Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 277

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Systematic analysis of complex genetic interactions

Open access
Kuzmin, Elena, VanderSluis, Benjamin, Wang, Wen, Tan, Guihong, Deshpande, Raamesh, Chen, Yiqun, Usaj, Matej, Balint, Attila, Mattiazzi Usaj, Mojca, van Leeuwen, Jolanda, Koch, Elizabeth N., Pons, Carles, Dagilis, Andrius J., Pryszlak, Michael, Wang, Jason Zi Yang, Hanchard, Julia, Riggi, Margot, Xu, Kaicong, Heydari, Hamed, San Luis, Bryan-Joseph, Shuteriqi, Ermira, Zhu, Hongwei, Van Dyk, Nydia, Sharifpoor, Sara, Costanzo, Michael, Loewith, Robbie, Caudy, Amy, Bolnick, Daniel, Brown, Grant W., Andrews, Brenda J., Boone, Charles, Myers, Chad L.·2018·Science

Abstract

Trigenic interactions in yeast link bioprocesses: To dissect the genotype-phenotype landscape of a cell, it is necessary to understand interactions between genes. Building on the digenic protein-protein interaction network, Kuzmin et al. created a trigenic landscape of yeast by using a synthetic genetic array (see the Perspective by Walhout). Triple-mutant analyses indicated that the majority of genes with trigenic associations functioned within the same biological processes. These converged on networks identified in the digenic interaction landscape. Although the overall effects were weaker for trigenic than for digenic interactions, trigenic interactions were more likely to bridge biological processes in the cell. Science , this issue p. eaao1729 ; see also p. 269

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aao1729

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 277

Metadata

Authors
Kuzmin, E., VanderSluis, B., Wang, W., Tan, G., Deshpande, R., Chen, Y., Usaj, M., Balint, A., Mattiazzi Usaj, M., van Leeuwen, J., Koch, E. N., Pons, C., Dagilis, A. J., Pryszlak, M., Wang, J. Z. Y., Hanchard, J., Riggi, M., Xu, K., Heydari, H., San Luis, B.-J., Shuteriqi, E., Zhu, H., Van Dyk, N., Sharifpoor, S., Costanzo, M., Loewith, R., Caudy, A., Bolnick, D., Brown, G. W., Andrews, B. J., Boone, C., & Myers, C. L.
Venue
Science
Published
2018-04-20
Volume
360
Issue
6386
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2799762305
Cited by
277
References
15
FWCI
11.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systematic analysis of complex genetic interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.aao1729
The paper
Kuzmin, E., VanderSluis, B., Wang, W., Tan, G., Deshpande, R., Chen, Y., Usaj, M., Balint, A., Mattiazzi Usaj, M., van Leeuwen, J., Koch, E. N., Pons, C., Dagilis, A. J., Pryszlak, M., Wang, J. Z. Y., Hanchard, J., Riggi, M., Xu, K., Heydari, H., . . . Myers, C. L. (2018). Systematic analysis of complex genetic interactions. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao1729

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.