Cited by 154SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchEvolution and Genetic DynamicsCOVID-19 epidemiological studies

Where did ‘weird’ Omicron come from?

Kupferschmidt, Kai·2021·Science

Abstract

but WHO skipped the letters Nu and Xi, it said, “because Nu is too easily confounded with ‘new’ and Xi was not used because it is a common surname.”) One reason for concern about Omicron is that sequenced samples indicate it has rapidly replaced other variants in South Africa. But that picture might be skewed. For one, sequencing might have been focused on possible cases of the new variant in recent days, which could make it appear more frequent than it is. PCR data provide broader coverage and a less biased view, but there, too, samples with the S gene failure indicate a rapid rise of Omicron. The rising frequency could still be due in part to chance. In San Diego, a series of superspreading events at a university resulted in an explosion of one particular strain of SARS-CoV-2 earlier this year, Andersen says: “It was thousands of cases and they were all the same virus.” But the virus wasn’t notably more infectious. South Africa has seen relatively few cases recently, so a series of superspreading events could have led to the rapid increase of Omicron. “I suspect that a lot of that signal is explained by that and I desperately hope so,” Andersen says. Based on a comparison of different Omicron genomes, Andersen estimates the virus emerged sometime around late September or early October, which suggests it might be spreading more slowly than it appears to have. The other reason to be concerned is Omicron’s confusing genome. Its spike protein, which latches on to receptors on h…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.acx9738

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The rising level of SARS-CoV-2 exposure in South Africa in 2020-2021 would be expected to promote the fitness advantage of immune escape variants over earlier variants.

    “While there are different hypotheses addressing the evolutionary origins of Omicron BA.1's emergence and this variant's unusual number of mutations 25 , the rising level of SARS-CoV-2 exposure in South Africa in 2020-2021 would be expected to promote the fitness advantage of immune escape variants over earlier variants.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kupferschmidt, K.
Corresponding author
Kupferschmidt, Kai
Venue
Science
Published
2021-12-03
Volume
374
Issue
6572
Pages
1179-1179
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W3215456302
Cited by
154
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 86 · 2021: 17
FWCI
11.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Keywords
Omicron variant, SARS-CoV-2, viral evolution, COVID-19 pandemic
MeSH terms
Vaccination Coverage, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, Persistent Infection, Animals, Humans, Mutation, Genome, Viral, Immunocompromised Host, Evolution, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review