Cited by 420Corneal Surgery and TreatmentsTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineCorneal surgery and disorders

A biosynthetic alternative to human donor tissue for inducing corneal regeneration: 24-month follow-up of a phase 1 clinical study

Open access
Fagerholm, Per, Lagali, Neil S., Merrett, Kimberley, Jackson, W. Bruce, Munger, Rejean, Liu, Yuwen, Polarek, James W., Söderqvist, Monica +1 more·2010·Science Translational Medicine

Abstract

A biosynthetic cornea is stably integrated with host tissues for 2 years after implantation and produces nerve regeneration and vision improvement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001022

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Synthetic collagen gels used in partial thickness grafts appear to act as temporary scaffolds to allow remodelling of the tissue.

    “but at present it appears that these gels are acting as temporary scaffolds to allow remodelling of the tissue.”

    From Corneal structure and transparency (2015) · cites this paper as Fagerholm et al., 2010

  • Clinical trials have been carried out on partial thickness grafts using synthetic collagen gels.

    “Currently, trials have been carried out on partial thickness grafts using synthetic collagen gels (Fagerholm et al., 2010)”

    From Corneal structure and transparency (2015) · cites this paper as Fagerholm et al., 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fagerholm, P., Lagali, N. S., Merrett, K., Jackson, W. B., Munger, R., Liu, Y., Polarek, J. W., Söderqvist, M., & Griffith, M.
Affiliations
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • University of Ottawa Eye Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1H 8L6.
  • CooperVision Inc., 5870 Stoneridge Drive, Suite 1, Pleasanton, CA 94588, USA.
  • FibroGen (United States) (US)
  • Synsam Opticians, Box 362, Trädgårdstorget 2, 581 03 Linköping, Sweden.
Corresponding author
  • Fagerholm, Per
  • Lagali, Neil S.
  • Griffith, May
Venue
Science Translational Medicine
Published
2010-08-25
Volume
2
Issue
46
Pages
46ra61-46ra61
ISSN
  • 1946-6234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1946-6242
OpenAlex
W2120258242
Cited by
420
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 19
FWCI
18.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Science Translational Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal Surgery and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal surgery and disorders
Keywords
corneal regeneration, corneal extracellular matrix, donor cornea shortage, corneal blindness, corneal re-epithelialization, nerve regeneration, tactile sensitivity, vision loss
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Astigmatism, Cornea, Extracellular Matrix, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Keratoconus, Middle Aged, Regeneration, Tissue Donors, Visual Acuity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review