Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 462

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chromosome errors in human eggs shape natural fertility over reproductive life span

Open access
Gruhn, Jennifer R., Zielinska, Agata P., Shukla, Vallari, Blanshard, Robert, Capalbo, Antonio, Cimadomo, Danilo, Nikiforov, Dmitry, Chan, Andrew Chi-Ho, Newnham, Louise J., Vogel, Ivan, Scarica, Catello, Krapchev, Marta, Taylor, Deborah, Kristensen, Stine Gry, Cheng, Junping, Ernst, Erik, Bjørn, Anne-Mette Bay, Colmorn, Lotte Berdiin, Blayney, Martyn, Elder, Kay, Liss, Joanna, Hartshorne, Geraldine, Grøndahl, Marie Louise, Rienzi, Laura, Ubaldi, Filippo, McCoy, Rajiv, Lukaszuk, Krzysztof, Andersen, Claus Yding, Schuh, Melina, Hoffmann, Eva R.·2019·Science

Abstract

Understanding fertility in young and old: Fertility in humans follows a U-curve, with low rates in both teenagers and women of advancing maternal age (mid-30s and above). Gruhn et al. found that this distinct shape originates from chromosomal errors in human eggs, which result in genomic imbalance and pregnancy loss. The error types and chromosomes affected in the young and advanced age groups were different, suggesting that two distinct chromosome-based mechanisms balance risk associated with pregnancy and evolutionary fitness as women enter and exit their reproductive life span. The authors show that chromosome structure erodes only with advancing age, acting as a “molecular clock” for reproductive senescence. Science , this issue p. 1466

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aav7321

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 462

Metadata

Authors
Gruhn, J. R., Zielinska, A. P., Shukla, V., Blanshard, R., Capalbo, A., Cimadomo, D., Nikiforov, D., Chan, A. C.-H., Newnham, L. J., Vogel, I., Scarica, C., Krapchev, M., Taylor, D., Kristensen, S. G., Cheng, J., Ernst, E., Bjørn, A.-M. B., Colmorn, L. B., Blayney, M., Elder, K., Liss, J., Hartshorne, G., Grøndahl, M. L., Rienzi, L., Ubaldi, F., McCoy, R., Lukaszuk, K., Andersen, C. Y., Schuh, M., & Hoffmann, E. R.
Venue
Science
Published
2019-09-27
Volume
365
Issue
6460
Pages
1466-1469
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2975979611
Cited by
462
References
2
FWCI
18.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chromosome errors in human eggs shape natural fertility over reproductive life span. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.aav7321
The paper
Gruhn, J. R., Zielinska, A. P., Shukla, V., Blanshard, R., Capalbo, A., Cimadomo, D., Nikiforov, D., Chan, A. C.-H., Newnham, L. J., Vogel, I., Scarica, C., Krapchev, M., Taylor, D., Kristensen, S. G., Cheng, J., Ernst, E., Bjørn, A.-M. B., Colmorn, L. B., Blayney, M., . . . Hoffmann, E. R. (2019). Chromosome errors in human eggs shape natural fertility over reproductive life span. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav7321

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.