Cited by 756Advanced Memory and Neural ComputingFerroelectric and Negative Capacitance DevicesConducting polymers and applications

Parallel programming of an ionic floating-gate memory array for scalable neuromorphic computing

Fuller, Elliot J., Keene, Scott T., Melianas, Armantas, Wang, Zhongrui, Agarwal, Sapan, Li, Yiyang, Tuchman, Yaakov, James, Conrad D. +4 more·2019·Science

Abstract

Ionic floating-gate memories: Digital implementations of artificial neural networks perform many tasks, such as image recognition and language processing, but are too energy intensive for many applications. Analog circuits that use large crossbar arrays of synaptic memory elements represent a low-power alternative, but most devices cannot update the synaptic weights uniformly or scale to large array sizes. Fuller et al. developed an integrated device, ionic floating-gate memory, that has the gate terminal of a redox transistor electrically connected to a diffusive memristor. This low-power device enabled linear and symmetric weight updates in parallel over an entire crossbar array at megahertz rates over 10 9 write-read cycles. Science , this issue p. 570

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aaw5581

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In many materials, such as PCM, ReRAM, CBRAM, or ECRAM, conductances are effectively continuous physical quantities, and stored weights are not quantized.

    “In many materials, such as phase-change memory (PCM)22,23, resistive random-access memory (ReRAM)24,25, conductive bridge RAM (CBRAM)26,27, or electro-chemical random-access memory (ECRAM)28,29, these conductances are effectively continuous physical quantities, and stored weights are not quantized.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fuller, E. J., Keene, S. T., Melianas, A., Wang, Z., Agarwal, S., Li, Y., Tuchman, Y., James, C. D., Marinella, M. J., Yang, J. J., Salleo, A., & Talin, A. A.
Affiliations
  • Sandia National Laboratories California (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
  • Sandia National Laboratories (US)
Corresponding author
  • Keene, Scott T.
  • Melianas, Armantas
  • Salleo, Alberto
  • Talin, A. Alec
Venue
Science
Published
2019-05-10
Volume
364
Issue
6440
Pages
570-574
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2942216650
Cited by
756
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 65 · 2025: 112 · 2024: 110 · 2023: 108 · 2022: 125 · 2021: 120 · 2020: 93 · 2019: 23
FWCI
32.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1739795)
  • Basic Energy Sciences (DESC0001160)
  • Sandia National Laboratories’ Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Conducting polymers and applications
Keywords
neuromorphic computing, crossbar memory arrays, conductive bridge memory, synaptic plasticity, non-volatile memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review