Cited by 110Veterinary Oncology ResearchCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersHuman-Animal Interaction Studies

A Role for Dogs in Advancing Cancer Immunotherapy Research

Open access
Dow, Steven·2020·Frontiers in Immunology

Abstract

The field of immuno-oncology has advanced so rapidly that there is large need for additional new animal models with which to effectively and efficiently evaluate cancer immunotherapies, particularly immunotherapy combinations with conventional therapeutics, including targeted agents, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. While current rodent cancer models are essential for early proof-of-concept and mechanistic studies for immune therapies, these models have limitations with regards to predicting the ultimate effectiveness of new immunotherapies in humans. The value of the dog cancer model was recently recognized by the National Institute of Medicine. Therefore, this review is intended to summarize key aspects of the dog cancer model that make the model particularly well-suited to evaluating new cancer immunotherapies and drug combinations. The review will focus on areas of investigation and cancer types in which the dog model currently is most likely to impact clinical immuno-oncology research and new drug development. Immune reagent availability is discussed, along with some unique challenges associated with the dog immunotherapy model. The intent of this review is to increase awareness of the dog cancer model and stimulate additional studies that may benefit both man and man’s best friend.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02935

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The integrated canine approach has been particularly promising for evaluating anti-metastatic and immune-based therapeutics.

    “This integrated approach has been particularly promising for the evaluation of anti-metastatic 99,234 and immune-based therapeutics 69,235 .”

    From Osteosarcoma (2022) · cites this paper as [235]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dow, S.
Affiliations
Colorado State University (US)
Corresponding author
Dow, Steven
Venue
Frontiers in Immunology
Published
2020-01-17
Volume
10
Pages
2935-2935
ISSN
1664-3224 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2999814752
Cited by
110
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Immunology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Veterinary Oncology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Keywords
cancer immunotherapy, animal models, drug combination therapy, translational research, canine cancer
MeSH terms
Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Humans, Immunotherapy, Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review