the capability to use new materials with commercial 3D printers, and customized printers have been enhanced with complementary traditional manufacturing processes, an approach known as multiprocess or hybrid 3D printing. Collectively, these advancements are leading to fabrications that are not only geometrically complex, but functionally complex as well. By introducing the robotic placement of components, micromachining for intricate detail, embedding of wires, and dispensing of functional inks, complex structures can be constructed with additional electronic, electromagnetic, optical, thermodynamic, chemical, and electromechanical content. OUTLOOK: Multiprocess 3D printing is a nascent area of research in which basic 3D printing is augmented to fabricate structures with multifunctionality. Progress will lead to local manufacturing with customized 3D spatial control of material, geometry, and placement of subcomponents. This next generation of printers will allow for the fabrication of arbitrarily shaped end-use devices, leading to direct and distributed manufacturing of products ranging from human organs to satellites. The ramifications are substantial, given that 3D printing will enable the fabrication of customer-specific products locally and on demand, improving personalization and reducing shipping costs and delays. Examples could include replacement components for grain-milling equipment in a remote village in the developing world, biomedical devices created specifically for a patient in a hospital before surgery, and satellite components printed in orbit, thus avoiding the delays and costs associated with launch operations. The automotive, aerospace, defense, pharmaceutical, biomedical, and consumer industries, among others, will benefit from the new design and manufacturing freedom made possible by multiprocess 3D printing. A long-exposure photo of the Multi3D Manufacturing system for multiprocess 3D printing.: Two production 3D printers are shown collaboratively printing, with a six-axis robot for conveyance and postprocess assembly. A central gantry in the background incorporatates other complementary manufacturing processes (machining, component placement, wire and foil embedding, and direct write) to provide geometrically complex structures combining polymers, metals, and active components.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A compliant, underactuated hand for robust manipulation
Odhner, L. U., Jentoft, L. P., Claffee, M. R., Corson, N., Tenzer, Y., Ma, R. R., Buehler, M., Kohout, R., Howe, R. D., & Dollar, A. M. (2014) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364913514466 · Cited by 598
Cited by
González-Henríquez, C. M., Sarabia-Vallejos, M. A., & Rodriguez-Hernandez, J. (2019) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.03.001 · Cited by 562
About metastable cellular structure in additively manufactured austenitic stainless steels
Kong, D., Dong, C., Wei, S., Ni, X., Zhang, L., Li, R., Wang, L., Man, C., & Li, X. (2021) · Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101804 · Cited by 528
Recent Advances on High‐Entropy Alloys for 3D Printing
Han, C., Fang, Q., Shi, Y., Tor, S. B., Chua, C. K., & Zhou, K. (2020) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201903855 · Cited by 486
The Boom in 3D-Printed Sensor Technology
Xu, Y., Wu, X., Guo, X., Kong, B., Zhang, M., Qian, X., Mi, S., & Sun, W. (2017) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s17051166 · Cited by 361
3D printed reversible shape changing soft actuators assisted by liquid crystal elastomers
Yuan, C., Roach, D. J., Dunn, C. K., Mu, Q., Kuang, X., Yakacki, C. M., Wang, T. J., Yu, K., & Qi, H. J. (2017) · Soft Matter · doi:10.1039/c7sm00759k · Cited by 300
Metadata
- Authors
- MacDonald, E., & Wicker, R.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2016-09-30
- Volume
- 353
- Issue
- 6307
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2525560340
- Cited by
- 961
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 60.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiprocess 3D printing for increasing component functionality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.aaf2093
- The paper
- MacDonald, E., & Wicker, R. (2016). Multiprocess 3D printing for increasing component functionality. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2093
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.