Cited by 301Space Satellite Systems and ControlSpace exploration and regulationSpace Exploration and Technology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Review on space robotics: Toward top-level science through space exploration

Open access
Gao, Yang, Chien, Steve·2017·Science Robotics

Abstract

Robotics and autonomous systems have been key to space exploration and science and will continue to be instrumental.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/scirobotics.aan5074

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Robots or systems that need to interact autonomously with their environment through sensory-motor capabilities must possess the capacity to act deliberately to fulfill their mission, especially in environments requiring LTA.

    “Robots or systems that need to interact autonomously with their environment through sensory-motor capabilities must possess the capacity to act deliberately to fulfill their mission [184], especially in environments requiring LTA.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Y. Gao Ed. Contemporary Planetary Robotics—An Approach to Autonomous Systems (Wiley-VCH 2016) pp. 1–450 ISBN-13: 978–3527413256.
  2. W. B. Banerdt S. Smrekar K. Hurst P. Lognonné T. Spohn S Asmar D. Banfield L. Boschi U. Christensen V. Dehant W. Folkner D. Giardini W. Goetz M. Golombek M. Grott T. Hudson C. Johnson G. Kargl N. Kobayashi J. Maki D. Mimoun A. Mocquet P. Morgan M. Panning W. T. Pike J. Tromp T. van Zoest R. Weber M. Wieczorek; InSight Team InSight: A discovery mission to explore the interior of Mars in Proceedings of Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (LPSC 2013) p. 1915.
  3. G. Rabideau E. Benowitz Prototyping an onboard scheduler for the mars 2020 rover in Proceedings of International Workshop on Planning and Scheduling for Space (IWPSS 2017).
  4. S. Chien R. Knight S. Schaffer D. R. Thompson B. Bue M. Troesch Agile science flight software—A new paradigm for space missions Invited Talk Flight Software Workshop Pasadena CA USA December 2016 http://flightsoftware.jhuapl.edu/.
  5. A. Ceballos S. Bensalem A. Cesta L. de Silva S. Fratini F. Ingrand J. Ocón A. Orlandini K. Rajan R. Rasconi M. van Winnendael A goal-oriented autonomous controller for space exploration in Proceedings of ESA Symposium on Advanced Space Technologies in Robotics & Automation (ASTRA 2011).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gao, Y., & Chien, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Surrey (GB)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Gao, Yang
Venue
Science Robotics
Published
2017-06-28
Volume
2
Issue
7
ISSN
2470-9476 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2730780157
Cited by
296
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science Robotics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • UK-RAS Network (award312048)
  • JPL/NASA (award312047)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Space exploration and regulation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Exploration and Technology
Keywords
space robotics, autonomous systems, space exploration, robotic space missions, human spaceflight, technology transfer, STEM education, future research priorities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review