The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 2 of the 75 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Structural, Biochemical, and Clinical Characterization of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Exon 20 Insertion Mutations in Lung Cancer
Open accessAbstract
Crystal structure and detailed analysis of different EGFR mutants explain why some mutations in exon 20 make lung cancers resistant to EGFR inhibitors and others make them more sensitive.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
47 Own result · 30 Not checked yet · 25 Own interpretation · 4 No basis given · 1 Partly supported · 1 Own method · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“This sequence alteration accounts for 10–20% of all reported EGFR exon 20 insertions 31,32,35.”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [31] Oxnard GR Lo PC Nishino M Dahlberg SE Lindeman NI Butaney M Jackman DM Johnson BE Janne PA Natural history and molecular characteristics of lung cancers harboring EGFR exon 20 insertions J Thorac. Oncol 2013 8 179 184 23328547 PMC3549533 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion identifies A763_Y764insFQEA as an exon 20 insertion variant but gives no frequency for it. The Results report that a different variant, V769_D770insASV, made up 22% of this cohort; searches for A763_Y764insFQEA and Table 2 did not establish the claimed 10–20% share of all reported insertions. (LLM, conf=0.76)
- Partly supportedcites [32] Arcila ME Nafa K Chaft JE Rekhtman N Lau C Reva BA Zakowski MF Kris MG Ladanyi M EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations in lung adenocarcinomas: prevalence, molecular heterogeneity, and clinicopathologic characteristics Mol. Cancer Ther 2013 12 220 229 23371856 PMC3714231 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion reports that A763_Y764insFQEA represented 9% of exon 20 insertion cases in the authors’ series. That supports a frequency near the lower end of the claimed range, but the paper does not establish that it accounts for 10–20% of all reported EGFR exon 20 insertions. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not checked yetcites [35] Yasuda H Kobayashi S Costa DB EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer: preclinical data and clinical implications Lancet Oncol 2012 13 e23 e31 21764376 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Could not verify
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“only cells with EGFR-delL747_P753insS, L858R and the atypical A763_Y764insFQEA - among all EGFR exon 20 insertions - were inhibited by erlotinib concentrations below 0.1 µM (Fig. 1B, 1C and Sup. Table 2).”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > RESULTS > Sensitivity of EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations to EGFR TKIs in vitro
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The D770_N771insNPG mutant bound gefitinib with a Ki similar to that of WT EGFR (Ki=25.7 nM for D770_N771insNPG and Ki=16.4 nM for WT EGFR).”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > RESULTS > Enzyme kinetic analysis of representative EGFR exon 20 insertion mutants
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nearly identical results were obtained with gefitinib (Sup. Table 2), and a similar pattern of insensitivity was noted with the more potent irreversible EGFR TKI afatinib (Sup. Table 2).”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > RESULTS > Sensitivity of EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations to EGFR TKIs in vitro
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“phosphorylation of EGFR, AKT and ERK were not fully inhibited by 1 µM erlotinib in cells with the inhibitor-insensitive EGFR exon 20 insertions mutations (Fig. 1D).”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > RESULTS > Sensitivity of EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations to EGFR TKIs in vitro
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“an inhibitor-insensitive EGFR exon 20 insertion (A767_V769dupASV) lacked deactivation of phosphorylated EGFR, downstream targets (PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK) and upregulation of the apoptotic cascade, as measured by levels of BIM”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > RESULTS > Sensitivity of EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations to EGFR TKIs in vitro
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the inhibitor-sensitive A763_Y764insFQEA mutant bound gefitinib ∼10-fold more tightly than the insensitive D770_N771insNPG mutant (Table 1).”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > RESULTS > Enzyme kinetic analysis of representative EGFR exon 20 insertion mutants
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“overall the D770_N771insNPG structure superimposes well with the L858R structure in complex with the same inhibitor (Fig. 4B, 4C).”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > RESULTS > Structural analysis of EGFR TKI-resistant and TKI-sensitive EGFR exon 20 mutants
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Within the ATP site, the conformation of the covalently bound inhibitor is essentially the same as in the L858R structure”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > RESULTS > Structural analysis of EGFR TKI-resistant and TKI-sensitive EGFR exon 20 mutants
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sequence of exons 18–21 of EGFR from DNA isolated from BID007 confirmed the presence of the 12 nucleotides corresponding to the A763_Y764insFQEA insertion (Fig. 3A).”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > RESULTS > Characterization of an A763_Y764insFQEA mutated lung cancer cell line
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 33
- Probably not a substantial claim. 12
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Ki value for A763_Y764insFQEA (2.5 nM) was comparable to that we measured for the L858R mutant (6.4 nM).”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > RESULTS > Enzyme kinetic analysis of representative EGFR exon 20 insertion mutants
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All other EGFR exon 20 insertions and T790M–bearing mutations had 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50s) that exceeded 2 µM erlotinib (Fig. 1B, 1C and Sup. Table 2).”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · boosted
“our data confirm that most exon 20 insertions are not inhibited by submicromolar concentrations of reversible EGFR TKIs.”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > RESULTS > Sensitivity of EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations to EGFR TKIs in vitro
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · boosted
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All were able to proliferate in the absence of IL3 (Sup. Fig. 1), indicating transforming ability of these mutations.”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > RESULTS > Sensitivity of EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations to EGFR TKIs in vitro
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“both insertion mutants exhibited higher catalytic activity than WT EGFR; although they were not as active as EGFR-L858R (Table 1).”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > RESULTS > Enzyme kinetic analysis of representative EGFR exon 20 insertion mutants
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the inhibition of these downstream phosphorylation events and upregulation of BIM were seen with EGFR-A763_Y764insFQEA in a similar fashion as with inhibitor-sensitive L858R (Fig. 1D, 1E)”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > RESULTS > Sensitivity of EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations to EGFR TKIs in vitro
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In both BID007 and H3255, EGFR-specific siRNAs decreased expression of EGFR and suppressed cell growth (Fig. 3B).”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > RESULTS > Characterization of an A763_Y764insFQEA mutated lung cancer cell line
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In vitro characterization of A763_Y764insFQEA demonstrated that it had an IC50 of < 0.05µM to erlotinib or gefitinib, which is more than 10-fold lower than the clinically achievable serum concentrations of these EGFR TKIs”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > DISCUSSION
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Together with D770, the three inserted residues form a tight turn, with a hydrogen bond formed between the main chain carbonyl of D770 and the amide of the inserted glycine (Fig. 4B, Sup. Fig. 10B, 10C).”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > RESULTS > Structural analysis of EGFR TKI-resistant and TKI-sensitive EGFR exon 20 mutants
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The D770_N771insNPG mutant adopts an active conformation with the C-helix in its inward position (Fig. 4A).”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > RESULTS > Structural analysis of EGFR TKI-resistant and TKI-sensitive EGFR exon 20 mutants
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“submicromolar concentrations of erlotinib inhibited phosphorylation of EGFR in A763_Y764insFQEA mutant cells, led to deactivation of the PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK pathways, and subsequently induced apoptosis in our models.”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > DISCUSSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Differences, which likely arise from the divergent crystal packing in D770_N771insNPG, include a small change in the relative orientation of the N- and C-lobes, and the conformation of the activation loop, which is fully ordered in the D770_N771insNPG structure but not in the present L858R structure.”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > RESULTS > Structural analysis of EGFR TKI-resistant and TKI-sensitive EGFR exon 20 mutants
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The region around chromosome 7, corresponding to EGFR, demonstrated slight amplification (Sup. Fig. 9B).”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > RESULTS > Characterization of an A763_Y764insFQEA mutated lung cancer cell line
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our kinetic characterization of this mutant revealed that it is activated, relative to WT EGFR, and that it is much more potently inhibited by gefitinib than is WT EGFR.”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > DISCUSSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In both models, the insertion was modeled in a helical conformation, shifting the register of the C-helix toward its N-terminus, and resulting in a longer loop at its N-terminal end (the β3-αC loop).”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > RESULTS > Structural analysis of EGFR TKI-resistant and TKI-sensitive EGFR exon 20 mutants
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“inspection of the model indicates that the FQEA insertion is compatible with formation of the asymmetric dimer and, consistent with this, analysis of the A763_Y764insFQEA mutant using size-exclusion chromatography revealed a monomer-dimer equilibrium in solution (Sup. Fig. 11).”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > RESULTS > Structural analysis of EGFR TKI-resistant and TKI-sensitive EGFR exon 20 mutants
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found that E762Q_insFQEA, like A763_Y764insFQEA, was highly active in a ligand independent manner but A763_Y764insFQQA was inactive (Fig. 5B).”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > RESULTS > Structural analysis of EGFR TKI-resistant and TKI-sensitive EGFR exon 20 mutants
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“BID007 had a focal area of deletion encompassing the CDKN2A tumor suppressor gene (Sup. Fig. 9C); an area commonly deleted in cancers 45.”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > RESULTS > Characterization of an A763_Y764insFQEA mutated lung cancer cell line
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [45] Weir BA Woo MS Getz G Perner S Ding L Beroukhim R Lin WM Province MA Kraja A Johnson LA Shah K Sato M Thomas RK Barletta JA Borecki IB Broderick S Chang AC Chiang DY Chirieac LR Cho J Fujii Y Gazdar AF Giordano T Greulich H Hanna M Johnson BE Kris MG Lash A Lin L Lindeman N Mardis ER McPherson JD Minna JD Morgan MB Nadel M Orringer MB Osborne JR Ozenberger B Ramos AH Robinson J Roth JA Rusch V Sasaki H Shepherd F Sougnez C Spitz MR Tsao MS Twomey D Verhaak RG Weinstock GM Wheeler DA Winckler W Yoshizawa A Yu S Zakowski MF Zhang Q Beer DG Wistuba II Watson MA Garraway LA Ladanyi M Travis WD Pao
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Unlike EGFR-L858R and exon 19 deletion mutants, the D770_N771insNPG mutation lacks this “Achilles’ heel”, since it activates EGFR without markedly diminishing its affinity for ATP or increasing its affinity for EGFR TKIs.”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > DISCUSSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The most common EGFR mutations are in-frame deletions around the LREA motif (amino-acid residues 747 to 750) of exon 19 (45% of EGFR mutations) and the exon 21 L858R point mutation (40% of EGFR mutations) 5,6,8.”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [5] Shigematsu H Lin L Takahashi T Nomura M Suzuki M Wistuba II Fong KM Lee H Toyooka S Shimizu N Fujisawa T Feng Z Roth JA Herz J Minna JD Gazdar AF Clinical and biological features associated with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations in lung cancers J Natl. Cancer Inst 2005 97 339 346 15741570
- Not checked yetcites [6] Sequist LV Bell DW Lynch TJ Haber DA Molecular predictors of response to epidermal growth factor receptor antagonists in non-small-cell lung cancer J Clin. Oncol 2007 25 587 595 17290067
- Not checked yetcites [8] Tokumo M Toyooka S Kiura K Shigematsu H Tomii K Aoe M Ichimura K Tsuda T Yano M Tsukuda K Tabata M Ueoka H Tanimoto M Date H Gazdar AF Shimizu N The relationship between epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and clinicopathologic features in non-small cell lung cancers Clin. Cancer Res 2005 11 1167 1173 15709185
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Exon 20 insertion mutations comprise 4–10% of all EGFR mutations 27,29–32.”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [27] Mitsudomi T Yatabe Y Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene and related genes as determinants of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors sensitivity in lung cancer Cancer Sci 2007 98 1817 1824 17888036 PMC11159145
- Not checked yetcites [29] Choi YL Soda M Yamashita Y Ueno T Takashima J Nakajima T Yatabe Y Takeuchi K Hamada T Haruta H Ishikawa Y Kimura H Mitsudomi T Tanio Y Mano H EML4-ALK mutations in lung cancer that confer resistance to ALK inhibitors N. Engl. J Med 2010 363 1734 1739 20979473
- Not checked yetcites [30] Pao W Chmielecki J Rational, biologically based treatment of EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer Nat. Rev. Cancer 2010 10 760 774 20966921 PMC3072803 source
- Not checked yetcites [31] Oxnard GR Lo PC Nishino M Dahlberg SE Lindeman NI Butaney M Jackman DM Johnson BE Janne PA Natural history and molecular characteristics of lung cancers harboring EGFR exon 20 insertions J Thorac. Oncol 2013 8 179 184 23328547 PMC3549533
- Not checked yetcites [32] Arcila ME Nafa K Chaft JE Rekhtman N Lau C Reva BA Zakowski MF Kris MG Ladanyi M EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations in lung adenocarcinomas: prevalence, molecular heterogeneity, and clinicopathologic characteristics Mol. Cancer Ther 2013 12 220 229 23371856 PMC3714231
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Other EGFR mutations have also been associated with some sensitivity to gefitinib and erlotinib. These include exon 18 point mutations in position G719 (G719A, C or S - ∼3% of EGFR mutations), rare inframe exon 19 insertions 25, and the exon 21 L861Q mutant (∼2% of EGFR mutations) 26–28.”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [25] He M Capelletti M Nafa K Yun CH Arcila ME Miller VA Ginsberg MS Zhao B Kris MG Eck MJ Janne PA Ladanyi M Oxnard GR EGFR exon 19 insertions: a new family of sensitizing EGFR mutations in lung adenocarcinoma Clin Cancer Res 2012 18 1790 1797 22190593 PMC3306520
- Not checked yetcites [26] Mitsudomi T Yatabe Y Epidermal growth factor receptor in relation to tumor development: EGFR gene and cancer FEBS J 2010 277 301 308 19922469
- Not checked yetcites [27] Mitsudomi T Yatabe Y Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene and related genes as determinants of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors sensitivity in lung cancer Cancer Sci 2007 98 1817 1824 17888036 PMC11159145
- Not checked yetcites [28] Yeh P Chen H Andrews J Naser R Pao W Horn L DNA-Mutation Inventory to Refine and Enhance Cancer Treatment (DIRECT): A Catalog of Clinically Relevant Cancer Mutations to Enable Genome-Directed Anticancer Therapy Clin Cancer Res 2013 19 1894 1901 23344264 PMC4121886
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Based on this measure, A763_Y764insFQEA is predicted to be almost as sensitive to gefitinib as the L858R mutant, whereas D770_N771insNPG is expected to be many fold less sensitive (Table 1).”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > RESULTS > Enzyme kinetic analysis of representative EGFR exon 20 insertion mutants
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Most of these mutations lie near the end of the C-helix within the N-lobe of the kinase, after residue M766, but a small subset map to the middle of the C-helix (affecting amino-acids E762 to Y764) 5,33,34.”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [5] Shigematsu H Lin L Takahashi T Nomura M Suzuki M Wistuba II Fong KM Lee H Toyooka S Shimizu N Fujisawa T Feng Z Roth JA Herz J Minna JD Gazdar AF Clinical and biological features associated with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations in lung cancers J Natl. Cancer Inst 2005 97 339 346 15741570
- Not checked yetcites [33] Murray S Dahabreh IJ Linardou H Manoloukos M Bafaloukos D Kosmidis P Somatic mutations of the tyrosine kinase domain of epidermal growth factor receptor and tyrosine kinase inhibitor response to TKIs in non-small cell lung cancer: an analytical database J Thorac. Oncol 2008 3 832 839 18670300
- Not checked yetcites [34] Linardou H Dahabreh IJ Bafaloukos D Kosmidis P Murray S Somatic EGFR mutations and efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in NSCLC Nat. Rev. Clin Oncol 2009 6 352 366 19483740
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Unlike EGFR exon 19 deletions and L858R–bearing tumors, most NSCLCs with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations don’t respond radiographically or clinically to gefitinib or erlotinib. The reported response rate (RR) is below 5% and most patients have short intervals of disease control 35.”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [35] Yasuda H Kobayashi S Costa DB EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer: preclinical data and clinical implications Lancet Oncol 2012 13 e23 e31 21764376 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our study was limited by a number of factors, including a paucity of available NSCLC cell lines with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations, a lack of in vivo models and the small number of exon 20 insertion mutated NSCLC cases that were treated with reversible EGFR TKIs in our centers.”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > DISCUSSION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“our structure and kinetic data show that D770_N771insNPG promotes the active conformation, as reflected by its enhanced catalytic activity (Table 1) and a propensity to form the asymmetric dimer as seen in the crystal structure (Sup. Fig. 10A) and in solution (Sup. Fig. 11).”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > RESULTS > Structural analysis of EGFR TKI-resistant and TKI-sensitive EGFR exon 20 mutants
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Alternatively, a shift toward the N-terminus would displace this residue by one turn, but effectively replace it with a glutamic acid residue introduced by the insertion (FQEA, Fig. 5A).”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > RESULTS > Structural analysis of EGFR TKI-resistant and TKI-sensitive EGFR exon 20 mutants
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“mutation of L747 in this cluster to proline or serine is believed to underlie the activity of EGFR-exon 19 insertions 25.”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > RESULTS > Structural analysis of EGFR TKI-resistant and TKI-sensitive EGFR exon 20 mutants
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [25] He M Capelletti M Nafa K Yun CH Arcila ME Miller VA Ginsberg MS Zhao B Kris MG Eck MJ Janne PA Ladanyi M Oxnard GR EGFR exon 19 insertions: a new family of sensitizing EGFR mutations in lung adenocarcinoma Clin Cancer Res 2012 18 1790 1797 22190593 PMC3306520
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Likewise, we expect that binding of gefitinib and erlotinib would be unperturbed in this mutant, consistent with the closely similar Ki values for gefitinib we measure for D770_N771insNPG and WT EGFR (Table 1).”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > RESULTS > Structural analysis of EGFR TKI-resistant and TKI-sensitive EGFR exon 20 mutants
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus we hypothesize that the de facto I759A replacement caused by the FQEA insertion may activate EGFR via a similar mechanism (destabilization of the inactive conformation).”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > RESULTS > Structural analysis of EGFR TKI-resistant and TKI-sensitive EGFR exon 20 mutants
hedgedconditional- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Rests on an assumption: I759, together with L747, L858, and L861, forms a cluster of interacting hydrophobic residues that helps stabilize the inactive conformation.
In the paper
“This mode of interaction mediates EGFR activation by ligand-induced dimerization 48, and is typically recapitulated in crystals of the EGFR kinase in its active conformation.”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > RESULTS > Structural analysis of EGFR TKI-resistant and TKI-sensitive EGFR exon 20 mutants
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [48] Zhang X Gureasko J Shen K Cole PA Kuriyan J An allosteric mechanism for activation of the kinase domain of epidermal growth factor receptor Cell 2006 125 1137 1149 16777603
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the four inserted residues are expected to form approximately one turn of helix and shift the register of adjacent residues in the helix, either toward the N-terminus or toward the C-terminus (Fig. 5A).”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > RESULTS > Structural analysis of EGFR TKI-resistant and TKI-sensitive EGFR exon 20 mutants
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The four inserted residues in A763_Y764insFQEA form approximately one turn of helix.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“PD168393 is a pre-clinical irreversible anilinoquinazoline inhibitor that is structurally related to afatinib and dacomitinib 46,47.”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > RESULTS > Structural analysis of EGFR TKI-resistant and TKI-sensitive EGFR exon 20 mutants
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [46] Engelman JA Zejnullahu K Gale CM Lifshits E Gonzales AJ Shimamura T Zhao F Vincent PW Naumov GN Bradner JE Althaus IW Gandhi L Shapiro GI Nelson JM Heymach JV Meyerson M Wong KK Janne PA PF00299804, an irreversible pan-ERBB inhibitor, is effective in lung cancer models with EGFR and ERBB2 mutations that are resistant to gefitinib Cancer Res 2007 67 11924 11932 18089823 source
- Not checked yetcites [47] Li D Ambrogio L Shimamura T Kubo S Takahashi M Chirieac LR Padera RF Shapiro GI Baum A Himmelsbach F Rettig WJ Meyerson M Solca F Greulich H Wong KK BIBW2992, an irreversible EGFR/HER2 inhibitor highly effective in preclinical lung cancer models Oncogene 2008 27 4702 4711 18408761 PMC2748240 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The L858R and L861Q mutations within this cluster are well-characterized activating mutations 28”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > RESULTS > Structural analysis of EGFR TKI-resistant and TKI-sensitive EGFR exon 20 mutants
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [28] Yeh P Chen H Andrews J Naser R Pao W Horn L DNA-Mutation Inventory to Refine and Enhance Cancer Treatment (DIRECT): A Catalog of Clinically Relevant Cancer Mutations to Enable Genome-Directed Anticancer Therapy Clin Cancer Res 2013 19 1894 1901 23344264 PMC4121886
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, we conclude that the insertion shifts the register of the helix in the N-terminal direction and that the glutamic acid residue in the FQEA insertion assumes the active site role of E762 in the WT kinase.”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > RESULTS > Structural analysis of EGFR TKI-resistant and TKI-sensitive EGFR exon 20 mutants
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“L858R and exon 19 deletion mutants exhibit increased Km[ATP] and higher affinity (5–10 fold) for gefitinib or erlotinib than the WT receptor 39,50,56.”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [39] Carey KD Garton AJ Romero MS Kahler J Thomson S Ross S Park F Haley JD Gibson N Sliwkowski MX Kinetic analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor somatic mutant proteins shows increased sensitivity to the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, erlotinib Cancer Res 2006 66 8163 8171 16912195
- Not checked yetcites [50] Eck MJ Yun CH Structural and mechanistic underpinnings of the differential drug sensitivity of EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010 1804 559 566 20026433 PMC2859716
- Not checked yetcites [56] Mulloy R Ferrand A Kim Y Sordella R Bell DW Haber DA Anderson KS Settleman J Epidermal growth factor receptor mutants from human lung cancers exhibit enhanced catalytic activity and increased sensitivity to gefitinib Cancer Res 2007 67 2325 2330 17332364
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Structurally, EGFR-A763_Y764insFQEA is very different from other exon 20 insertions.”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > DISCUSSION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Together with the oncogene-addicted state of tumors bearing these mutations 39,50,56, these factors explain their sensitivity to EGFR TKIs 50.”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [50] Eck MJ Yun CH Structural and mechanistic underpinnings of the differential drug sensitivity of EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010 1804 559 566 20026433 PMC2859716
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we hypothesize that it leads to catalytic activation in a related manner.”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > DISCUSSION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Together with the oncogene-addicted state of tumors bearing these mutations 39,50,56, these factors explain their sensitivity to EGFR TKIs 50.”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [39] Carey KD Garton AJ Romero MS Kahler J Thomson S Ross S Park F Haley JD Gibson N Sliwkowski MX Kinetic analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor somatic mutant proteins shows increased sensitivity to the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, erlotinib Cancer Res 2006 66 8163 8171 16912195
- Not checked yetcites [50] Eck MJ Yun CH Structural and mechanistic underpinnings of the differential drug sensitivity of EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010 1804 559 566 20026433 PMC2859716
- Not checked yetcites [56] Mulloy R Ferrand A Kim Y Sordella R Bell DW Haber DA Anderson KS Settleman J Epidermal growth factor receptor mutants from human lung cancers exhibit enhanced catalytic activity and increased sensitivity to gefitinib Cancer Res 2007 67 2325 2330 17332364
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The EGFR-T790M mutation confers resistance by reversing the sensitization conferred by primary activating mutations, but it does so by altering the gatekeeper residue in the ATP-site that is known to be an important determinant of inhibitor specificity 50,57.”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [50] Eck MJ Yun CH Structural and mechanistic underpinnings of the differential drug sensitivity of EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010 1804 559 566 20026433 PMC2859716
- Not checked yetcites [57] Yun CH Mengwasser KE Toms AV Woo MS Greulich H Wong KK Meyerson M Eck MJ The T790M mutation in EGFR kinase causes drug resistance by increasing the affinity for ATP Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 2008 105 2070 2075 18227510 PMC2538882
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Indeed, it seems that EGFR monoclonal antibodies 60 and EGFR WT kinase sparing covalent T790M selective TKIs 61 are ineffective in typical EGFR exon 20 insertion mutants.”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [60] Cho J Chen L Sangji N Okabe T Yonesaka K Francis JM Flavin RJ Johnson W Kwon J Yu S Greulich HE Johnson BE Eck MJ Janne PA Wong KK Meyerson M Cetuximab response of lung cancer-derived EGF receptor mutants is associated with asymmetric dimerization Cancer Res 2013 PMC3903789 24063894
- Not checked yetcites [61] Walter AO Tjin Tham SR Haringsma HJ Ohashi K Sun J Lee K Dubrovskiy A Labenski M Zhu Z Wang Z Sheets M St Martin T Karp R van Kalken D Chaturvedi P Niu D Nacht M Petter RC Westlin W Lin K Jaw-Tsai S Raponi M Van Dyke T Etter J Weaver Z Pao W Singh J Simmons AD Harding TC Allen A Discovery of a mutant-selective covalent inhibitor of EGFR that overcomes T790M–mediated resistance in NSCLC Cancer Discov 2013 PMC4048995 24065731 source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“our structural analysis and supporting mutagenesis indicate that the inserted FQEA sequence shifts the register of the C-helix toward its N-terminus, altering the length of the β3-αC loop leading into the helix and effectively leading to an I759A replacement.”
§ Structural, biochemical and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer > DISCUSSION
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
The concentration of ATP in cells approximates 1 mM.
“which approximates the concentration of ATP in cells”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The four inserted residues in A763_Y764insFQEA form approximately one turn of helix.
“the four inserted residues are expected to form approximately one turn of helix”
The paper relies on this without support.
In the inactive state, the C-helix pivots outward and shifts by ~3.5Å toward the insertion site.
“In the inactive state, the C-helix pivots outward, and shifts by ∼3.5Å toward the insertion site.”
The paper relies on this without support.
I759, together with L747, L858, and L861, forms a cluster of interacting hydrophobic residues that helps stabilize the inactive conformation.
“Isoleucine at position 759, together with L747, L858 and L861, is part of a cluster of interacting hydrophobic residues that helps to stabilize the inactive conformation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
D770_N771insNPG is a representative EGFR TKI-insensitive exon 20 insertion mutation.
“The structure of D770_N771insNPG, which we studied as a representative EGFR TKI-insensitive exon 20 mutation, shows how the three amino acid insertion forms a “wedge” at the end of the C-helix that may effectively lock the helix in its inward, active position.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Exon 20 of EGFR and HER2 contains two major regions, the α-C helix (residues 762–766 in EGFR and 770–774 in HER2) and the loop following the α-C helix (residues 767–774 in EGFR and 775–783 in HER2)16,19,20,27.”
From Mechanisms and clinical activity of an EGFR and HER2 exon 20–selective kinase inhibitor in non–small cell lung cancer (2018) · cites this paper as [16]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“These clinical data as well as results from prior studies16,18 demonstrate the limited activity of the available EGFR TKIs in NSCLC driven by an EGFR exon 20 insertion and validate the need for alternative treatment strategies for these specific tumors.”
From Mechanisms and clinical activity of an EGFR and HER2 exon 20–selective kinase inhibitor in non–small cell lung cancer (2018) · cites this paper as [16]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“EGFR Ex20Ins tumors are generally unresponsive to 1st and 2nd generation EGFR inhibitors”
From Antitumor Activity of Osimertinib, an Irreversible Mutant-Selective EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, in NSCLC Harboring EGFR Exon 20 Insertions (2018) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“Very few of these EGFRex20ins such as A763_Y764insFQEA have demonstrated sensitivity to 1st and 2nd generation EGFR TKIs”
From Diverse EGFR Exon 20 Insertions and Co-Occurring Molecular Alterations Identified by Comprehensive Genomic Profiling of NSCLC (2018) · cites this paper as [9]
In the citing paper
“Structural modeling and binding affinity studies of representative EGFR exon 20 insertions showed that 1st generation EGFR TKI binding affinity is similar to that of wild-type EGFR”
From Diverse EGFR Exon 20 Insertions and Co-Occurring Molecular Alterations Identified by Comprehensive Genomic Profiling of NSCLC (2018) · cites this paper as [9]
In the citing paper
“However, modeling of EGFR A763insFQEA demonstrated that insertions before residue 764 do not exhibit this effect and do not induce drug resistance16.”
From Mechanisms and clinical activity of an EGFR and HER2 exon 20–selective kinase inhibitor in non–small cell lung cancer (2018) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“Crystallography of the EGFR exon 20 insertion D770insNPG has revealed a stabilized and rigid active conformation inducing resistance to first-generation TKIs in the insertions after residue 764.”
From Mechanisms and clinical activity of an EGFR and HER2 exon 20–selective kinase inhibitor in non–small cell lung cancer (2018) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“Historical data for patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations have shown that overall response rates are approximately 3–8% to first-line therapy with erlotinib, gefitinib, or afatinib16,18.”
From Mechanisms and clinical activity of an EGFR and HER2 exon 20–selective kinase inhibitor in non–small cell lung cancer (2018) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“Although most activating mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non–small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) are sensitive to available EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), a subset with alterations in exon 20 of EGFR and HER2 are intrinsically resistant and lack an effective therapy.”
From Mechanisms and clinical activity of an EGFR and HER2 exon 20–selective kinase inhibitor in non–small cell lung cancer (2018) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“However, approximately 10–12% of EGFR-mutant NSCLC tumors have an in-frame insertion within exon 20 of EGFR6,15,16,17 and are generally resistant to EGFR TKIs.”
From Mechanisms and clinical activity of an EGFR and HER2 exon 20–selective kinase inhibitor in non–small cell lung cancer (2018) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“Only one crystal structure is available for an exon 20 variant (the insNPG mutant) and it reveals an inhibitor binding site that is essentially indistinguishable from that of the inhibitor-sensitive L858R mutant (8).”
From Response Heterogeneity of EGFR and HER2 Exon 20 Insertions to Covalent EGFR and HER2 Inhibitors (2017) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“However, there is significant clinical and biochemical heterogeneity among EGFR or HER2 exon 20 mutations.”
From Response Heterogeneity of EGFR and HER2 Exon 20 Insertions to Covalent EGFR and HER2 Inhibitors (2017) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“Although the vast majority are associated with resistance to EGFR inhibitors, previous studies have identified a unique EGFR exon 20 mutation (A763_Y764insFQEA) that remained sensitive to erlotinib (8).”
From Response Heterogeneity of EGFR and HER2 Exon 20 Insertions to Covalent EGFR and HER2 Inhibitors (2017) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“Although Ex20Ins mutants lack T790M-associated structural differences proximate to the ATP-binding site (7)”
From Antitumor Activity of Osimertinib, an Irreversible Mutant-Selective EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, in NSCLC Harboring EGFR Exon 20 Insertions (2018) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“Several studies, although very small, have shown that 1G EGFR‐TKI are less effective in patients with NSCLC harboring such uncommon EGFR mutations, compared with patients harboring common EGFR mutations.”
In the citing paper
“Several studies, in which affinities between kinases and various EGFR‐TKI were investigated, indicate that the different EGFR inhibitory effects of EGFR‐TKI might be associated with the different structural‐based interactions.25, 44”
In the citing paper
“In contrast, like 1G EGFR‐TKI, afatinib might be less effective for most exon 20 insertions in preclinical and clinical studies.24, 25, 28, 42, 43”
In the citing paper
“Thus, this mutation, accounting for 7% of Ins20, should not be overlooked in clinical practice.63, 67”
From Not all epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer are created equal: Perspectives for individualized treatment strategy (2016) · cites this paper as [63]
In the citing paper
“In a compilation of data on the treatment response to 1G‐TKI, ORR was only 17% (10/59) (Table 3).61, 62, 63, 64, 65”
From Not all epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer are created equal: Perspectives for individualized treatment strategy (2016) · cites this paper as [63]
In the citing paper
“In addition, Yasuda et al. reported an additional 31 types of mutations.18, 63”
From Not all epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer are created equal: Perspectives for individualized treatment strategy (2016) · cites this paper as [63]
In the citing paper
“not all exon 20 insertions or duplications are insensitive to EGFR TKIs, with the FQEA insertion at position A763_Y764 (in the middle of the c-helix) conferring sensitivity to firstand second-generation EGFR TKIs.60,64”
Citations
Cites
Coot : model-building tools for molecular graphics
Emsley, P., & Cowtan, K. (2004) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444904019158 · Cited by 30,571
Phaser crystallographic software
McCoy, A. J., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Adams, P. D., Winn, M. D., Storoni, L. C., & Read, R. J. (2007) · Journal of Applied Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0021889807021206 · Cited by 20,612
Crystallography & NMR System: A New Software Suite for Macromolecular Structure Determination
Brünger, A. T., Adams, P. D., Clore, G. M., DeLano, W. L., Gros, P., Grosse‐Kunstleve, R. W., Jiang, J., Kuszewski, J. J., Nilges, M., Pannu, N., et al. (1998) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444998003254 · Cited by 15,723
Refinement of Macromolecular Structures by the Maximum-Likelihood Method
Murshudov, G. N., Vagin, A. A., & Dodson, E. J. (1997) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444996012255 · Cited by 14,796
Siegel, R., Naishadham, D., & Jemal, A. (2013) · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21166 · Cited by 11,825
Lynch, T. J., Bell, D. W., Sordella, R., Gurubhagavatula, S., Okimoto, R. A., Brannigan, B. W., Harris, P. L., Haserlat, S. M., Supko, J. G., Haluska, F. G., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa040938 · Cited by 11,486
EGFR Mutations in Lung Cancer: Correlation with Clinical Response to Gefitinib Therapy
Paez, J. G., Jänne, P. A., Lee, J. C., Tracy, S., Greulich, H., Gabriel, S., Herman, P., Kaye, F. J., Lindeman, N., Boggon, T. J., et al. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1099314 · Cited by 9,368
Self-citationGefitinib or Carboplatin–Paclitaxel in Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma
Mok, T. S., Wu, Y.-L., Thongprasert, S., Yang, C.-H., Chu, D.-T., Saijo, N., Sunpaweravong, P., Han, B., Margono, B., Ichinose, Y., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0810699 · Cited by 8,261
Gefitinib or Chemotherapy for Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Mutated EGFR
Maemondo, M., Inoue, A., Kobayashi, K., Sugawara, S., Oizumi, S., Isobe, H., Gemma, A., Harada, M., Yoshizawa, H., Kinoshita, I., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0909530 · Cited by 5,525
PRODRG: a tool for high-throughput crystallography of protein–ligand complexes
Schüttelkopf, A. W., & van Aalten, D. M. F. (2004) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444904011679 · Cited by 4,837
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 574
Kobayashi, I. S., Viray, H., Rangachari, D., Kobayashi, S. S., & Costa, D. B. (2021) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells10123561 · Cited by 12
Self-citationHajjo, R., Sabbah, D. A., Bardaweel, S. K., & Zhong, H. A. (2024) · Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents · doi:10.1080/13543776.2024.2327307 · Cited by 14
Saini, H., Gupta, P. K., Mahapatra, A. K., Rajagopala, S., Tripathi, R., & Nesari, T. M. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-75059-z · Cited by 12
Sarı, M., & Aydıner, A. (2020) · Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics · doi:10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_757_19 · Cited by 12
Palgen, J., Perrillat-Mercerot, A., Ceres, N., Peyronnet, E., Coudron, M., Tixier, E., Illigens, B. M. W., Bosley, J., L’Hostis, A., & Monteiro, C. (2022) · Acta Biotheoretica · doi:10.1007/s10441-022-09445-3 · Cited by 12
TAS2940 , a novel brain‐penetrable pan‐ERBB inhibitor, for tumors with HER2 and EGFR aberrations
Oguchi, K., Araki, H., Tsuji, S., Nakamura, M., Miura, A., Funabashi, K., Osada, A., Tanaka, S., Suzuki, T., Kobayashi, S. S., et al. (2022) · Cancer Science · doi:10.1111/cas.15617 · Cited by 12
Self-citationKagawa, Y., Hayashida, T., Liu, J., Mori, S., Izumi, H., Kumagai, S., Udagawa, H., Hattori, N., Goto, K., & Kobayashi, S. S. (2023) · JTO Clinical and Research Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jtocrr.2023.100462 · Cited by 12
Self-citationQin, Y., Long, Y., Tang, Y., Tian, Y., Li, J., Duan, P., Luo, J., Yu, M., Li, Y., Zhou, X., et al. (2023) · Cancer Science · doi:10.1111/cas.15769 · Cited by 12
Shah, V. S., McNatty, A., Simpson, L., Ofori, H., & Raheem, F. (2023) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines11030950 · Cited by 12
Non-small cell lung cancer: an update on emerging EGFR-targeted therapies
Favorito, V., Ricciotti, I., Giglio, A. D., Fabbri, L., Seminerio, R., Federico, A. D., Gariazzo, E., Costabile, S., & Metro, G. (2024) · Expert Opinion on Emerging Drugs · doi:10.1080/14728214.2024.2331139 · Cited by 13
Ito, K., Nishio, M., Kato, M., Murakami, H., Aoyagi, Y., Ohe, Y., Okayama, T., Hashimoto, A., Ohsawa, H., Tanaka, G., et al. (2019) · Molecular Cancer Therapeutics · doi:10.1158/1535-7163.mct-18-0645 · Cited by 12
Sartori, G., Belluomini, L., Lombardo, F., Avancini, A., Trestini, I., Vita, E., Tregnago, D., Menis, J., Bria, E., Milella, M., et al. (2020) · Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy · doi:10.1080/14737140.2020.1776119 · Cited by 12
Li, C., Liu, W., Ning, J.-F., Meng, W.-Q., Hu, J., Zhao, Y., & Liu, C. (2015) · Drug Design Development and Therapy · doi:10.2147/dddt.s85357 · Cited by 12
Ismail, N. Z., Khairuddean, M., Abubakar, S., & Arsad, H. (2023) · Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics · doi:10.1080/07391102.2023.2296606 · Cited by 11
Okahisa, M., Udagawa, H., Matsumoto, S., Kato, T., Yokouchi, H., Furuya, N., Kanemaru, R., Toyozawa, R., Nishiyama, A., Ohashi, K., et al. (2024) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107798 · Cited by 12
Ohgino, K., Terai, H., Yasuda, H., Nukaga, S., Hamamoto, J., Tani, T., Kuroda, A., Arai, D., Ishioka, K., Masuzawa, K., et al. (2020) · Cancer Science · doi:10.1111/cas.14569 · Cited by 11
Self-citationBoukansa, S., Benbrahim, Z., Gamrani, S., Bardai, S. E., Bouguenouch, L., Mazti, A., Boutahiri, N., Serraj, M., Amara, B., Ouadnouni, Y., et al. (2022) · Cancer Control · doi:10.1177/10732748221084930 · Cited by 11
L’Hostis, A., Palgen, J., Perrillat-Mercerot, A., Peyronnet, E., Jacob, E., Bosley, J., Duruisseaux, M., Toueg, R., Lefèvre, L., Kahoul, R., et al. (2023) · npj Systems Biology and Applications · doi:10.1038/s41540-023-00292-7 · Cited by 11
Zhang, S., Xia, B., Jiang, H., Wang, L., Xu, R., Shi, Y., Zhang, J., Xu, M., Cram, D. S., & Ma, S. (2016) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.10464 · Cited by 11
Molecular Diagnostics in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
Sholl, L. M. (2020) · Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1055/s-0039-3399564 · Cited by 11
Diagnostic Molecular Pathology
Roy‐Chowdhuri, S., Luthra, R., & Wistuba, I. I. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96681-6_18 · Cited by 11
Kobayashi, I. S., Shaffer, W., Viray, H., Rangachari, D., VanderLaan, P. A., Kobayashi, S. S., & Costa, D. B. (2023) · JTO Clinical and Research Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jtocrr.2023.100614 · Cited by 10
Self-citationYang, L., Li, Y., Du, Y. E., Guo, Y., Guo, Z., Liu, B., Liu, J., Liu, Y., Niu, H., Sun, Y., et al. (2024) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c02302 · Cited by 10
Pagliarini, R. A., Henderson, J. A., Milgram, B. C., Borrelli, D. R., Brooijmans, N., Hilbert, B. J., Huff, M. R., Ito, T., Kryukov, G. V., Ladd, B., et al. (2025) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-3833 · Cited by 10
Togashi, Y., Hayashi, H., Nakagawa, K., & Nishio, K. (2014) · Drug Design Development and Therapy · doi:10.2147/dddt.s50358 · Cited by 11
From Biology to Therapy: Improvements of Therapeutic Options in Lung Cancer
Formisano, L., Jansen, V. M., Marciano, R., & Bianco, R. (2018) · Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/1871520617666170912123416 · Cited by 10
Köhler, J., & Janne, P. A. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.21.01494 · Cited by 11
Yang, G., Yang, Y., Hu, J., Xu, H., Zhang, S., & Wang, Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2022.984503 · Cited by 11
Sompallae, R. R., Dundar, B., Guseva, N. V., Bossler, A., & Ma, D. (2023) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2023.1163485 · Cited by 10
Jacob, E., Perrillat-Mercerot, A., Palgen, J., L’Hostis, A., Ceres, N., Boissel, J., Bosley, J., Monteiro, C., & Kahoul, R. (2023) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-023-05430-w · Cited by 10
Sholl, L. M. (2015) · Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology · doi:10.1053/j.semdp.2015.02.019 · Cited by 10
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutated Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Pakkala, S., & Ramalingam, S. S. (2016) · Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.hoc.2016.08.003 · Cited by 10
Response to Afatinib in a Patient with NSCLC Harboring Novel EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutations
Lin, L., Wu, X., Yan, S., Zhu, Y., Yan, Z., Lv, D., & Ge, H. (2020) · OncoTargets and Therapy · doi:10.2147/ott.s268694 · Cited by 10
Kunimasa, K., Nishino, K., Kukita, Y., Matsumoto, S., Kawachi, H., Kawamura, T., Inoue, T., Tamiya, M., Honma, K., Sugimoto, N., et al. (2021) · Cancer Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.cancergen.2021.04.001 · Cited by 10
Ibrahim, M. T., Uzairu, A., Shallangwa, G. A., & Uba, S. (2021) · Egyptian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences · doi:10.1080/2314808x.2021.1946650 · Cited by 10
Ning, J., Wu, Q., Liu, Z., Wang, J., & Lin, X. (2015) · Journal of Receptors and Signal Transduction · doi:10.3109/10799893.2015.1015739 · Cited by 10
Shen, H., Du, G., Liu, Z., Bao, J., Qin, Y., Jia, C., Liang, X., & Li, S. (2015) · PubMed Central · Cited by 10
Monoclonal Antibodies in Oncology: A Decade of Novel Options
Kardile, V., Kulkarni, A., Nadar, B., & Saldanha, T. (2023) · Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics · doi:10.1007/s12013-023-01144-1 · Cited by 9
Zhang, J., & Li, W. (2025) · BMC Pulmonary Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12890-025-03509-z · Cited by 9
Acar, C., Göker, H., Kütük, Ö., Çeli̇k, İ., & Altuntas, T. G. (2025) · Bioorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bioorg.2025.108345 · Cited by 9
Park, G., Park, S., Kim, H., Jung, H. A., Sun, J., Ahn, J. S., Ahn, M., & Lee, S.-H. (2025) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115631 · Cited by 9
Lung Cancer Genomics in the Era of Accelerated Targeted Drug Development
Wijesinghe, P., & Bollig-Fischer, A. B. (2015) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24932-2_1 · Cited by 9
Urbán, L., Dóczi, R., Vodicska, B., Tihanyi, D., Horváth, M., Kormos, D., Takács, I., Pápai-Székely, Z., Póka-Farkas, Z., Várkondi, E., et al. (2020) · Clinical Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.cllc.2020.09.005 · Cited by 10
Shevchenko, E., & Pantsar, T. (2022) · Biochemical Society Transactions · doi:10.1042/bst20210837 · Cited by 9
Pan, B., Liang, J., Shi, H., Rao, K., Guo, W., & Zhan, C. (2023) · Thoracic Cancer · doi:10.1111/1759-7714.15127 · Cited by 9
Zeng, L., Song, L., Liu, L., Wu, F., Xu, Q., Yan, H., Lin, S., Jiang, W., Wang, Z., Li, D., et al. (2024) · Med · doi:10.1016/j.medj.2024.02.011 · Cited by 9
Miyawaki, M., Naoki, K., Yoda, S., Nakayama, S., Satomi, R., Sato, T., Ikemura, S., Ohgino, K., Ishioka, K., Arai, D., et al. (2017) · Molecular and Clinical Oncology · doi:10.3892/mco.2017.1154 · Cited by 9
Self-citationAn update on biomarkers for kinase inhibitor response in non-small-cell lung cancer
Ku, B. M., Sun, J., Lee, S.-H., Ahn, J. S., Park, K., & Ahn, M. (2017) · Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics · doi:10.1080/14737159.2017.1372196 · Cited by 10
Clinicopathologic characteristics and outcome of patients with different EGFR mutations
Zhou, S., Hu, X., Wang, Y., Li, J., Zhou, L., Hao, X., Liu, Y., & Shi, Y. (2018) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1111/ajco.13072 · Cited by 9
Sarcar, B., Gimbrone, N. T., Wright, G. M., Rix, L. L. R., Gordián, E. R., Rix, U., Chiappori, A., Reuther, G. W., Santiago‐Cardona, P. G., Muñoz-Antonia, T., et al. (2019) · FEBS Open Bio · doi:10.1002/2211-5463.12702 · Cited by 9
Tumor evolution in epidermal growth factor receptor mutated non-small cell lung cancer
Velázquez, A. I., & McCoach, C. E. (2020) · Journal of Thoracic Disease · doi:10.21037/jtd.2019.08.31 · Cited by 9
Xie, C., Kong, J., Miao, F., Wang, X., & Sheng, J. (2020) · Thoracic Cancer · doi:10.1111/1759-7714.13487 · Cited by 9
Michal, M., Kuruc, J. D., Hájková, V., Michalová, K., & Klubíčková, N. (2024) · Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin · doi:10.1007/s00428-024-03936-z · Cited by 8
Masciale, V., Banchelli, F., Grisendi, G., Samarelli, A. V., Raineri, G., Rossi, T., Zanoni, M., Cortesi, M., Bandini, S., Ulivi, P., et al. (2024) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2024.107994 · Cited by 11
Milgram, B. C., Borrelli, D. R., Brooijmans, N., Henderson, J. A., Hilbert, B. J., Huff, M. R., Ito, T., Jackson, E. L., Jonsson, P., Ladd, B., et al. (2025) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c02377 · Cited by 8
New advances in the treatment of EGFR exon20ins mutant advanced NSCLC
Yuan, C. (2025) · American Journal of Cancer Research · doi:10.62347/wtmu5537 · Cited by 8
On the helical arrangements of protein molecules
Dauter, Z., & Jaskólski, M. (2017) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.3356 · Cited by 8
van Veggel, B. A. M. H., van der Wekken, A. J., Paats, M. S., Hendriks, L. E. L., Hashemi, S. M. S., Daletzakis, A., van den Broek, D. A., Bosch, L. J. W., Monkhorst, K., Smit, E. F., et al. (2023) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.35090 · Cited by 8
Drug Response of Patient-Derived Lung Cancer Cells Predicts Clinical Outcomes of Targeted Therapy
Kim, S., Lee, Y., Song, B., Sim, H., Kang, E. H., Hwang, M., Yu, N., Hong, S. H., Park, C., Ahn, B., et al. (2024) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers16040778 · Cited by 8
Liang, F., Zhang, Y., Xue, Q., & Yao, N. (2024) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2024.1363259 · Cited by 9
Hu, S., Ming, H., He, Q., Ding, M., Ding, H., & Li, C. (2024) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2024.1314301 · Cited by 8
Zhao, H., Beyett, T. S., Jiang, J., Rana, J. K., Schaeffner, I. K., Santana, J., Janne, P. A., & Eck, M. J. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2417144121 · Cited by 8
Self-citationKoyama, T., Rhrissorrakrai, K., & Parida, L. (2019) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-019-5313-1 · Cited by 8
Mehta, A., & Vasudevan, S. (2021) · Cancer Treatment and Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.ctarc.2021.100398 · Cited by 8
Jatkoe, T. A., Wang, S., Odegaard, J. I., Roth, A. M. V., Osgood, D., Martinez, G., Lucas, P., Curtin, J. C., & Karkera, J. D. (2022) · Journal of Molecular Diagnostics · doi:10.1016/j.jmoldx.2022.07.003 · Cited by 8
Zhang, X., Han, H., Zhao, J., Liu, X., Zhang, J., Sun, R., Li, S., Liu, B., Zhu, H., Jiao, S., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2022.964606 · Cited by 8
Du, Z., Sun, J., Zhang, Y., Hesilaiti, N., Xia, Q., Cui, H., Fan, N., & Xu, X. (2023) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom13020210 · Cited by 9
Amivantamab: A narrative drug review
John, A., Noronha, V., Singh, A. K., Menon, N. S., & Prabhash, K. (2023) · Cancer Research Statistics and Treatment · doi:10.4103/crst.crst_166_23 · Cited by 8
Chen, L., Shih, J., Yu, C., & Yang, C. (2019) · Respirology Case Reports · doi:10.1002/rcr2.425 · Cited by 8
Man, X., Sun, X., Chen, C., Xiang, Y., Zhang, J., & Yang, L. (2024) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2024.1367204 · Cited by 7
Liu, H., Qin, J., & Qian, X. (2024) · Cancer Control · doi:10.1177/10732748241292782 · Cited by 8
Xie, Z., Chen, X., Gao, R., Yang, M., Han, X., Sun, Y., & Shi, Y. (2026) · Chinese Medical Journal · doi:10.1097/cm9.0000000000004016 · Cited by 8
Han, H., Zhang, X., Liu, X., Zhao, J., Zhang, J., Zhang, J., Zhu, H., Jiao, S., & Tang, H. (2023) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000036667 · Cited by 7
Xu, Y., Chen, M., Gao, X., Liu, X., Zhao, J., Zhong, W., Wang, M., Wang, M., Yip, C. W., & Wang, M. (2025) · Cancer Letters · doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2025.217904 · Cited by 7
Selective Kinase Inhibitors in Cancer
Mortlock, A. A., Wilson, D. M., Kettle, J. G., Goldberg, F. W., & Foote, K. M. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-409547-2.12391-1 · Cited by 7
Bai, R., Chen, X., Song, W., Tian, H., & Cui, J. (2021) · Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1007/s00432-021-03840-y · Cited by 7
The Anti-atherosclerosis Mechanism of Ziziphora clinopodioides Lam. Based On Network Pharmacology
Liu, H., Jianxin, Z., Yan, X., Dong-qing, A., & Lei, H. (2023) · Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics · doi:10.1007/s12013-023-01151-2 · Cited by 7
Choi, D.-H., Jung, H. A., Park, S., Sun, J., Ahn, J. S., Ahn, M., & Lee, S. (2023) · Translational Lung Cancer Research · doi:10.21037/tlcr-23-643 · Cited by 7
Erazua, E. A., Oyebamiji, A. K., Akintelu, S. A., Adewole, P. D., Adelakun, A., & Adeleke, B. B. (2023) · Eclética Química · doi:10.26850/1678-4618eqj.v48.1.2023.p55-71 · Cited by 7
Uncommon EGFR Mutations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Their Impact on the Treatment
Bílek, O., Holánek, M., Berkovcová, J., Horký, O., Kazda, T., Čoupková, H., Špelda, S., Kristková, L., Zvaríková, M., Podhorec, J., et al. (2019) · Klinicka onkologie · doi:10.14735/amko20193s6 · Cited by 7
Xu, Y., Jia, L., Zhang, L., Wang, H., Jiang, L., Xu, F., Wei, R., Yao, Q., Ren, M., Xue, T., et al. (2024) · Translational Lung Cancer Research · doi:10.21037/tlcr-23-848 · Cited by 6
An overview of recent advancements in targeted cancer therapies and their potential clinical impact
Ahmed, S., Sakla, A. P., Jahan, K., Neshat, N., Akhter, M., Aaghaz, S., & Kamal, A. (2025) · RSC Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1039/d5md00740b · Cited by 6
Li, G., Fang, M., Zhou, Y., Liu, X., Tian, P., & Mei, F.-J. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20690 · Cited by 6
de Jager, V. D., Plomp, P., Paats, M. S., van Helvert, S., ter Elst, A., van den Berg, A., Dubbink, H. J., van Geffen, W. H., Zhang, L., Hendriks, L. E. L., et al. (2024) · ESMO Open · doi:10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103966 · Cited by 6
Zhu, W., Pei, J., & Lu, X. (2024) · Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents · doi:10.1080/13543776.2024.2446220 · Cited by 6
Predictive Biomarker Testing for Lung Cancer: Past and Future Perspectives
Hatanaka, Y., Kinoshita, I., & Dosaka‐Akita, H. (2022) · Haigan · doi:10.2482/haigan.62.15 · Cited by 6
Shen, C., Ho, H., Yeh, Y., Chiu, C., & Chou, T. (2020) · Journal of the Chinese Medical Association · doi:10.1097/jcma.0000000000000277 · Cited by 6
Guo, M. Z., Marrone, K. A., Spira, A. I., Freeman, K., & Scott, S. C. (2021) · touchREVIEWS in Oncology & Haematology · doi:10.17925/ohr.2021.17.1.42 · Cited by 7
Stoyanova, M., Gledacheva, V., Milusheva, M., Todorova, M. M., Kircheva, N., Angelova, S., Stefanova, I. D., Pencheva, M. M., Tumbarski, Y. D., Vasileva, B., et al. (2025) · Nanomaterials · doi:10.3390/nano15110815 · Cited by 5
Olowosoke, C. B., Ibeh, R. C., Ibisanmi, T. A., & Chukwuemeka, P. O. (2025) · In Silico Research in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.insi.2025.100083 · Cited by 5
Li, S., & Sun, Y. (2023) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000034439 · Cited by 5
Kim, T. M., Girard, N., Low, G. K. M., Zhuo, J., Yu, D. Y., Yang, Y., Murota, M., Lim, C. T. K., Kleinman, N. J., & Cho, B. C. (2023) · Acta Oncologica · doi:10.1080/0284186x.2023.2254479 · Cited by 5
Sunvozertinib: the next candidate of TKI for NSCLC
Hayashi, H. (2023) · The Lancet Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/s2213-2600(23)00419-8 · Cited by 5
Lei, Q., Zhou, X., Li, Y., Zhao, S., Yang, N., Xiao, Z., Song, C., Yu, Q., & Deng, H. (2025) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.4c16528 · Cited by 5
Watanabe, N., Horio, Y., & Fujiwara, Y. (2022) · Annals of Translational Medicine · doi:10.21037/atm-2022-56 · Cited by 6
Shaffer, W., Kobayashi, I. S., Sentana‐Lledo, D., Sundararaman, S. K., Lee, M. D., Rangachari, D., VanderLaan, P. A., Kobayashi, S. S., & Costa, D. B. (2023) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2023.107250 · Cited by 5
Self-citationLiu, J., Xiang, Y., Fang, T., Zeng, L., Sun, A., Lin, Y., & Lu, K. (2023) · Clinical Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.cllc.2023.11.010 · Cited by 5
Jia, G., Bashir, S., Ye, M., Li, Y., Lai, M., Cai, L., & Xu, M. (2024) · Anti-Cancer Drugs · doi:10.1097/cad.0000000000001593 · Cited by 5
Amivantamab: A Novel Advance in the Treatment of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Zavaleta‐Monestel, E., García-Montero, J., Arguedas‐Chacón, S., Quesada-Villaseñor, R., Barrantes-López, M., Arroyo-Solís, R., & Zúñiga-Orlich, C. (2024) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.60851 · Cited by 5
Skroński, M., Szpechciński, A., & Chorostowska‐Wynimko, J. (2014) · Advances in respiratory medicine · doi:10.5603/piap.2014.0036 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Yasuda, H., Park, E., Yun, C.-H., Sng, N. J., Lucena-Araujo, A. R., Yeo, W.-L., Huberman, M. S., Cohen, D. W., Nakayama, S., Ishioka, K., Yamaguchi, N., Hanna, M., Oxnard, G. R., Lathan, C. S., Moran, T., Sequist, L. V., Chaft, J. E., Riely, G. J., Arcila, M. E., Soo, R. A., Meyerson, M., Eck, M. J., Kobayashi, S. S., & Costa, D. B.
- Affiliations
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Peking University (CN)
- Keio University (JP)
- Broad Institute (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Yasuda, Hiroyuki
- Park, Eunyoung
- Yun, Cai-Hong
- Cohen, David W.
- Eck, Michael J.
- Kobayashi, Susumu S.
- Costa, Daniel B.
- ORCID
- Yasuda, Hiroyuki
- Park, Eunyoung
- Yun, Cai-Hong
- Lucena-Araujo, Antonio R.
- Cohen, David W.
- Nakayama, Sohei
- Ishioka, Kota
- Yamaguchi, Norihiro
- Oxnard, Geoffrey R.
- Lathan, Christopher S.
- Sequist, Lecia V.
- Chaft, Jamie E.
- Riely, Gregory J.
- Arcila, Maria E.
- Soo, Ross A.
- Meyerson, Matthew
- Eck, Michael J.
- Kobayashi, Susumu S.
- Costa, Daniel B.
- Venue
- Science Translational Medicine
- Published
- 2013-12-18
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 216
- Pages
- 216ra177-216ra177
- ISSN
- 1946-6234 (ISSN-L)
- 1946-6242
- PMC
- PMC3954775
- OpenAlex
- W2076883919
- Cited by
- 571
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 17
- FWCI
- 24.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Science Translational Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA116020, CA090578, R00CA126026, R01CA169259, CA 116020, P50CA090578, K99CA126026, P20CA090578, P01CA154303, CA154303, CA126026, CA169259)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Keywords
- EGFR exon 20 insertion, non-small cell lung cancer, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, gefitinib, erlotinib, tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance, L858R mutation, ATP binding site, kinase conformation, crystal structure, targeted therapy
- MeSH terms
- Erlotinib Hydrochloride, Gefitinib, Amino Acid Sequence, Antineoplastic Agents, Base Sequence, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, DNA, Neoplasm, Exons, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Models, Molecular, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Protein Conformation, Quinazolines, Mutagenesis, Insertional, Crystallography, X-Ray, Genes, erbB-1, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Structural Homology, Protein, Cell Line, Tumor, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Translational Research, Biomedical, ErbB Receptors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review