Cited by 7,953

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix

Liebschner, Dorothee, Afonine, Pavel V., Baker, Matthew L., Bunkóczi, Gábor, Chen, Vincent B., Croll, Tristan I., Hintze, Bradley, Hung, Li-Wei, Jain, Swati, McCoy, Airlie J., Moriarty, Nigel W., Oeffner, Robert D., Poon, Billy K., Prisant, Michael G., Read, Randy J., Richardson, Jane S., Richardson, David C., Sammito, Massimo D., Sobolev, Oleg V., Stockwell, Duncan H., Terwilliger, Thomas C., Urzhumtsev, Alexandre G., Videau, Lizbeth L., Williams, Christopher J., Adams, Paul D.·2019·Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology

Abstract

Diffraction (X-ray, neutron and electron) and electron cryo-microscopy are powerful methods to determine three-dimensional macromolecular structures, which are required to understand biological processes and to develop new therapeutics against diseases. The overall structure-solution workflow is similar for these techniques, but nuances exist because the properties of the reduced experimental data are different. Software tools for structure determination should therefore be tailored for each method. Phenix is a comprehensive software package for macromolecular structure determination that handles data from any of these techniques. Tasks performed with Phenix include data-quality assessment, map improvement, model building, the validation/rebuilding/refinement cycle and deposition. Each tool caters to the type of experimental data. The design of Phenix emphasizes the automation of procedures, where possible, to minimize repetitive and time-consuming manual tasks, while default parameters are chosen to encourage best practice. A graphical user interface provides access to many command-line features of Phenix and streamlines the transition between programs, project tracking and re-running of previous tasks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1107/s2059798319011471

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Model geometries were assessed using the MolProbity module in Phenix, the Molprobity server, and the PDB Validation server.

    “Model geometries were assessed using the MolProbity module in Phenix, the Molprobity server68 (http://molprobity.biochem.duke.edu/), and the PDB Validation server69 (www.wwpdb.org).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 151

  1. Abrahams, 2003, C/C++ Users J., 21, 29
  2. Adams, 2019, Acta Cryst. D, 75, 451, 10.1107/S2059798319004522 · DOI
  3. Adams, 2010, Acta Cryst. D, 66, 213, 10.1107/S0907444909052925 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Adams, 2009, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 19, 566, 10.1016/j.sbi.2009.07.014 · DOI
  5. Adams, 2002, Acta Cryst. D, 58, 1948, 10.1107/S0907444902016657 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Adams, 2009, Acta Cryst. D, 65, 567, 10.1107/S0907444909011548 · DOI
  7. Afonine, 2018, Acta Cryst. D, 74, 621, 10.1107/S2059798318005764 · DOI
  8. Afonine, 2005, Acta Cryst. D, 61, 850, 10.1107/S0907444905007894 · DOI
  9. Afonine, 2007, Acta Cryst. D, 63, 1194, 10.1107/S0907444907046148 · DOI
  10. Afonine, 2013, Acta Cryst. D, 69, 625, 10.1107/S0907444913000462 · DOI
  11. Afonine, 2009, J. Appl. Cryst., 42, 607, 10.1107/S0021889809023528 · DOI
  12. Afonine, 2018, Acta Cryst. D, 74, 814, 10.1107/S2059798318009324 · DOI
  13. Afonine, 2015, Acta Cryst. D, 71, 646, 10.1107/S1399004714028132 · DOI
  14. Afonine, 2010, Acta Cryst. D, 66, 1153, 10.1107/S0907444910026582 · DOI
  15. Afonine, 2018, Acta Cryst. D, 74, 531, 10.1107/S2059798318006551 · DOI
  16. Bai, 2015, Trends Biochem. Sci., 40, 49, 10.1016/j.tibs.2014.10.005 · DOI
  17. Baker, 2012, Structure, 20, 450, 10.1016/j.str.2012.01.008 · DOI
  18. Barad, 2015, Nature Methods, 12, 943, 10.1038/nmeth.3541 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Berkholz, 2009, Structure, 17, 1316, 10.1016/j.str.2009.08.012 · DOI
  20. Bernstein, 1977, J. Mol. Biol., 112, 535, 10.1016/S0022-2836(77)80200-3 · DOI
  21. Blow, D. M., Navaza, J., Tong, L., Arnold, E. & Rossmann, M. G. (2012). International Tables for Crystallography, Vol. F, edited by E. Arnold, D. M. Himmel & M. G. Rossmann, pp. 333-366. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  22. Borbulevych, 2014, Comput. Crystallogr. Newsl., 5, 26
  23. Brändén, 1990, Nature (London), 343, 687, 10.1038/343687a0 · DOI
  24. Britton, 1972, Acta Cryst. A, 28, 296, 10.1107/S0567739472000786 · DOI
  25. Brünger, 1992, Nature (London), 355, 472, 10.1038/355472a0 · DOI
  26. Brünger, 1998, Acta Cryst. D, 54, 905, 10.1107/S0907444998003254 · DOI
  27. Brunger, 2012, Acta Cryst. D, 68, 391, 10.1107/S090744491104978X · DOI
  28. Bryan, 2013, Acta Cryst. F, 69, 1015, 10.1107/S1744309113021386 · DOI
  29. Bunkóczi, 2013, Acta Cryst. D, 69, 2276, 10.1107/S0907444913022750 · DOI
  30. Bunkóczi, 2011, Acta Cryst. D, 67, 303, 10.1107/S0907444910051218 · DOI
  31. Burley, 2019, Nucleic Acids Res., 47, D464, 10.1093/nar/gky1004 · DOI
  32. Burnley, 2012, Elife, 1, e00311, 10.7554/eLife.00311 · DOI
  33. Busing, 1964, Acta Cryst., 17, 142, 10.1107/S0365110X64000408 · DOI
  34. Cardone, 2013, J. Struct. Biol., 184, 226, 10.1016/j.jsb.2013.08.002 · DOI
  35. Chapman, 2011, Nature (London), 470, 73, 10.1038/nature09750 · DOI
  36. Chen, 2010, Acta Cryst. D, 66, 12, 10.1107/S0907444909042073 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Chen, 2009, Protein Sci., 18, 2403, 10.1002/pro.250 · DOI
  38. Chou, 2013, Nature Methods, 10, 74, 10.1038/nmeth.2262 · DOI
  39. Clowney, 1996, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 118, 509, 10.1021/ja952883d · DOI
  40. Coppens, 1967, Science, 158, 1577, 10.1126/science.158.3808.1577 · DOI
  41. Croll, 2015, Acta Cryst. D, 71, 706, 10.1107/S1399004715000826 · DOI
  42. Croll, 2018, Acta Cryst. D, 74, 519, 10.1107/S2059798318002425 · DOI
  43. Dauter, 2017, Methods Mol. Biol., 1607, 349, 10.1007/978-1-4939-7000-1_14 · DOI
  44. Deis, 2013, Comput. Crystallogr. Newsl., 4, 9
  45. Diederichs, 2017, Methods Mol. Biol., 1607, 239, 10.1007/978-1-4939-7000-1_10 · DOI
  46. DiMaio, 2013, Nature Methods, 10, 1102, 10.1038/nmeth.2648 · DOI
  47. DiMaio, 2011, Nature (London), 473, 540, 10.1038/nature09964 · DOI
  48. Emsley, 2010, Acta Cryst. D, 66, 486, 10.1107/S0907444910007493 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Engh, 1991, Acta Cryst. A, 47, 392, 10.1107/S0108767391001071 · DOI
  50. Evans, 2007, Acta Cryst. D, 63, 58, 10.1107/S090744490604604X · DOI
  51. Evans, 2008, Acta Cryst. D, 64, 1, 10.1107/S0907444907051554 · DOI
  52. Fernández, 2008, J. Struct. Biol., 164, 170, 10.1016/j.jsb.2008.05.010 · DOI
  53. Gelbin, 1996, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 118, 519, 10.1021/ja9528846 · DOI
  54. Goddard, 2018, Protein Sci., 27, 14, 10.1002/pro.3235 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Grosse-Kunstleve, 2003, Acta Cryst. D, 59, 1966, 10.1107/S0907444903018043 · DOI
  56. Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Moriarty, N. W. & Adams, P. D. (2009). Proceedings of the ASME 2009 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Vol. 4, pp. 1477-1485. New York: ASME.
  57. Grosse-Kunstleve, 2002, J. Appl. Cryst., 35, 126, 10.1107/S0021889801017824 · DOI
  58. Gruene, 2018, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 57, 16313, 10.1002/anie.201811318 · DOI
  59. Hahn, T. & Klapper, H. (2006). International Tables for Crystallography, Vol. D, edited by A. Authier, pp. 393-448. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  60. Headd, 2012, Acta Cryst. D, 68, 381, 10.1107/S0907444911047834 · DOI
  61. Headd, 2014, Acta Cryst. D, 70, 1346, 10.1107/S1399004714003277 · DOI
  62. Heel, 1986, Optik, 73, 119
  63. Hintze, 2016, Proteins, 84, 1177, 10.1002/prot.25039 · DOI
  64. Hoppe, 1957, Acta Cryst., 10, 750
  65. Howells, 1950, Acta Cryst., 3, 210, 10.1107/S0365110X50000513 · DOI
  66. Jain, 2015, Methods Enzymol., 558, 181, 10.1016/bs.mie.2015.01.007 · DOI
  67. Jensen, 2010, Methods Enzymol., 483, xv, 10.1016/S0076-6879(10)83021-6 · DOI
  68. Jones, 2018, ACS Cent. Sci., 4, 1587, 10.1021/acscentsci.8b00760 · DOI
  69. Jones, 1991, Acta Cryst. A, 47, 110, 10.1107/S0108767390010224 · DOI
  70. Kendrew, 1958, Nature (London), 181, 662, 10.1038/181662a0 · DOI
  71. Kim, D. N., Moriarty, N. W., Kirmizialtin, S., Afonine, P. V., Poon, B. K., Sobolev, O. V., Adams, P. D. & Sanbonmatsu, K. Y. (2019). In the press.
  72. Kirmizialtin, 2015, Methods Enzymol., 558, 497, 10.1016/bs.mie.2015.02.011 · DOI
  73. Klei, 2014, Acta Cryst. D, 70, 134, 10.1107/S1399004713030071 · DOI
  74. Kleywegt, 1996, Structure, 4, 897, 10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00097-4 · DOI
  75. Kleywegt, 1995, Structure, 3, 535, 10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00187-3 · DOI
  76. Knihtila, 2015, J. Biol. Chem., 290, 31025, 10.1074/jbc.M115.679860 · DOI
  77. Kucukelbir, 2014, Nature Methods, 11, 63, 10.1038/nmeth.2727 · DOI
  78. Li, 2013, Nature Methods, 10, 584, 10.1038/nmeth.2472 · DOI
  79. Liebschner, 2018, Acta Cryst. D, 74, 800, 10.1107/S2059798318004588 · DOI
  80. Liebschner, 2017, Acta Cryst. D, 73, 148, 10.1107/S2059798316018210 · DOI
  81. Liu, 2017, Protein Sci., 26, 8, 10.1002/pro.2989 · DOI
  82. Loeffelholz, 2017, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 46, 140, 10.1016/j.sbi.2017.07.007 · DOI
  83. Lovell, 2003, Proteins, 50, 437, 10.1002/prot.10286 · DOI · Paper page
  84. Lutz, M. & Ascher, D. (1999). Learning Python. Sebastopol: O'Reilly Media.
  85. McPherson, A. (2009). Introduction to Macromolecular Crystallography. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. · DOI
  86. Moriarty, 2019, Acta Cryst. D, 75, 16, 10.1107/S205979831801519X · DOI
  87. Moriarty, 2017, Acta Cryst. D, 73, 123, 10.1107/S2059798316016570 · DOI
  88. Moriarty, 2009, Acta Cryst. D, 65, 1074, 10.1107/S0907444909029436 · DOI
  89. Moriarty, 2018, Protein Sci., 27, 182, 10.1002/pro.3296 · DOI
  90. Moriarty, 2014, FEBS J., 281, 4061, 10.1111/febs.12860 · DOI
  91. Moriarty, 2016, Acta Cryst. D, 72, 176, 10.1107/S2059798315022408 · DOI
  92. Nannenga, 2018, Emerg. Top. Life Sci., 2, 1, 10.1042/ETLS20170082 · DOI
  93. Natchiar, 2017, Nature (London), 551, 472, 10.1038/nature24482 · DOI
  94. Oeffner, 2018, Acta Cryst. D, 74, 245, 10.1107/S2059798318004357 · DOI
  95. Oldfield, 2001, Acta Cryst. D, 57, 82, 10.1107/S0907444900014098 · DOI
  96. Orpen, 1978, Acta Cryst. B, 34, 2466, 10.1107/S0567740878014697 · DOI
  97. Padilla, 2003, Acta Cryst. D, 59, 1124, 10.1107/S0907444903007947 · DOI
  98. Penczek, 2010, Methods Enzymol., 482, 73, 10.1016/S0076-6879(10)82003-8 · DOI
  99. Perutz, 1960, Nature (London), 185, 416, 10.1038/185416a0 · DOI
  100. Podjarny, 1996, Methods Mol. Biol., 56, 205
  101. Popov, 2003, Acta Cryst. D, 59, 1145, 10.1107/S0907444903008163 · DOI
  102. Read, 2011, Structure, 19, 1395, 10.1016/j.str.2011.08.006 · DOI
  103. Richardson, 2015, Comput. Crystallogr. Newsl., 6, 47
  104. Richardson J S Schneider B Murray L W Kapral G J Immormino R M Headd J J Richardson D C Ham D Hershkovits E Williams L D Keating K S Pyle A M Micallef D Westbrook J Berman H M & RNA Ontology Consortium, 2008, RNA, 14, 465, 10.1261/rna.657708 · DOI
  105. Richardson, 2018, Acta Cryst. D, 74, 132, 10.1107/S2059798317009834 · DOI
  106. Richardson, 2018, J. Struct. Biol., 204, 301, 10.1016/j.jsb.2018.08.007 · DOI
  107. Roseman, 2000, Acta Cryst. D, 56, 1332, 10.1107/S0907444900010908 · DOI
  108. Rosenthal, 2003, J. Mol. Biol., 333, 721, 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.07.013 · DOI · Paper page
  109. Rossmann, 2014, IUCrJ, 1, 84, 10.1107/S2052252514000499 · DOI
  110. Rotkiewicz, 2008, J. Comput. Chem., 29, 1460, 10.1002/jcc.20906 · DOI
  111. Schlichting, 2015, IUCrJ, 2, 246, 10.1107/S205225251402702X · DOI
  112. Schomaker, 1968, Acta Cryst. B, 24, 63, 10.1107/S0567740868001718 · DOI
  113. Sheldrick, 2008, Acta Cryst. A, 64, 112, 10.1107/S0108767307043930 · DOI
  114. Sheldrick, 1997, Methods Enzymol., 277, 319, 10.1016/S0076-6879(97)77018-6 · DOI
  115. Sobolev, 2015, J. Appl. Cryst., 48, 1130, 10.1107/S1600576715010432 · DOI
  116. Standfuss, 2017, IUCrJ, 4, 100, 10.1107/S2052252517001877 · DOI
  117. Taylor, 2010, Acta Cryst. D, 66, 325, 10.1107/S0907444910006694 · DOI
  118. Terwilliger, 2000, Acta Cryst. D, 56, 965, 10.1107/S0907444900005072 · DOI
  119. Terwilliger, 2002, Acta Cryst. D, 58, 1937, 10.1107/S0907444902016438 · DOI
  120. Terwilliger, 2018, Comput. Crystallogr. Newsl., 9, 51
  121. Terwilliger, 2018, Nature Methods, 15, 905, 10.1038/s41592-018-0173-1 · DOI
  122. Terwilliger, 2007, Acta Cryst. D, 63, 101, 10.1107/S0907444906046233 · DOI
  123. Terwilliger, 2009, Acta Cryst. D, 65, 582, 10.1107/S0907444909012098 · DOI
  124. Terwilliger, 1999, Acta Cryst. D, 55, 849, 10.1107/S0907444999000839 · DOI
  125. Terwilliger, 2016, Acta Cryst. D, 72, 346, 10.1107/S2059798315019269 · DOI
  126. Terwilliger, 2016, Acta Cryst. D, 72, 359, 10.1107/S2059798315019403 · DOI
  127. Terwilliger, 2012, J. Struct. Funct. Genomics, 13, 81, 10.1007/s10969-012-9129-3 · DOI
  128. Terwilliger, 2008, Acta Cryst. D, 64, 61, 10.1107/S090744490705024X · DOI · Paper page
  129. Terwilliger, 2006, Acta Cryst. D, 62, 915, 10.1107/S0907444906017161 · DOI
  130. Terwilliger, 2013, Acta Cryst. D, 69, 2244, 10.1107/S0907444913017770 · DOI
  131. Terwilliger, 2018, Acta Cryst. D, 74, 545, 10.1107/S2059798318004655 · DOI
  132. Urzhumtsev, 2014, Acta Cryst. D, 70, 2593, 10.1107/S1399004714016289 · DOI
  133. Urzhumtsev, 2016, Acta Cryst. D, 72, 1073, 10.1107/S2059798316013048 · DOI
  134. Urzhumtseva, 2009, Acta Cryst. D, 65, 297, 10.1107/S0907444908044296 · DOI · Paper page
  135. Vagin, 2004, IUCr Comput. Comm. Newsl., 4, 59
  136. Vagin, 2004, Acta Cryst. D, 60, 2184, 10.1107/S0907444904023510 · DOI
  137. Wall, 2014, Structure, 22, 182, 10.1016/j.str.2014.01.002 · DOI
  138. Wall, 2018, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 50, 109, 10.1016/j.sbi.2018.01.009 · DOI
  139. Wang, 2017, Protein Sci., 26, 122, 10.1002/pro.3060 · DOI
  140. Williams, 2018, Protein Sci., 27, 293, 10.1002/pro.3330 · DOI · Paper page
  141. Williams, 2018, BioRxiv, 324517
  142. Wlodawer, 1980, Acta Cryst. B, 36, 1826, 10.1107/S0567740880007315 · DOI
  143. Wlodawer, 1982, Acta Cryst. A, 38, 239, 10.1107/S0567739482000527 · DOI
  144. Wlodawer, 2013, FEBS J., 280, 5705, 10.1111/febs.12495 · DOI
  145. Word, 1999, J. Mol. Biol., 285, 1711, 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2400 · DOI
  146. Word, 1999, J. Mol. Biol., 285, 1735, 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2401 · DOI
  147. Yamaguchi, 2009, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 440, 10.1073/pnas.0811882106 · DOI
  148. Yeates, 1997, Methods Enzymol., 276, 344, 10.1016/S0076-6879(97)76068-3 · DOI
  149. Zheng, 2017, Acta Cryst. D, 73, 1020, 10.1107/S2059798317016746 · DOI
  150. Zheng, 2017, Acta Cryst. D, 73, 45, 10.1107/S2059798316019847 · DOI
  151. Zwart, 2005, Acta Cryst. D, 61, 1437, 10.1107/S0907444905023589 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Liebschner, D., Afonine, P. V., Baker, M. L., Bunkóczi, G., Chen, V. B., Croll, T. I., Hintze, B., Hung, L.-W., Jain, S., McCoy, A. J., Moriarty, N. W., Oeffner, R. D., Poon, B. K., Prisant, M. G., Read, R. J., Richardson, J. S., Richardson, D. C., Sammito, M. D., Sobolev, O. V., Stockwell, D. H., Terwilliger, T. C., Urzhumtsev, A. G., Videau, L. L., Williams, C. J., & Adams, P. D.
Venue
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
Published
2019-10-01
Volume
75
Issue
10
Pages
861-877
ISSN
2059-7983
Cited by
7,953
References
5
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (P01GM063210, 1R01GM071939)
  • US Department of Energy (DE-AC02-05CH1123.)
  • Wellcome Trust (209407/Z/17/Z)
  • Horizon 2020 (790122)
  • French Infrastructure for Integrated Structural Biology (ANR-10-INBS-05)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review