Cited by 147Veterinary Oncology ResearchScience, Research, and MedicineHuman-Animal Interaction Studies

Perspectives from man’s best friend: National Academy of Medicine’s Workshop on Comparative Oncology

Open access
LeBlanc, Amy K., Breen, Matthew, Choyke, Peter, Dewhirst, Mark, Fan, Timothy M., Gustafson, Daniel L., Helman, Lee J., Kastan, Michael B. +12 more·2016·Science Translational Medicine

Abstract

Scientists gather to survey comparative oncology research and pinpoint potential contributions to human therapeutics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf0746

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Large clinical trial networks facilitating multiinstitutional studies in canine osteosarcoma are well established.

    “Large clinical trial networks facilitating multiinstitutional studies are well established 233 .”

    From Osteosarcoma (2022) · cites this paper as [233]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LeBlanc, A. K., Breen, M., Choyke, P., Dewhirst, M., Fan, T. M., Gustafson, D. L., Helman, L. J., Kastan, M. B., Knapp, D. W., Levin, W. J., London, C., Mason, N., Mazcko, C., Olson, P. N., Page, R., Teicher, B. A., Thamm, D. H., Trent, J. M., Vail, D. M., & Khanna, C.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • North Carolina State University (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Colorado State University (US)
  • Duke Cancer Institute (US)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • Fate Therapeutics (United States) (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Olson Consulting, Animal Health and Welfare, Fort Collins, CO 80528, USA.
  • Translational Genomics Research Institute (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
  • LeBlanc, Amy K.
  • Khanna, Chand
Venue
Science Translational Medicine
Published
2016-02-03
Volume
8
Issue
324
Pages
324ps5-324ps5
ISSN
  • 1946-6234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1946-6242
OpenAlex
W2268311328
Cited by
147
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8
FWCI
22.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science Translational Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  • NCI
  • Center for Cancer Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Veterinary Oncology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Science, Research, and Medicine
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Keywords
comparative oncology, dogs, dogs as cancer models, translational oncology
MeSH terms
Academies and Institutes, Animals, Clinical Trials as Topic, Dogs, Education, Humans, Neoplasms, Societies, Scientific, Drug Discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review