Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 303

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Shifting mutational constraints in the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain during viral evolution

Open access
Starr, Tyler N., Greaney, Allison J., Hannon, William W., Loes, Andrea N., Hauser, Kevin, Dillen, Josh R., Ferri, Elena, Farrell, Ariana Ghez, Dadonaite, Bernadeta, McCallum, Matthew, Matreyek, Kenneth A., Corti, Davide, Veesler, David, Snell, Gyorgy, Bloom, Jesse D.·2022·Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has evolved variants with substitutions in the spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) that affect its affinity for angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor and recognition by antibodies. These substitutions could also shape future evolution by modulating the effects of mutations at other sites—a phenomenon called epistasis. To investigate this possibility, we performed deep mutational scans to measure the effects on ACE2 binding of all single–amino acid mutations in the Wuhan-Hu-1, Alpha, Beta, Delta, and Eta variant RBDs. Some substitutions, most prominently Asn 501 →Tyr (N501Y), cause epistatic shifts in the effects of mutations at other sites. These epistatic shifts shape subsequent evolutionary change—for example, enabling many of the antibody-escape substitutions in the Omicron RBD. These epistatic shifts occur despite high conservation of the overall RBD structure. Our data shed light on RBD sequence-function relationships and facilitate interpretation of ongoing SARS-CoV-2 evolution.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.abo7896

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 62 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.1126/science.abh1139 · doi:10.1126/science.abh1139 · Paper page

Cited by

See all 303

Metadata

Authors
Starr, T. N., Greaney, A. J., Hannon, W. W., Loes, A. N., Hauser, K., Dillen, J. R., Ferri, E., Farrell, A. G., Dadonaite, B., McCallum, M., Matreyek, K. A., Corti, D., Veesler, D., Snell, G., & Bloom, J. D.
Venue
Science
Published
2022-07-22
Volume
377
Issue
6604
Pages
420-424
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W4283646162
Cited by
303
References
62
FWCI
30.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Shifting mutational constraints in the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain during viral evolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.abo7896
The paper
Starr, T. N., Greaney, A. J., Hannon, W. W., Loes, A. N., Hauser, K., Dillen, J. R., Ferri, E., Farrell, A. G., Dadonaite, B., McCallum, M., Matreyek, K. A., Corti, D., Veesler, D., Snell, G., & Bloom, J. D. (2022). Shifting mutational constraints in the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain during viral evolution. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo7896

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.