Cited by 97Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications

A proteomic surrogate for cardiovascular outcomes that is sensitive to multiple mechanisms of change in risk

Open access
Williams, Stephen A., Ostroff, Rachel, Hinterberg, Michael A., Coresh, Josef, Ballantyne, Christie M., Matsushita, Kunihiro, Mueller, Christian E., Walter, Joan +23 more·2022·Science Translational Medicine

Abstract

A reliable, individualized, and dynamic surrogate of cardiovascular risk, synoptic for key biologic mechanisms, could shorten the path for drug development, enhance drug cost-effectiveness and improve patient outcomes. We used highly multiplexed proteomics to address these objectives, measuring about 5000 proteins in each of 32,130 archived plasma samples from 22,849 participants in nine clinical studies. We used machine learning to derive a 27-protein model predicting 4-year likelihood of myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, or death. The 27 proteins encompassed 10 biologic systems, and 12 were associated with relevant causal genetic traits. We independently validated results in 11,609 participants. Compared to a clinical model, the ratio of observed events in quintile 5 to quintile 1 was 6.7 for proteins versus 2.9 for the clinical model, AUCs (95% CI) were 0.73 (0.72 to 0.74) versus 0.64 (0.62 to 0.65), c -statistics were 0.71 (0.69 to 0.72) versus 0.62 (0.60 to 0.63), and the net reclassification index was +0.43. Adding the clinical model to the proteins only improved discrimination metrics by 0.01 to 0.02. Event rates in four predefined protein risk categories were 5.6, 11.2, 20.0, and 43.4% within 4 years; median time to event was 1.71 years. Protein predictions were directionally concordant with changed outcomes. Adverse risks were predicted for aging, approaching an event, anthracycline chemotherapy, diabetes, smoking, rheumatoid arthritis, cancer history, cardiovascular disease, high systolic blood pressure, and lipids. Reduced risks were predicted for weight loss and exenatide. The 27-protein model has potential as a “universal” surrogate end point for cardiovascular risk.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/scitranslmed.abj9625

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The SomaScan assay uses DNA-based slow off-rate modified aptamers (SOMAmer reagents) to quantify the relative abundance of approximately 7000 proteins with high specificity and limits of detection largely comparable to antibody-based assays.

    “The assay uses DNA-based slow off-rate modified aptamers (SOMAmerTM reagents) to quantify the relative abundance of approximately 7000 proteins with high specificity and limits of detection largely comparable to antibody-based assays.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, S. A., Ostroff, R., Hinterberg, M. A., Coresh, J., Ballantyne, C. M., Matsushita, K., Mueller, C. E., Walter, J., Jonasson, C., Holman, R. R., Shah, S. H., Sattar, N., Taylor, R., Lean, M. E., Kato, S., Shimokawa, H., Sakata, Y., Nochioka, K., Parikh, C. R., Coca, S. G., Omland, T., Chadwick, J., Astling, D., Hagar, Y., Kureshi, N., Loupy, K., Paterson, C., Primus, J., Simpson, M., Trujillo, N. P., & Ganz, P.
Affiliations
  • SomaLogic (United States) (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • NEC Solution Innovators, Ltd. (Japan) (JP)
  • Tohoku University (JP)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • Boulder Community Hospital (US)
  • San Francisco General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
  • Williams, Stephen A.
  • Ganz, Peter
Venue
Science Translational Medicine
Published
2022-04-06
Volume
14
Issue
639
Pages
eabj9625-eabj9625
ISSN
  • 1946-6234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1946-6242
OpenAlex
W4223581642
Cited by
97
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 6
FWCI
18.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-sa
Locations
  • Science Translational Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG052964)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HHSN268201700004I, HHSN268201700001I, R01HL085757, HHSN268201700003I, R01HL087641, HHSN268201700005I, R01HL129856, HHSN268201700002I, R01HL086694)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (U01HG004402)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U01DK106962, U01DK108809)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Keywords
cardiovascular risk prediction, plasma proteomics, surrogate endpoints, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, cardiovascular mortality, multiplexed proteomics, anthracycline chemotherapy, exenatide, weight loss, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes mellitus, smoking, drug development
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Failure, Humans, Myocardial Infarction, Biomarkers, Stroke, Proteomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review