Cited by 50Ethics and Social Impacts of AILaw, AI, and Intellectual PropertyGlobal Security and Public Health

AI and biosecurity: The need for governance

Open access
Bloomfield, Doni, Pannu, Jaspreet, Zhu, Alex W., Ng, Madelena Y., Lewis, Ashley, Bendavid, Eran, Asch, Steven M., Hernandez-Boussard, Tina +2 more·2024·Science

Abstract

Governments should evaluate advanced models and if needed impose safety measures

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.adq1977

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI systems that design proteins, antibodies, and other therapeutic biomolecules could be used to develop harmful products, such as bioweapons or environmentally disruptive species.

    “For example, AI systems that design proteins, antibodies, and other therapeutic biomolecules could be used to develop harmful products, such as bioweapons or environmentally disruptive species [106–108].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [6]Lyu S, Sowlati-Hashjin S, Garton M, Nat. Mach. Intell 6, 147 (2024).
  2. [15]National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology; Board on Life Sciences; Committee on Strategies for Identifying and Addressing Potential Biodefense Vulnerabilities Posed by Synthetic Biology, Biodefense in the Age of Synthetic Biology (National Academies Press, 2018).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bloomfield, D., Pannu, J., Zhu, A. W., Ng, M. Y., Lewis, A., Bendavid, E., Asch, S. M., Hernandez-Boussard, T., Cicero, A., & Inglesby, T.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Department of Medicine (Biomedical Informatics), Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Venue
Science
Published
2024-08-23
Volume
385
Issue
6711
Pages
831-833
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W4401752277
Cited by
50
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 1
FWCI
20.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Open Philanthropy Project
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR003142, UM1TR004921)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Global Security and Public Health
Keywords
artificial intelligence, biosecurity, AI governance, safety regulations, government oversight
MeSH terms
Biosecurity, Administrative Personnel, Artificial Intelligence, Government, Humans, Models, Biological, Security Measures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review