Response Heterogeneity of EGFR and HER2 Exon 20 Insertions to Covalent EGFR and HER2 Inhibitors
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Insertion mutations in EGFR and HER2 both occur at analogous positions in exon 20. Non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with tumors harboring these mutations seldom achieve clinical responses to dacomitinib and afatinib, two covalent quinazoline–based inhibitors of EGFR or HER2, respectively. In this study, we investigated the effects of specific EGFR and HER2 exon 20 insertion mutations from NSCLC patients that had clinically achieved a partial response after dacomitinib treatment. We identified Gly770 as a common feature among the drug-sensitive mutations. Structural modeling suggested that this mutation may facilitate inhibitor binding to EGFR. Introduction of Gly770 into two dacomitinib-resistant EGFR exon 20 insertion mutants restored sensitivity to dacomitinib. Based on these findings, we used afatinib to treat an NSCLC patient whose tumor harbored the HER2 V777_G778insGSP mutation and achieved a durable partial response. We further identified secondary mutations in EGFR (T790M or C797S) and HER2 (C805S) that mediated acquired drug resistance in drug-sensitive EGFR or HER2 exon 20 insertion models. Overall, our findings identified a subset of EGFR and HER2 exon 20 insertion mutations that are sensitive to existing covalent quinazoline–based EGFR/HER2 inhibitors, with implications for current clinical treatment and next-generation small-molecule inhibitors. Cancer Res; 77(10); 2712–21. ©2017 AACR.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 28 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
HER2 mutant Ba/F3 cells were generally more sensitive to neratinib, dacomitinib, and afatinib than EGFR exon 20 mutant Ba/F3 cells.
“In general, the HER2 mutant Ba/F3 cells were more sensitive to all three drugs compared to the EGFR exon 20 mutant Ba/F3 cells (Figure 1A and Figure S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
One patient with the D770delinsGY EGFR mutation showed a partial response to dacomitinib.
“Some of these patients were enrolled in clinical trials of dacomitinib treatment, and one patient with D770delinsGY showed partial response (25).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Janne, 2011, Phase I dose-escalation study of the pan-HER inhibitor, PF299804, in patients with advanced malignant solid tumors, Clin Cancer Res source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingnone given
The HER2 V777_G778insGSP mutation causes the same protein changes as the HER2 P780_Y781insGSP mutation.
“The HER2 V777_G778insGSP mutation leads to the same changes in the HER2 protein as does the HER2 P780_Y781insGSP mutation (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Immunoblot analyses showed that inhibition of HER2 phosphorylation corresponded to the relative cellular sensitivities for each tested drug.
“Immunoblot analyses demonstrating inhibition of HER2 phosphorylation corresponded to the relative cellular sensitivities for each of the tested drugs (Figure 1D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Ba/F3 cells harboring InsCPG were similarly sensitive to all three covalent inhibitors.
“Ba/F3 cells harboring the InsCPG were similarly sensitive to all three covalent inhibitors (Figure 1C).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
Immunoblot analysis revealed higher levels of cleaved PARP in response to dacomitinib than to gefitinib in DFCI cell lines.
“Immunoblot analysis revealed higher levels of cleaved PARP in response to dacomitinib treatment than to gefitinib treatment (Figure S3C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Secondary mutations in EGFR (T790M or C797S) and HER2 (C805S) mediated acquired drug resistance in drug-sensitive EGFR or HER2 exon 20 insertion models.
“We further identified secondary mutations in EGFR (T790M or C797S) and HER2 (C805S) that mediated acquired drug resistance in drug-sensitive EGFR or HER2 exon 20 insertion models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Sequencing of EGFR in the resistant clones revealed T790M in 10/12 clones selected at 100 nM and 5/5 selected at 1 μM dacomitinib.
“Sequencing of EGFR revealed a T790M mutation in 10/12 100 nM and 5/5 1 μM treated cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The Asp770Gly mutation markedly increased sensitivity of both the H773_V774 insH and D770_N771 insSVD mutants to dacomitinib.
“However, the glycine mutation markedly sensitized both variants to inhibition by dacomitinib (Figure 2D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
All inhibitor-sensitive mutants contained a glycine at a position two residues beyond the end of the C-helix.
“In doing so, we noticed that all of the inhibitor-sensitive mutants contained a glycine in a position two residues beyond the end of the C-helix (Table 2 and Figure 2A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
EGFR mutations were detected in 678 patients (24%).
“EGFR mutations were detected in 678 patients (24%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Only 8 different HER2 exon 20 mutation variants were identified.
“In contrast to EGFR, only 8 different variants of HER2 exon 20 mutations were identified (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
All HER2 exon 20 insertion mutant and WT HER2 Ba/F3 cells were able to grow without IL-3.
“All mutants, including WT HER2 were able to grow without IL-3 (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the D770_N771 insSVD mutant, Asp770Gly shifted the dacomitinib IC50 10-fold (p = 0.046, n=3).
“In the D770_N771 insSVD mutation, the Asp770Gly mutation shifted the IC50 10-fold (p = 0.046; mean IC50 (n=3) insSVD vs. GinsSVD; t-test).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In DFCI58 and DFCI127, afatinib and dacomitinib were substantially more effective than gefitinib at inhibiting cell growth and phosphorylation of EGFR, AKT, and ERK1/2.
“Although higher concentrations of gefitinib had some efficacy in both cell lines, afatinib and dacomitinib were substantially more effective at inhibiting cell growth as well as phosphorylation of EGFR, AKT and ERK1/2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Introduction of Gly770 into two dacomitinib-resistant EGFR exon 20 insertion mutants restored sensitivity to dacomitinib.
“Introduction of Gly770 into two dacomitinib-resistant EGFR exon 20 insertion mutants restored sensitivity to dacomitinib.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Afatinib treatment of a NSCLC patient whose tumor harbored the HER2 V777_G778insGSP mutation achieved a durable partial response.
“Based on these findings we used afatinib to treat a NSCLC patient whose tumor harbored the HER2 V777_G778insGSP mutation and achieved a durable partial response.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The most common HER2 exon 20 mutation was A775_G776insYVMA, found in 33 of 48 cases (68.8%).
“The most common mutation resulted in a duplication of codon 772 to 775 (A775_G776insYVMA) and was found in 33 of 48 cases of all HER2 exon 20 insertions (68.8%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The patient's tumor had a HER2 V777_G778insGSP mutation.
“Routine targeted next generation sequencing of her tumor identified a HER2 V777_G778insGSP mutation (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Proliferation rates were similar for the H773_V774 insH and D770_N771 insSVD mutants with or without the Asp770Gly substitution.
“In addition, the proliferation rates were similar with or without the glycine substitution (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The insNPG insertion and most other exon 20 insertions are not directly in contact with the ATP-site of the kinase.
“This insertion and most other insertions encoded within exon20 are not directly in contact with the ATP-site of the kinase (Figure 2A)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The differential sensitivity of InsGY cells to dacomitinib was mirrored by the drug's ability to inhibit pEGFR in those cells.
“The differential sensitivity of dacomitinib in the InsGY cells was mirrored by its ability to inhibit pEGFR in these cells (Figure 1B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Two patient-derived cell lines, DFCI58 and DFCI127, harboring EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations were established.
“Accordingly, we established two patient-derived cell lines (DFCI58 and DFCI127) harboring EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations (Figure S3A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Eleven of the 19 EGFR exon 20 insertion variants were identified in only one patient each.
“Eleven of 19 variants were identified in only 1 patient each.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among the 44 EGFR exon 20 mutations, there were 19 different mutations.
“Among the 44 EGFR exon 20 mutations, there were 19 different mutations (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
InsGY Ba/F3 cells were significantly more sensitive to dacomitinib (IC50 17.5 nM) than the other four EGFR exon 20 insertion Ba/F3 cell lines (p=0.013; n=4 vs others; t-test).
“In addition, the InsGY Ba/F3 cells were significantly more sensitive to dacomitinib (IC50 17.5 nM) than the other four exon 20 insertion Ba/F3 cell lines (p = 0.013; mean IC50 in InsGY mutant (n=4) vs. mean IC50 in other exon 20 insertion mutants; t-test).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the H773_V774 insH mutant, Asp770Gly produced an IC50 of 5 nM for dacomitinib (p < 0.001, n=3).
“The effect in the H773_V774 insH variant was more dramatic, with an IC50 of 5 nM (figure 2D) (p < 0.001; mean IC50 (n=3) insH vs. GinsH; t-test).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Introducing a glycine at position 770 into two dacomitinib-resistant EGFR exon 20 mutations substantially enhanced dacomitinib efficacy.
“Furthermore, by introducing a glycine into position 770 of two dacomitinib resistant EGFR exon 20 mutations, we were able to substantially enhance the efficacy of dacomitinib (Figure 2D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the HER2 C805S-resistant cells, HER2 phosphorylation was not completely inhibited.
“Immunoblot analysis revealed HER2 phosphorylation was not completely inhibited in the resistant cells (Figure 4D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
All 12 HER2-resistant clones had a secondary C805S mutation that was absent in drug-sensitive cells.
“Sequencing of HER2 from the resistant cells revealed a secondary C805S mutation in all 12 clones that was not present in the drug sensitive cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For HER2 exon 20 mutations, the findings were similar but less pronounced.
“The findings for HER2 exon 20 mutations are similar albeit more subtle (Figure S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The remaining two drug-resistant clones from the 100 nM group had no additional EGFR mutations.
“The remaining 2 drug resistant clones from the 100 nM treated group did not contain any additional EGFR mutations (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Twelve drug-resistant clones were obtained from HER2 InsYVMA Ba/F3 cells after selection with 200 nM neratinib (n=5) or 200 nM dacomitinib (n=7).
“Twelve (12) drug resistant clones were identified following selection in either 200 nM of neratinib (n=5) or 200 nM of dacomitinib (n=7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Drug-sensitive EGFR and HER2 exon 20 insertion mutations share the presence of a glycine at position 770.
“Remarkably, by studying the drug sensitive and resistant EGFR and HER2 exon 20 insertion mutations, we uncovered a common feature among the drug sensitive mutations: the presence of a glycine at position 770 (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In both EGFR and HER2 cases described, mutation in the covalent binding site (EGFR C797S or HER2 C805S) is sufficient to cause drug resistance.
“In both cases described here, mutation in the covalent binding site of either EGFR (C797S) or HER2 (C805S) is sufficient to lead to drug resistance (Figure 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: EGFR C797 is the covalent binding site for neratinib, dacomitinib, and afatinib.
- Findingown data
Ba/F3 cells co-expressing HER2 InsYVMA or InsWLV with C805S were resistant to all three drugs compared with parental cells.
“Cell proliferation assay revealed these two cell lines were resistant to all three drugs compared to parental cells (Figure 4C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A patient with a HER2 mutant tumor harboring glycine at position 770, who had failed prior trastuzumab, had a clinically significant and durable response to afatinib.
“She ultimately had a clinically significant and durable response on afatinib treatment (Figure 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In Ba/F3 cells with EGFR InsGY plus T790M or C797S, dacomitinib did not inhibit EGFR phosphorylation compared with parental InsGY cells.
“Immunoblot analysis revealed EGFR phosphorylation was not inhibited by dacomitinib in Ba/F3 cells harboring either the T790M or C797S mutations when compared to the parental InsGY cells (Figure 4B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: EGFR C797 is the covalent binding site for neratinib, dacomitinib, and afatinib.
- Findingown data
Both T790M and C797S in cis with EGFR InsGY conferred resistance to dacomitinib and afatinib.
“Both T790M and C797S resulted in drug resistance to dacomitinib and afatinib (Figure 4A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: EGFR C797 is the covalent binding site for neratinib, dacomitinib, and afatinib.
- Findingown data
Among tested EGFR exon 20 mutations, only InsGY had an IC50 below the phase II trough concentration (17.5 nM).
“Of the EGFR exon 20 mutations tested, only the IC50 value of the InsGY mutation was below this concentration (17.5nM; Figures 1A and S1), suggesting that this glycine bearing mutation may have been the reason for the unique clinical sensitivity to dacomitinib in this patient.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For EGFR, T790M also causes drug resistance to a similar degree as C797S.
“For EGFR, the T790M secondary mutation also results in drug resistance; to a similar degree as C797S.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: EGFR C797 is the covalent binding site for neratinib, dacomitinib, and afatinib.
- Findingnone given
C805 is the cysteine residue analogous to EGFR C797.
“C805 is the EGFR C797 analogous cysteine residue (Figure S4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The present study identified four additional rare exon 20 mutations-EGFR InsGY and HER2 InsGSP, InsWLV, and InsCPG-that are more sensitive to dacomitinib than more common EGFR or HER2 exon 20 mutations.
“In the present study, we identify four additional rare exon 20 mutations in EGFR (InsGY) and HER2 (InsGSP, InsWLV and InsCPG) that are uniquely more sensitive to the covalent EGFR/HER2 inhibitor dacomitinib than the more common EGFR or HER2 exon 20 mutations (Figure 1A and 1C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
NSCLC tumors carrying EGFR or HER2 exon 20 insertion mutations rarely show clinical responses to dacomitinib or afatinib.
“Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with tumors harboring these mutations seldom achieve clinical responses to dacomitinib and afatinib, two covalent quinazoline-based inhibitors of EGFR or HER2, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [13] Yang, 2015, Clinical activity of afatinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring uncommon EGFR mutations: A combined post-hoc analysis of LUX-Lung 2, LUX-Lung 3, and LUX-Lung 6, Lancet Oncol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [25] Janne, 2011, Phase I dose-escalation study of the pan-HER inhibitor, PF299804, in patients with advanced malignant solid tumors, Clin Cancer Res source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [26] Kris, 2015, Targeting HER2 aberrations as actionable drivers in lung cancers: phase II trial of the pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor dacomitinib in patients with HER2-mutant or amplified tumors, Ann Oncol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In the phase I dacomitinib study, 1 of 6 patients with EGFR exon 20 insertions had a sustained partial response.
“In the phase I study of dacomitinib, 6 patients with EGFR exon 20 insertions were treated and 1 of 6 patients had a sustained PR (25).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Janne, 2011, Phase I dose-escalation study of the pan-HER inhibitor, PF299804, in patients with advanced malignant solid tumors, Clin Cancer Res source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
None of the three HER2 mutant NSCLC patients who responded to dacomitinib harbored the common A775_G776insYVMA mutation.
“None of the three responders harbored the common A775_G776insYVMA HER2 mutation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Kris, 2015, Targeting HER2 aberrations as actionable drivers in lung cancers: phase II trial of the pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor dacomitinib in patients with HER2-mutant or amplified tumors, Ann Oncol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The A775_G776insYVMA mutation accounts for most HER2 exon 20 mutations observed in NSCLC.
“with the A775_G776insYVMA mutation accounting for most of the mutations seen in NSCLC (17–21).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [17] Stephens, 2004, Lung cancer: Intragenic ERBB2 kinase mutations in tumours, Nature source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [18] Shigematsu, 2005, Somatic mutations of the HER2 kinase domain in lung adenocarcinomas, Cancer Res source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [19] Buttitta, 2006, Mutational analysis of the HER2 gene in lung tumors from Caucasian patients: Mutations are mainly present in adenocarcinomas with bronchioloalveolar features, Int J Cancer source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [20] Tomizawa, 2011, Prognostic and predictive implications of HER2/ERBB2/neu gene mutations in lung cancers, Lung Cancer source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [21] Arcila, 2012, Prevalence, clinicopathologic associations, and molecular spectrum of ERBB2 (HER2) tyrosine kinase mutations in lung adenocarcinomas, Clin Cancer Res source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Inhibitor resistance of most exon 20 insertion mutants may arise, at least in part, from differences in conformational dynamics of the kinase.
“suggesting that inhibitor resistance may arise, at least in part, from differences in conformational dynamics of the kinase.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Structural modeling suggested that Gly770 may facilitate inhibitor binding to EGFR.
“Structural modeling suggested that this mutation may facilitate inhibitor binding to EGFR.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Insertion residues reposition Asp770, sterically blocking Arg776 from accessing the end of the C-helix.
“The insertion residues reposition Asp770, thus sterically blocking Arg776 from accessing the end of the C-helix.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
During the switch to the inactive conformation, the side chain of Arg776 rearranges to hydrogen bond with the carbonyl group of Ala767 at the end of the C-helix.
“As part of the switch to the inactive conformation, the side chain of Arg776 rearranges to hydrogen bond with the carbonyl group of Ala767 at the end of the C-helix (Figure 2B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In EGFR, Asp770 and the exon 20 insertions lie at the pivot-point of the C-helix.
“In EGFR, Asp770 and the exon 20 insertions lie at the pivot-point of the C-helix.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
A subset of EGFR and HER2 exon 20 insertion mutations are sensitive to existing covalent quinazoline-based EGFR/HER2 inhibitors.
“Overall, our findings identified a subset of EGFR and HER2 exon 20 insertion mutations that are sensitive to existing covalent quinazoline-based EGFR/HER2 inhibitors, with implications for current clinical treatment and next-generation small molecule inhibitors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The apparent inhibition of cell growth induced by dacomitinib in DFCI cell lines was mediated by enhanced apoptosis.
“These data suggested that the apparent inhibition of cell growth induced by the dacomitinib treatment was mediated by enhanced apoptosis in both DFCI cell lines.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In a phase II study, 3 of 26 patients with HER2 mutant NSCLC (12%) had a partial response to dacomitinib.
“In a phase II study, 3 of 26 patients with HER2 mutant NSCLC (12%) had a partial response (26).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Kris, 2015, Targeting HER2 aberrations as actionable drivers in lung cancers: phase II trial of the pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor dacomitinib in patients with HER2-mutant or amplified tumors, Ann Oncol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
For HER2, afatinib efficacy is more likely dependent on covalent binding than on non-covalent inhibition.
“In the case of HER2, unlike EGFR, the efficacy of afatinib is more likely dependent on covalent binding than on non-covalent inhibition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: EGFR C797 is the covalent binding site for neratinib, dacomitinib, and afatinib.
- Interpretationown data
The findings show that inhibitor resistance is not an inherent feature of activating exon 20 insertions in this region.
“While our model linking rearrangements of Arg776 and confirmation of the C-helix to inhibitor sensitivity remains speculative, taken together, our findings show that inhibitor resistance is not an inherent feature of activating exon 20 insertions in this region.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The impact of HER2 C805S may differ from that of EGFR C797S.
“However, the impact of the C805S mutation may be different than that recently described for the EGFR C797S mutation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: EGFR C797 is the covalent binding site for neratinib, dacomitinib, and afatinib.
- Interpretationown data
The studies highlight heterogeneity among EGFR and HER2 exon 20 insertion mutations that may affect the efficacy of specific therapies.
“Our studies highlight the heterogeneity among EGFR and HER2 exon 20 insertion mutations which may impact the efficacy of specific therapies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
More potent and specific inhibitors of EGFR or HER2 exon 20 insertion mutations, with IC50 values closer to those of dacomitinib-sensitive Ba/F3 lines, may be clinically effective against a larger fraction of these cancers.
“Collectively these findings raise the possibility that more potent and specific inhibitors of EGFR or HER2 exon 20 insertion mutations—with IC50 values closer to the Ba/F3 cell lines harboring dacomitinib sensitive mutations—may be clinically effective against a larger fraction of these cancers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
There is significant clinical and biochemical heterogeneity among EGFR and HER2 exon 20 mutations.
“However, there is significant clinical and biochemical heterogeneity among EGFR or HER2 exon 20 mutations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Yasuda, 2013, Structural, biochemical, and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer, Sci Transl Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
C797S mutations have been shown to cause resistance to mutant-selective EGFR inhibitors (WZ4002, rociletinib, osimertinib) in vitro and in lung cancer patients.
“Mutations in C797 (to C797S) have recently been demonstrated to lead to resistance to mutant selective EGFR inhibitors both in vitro (WZ4002, rociletinib, osimertinib) and in lung cancer patients (31, 33).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [31] Ercan, 2015, EGFR mutations and resistance to irreversible pyrimidine based EGFR inhibitors, Clin Cancer Res source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [33] Thress, 2015, Acquired EGFR C797S mutation mediates resistance to AZD9291 in non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR T790M, Nat Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: EGFR C797 is the covalent binding site for neratinib, dacomitinib, and afatinib.
- Premisecitation
In a phase II trial, the mean trough concentration of dacomitinib after 45 mg once daily was 56.7-74.7 ng/mL (approximately 120-160 nmol/L).
“In the phase II trial of dacomitinib, the mean trough concentration following dosing with 45mg of dacomitinib once daily was 56.7–74.7ng/mL (approximately 120–160nmol/L) (24).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Janne, 2014, Dacomitinib as first-line treatment in patients with clinically or molecularly selected advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial, Lancet Oncol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The low IC50 of EGFR InsGY may explain the unique clinical sensitivity to dacomitinib in this patient.
“Of the EGFR exon 20 mutations tested, only the IC50 value of the InsGY mutation was below this concentration (17.5nM; Figures 1A and S1), suggesting that this glycine bearing mutation may have been the reason for the unique clinical sensitivity to dacomitinib in this patient.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 29
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 2
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataInsYVMA Ba/F3 cells were more sensitive to neratinib than to other drugs, although not as sensitive as WT HER2 cells.
“These cells were more sensitive to neratinib although not as sensitive as those the WT HER2 cells (Figure 1C).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBoth the H773_V774 insH and D770_N771 insSVD mutants transformed Ba/F3 cells and supported IL-3-independent growth.
“Both mutants led to transformation and IL-3 independent growth (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDFCI58 was established from the adenocarcinoma of a 60-year-old male with stage IV disease and an EGFR H773_V774insNPH exon 20 mutation.
“DFCI58 was established from the adenocarcinoma of a 60-year-old male. He was diagnosed with stage IV disease and and an EGFR H773_V774insNPH exon 20 mutation was identified.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataInsGY Ba/F3 cells were slightly more sensitive to afatinib, while all five EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations were relatively more resistant to neratinib.
“The InsGY Ba/F3 cells were also slightly more sensitive to afatinib while all five exon 20 insertion mutations were relatively more resistant to neratinib.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe patient's response to afatinib lasted 7 months, with progression due to leptomeningeal carcinomatosis.
“The response was sustained for 7 months with eventual clinical progression due to leptomeningeal carcinomatosis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataForty-four EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations were identified, representing 7% of EGFR mutant cases and 1.7% of all tested cases.
“Forty four EGFR mutations were insertion mutations in exon 20 (7% of EGFR mutant cases and 1.7% of all tested cases).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSubstituting alanine, arginine, or aspartic acid for the inserted glycine in D770delinsGY did not uniformly confer resistance; alanine was slightly more resistant, while arginine and aspartic acid increased sensitivity.
“Notably, contrary to our hypothesis, these substitutions did not uniformly confer resistance; the alanine mutant was slightly more resistant while the arginine and aspartic acid mutants exhibited increased sensitivity (Figure 2D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Arg776 interaction site is accessible in wild-type EGFR but is blocked by Asp770 in the insertion mutant.
“While this position is accessible in wild type EGFR, it is blocked by Asp770 in the insertion mutant (Figure 2C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataInsYVMA Ba/F3 cells were the most resistant among HER2 mutants, with IC50 values higher than WT HER2.
“The InsYVMA Ba/F3 cells were the most resistant with IC50 values higher than that seen for WT HER2 (Figure 1C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the DFCI cohort, 2789 patients were tested for EGFR mutations between 2004 and 2015, and 1901 patients were tested for HER2 mutations between 2009 and 2015.
“Between 2004 and 2015, 2789 patients were tested for EGFR mutations and between 2009 and 2015, 1901 patients were tested for HER2 mutations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAll EGFR exon 20 insertion-containing Ba/F3 cells were resistant to gefitinib, while EGFR WT cells remained sensitive.
“All of the EGFR exon 20 insertion containing Ba/F3 cells were resistant to gefitinib while the EGFR WT cells remained sensitive (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationTwo patients with P780_Y781insGSP and one patient with M774delinsWLV achieved a partial response to dacomitinib.
“Some HER2 exon 20 patients were also enrolled into clinical trials of dacomitinib, and two patients with a P780_Y781insGSP and one patient with a M774delinsWLV achieved a partial response (26).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Kris, 2015, Targeting HER2 aberrations as actionable drivers in lung cancers: phase II trial of the pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor dacomitinib in patients with HER2-mutant or amplified tumors, Ann Oncol source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataDFCI127 was established from the adenocarcinoma of a 42-year-old female with stage IV disease and an EGFR P772_H773insPNP exon 20 mutation.
“DFCI127 was established from the adenocarcinoma of a 42-year-old female. She was diagnosed with stage IV disease and had an EGFR P772_H773insPNP exon 20 mutation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataFive of the 8 HER2 exon 20 variants were detected only once.
“Five of the 8 variants were detected only once.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe patient experienced significant tumor shrinkage and decreased supplemental oxygen requirement after afatinib.
“She experienced significant tumor shrinkage (Figure 3), accompanied by a decrease in the requirement for supplemental oxygen.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAll EGFR exon 20 mutant Ba/F3 cells grew without IL-3, except EGFR WT Ba/F3 cells, which required EGF.
“All exon 20 EGFR mutant Ba/F3 cells were able to grow without interleukin-3 (IL-3) with the exception of EGFR WT Ba/F3 cells which required 10 ng/ml of EGF to sustain growth (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn soft agar colony formation assays, neratinib was most effective at inhibiting growth of InsGSP and InsYVMA colonies, while dacomitinib was most effective against InsWLV cells.
“Similar to the Ba/F3 cells, neratinib was most effective at inhibiting the growth of the InsGSP and InsYVMA colonies while dacomitinib was most effective against the InsWLV cells (Figures S2A and S2B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataDacomitinib was a more potent inhibitor of WT EGFR Ba/F3 cells than of EGFR exon 20 insertion mutant Ba/F3 cells.
“Dacomitinib was a more potent inhibitor of WT EGFR Ba/F3 cells (Figure 1A and Figure S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe most common EGFR exon 20 insertion was D770_N771insSVD, the second most common was V769_D770insASV, and together they accounted for 36.3% (16/44) of all EGFR exon 20 insertions.
“The most common one was a duplication of codon 768 to 770 resulting in D770_N771insSVD. The second most common one was a duplication of codon 767 to 769 resulting in V769_D770insASV. These two insertions are very similar in their locations and together accounted for 36.3% (16 in 44 cases) of all EGFR exon 20 insertions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSeventeen drug-resistant clones were obtained from EGFR exon 20 InsGY cells after ENU exposure and selection with 100 nM or 1 μM dacomitinib; 12 from 100 nM and 5 from 1 μM.
“Seventeen (17) drug resistant clones were expanded and identified to be drug resistant; 12 from the 100 nM and 5 from the 1 μM treated cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataForty-seven HER2 exon 20 mutations were detected, representing 2.5% of all tested cases.
“Forty seven HER2 mutations were detected in exon 20 (2.5% of all tested cases).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThree of these sensitive mutations came from patients who clinically responded to dacomitinib, and the fourth was an in vitro mutation conferring drug sensitivity.
“Three of these mutations were initially identified from the tumors of lung cancer patients who had clinically responded to dacomitinib while the fourth was identified as an in vitro mutation conferring drug sensitivity (Figure 1C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataHER2 mutations from dacomitinib-responding patients were the most sensitive to dacomitinib in vitro, but the IC50 differences from non-responding mutations such as HER2 InsYVMA were less pronounced than for EGFR exon 20 mutations.
“The HER2 mutations identified from dacomitinib responding patients were also the most sensitive to dacomitinib in vitro (Figure 1C) but the differences in the IC50 values between these and mutations from patients with no response (such as HER2 InsYVMA) were not as pronounced as in those with the EGFR exon 20 mutations (Figure 1C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn a review of 84 patients with EGFR exon 20 insertions treated with gefitinib or erlotinib, the response rate was 11% and progression-free survival was 2.4 months.
“A review of 84 patients with exon 20 insertions across different series treated with either gefitinib or erlotinib demonstrated a RR of only 11% with a PFS of 2.4 months (12).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Naidoo, 2015, Epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 insertions in advanced lung adenocarcinomas: Clinical outcomes and response to erlotinib, Cancer source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAfatinib treatment in EGFR exon 20 insertion patients is associated with a low response rate of 8.7% and progression-free survival of 2.7 months.
“Similarly, treatment with afatinib in this patient population is also associated with a low RR and PFS (8.7% and 2.7 months, respectively) (13).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Yang, 2015, Clinical activity of afatinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring uncommon EGFR mutations: A combined post-hoc analysis of LUX-Lung 2, LUX-Lung 3, and LUX-Lung 6, Lancet Oncol source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHER2 mutations are oncogenic in vitro and in vivo.
“Mutations in HER2 are oncogenic both in vitro and in vivo (14–16).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [14] Shimamura, 2006, Non-small-cell lung cancer and Ba/F3 transformed cells harboring the ERBB2 G776insV_G/C mutation are sensitive to the dual-specific epidermal growth factor receptor and ERBB2 inhibitor HKI-272, Cancer Res source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [15] Wang, 2006, HER2 kinase domain mutation results in constitutive phosphorylation and activation of HER2 and EGFR and resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, Cancer Cell source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [16] Perera, 2009, HER2YVMA drives rapid development of adenosquamous lung tumors in mice that are sensitive to BIBW2992 and rapamycin combination therapy, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationENU mutagenesis has previously identified clinically relevant drug resistance mutations to EGFR TKIs.
“This approach has previously led to identification of clinically relevant drug resistance mutations to EGFR TKIs (30, 31).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationOnly one crystal structure is available for an exon 20 variant (insNPG), and it reveals an inhibitor binding site essentially indistinguishable from that of the inhibitor-sensitive L858R mutant.
“Only one crystal structure is available for an exon 20 variant (the insNPG mutant) and it reveals an inhibitor binding site that is essentially indistinguishable from that of the inhibitor-sensitive L858R mutant (8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Yasuda, 2013, Structural, biochemical, and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer, Sci Transl Med source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn a randomized phase II trial, no HER2 mutation-positive NSCLC patients responded to neratinib alone, while 3 of 14 (21%) treated with neratinib plus temsirolimus had a partial response.
“While none of the patients treated with neratinib alone responded (RR: 0%), 3 of 14 (RR: 21%) patients treated with the combination of neratinib/temsirolimus had a PR (23).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] Besse, 2014, Neratinib (N) with or without temsirolimus (TEM) in patients (pts) with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) carrying HER2 somatic mutations: an international randomized phase II study, Ann Oncol source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrevious studies identified EGFR A763_Y764insFQEA as sensitive to erlotinib, while most EGFR exon 20 mutations are resistant to EGFR inhibitors.
“Although the vast majority are associated with resistance to EGFR inhibitors, previous studies have identified a unique EGFR exon 20 mutation (A763_Y764insFQEA) that remained sensitive to erlotinib (8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Yasuda, 2013, Structural, biochemical, and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer, Sci Transl Med source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataGlycine mutations can restore inhibitor sensitivity without abrogating transforming activity.
“Indeed, glycine mutations can restore inhibitor sensitivity without abrogating transforming activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCells with an EGFR activating mutation and C797S without T790M are resistant to mutant-selective EGFR inhibitors (WZ4002, osimertinib, rociletinib) but remain sensitive to afatinib.
“Cells expressing an EGFR activating mutation and C797S in the absence of T790M are resistant to mutant selective EGFR inhibitors (WZ4002, osimertinib and rociletinib) but remain sensitive to afatinib (31).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Ercan, 2015, EGFR mutations and resistance to irreversible pyrimidine based EGFR inhibitors, Clin Cancer Res source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: EGFR C797 is the covalent binding site for neratinib, dacomitinib, and afatinib.
The paper relies on this without support.
EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations and HER2 exon 20 insertion mutations occur at structurally analogous positions.
“Insertion mutations in EGFR and HER2 both occur at analogous positions in exon 20.”
“Notably, EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations occur in a structurally analogous position as exon 20 insertion mutations in HER2.”
The paper relies on this without support.
EGFR C797 is the covalent binding site for neratinib, dacomitinib, and afatinib.
“EGFR C797 is the site of covalent binding of neratinib, dacomitinib and afatinib.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There are currently no effective or approved targeted therapies for patients with EGFR or HER2 exon 20 mutant lung tumors.
“Lung cancer patients harboring EGFR or HER2 exon 20 mutant tumors represent a unique subset of patients for whom there are currently no effective or approved targeted therapies.”
The paper relies on this without support.
No features among EGFR or HER2 exon 20 mutations have been identified that predict clinical sensitivity to existing covalent EGFR/HER2 inhibitors.
“To date, no features among the different EGFR or HER2 exon 20 mutations have been identified that could predict clinical sensitivity to existing covalent EGFR or HER2 inhibitors.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The common EGFR exon 20 mutations InsSVD and InsASV account for about one-third of all exon 20 mutations, and HER2 InsYVMA accounts for about two-thirds of HER2 exon 20 mutations.
“Furthermore, there continues to be a need to develop effective therapies for patients with the more common EGFR exon 20 mutation (InsSVD and InsASV, accounting for ~ 1/3 of all exon 20 mutations) and HER2 exon 20 mutations (InsYVMA, accounting for ~ 2/3 of all exon 20 mutations).”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The frequency and effects of atypical EGFR mutations on drug sensitivity are unknown.
“Furthermore, the frequency and effects of atypical EGFR mutations on drug sensitivity are unknown1,3,7–10.”
From Structure-based classification predicts drug response in EGFR-mutant NSCLC (2021) · cites this paper as [10]
Patients with atypical EGFR mutations show heterogeneous and reduced responses to EGFR inhibitors, including osimertinib.
“Patients with atypical EGFR mutations show heterogeneous and reduced responses to EGFR inhibitors1,3,7–10, including osimertinib12.”
From Structure-based classification predicts drug response in EGFR-mutant NSCLC (2021) · cites this paper as [10]
In a recent study of rare EGFR and HER2 exon 20 mutations, heterogeneous response to covalent quinazoline-based second-generation inhibitors was found; concentrations required to target more common exon 20 insertion mutations were above clinically achievable.
“In a recent study of rare EGFR and HER2 exon 20 mutations, the authors found a heterogeneous response to covalent quinazoline-based second-generation inhibitors, such as dacomitinib and afatinib; however, the concentrations that were required to target more common exon 20 insertion mutations were above what are clinically achievable24.”
From Mechanisms and clinical activity of an EGFR and HER2 exon 20–selective kinase inhibitor in non–small cell lung cancer (2018) · cites this paper as [24]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
HER2 exon 20 case totals disagree
MinorThe results first give 47 HER2 exon 20 cases, then use 48 as the total for the same group.
“Forty seven HER2 mutations were detected in exon 20 (2.5% of all tested cases).”
“The most common mutation resulted in a duplication of codon 772 to 775 (A775_G776insYVMA) and was found in 33 of 48 cases of all HER2 exon 20 insertions (68.8%).”
EGFR insertion prevalence is overstated
MinorForty-four cases among 2,789 tested patients is approximately 1.58%, which rounds to 1.6%, not the reported 1.7%.
Reported 1.7 · recomputed 1.577626
“Forty four EGFR mutations were insertion mutations in exon 20 (7% of EGFR mutant cases and 1.7% of all tested cases).”
Wild-type HER2 is counted as an insertion mutant
MinorThe six cell lines comprise wild-type HER2 and five insertion mutants, so they cannot all be HER2 exon 20 insertion mutant cell lines.
“We evaluated the efficacy of neratinib, dacomitinib and afatinib in all six HER2 exon 20 insertion mutant Ba/F3 cell lines (Figure 1C).”
“We also generated and studied WT and 5 different HER2 exon 20 insertion Ba/F3 cell lines.”
Cites
Gefitinib or Carboplatin–Paclitaxel in Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma
Mok, T. S., Wu, Y.-L., Thongprasert, S., Yang, C.-H., Chu, D.-T., Saijo, N., Sunpaweravong, P., Han, B., Margono, B., Ichinose, Y., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0810699 · Cited by 8,261 · see citing works
Gefitinib or Chemotherapy for Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Mutated EGFR
Maemondo, M., Inoue, A., Kobayashi, K., Sugawara, S., Oizumi, S., Isobe, H., Gemma, A., Harada, M., Yoshizawa, H., Kinoshita, I., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0909530 · Cited by 5,525 · see citing works
Zhou, C., Wu, Y.-L., Chen, G., Feng, J., Liu, X.-Q., Wang, C., Zhang, S., Wang, J., Zhou, S., Ren, S., et al. (2011) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70184-x · Cited by 4,081 · see citing works
Crizotinib versus Chemotherapy in Advanced <i>ALK</i> -Positive Lung Cancer
Shaw, A. T., Kim, D.-W., Nakagawa, K., Seto, T., Crinó, L., Ahn, M.-J., De Pas, T., Besse, B., Solomon, B. J., Blackhall, F., et al. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1214886 · Cited by 3,381 · see citing works
Screening for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Lung Cancer
Rosell, R., Moran, T., Queralt, C., Porta, R., Cardenal, F., Camps, C., Majem, M., Lopez-Vivanco, G., Isla, D., Provencio, M., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0904554 · Cited by 2,373 · see citing works
Thress, K. S., Paweletz, C. P., Felip, E., Cho, B. C., Stetson, D., Dougherty, B., Lai, Z., Markovets, A., Vivancos, A., Kuang, Y., et al. (2015) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3854 · Cited by 1,589 · see citing works
Self-citationNovel mutant-selective EGFR kinase inhibitors against EGFR T790M
Zhou, W., Ercan, D., Chen, L., Yun, C.-H., Li, D., Capelletti, M., Cortot, A. B., Chirieac, L., Iacob, R. E., Padera, R., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08622 · Cited by 1,013 · see citing works
Self-citationYang, J. C.-H., Sequist, L. V., Geater, S. L., Tsai, C.-M., Mok, T. S. K., Schuler, M., Yamamoto, N., Yu, C.-J., Ou, S.-H. I., Zhou, C., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00026-1 · Cited by 1,002 · see citing works
Intragenic ERBB2 kinase mutations in tumours
Stephens, P., Hunter, C., Bignell, G., Edkins, S., Davies, H., Teague, J., Stevens, C., O'Meara, S., Smith, R., Parker, A., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/431525b · Cited by 802 · see citing works
Awad, M. M., Oxnard, G. R., Jackman, D. M., Savukoski, D. O., Hall, D., Shivdasani, P., Heng, J. C., Dahlberg, S. E., Janne, P. A., Verma, S., et al. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2015.63.4600 · Cited by 697 · see citing works
Self-citationSomatic Mutations of the <i>HER2</i> Kinase Domain in Lung Adenocarcinomas
Shigematsu, H., Takahashi, T., Nomura, M., Majmudar, K., Suzuki, M., Lee, H., Wistuba, I. I., Fong, K. M., Toyooka, S., Shimizu, N., et al. (2005) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-4235 · Cited by 678 · see citing works
Yasuda, H., Kobayashi, S., & Costa, D. B. (2012) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70129-2 · Cited by 610 · see citing works
Mitsudomi, T., & Yatabe, Y. (2007) · Cancer Science · doi:10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00607.x · Cited by 606 · see citing works
Yasuda, H., Park, E., Yun, C.-H., Sng, N. J., Lucena-Araujo, A. R., Yeo, W.-L., Huberman, M. S., Cohen, D. W., Nakayama, S., Ishioka, K., et al. (2013) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3007205 · Cited by 571 · see citing works
Self-citationWagle, N., Berger, M. F., Davis, M. J., Blumenstiel, B. S., DeFelice, M. T., Pochanard, P., Ducar, M. D., Hummelen, P. V., MacConaill, L. E., Hahn, W. C., et al. (2011) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-11-0184 · Cited by 526 · see citing works
Arcila, M. E., Chaft, J. E., Nafa, K., Roy-Chowdhuri, S., Lau, C., Zaidinski, M., Paik, P. K., Zakowski, M. F., Kris, M. G., & Ladanyi, M. (2012) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-12-0912 · Cited by 505 · see citing works
Wang, S. E., Narasanna, A., Pérez-Torres, M., Xiang, B., Wu, F. Y., Yang, S., Carpenter, G. F., Gazdar, A. F., Muthuswamy, S. K., & Arteaga, C. L. (2006) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2006.05.023 · Cited by 474 · see citing works
Arcila, M. E., Nafa, K., Chaft, J. E., Rekhtman, N., Lau, C., Reva, B. A., Zakowski, M. F., Kris, M. G., & Ladanyi, M. (2013) · Molecular Cancer Therapeutics · doi:10.1158/1535-7163.mct-12-0620 · Cited by 473 · see citing works
EGFR Mutations and Resistance to Irreversible Pyrimidine-Based EGFR Inhibitors
Ercan, D., Choi, H. G., Yun, C.-H., Capelletti, M., Xie, T., Eck, M. J., Gray, N. S., & Jänne, P. A. (2015) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-2789 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
Self-citationNatural History and Molecular Characteristics of Lung Cancers Harboring EGFR Exon 20 Insertions
Oxnard, G. R., Lo, P. C., Nishino, M., Dahlberg, S. E., Lindeman, N. I., Butaney, M., Jackman, D. M., Johnson, B. E., & Jänne, P. A. (2013) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1097/jto.0b013e3182779d18 · Cited by 360 · see citing works
Self-citationKris, M. G., Camidge, D. R., Giaccone, G., Hida, T., Li, B. T., O'Connell, J., Taylor, I., Zhang, H., Arcila, M. E., Goldberg, Z., et al. (2015) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdv186 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Sasaki, T., Okuda, K., Zheng, W., Butrynski, J. E., Capelletti, M., Wang, L., Gray, N. S., Wilner, K. D., Christensen, J. G., Demetri, G. D., et al. (2010) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-10-2956 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Self-citationNaidoo, J., Sima, C. S., Rodriguez, K., Busby, N., Nafa, K., Ladanyi, M., Riely, G. J., Kris, M. G., Arcila, M. E., & Yu, H. A. (2015) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.29493 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Perera, S. A., Li, D., Shimamura, T., Raso, M. G., Ji, H., Chen, L., Borgman, C. L., Zaghlul, S., Brandstetter, K. A., Kubo, S., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0808930106 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Jänne, P. A., Boss, D. S., Camidge, D. R., Britten, C. D., Engelman, J. A., Garon, E. B., Guo, F., Wong, S., Liang, J., Letrent, S., et al. (2011) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-10-1220 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Buttitta, F., Barassi, F., Fresu, G., Felicioni, L., Chella, A., Paolizzi, D., Lattanzio, G., Salvatore, S., Camplese, P. P., Rosini, S., et al. (2006) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.22143 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Prognostic and predictive implications of HER2/ERBB2/neu gene mutations in lung cancers
Tomizawa, K., Suda, K., Onozato, R., Kosaka, T., Endoh, H., Sekido, Y., Shigematsu, H., Kuwano, H., Yatabe, Y., & Mitsudomi, T. (2011) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.01.014 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Self-citationShimamura, T., Ji, H., Minami, Y., Thomas, R. K., Lowell, A. M., Shah, K., Greulich, H. E., Glatt, K. A., Meyerson, M. M., Shapiro, G. I., et al. (2006) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-0971 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Jänne, P. A., Ou, S.-H. I., Kim, D.-W., Oxnard, G. R., Martins, R., Kris, M. G., Dunphy, F., Nishio, M., O'Connell, J., Paweletz, C., et al. (2014) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(14)70461-9 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Introduction of Systematic Genomic Testing for Patients with Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Cardarella, S., Ortiz, T. M., Joshi, V. A., Butaney, M., Jackman, D. M., Kwiatkowski, D. J., Yeap, B. Y., Janne, P. A., Lindeman, N. I., & Johnson, B. E. (2012) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1097/jto.0b013e3182745bcb · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Activating Mutations in ERBB2 and Their Impact on Diagnostics and Treatment
Herter-Sprie, G. S., Greulich, H. E., & Wong, K. (2013) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2013.00086 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Besse, B., Soria, J., Yao, B., Kris, M. G., Chao, B. H., Cortot, A. B., Mazières, J., Socinski, M. A., Horn, L., Waqar, S. N., et al. (2014) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdu438.47 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
First-Line Crizotinib in ALK-Positive Lung Cancer
Alkan, A., Köksoy, E. B., & Utkan, G. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmc1415973 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Planchard, D., Popat, S., Kerr, K., Novello, S., Smit, E. F., Faivre-Finn, C., Mok, T. S., Reck, M., Van Schil, P. E., Hellmann, M. D., et al. (2018) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy275 · Cited by 2,274 · see citing works
Understanding and targeting resistance mechanisms in NSCLC
Rotow, J. K., & Bivona, T. G. (2017) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc.2017.84 · Cited by 978 · see citing works
HER kinase inhibition in patients with HER2- and HER3-mutant cancers
Hyman, D. M., Piha-Paul, S. A., Won, H., Rodon, J., Saura, C., Shapiro, G. I., Juric, D., Quinn, D. I., Moreno, V., Doger, B., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature25475 · Cited by 780 · see citing works
Mechanisms of acquired resistance to first- and second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors
Westover, D., Zugazagoitia, J., Cho, B. C., Lovly, C. M., & Paz-Ares, L. (2018) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdx703 · Cited by 766 · see citing works
Rare epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in non-small cell lung cancer
Harrison, P. T., Vyse, S., & Huang, P. H. (2019) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.09.015 · Cited by 625 · see citing works
Structure-based classification predicts drug response in EGFR-mutant NSCLC
Robichaux, J. P., Le, X., Vijayan, R. S. K., Hicks, J. K., Heeke, S., Elamin, Y. Y., Lin, H. Y., Udagawa, H., Skoulidis, F., Tran, H., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03898-1 · Cited by 490 · see citing works
Robichaux, J. P., Elamin, Y. Y., Tan, Z., Carter, B. W., Zhang, S., Liu, S., Li, S., Chen, T., Poteete, A., Estrada-Bernal, A., et al. (2018) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0007-9 · Cited by 468 · see citing works
Targeting EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations in non-small cell lung cancer
Vyse, S., & Huang, P. H. (2019) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-019-0038-9 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
Yun, J., Lee, S.-H., Kim, S.-Y., Jeong, S.-Y., Kim, J.-H., Pyo, K.-H., Park, C.-W., Heo, S. G., Yun, M. R., Lim, S., et al. (2020) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-0116 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Antitumour immunity regulated by aberrant ERBB family signalling
Kumagai, S., Koyama, S., & Nishikawa, H. (2021) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-020-00322-0 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Yu, H. A., Suzawa, K., Jordan, E., Zehir, A., Ni, A., Kim, R., Kris, M. G., Hellmann, M. D., Li, B. T., Somwar, R., et al. (2018) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-2961 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Robichaux, J. P., Elamin, Y. Y., Vijayan, R. S. K., Nilsson, M. B., Hu, L., He, J., Zhang, F., Pisegna, M., Poteete, A., Sun, H., et al. (2019) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2019.09.001 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Drug resistance to targeted therapeutic strategies in non-small cell lung cancer
Liu, W., Du, Y., Wen, R. M., Yang, M., & Xu, J. (2019) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2019.107438 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Wang, Y., Jiang, T., Qin, Z., Jiang, J., Wang, Q., Yang, S., Rivard, C. J., Gao, G., Ng, T. L., Tu, M. M., et al. (2018) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy542 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Dong, R., Zhu, M., Liu, M., Xu, Y., Yuan, L.-L., Bian, J., Xia, Y., & Kong, L. (2021) · Pharmacological Research · doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105583 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
EGFR and HER2 exon 20 insertions in solid tumours: from biology to treatment
Friedlaender, A., Subbiah, V., Russo, A., Banna, G. L., Malapelle, U., Rolfo, C. D., & Addeo, A. (2021) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-021-00558-1 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Santoni‐Rugiu, E., Melchior, L. C., Urbanska, E. M., Jakobsen, J. N., de Stricker, K., Grauslund, M., & Sørensen, J. B. (2019) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers11070923 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Current Landscape of Targeted Therapy in Lung Cancer
Mayekar, M. K., & Bivona, T. G. (2017) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1002/cpt.810 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Activating HER2 mutations as emerging targets in multiple solid cancers
Connell, C. M., & Doherty, G. J. (2017) · ESMO Open · doi:10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000279 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
To, C., Beyett, T. S., Jang, J., Feng, W. W., Bahcall, M., Haikala, H. M., Shin, B. H., Heppner, D. E., Rana, J. K., Leeper, B. A., et al. (2022) · Nature Cancer · doi:10.1038/s43018-022-00351-8 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Self-citationLe, X., Cornelissen, R., Garassino, M. C., Clarke, J. M., Tchekmedyian, N., Goldman, J. W., Leu, S.-Y., Bhat, G., Lebel, F. M., Heymach, J. V., et al. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.21.01323 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Molecular-Targeted Therapies for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and Its Resistance Mechanisms
Yamaoka, T., Ohba, M., & Ohmori, T. (2017) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms18112420 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Genomic alterations of ERBB receptors in cancer: clinical implications
Mishra, R., Hanker, A. B., & Garrett, J. T. (2017) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.22825 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Cheng, Y., Zhang, T., & Xu, Q. (2021) · MedComm · doi:10.1002/mco2.105 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Elamin, Y. Y., Robichaux, J. P., Carter, B. W., Altan, M., Tran, H. T., Gibbons, D. L., Heeke, S., Fossella, F. V., Lam, V. K. L., Le, X., et al. (2022) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2022.06.006 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Russo, A., Franchina, T., Ricciardi, G., Battaglia, A., Picciotto, M., & Adamo, V. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20061431 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Targeting HER2 Aberrations in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer with Osimertinib
Liu, S., Li, S., Hai, J., Wang, X., Chen, T., Quinn, M. M., Gao, P., Zhang, Y., Ji, H., Cross, D. A. E., et al. (2018) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-1875 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Emergence of ERBB2 Mutation as a Biomarker and an Actionable Target in Solid Cancers
Subramanian, J., Katta, A., Masood, A., Vudem, D. R., & Kancha, R. K. (2019) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0845 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Elamin, Y. Y., Robichaux, J. P., Carter, B. W., Altan, M., Gibbons, D. L., Fossella, F. V., Lam, V. K. L., Patel, A. B., Negrao, M. V., Le, X., et al. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.21.01113 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Foulkes, D. M., Byrne, D. P., Yeung, W., Shrestha, S., Bailey, F. P., Ferries, S., Eyers, C. E., Keeshan, K., Wells, C. I., Drewry, D. H., et al. (2018) · Science Signaling · doi:10.1126/scisignal.aat7951 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Choi, Y.-M., Lee, H., Ann, M., Song, M., Rheey, J., & Jang, J. (2023) · Biofabrication · doi:10.1088/1758-5090/acd95f · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Treatment of Brain Metastases of Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
Rybarczyk-Kasiuchnicz, A., Ramlau, R., & Stencel, K. M. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22020593 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Mechanisms of resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitor‐targeted therapy and overcoming strategies
Ou, X., Gao, G., Habaz, I. A., & Wang, Y. (2024) · MedComm · doi:10.1002/mco2.694 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Iwama, E., Zenke, Y., Sugawara, S., Daga, H., Morise, M., Yanagitani, N., Sakamoto, T., Murakami, H., Kishimoto, J., Matsumoto, S., et al. (2021) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2021.11.021 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Piotrowska, Z., Costa, D. B., Oxnard, G. R., Huberman, M., Gainor, J. F., Lennes, I. T., Muzikansky, A., Shaw, A. T., Azzoli, C. G., Heist, R. S., et al. (2018) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy336 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Self-citationLai, W. V., Lebas, L., Barnes, T. A., Milia, J., Ni, A., Gautschi, O. P., Peters, S., Ferrara, R., Plodkowski, A. J., Kavanagh, J., et al. (2019) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2018.11.030 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
High-Throughput Functional Evaluation of Variants of Unknown Significance in ERBB2
Nagano, M., Kohsaka, S., Ueno, T., Kojima, S., Saka, K., Iwase, H., Kawazu, M., & Mano, H. (2018) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-0991 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Current Approaches in NSCLC Targeting K-RAS and EGFR
Aran, V., & Omerović, J. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20225701 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Mansour, M. A., AboulMagd, A. M., Abbas, S. H., Abdel-Rahman, H. M., & Abdel‐Aziz, M. (2023) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/d3ra02347h · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Koga, T., Kobayashi, Y., Tomizawa, K., Suda, K., Kosaka, T., Sesumi, Y., Fujino, T., Nishino, M., Ohara, S., Chiba, M., et al. (2018) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.10.019 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Self-citationȘandor, A., Ionuţ, I. A., Marc, G., Oniga, I., Eniu, D. T., & Oniga, O. (2023) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph16040534 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Novel drugs targeting EGFR and HER2 exon 20 mutations in metastatic NSCLC
Baraibar, I., Mezquita, L., Bazo, I. G., & Planchard, D. (2020) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.102906 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Ruan, Z., & Kannan, N. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1803152115 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
EGFR exon 20 insertion in lung adenocarcinomas among Hispanics (geno1.2-CLICaP)
Cardona, A. F., Rojas, L., Zatarain-Barrón, Z. L., Freitas, H., Granados, S. T., Castillo, O., Oblitas, G., Corrales, L., Castro, C. D., Ruíz-Patiño, A., et al. (2018) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.10.007 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Distribution and Detectability of EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Variants in NSCLC
Ou, S. I., Hong, J., Christopoulos, P., Lin, H. M., Vincent, S., Churchill, E. N., Soeda, J., Kazdal, D. N., Stenzinger, A., & Thomas, M. (2023) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2023.01.086 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Byeon, S., Kim, Y., Lim, S. W., Cho, J. H., Park, S., Lee, J., Sun, J., Choi, Y., Lee, S., Ahn, J. S., et al. (2018) · Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.4143/crt.2018.151 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Yang, S., Wang, Y., Zhao, C., Li, X., Liu, Q., Mao, S., Liu, Y., Yu, X., Wang, W., Tian, Q., et al. (2021) · Translational Lung Cancer Research · doi:10.21037/tlcr-20-559 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Yang, G., Li, J., Xu, H., Sun, Y., Liu, L., Li, H., Yang, L., Zhang, Y., Li, G., & Wang, Y. (2020) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.11.027 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Management of HER2 alterations in non-small cell lung cancer – The past, present, and future
Nützinger, J., Lee, J. B., Low, J. L., Chia, P. L., Wijaya, S. T., Cho, B. C., Lim, S. M., & Soo, R. A. (2023) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2023.107385 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Ikemura, S., Yasuda, H., Matsumoto, S., Kamada, M., Hamamoto, J., Masuzawa, K., Kobayashi, K., Manabe, T., Arai, D., Nakachi, I., et al. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1819430116 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Fan, Y., Chen, J., Zhou, C., Wang, H., Shu, Y., Zhang, J., Huang, D., Huang, D. C.-L., & Zhou, C. (2020) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.07.017 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Zhao, S., Fang, W., Pan, H., Yang, Y., Liang, Y., Yang, L., Dong, X., Zhan, J., Wang, K., & Zhang, L. (2020) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2020.01.020 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Ivanova, E. V., Kuraguchi, M., Xu, M., Portell, A. J., Taus, L. J., Diala, I., Lalani, A. S., Choi, J., Chambers, E. S., Li, S., et al. (2020) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-1844 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationSon, J., Jang, J., Beyett, T. S., Eum, Y., Haikala, H. M., Verano, A. L., Lin, M., Hatcher, J. M., Kwiatkowski, N. P., Eser, P. Ö., et al. (2022) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-21-2693 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Self-citationEmerging roles of the αC‐β4 loop in protein kinase structure, function, evolution, and disease
Yeung, W., Ruan, Z., & Kannan, N. (2020) · IUBMB Life · doi:10.1002/iub.2253 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
HER2-Altered Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Biology, Clinicopathologic Features, and Emerging Therapies
Yu, X., Ji, X., & Su, C. (2022) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.860313 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations in non-small cell lung cancer
Wang, F., Li, C., Wu, Q., & Lu, H. (2020) · Translational Cancer Research · doi:10.21037/tcr.2020.03.10 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Patil, T., Mushtaq, R. R., Marsh, S. A., Azelby, C. M., Pujara, M., Davies, K. D., Aisner, D. L., Purcell, W. T., Schenk, E. L., Pacheco, J. M., et al. (2019) · Clinical Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.cllc.2019.11.008 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Bai, Q., Wang, J., & Zhou, X. (2023) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102605 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Amrhein, J. A., Beyett, T. S., Feng, W. W., Krämer, A., Weckesser, J., Schaeffner, I. K., Rana, J. K., Janne, P. A., Eck, M. J., Knapp, S., et al. (2022) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01041 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationCheng, Y., Chen, Z., Huang, J.-J., & Shao, D. (2023) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-023-09922-4 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
The immune microenvironment in EGFR- and ERBB2-mutated lung adenocarcinoma
Kirchner, M., Kluck, K., Brandt, R., Volckmar, A., Penzel, R., Kazdal, D. N., Endris, V., Neumann, O., Seker‐Cin, H., Goldschmid, H., et al. (2021) · ESMO Open · doi:10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100253 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Bahcall, M., Paweletz, C. P., Kuang, Y., Taus, L. J., Sim, T., Kim, N. D., Dholakia, K. H., Lau, C. J., Gokhale, P. C., Chopade, P. R., et al. (2021) · Molecular Cancer Therapeutics · doi:10.1158/1535-7163.mct-21-0344 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationSentana‐Lledo, D., Academia, E. C., Viray, H., Rangachari, D., Kobayashi, S. S., VanderLaan, P. A., & Costa, D. B. (2023) · Translational Lung Cancer Research · doi:10.21037/tlcr-23-98 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Liu, Z., Wu, L., Cao, J., Yang, Z., Zhou, C., Cao, L., Wu, H., Shen, H., Jin, M., Zhang, Y., et al. (2018) · OncoTargets and Therapy · doi:10.2147/ott.s173391 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Brown, B. P., Zhang, Y., Kim, S., Finneran, P., Yan, Y., Du, Z., Kim, J., Hartzler, A. L., Lenoue-Newton, M. L., Smith, A. W., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2206588119 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Nishino, M., Suda, K., Koga, T., Ohara, S., Fujino, T., Soh, J., Tirunagaru, V. G., Vellanki, A., Doebele, R. C., & Mitsudomi, T. (2021) · Thoracic Cancer · doi:10.1111/1759-7714.13931 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Jang, J., Son, J., Park, E., Kosaka, T., Saxon, J. A., Clercq, D. J. H. D., Choi, H. G., Tanizaki, J., Eck, M. J., Janne, P. A., et al. (2018) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201805187 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citationTakeda, M., Sakai, K., Hayashi, H., Tanaka, K., Tanizaki, J., Takahama, T., Haratani, K., Nishio, K., & Nakagawa, K. (2018) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.24958 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citationStructure Defines Function: Clinically Relevant Mutations in ErbB Kinases
Niggenaber, J., Hardick, J., Lategahn, J., & Rauh, D. (2019) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b00964 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Structural Basis for the Functional Changes by EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutations
Tamirat, M. Z., Kurppa, K. J., Elenius, K., & Johnson, M. S. (2021) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers13051120 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Sevabertinib, a Reversible HER2 Inhibitor with Activity in Lung Cancer
Siegel, F., Siegel, S., Kotýnková, K., Uzunbas, G. K., Korr, D., Tomono, H., Andersen, S., Denney, D. R., Berger, M., Schulze, V., et al. (2025) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-25-0605 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutations in Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Pacini, L., Cabal, V. N., Hermsen, M. A. J. A., & Huang, P. H. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14020394 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
HER2 Aberrations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: From Pathophysiology to Targeted Therapy
Vathiotis, I. A., Charpidou, A. G., Gavrielatou, N., & Syrigos, K. N. (2021) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph14121300 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Case Report: Afatinib Treatment in a Patient With NSCLC Harboring a Rare EGFR Exon 20 Mutation
Zöchbauer‐Müller, S., Kaserer, B., Prosch, H., Cseh, A., Solca, F., Bauer, M. J., & Müllauer, L. (2021) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2020.593852 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
EGFR inhibitors across generations: Progress, challenges, and future directions
Deshmukh, V. G., Sapkal, S. B., Gadekar, S. S., & Deshmukh, V. (2025) · Journal of Molecular Structure · doi:10.1016/j.molstruc.2025.142326 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Targeting Infrequent Driver Alterations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Nokin, M., Ambrogio, C., Nadal, E., & Santamarı́a, D. (2020) · Trends in cancer · doi:10.1016/j.trecan.2020.11.005 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Zhang, S., Jin, S., Griffin, C., Feng, Z., Lin, J., Baratta, M., Brake, R. L., Venkatakrishnan, K., & Gupta, N. (2021) · Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development · doi:10.1002/cpdd.951 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Dong, F., Liu, J., & Wang, X. (2020) · Organic Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.0c00497 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Tan, A. C., Saw, S. P. L., Chen, J., Lai, G. G. Y., Hlaing, N. O., Takano, A. M., Lau, D. P., Yeong, J. P.-S., Tan, G. S., Lim, K. H., et al. (2022) · JCO Precision Oncology · doi:10.1200/po.22.00278 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Cheng, Y., Jiang, Z.-P., Chen, X., Lu, K.-Y., Liu, Z., & Shao, D. (2025) · Clinical Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.1097/rlu.0000000000005863 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Shi, Y., & Wang, M. (2018) · Thoracic Cancer · doi:10.1111/1759-7714.12906 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Mutation Profile of ResectedEGFR-Mutated Lung Adenocarcinoma by Next-Generation Sequencing
Zhao, Z.-R., Lin, Y., Ng, C. S. H., Zhang, R., Wu, X., Ou, Q., Chen, W., Zhou, W., Lin, Y., Su, X., et al. (2019) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0567 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Yang, G., Xu, H., Hu, J., Liu, R., Hu, P., Yang, Y., Li, W., Hao, X., Zhang, S., Xu, F., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2022.806737 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Koga, T., Suda, K., Nishino, M., Fujino, T., Ohara, S., Hamada, A., Soh, J., Tirunagaru, V. G., Vellanki, A., Doebele, R. C., et al. (2021) · Translational Lung Cancer Research · doi:10.21037/tlcr-21-216 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Kobayashi, I. S., Viray, H., Rangachari, D., Kobayashi, S. S., & Costa, D. B. (2021) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells10123561 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
A novel strategy for designing the magic shotguns for distantly related target pairs
Luo, Y., Wang, P., Mou, M., Zheng, H., Hong, J., Tao, L., & Zhu, F. (2023) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbac621 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Vannitamby, A., Hendry, S. A., Makadia, T. H., Danks, J. A., Slavin, J., Irving, L. B., Steinfort, D., & Bozinovski, S. (2019) · Journal of Molecular Diagnostics · doi:10.1016/j.jmoldx.2018.10.001 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Le, X., Robichaux, J. P., Nilsson, M. B., Vijayan, R. S. K., Ravichandran, A., Wu, J., Elamin, Y. Y., Hong, L., Pei, J., He, J., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-61817-8 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
The efficacy of afatinib in patients with HER2 mutant non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis
Zhou, N., Zhao, J., Huang, X. Y., Shen, H., Li, W., Xu, Z., & Xia, Y. (2020) · Translational Cancer Research · doi:10.21037/tcr.2020.04.09 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Urbán, L., Dóczi, R., Vodicska, B., Tihanyi, D., Horváth, M., Kormos, D., Takács, I., Pápai-Székely, Z., Póka-Farkas, Z., Várkondi, E., et al. (2020) · Clinical Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.cllc.2020.09.005 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Yang, G., Yang, Y., Hu, J., Xu, H., Zhang, S., & Wang, Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2022.984503 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
van Veggel, B. A. M. H., van der Wekken, A. J., Paats, M. S., Hendriks, L. E. L., Hashemi, S. M. S., Daletzakis, A., van den Broek, D. A., Bosch, L. J. W., Monkhorst, K., Smit, E. F., et al. (2023) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.35090 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Yang, L., Luo, X.-Z., Xie, L., Lei, X.-Z., & Zhu, J. (2023) · Translational Cancer Research · doi:10.21037/tcr-23-95 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Li, G., Fang, M., Zhou, Y., Liu, X., Tian, P., & Mei, F.-J. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20690 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Kobayashi, K. (2023) · Journal of Respiration · doi:10.3390/jor3040021 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Advances in Small-molecule Dual Inhibitors Targeting EGFR and HER2 Receptors as Anti-cancer Agents
Kang, J.-X., Li, C., Cheng, Y.-M., Huang, M.-X., Zhao, G.-K., Jin, Z., Qi, X., Gu, J., & Ouyang, Q. (2024) · Current Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/0109298673308896240528173317 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Lin, L., Ge, H., Yan, Z., Wang, G., Wu, X., & Lv, D. (2019) · OncoTargets and Therapy · doi:10.2147/ott.s228726 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Al-Obeidi, E., Li, T., & Kelly, K. L. (2019) · Clinical Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.cllc.2019.09.006 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Suppression of tumor growth and metastasis in Shkbp1 knockout mice
Liu, Q., Li, H., Yang, M., Mei, Y., Niu, T., Zhou, Z., Zhang, X., He, X., Wang, L., & Li, J. (2021) · Cancer Gene Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41417-021-00349-x · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kosaka, T., Tanizaki, J., Paranal, R. M., Endoh, H., Lydon, C., Capelletti, M., Repellin, C. E., Choi, J., Ogino, A., Calles, A., Ercan, D., Redig, A. J., Bahcall, M., Oxnard, G. R., Eck, M. J., & Jänne, P. A.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- 1Lowe Center for Thoracic Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cancer Research
- Published
- 2017-05-14
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2712-2721
- ISSN
- 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-7445
- PMC
- PMC5596996
- OpenAlex
- W2598622710
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 7
- FWCI
- 13.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- NCI (R01CA135257, R01CA114465)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Keywords
- EGFR exon 20 insertion, HER2 exon 20 insertion, non-small cell lung cancer, dacomitinib, afatinib, acquired drug resistance, T790M, C797S, structural modeling, drug sensitivity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Codon, Disease Models, Animal, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Exons, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Molecular, Molecular Conformation, Protein Binding, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Gene Expression, Mutagenesis, Insertional, Treatment Outcome, Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Amino Acid Substitution, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, Cell Line, Tumor, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Mice, ErbB Receptors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review