Cited by 13Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyAdvanced Biosensing Techniques and ApplicationsRace, Genetics, and Society

Cross-ancestry comparison of aptamer and antibody protein measures

Open access
Nicholas, Jayna C., Katz, Daniel H., Tahir, Usman A., Debban, Catherine L., Aguet, Francois, Blackwell, Thomas, Bowler, Russell P., Broadaway, K. Alaine +44 more·2026·Nature Communications

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract Measures from affinity-proteomics platforms often correlate poorly, challenging interpretation of protein associations with genetic variants (pQTL) and phenotypes. Here, we examined 2,157 proteins measured on both SomaScan 7k and Olink Explore 3072 across 1,930 participants with genetic similarity to European, African, East Asian, and Admixed American ancestry references. Inter-platform correlation coefficients for these 2,157 proteins followed a bimodal distribution (median r=0.30). Protein measures were associated with variants (pQTLs), and one-third of the pQTL signals were driven by protein-altering variants (PAVs). We highlight 80 proteins that correlate differently across ancestry groups likely due to differing PAV frequencies by ancestry. Furthermore, adjustment for PAVs with opposite directions of effect by platform improved inter-platform protein measure correlation and resulted in more concordant genetic and phenotypic associations. Hence, PAVs need to be accounted for across ancestries to facilitate platform-concordant and accurate protein measurement.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Inter-platform agreement between SomaScan 7k and Olink Explore 3072 is often poor for the 2157 proteins measured on both platforms, with a median Pearson correlation of 0.30. Protein-altering variants, especially those with ancestry-differentiated frequencies, contribute to platform discordance and can be adjusted for to improve cross-platform and downstream genetic/phenotypic concordance.

Key findings

  • Among 2157 overlapping proteins in 1930 MESA participants, inter-platform correlations were bimodal with median Pearson’s r = 0.30 (Q1 = 0.02, Q3 = 0.63) for SomaScan ANML-SMP vs. Olink; 80 proteins showed Bonferroni-significant ancestry-heterogeneous inter-platform correlation (Cochran’s Q P < 1.85 × 10⁻⁵, correcting for 2708 probe pairs).
  • pQTL mapping identified significant cis-pQTL credible sets for 840 proteins on SomaScan and 1036 on Olink; approximately 25–30% of platform-specific signals were likely driven by protein-altering variants, and 15/19 platform-discordant cis-pQTL credible sets contained a missense variant.
  • Proteins with ancestry-heterogeneous correlation were enriched for ancestry-differentiated PAV cis-pQTL: 16% vs. 5.5% of proteins overall.
  • Adjusting for platform-discordant PAVs improved inter-platform correlation for 15 proteins (mean r 0.38 to 0.51), improved suPAR correlation from 0.44 to 0.57, and increased concordance of Alzheimer’s disease Mendelian randomization estimates (Pearson’s r 0.48, 0.51 to 0.63 after excluding PAV instruments).

Methods

  • Used MESA exam 1 EDTA-plasma samples from 1930 participants assayed on SomaScan 7k and Olink Explore 3072; 1889 unrelated participants with TOPMed whole-genome sequencing were used for pQTL mapping. Ancestry groups were assigned by >0.5 genetic similarity to 1000 Genomes AFR (n = 439), AMR (n = 231), EAS (n = 277), or EUR (n = 939) references; 44 participants were unclassified.
  • Compared 2157 proteins measured on both platforms using standardized, inverse-normal-transformed measures; computed Pearson correlations overall and by ancestry, tested heterogeneity with Cochran’s Q, and mapped cis-/trans-pQTL with tensorQTL and SuSiE fine-mapping adjusting for age, sex, site, 10 genotype PCs, and 10 protein PCs.
  • Annotated protein-altering variants with VEP, assessed ancestry-differentiated allele frequencies by chi-square, evaluated overlap with GTEx eQTLs, MS-pQTLs, deCODE/UK Biobank pQTLs, and GWAS Catalog variants, and performed exploratory Alzheimer’s disease Mendelian randomization with and without PAV instruments.

Limitations

  • Stated in the paper: representation of non-European ancestry groups remains limited; ancestry clusters are continental-level; analyses are restricted to the 2157 proteins measured on both platforms and may not generalize to newer SomaScan 11k or Olink 5k versions; pQTL power, especially for trans-pQTL, is limited by sample size.
  • Stated in the paper: inter-platform correlation is used as a proxy for on-target affinity-probe binding, and it remains possible that neither platform provides accurate protein measures; interpreting platform-discordant measures is especially challenging.
  • Evident from the text: the study is cross-sectional at MESA exam 1, and the authors note that ancestry-differentiated non-coding cis-pQTL, trans-pQTL, environmental/lifestyle factors, and differential recruitment by site may also contribute to ancestry heterogeneity in platform agreement.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-025-67814-1

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

71 of 76 cited sources checked · 29 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    PAVs may result in pQTL associations that reflect differential probe binding to alternate isoforms rather than differential protein abundances.

    “Nevertheless, interpreting cis- and trans-pQTL remains complicated, as PAVs may result in pQTL associations that reflect differential probe binding to alternate isoforms12,17–19 rather than differential protein abundances.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim4 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [12] Katz, D. H. et al. Proteomic profiling platforms head to head: leveraging genetics and clinical traits to compare aptamer- and antibody-based methods. Sci. Adv. 8, eabm5164 (2022). source

      The Results section on platform correlation and cis pQTLs describes associations between genetic variants and protein measurements, while the Discussion treats cis pQTLs as a possible indicator of assay specificity. Our copy does not address whether protein-altering variants produce associations through differential probe binding to alternate isoforms rather than differences in protein abundance (searched: PAVs, isoforms, differential binding). (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [17] Eldjarn, G. H. et al. Large-scale plasma proteomics comparisons through genetics and disease associations. Nature 622, 348–358 (2023). source

      The ‘Relationship of pQTLs between platforms’ section says PAV-linked cis-pQTLs are likely to reflect epitope effects rather than variation in protein levels. The Discussion also says the platforms may target different proteoforms, but it does not specifically link PAV-driven binding differences to alternate isoforms. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [18] Suhre, K. et al. A genome-wide association study of mass spectrometry proteomics using a nanoparticle enrichment platform. Nat. Genet. 57, 2987–2996 (2025). source

      The Discussion states that PAV-containing peptides can produce an epitope-effect pQTL that does not fully reflect genotype-dependent protein abundance. The Results (Validity of the MSPA score) likewise identify coding variants that could alter epitopes. The paper discusses affinity binders targeting different isoforms as another possible explanation, but does not specifically establish that PAVs cause differential probe binding to alternate isoforms. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [19] Pietzner, M. et al. Mapping the proteo-genomic convergence of human diseases. Science 374, eabj1541 (2021). source

      The Results section on cis and trans genetic architecture says PAVs can affect a protein’s binding epitope and that conformation, rather than plasma abundance, may explain some genetic effects. A separate Results section on gene expression and splicing suggests that alternative protein isoforms can have different affinities for the assay reagent. The paper does not link PAVs specifically to differential binding to alternate isoforms. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    The detection of a cis-pQTL for a given protein measure is often used as a metric to confirm on-target affinity-probe binding.

    “The detection of a cis-pQTL for a given protein measure is often used as a metric to confirm on-target affinity-probe binding12,15,16; existing studies comparing SomaScan and Olink measures have established that the detection of a cis-pQTL is a strong predictor of inter-platform correlation coefficients for a given protein12,15,16.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [12] Katz, D. H. et al. Proteomic profiling platforms head to head: leveraging genetics and clinical traits to compare aptamer- and antibody-based methods. Sci. Adv. 8, eabm5164 (2022). source
    • cites [15] Raffield, L. M. et al. Comparison of proteomic assessment methods in multiple cohort studies. Proteomics 20, e1900278 (2020). source

      The Discussion says cis-pQTL presence can provide clues to assay specificity and suggests that a probe has at least some binding to its target protein. It does not treat a cis-pQTL as confirmation of on-target binding: it cautions that binding differences can produce spurious pQTLs and that a cis-pQTL does not exclude off-target binding. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [16] Pietzner, M. et al. Synergistic insights into human health from aptamer- and antibody-based proteomic profiling. Nat. Commun. 12, 6822 (2021). source

      The Methods (Annotation of pQTLs; page unavailable) describe checking cis-pQTLs for protein-altering variants, but do not say their detection is used to confirm on-target probe binding. The Discussion (page unavailable) says identifying the protein species bound to an affinity reagent may require mass spectrometry. Searches for cis-pQTLs as a binding-specificity or validation metric found no passage establishing the claimed practice. (LLM, conf=0.73)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    As genetic variants may vary in frequency across populations, such variants could drive systematic differences in protein measures.

    “As these genetic variants may vary in frequency across populations, such variants could drive systematic differences in protein measures20.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [20] Olson, N. C. et al. Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor: genetic variation and cardiovascular disease risk in black adults. Circ. Genom. Precis. Med. 14, e003421 (2021). source
  • Findingown data

    Several cis-pQTL signals driven by PAVs-most commonly missense variants-were observed on each platform.

    “While the majority of cis-pQTL variants were non-coding on both platforms (Supplementary Fig. 8), we observe several cis-pQTL signals driven by protein altering variants (PAVs—most commonly missense variants) on each platform, raising concerns as to whether the signal captures abundances or differences in isoform, as has been shown in other studies18,24,25.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [18] Suhre, K. et al. A genome-wide association study of mass spectrometry proteomics using a nanoparticle enrichment platform. Nat. Genet. 57, 2987–2996 (2025). source

      The Results section, ‘Validity of the MSPA score’ (page not provided), reports candidate epitope-changing coding variants for cis-pQTLs on both SOMAscan and Olink, including detected PAV-containing peptides. This supports the presence of PAV-related signals on both platforms, but the passage does not establish that missense variants were the most common PAVs or that every candidate variant drove its signal. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [24] Pietzner, M. et al. Nanoparticle enriched mass spectrometry proteomics in British South Asians identifies novel variant-protein-disease mechanisms. Preprint at medRxiv, https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.08.12.25333522 (2025). source

      The section “Protein altering variants and overlap with tissue gene expression loci explain pQTLs” (page unavailable) reports cis-pQTLs associated with protein-altering variants. “Cross-platform concordance of pQTLs” (page unavailable) also reports PAV-associated cis-pQTLs in comparisons with both Olink HT and SomaLogic 11k. The passages do not establish that missense variants were the most common PAVs on each platform, and they describe associations rather than showing that the PAVs drove those signals. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [25] Wang, Q. S. et al. Platform-dependent effects of genetic variants on plasma APOL1. Preprint at BioRxiv, https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.30.635763 (2025). source

      The Introduction reports that APOL1 G1/G2 mutations have pQTL effects on both Olink and SomaLogic, and the Discussion describes a similar effect for V1. The paper supports protein-altering variants affecting measurements on both platforms, but its APOL1-focused analysis does not establish that missense variants are the most common drivers of cis-pQTL signals generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Existing studies comparing SomaScan and Olink measures have established that the detection of a cis-pQTL is a strong predictor of inter-platform correlation coefficients for a given protein.

    “The detection of a cis-pQTL for a given protein measure is often used as a metric to confirm on-target affinity-probe binding12,15,16; existing studies comparing SomaScan and Olink measures have established that the detection of a cis-pQTL is a strong predictor of inter-platform correlation coefficients for a given protein12,15,16.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [12] Katz, D. H. et al. Proteomic profiling platforms head to head: leveraging genetics and clinical traits to compare aptamer- and antibody-based methods. Sci. Adv. 8, eabm5164 (2022). source

      In Results, ‘Accuracy: Platform correlation and cis pQTLs’ (page unavailable), the paper reports that highly correlated Olink–SomaScan reagent pairs were likely to show cis-pQTLs on both platforms. It also reports that lower-correlation pairs were more likely to show a cis-pQTL on Olink only. The evidence therefore supports an association with detection on both platforms, but not the unqualified claim that detecting a cis-pQTL for a protein measure is a strong predictor of its inter-platform correlation coefficient. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [15] Raffield, L. M. et al. Comparison of proteomic assessment methods in multiple cohort studies. Proteomics 20, e1900278 (2020). source

      The Results section reports that proteins with a SOMAscan cis-pQTL were enriched among the more highly correlated SOMAscan–Olink measures. But the Discussion says the Olink–SOMAscan dataset was too small for cis-pQTL analysis, and cautions that a cis-pQTL does not guarantee high inter-assay correlation. The paper therefore supports an association, not the claim that cis-pQTL detection was established as a strong predictor of correlation coefficients. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [16] Pietzner, M. et al. Synergistic insights into human health from aptamer- and antibody-based proteomic profiling. Nat. Commun. 12, 6822 (2021). source

      The Results section (‘Shared genetic effects are target-dependent’; page unavailable) reports that lower observational correlation between SomaScan and Olink measures was associated with a higher likelihood of a platform-specific pQTL. That supports a relationship between cross-platform correlation and pQTL agreement, but does not establish that detecting a cis-pQTL is a strong predictor of the correlation coefficient for a protein. (LLM, conf=0.77)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 27
  • May combine two claims. 45
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Recent MS-based pQTL studies have suggested that some pQTL may reflect isoform differences.

    “Recent MS-based pQTL studies10,18 have further suggested that some pQTL may reflect isoform differences (although these studies are limited in number and generally encompass fewer proteins/participants).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [10] Suhre, K. et al. Nanoparticle enrichment mass-spectrometry proteomics identifies protein-altering variants for precise pQTL mapping. Nat. Commun. 15, 989 (2024). source
    • cites [18] Suhre, K. et al. A genome-wide association study of mass spectrometry proteomics using a nanoparticle enrichment platform. Nat. Genet. 57, 2987–2996 (2025). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Protein quantitative trait loci (pQTL) are commonly detected in large-scale studies.

    “Protein quantitative trait loci (pQTL), or associations between circulating protein abundances and genetic variants either within or nearby (cis-) to the protein-encoding gene or elsewhere in the genome (trans-), are commonly detected in large-scale studies1–6.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim5 of 6 sources checked
    • cites [1] Ferkingstad, E. et al. Large-scale integration of the plasma proteome with genetics and disease. Nat. Genet. 53, 1712–1721 (2021). source
    • cites [2] Folkersen, L. et al. Genomic and drug target evaluation of 90 cardiovascular proteins in 30,931 individuals. Nat. Metab. 2, 1135–1148 (2020). source
    • cites [3] Said, S. et al. Ancestry diversity in the genetic determinants of the human plasma proteome and associated new drug targets. Preprint at medRxiv, https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.13.23298365 (2023). source
    • cites [4] Sun, B. B. et al. Genomic atlas of the human plasma proteome. Nature 558, 73–79 (2018). source
    • cites [5] Sun, B. B. et al. Plasma proteomic associations with genetics and health in the UK Biobank. Nature 622, 329–338 (2023). source
    • cites [6] Dhindsa, R. S. et al. Rare variant associations with plasma protein levels in the UK Biobank. Nature 622, 339–347 (2023). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Failure to detect and account for such genetic variation may challenge the interpretation of results obtained across ancestries and introduce a source of bias.

    “Failure to detect and account for such genetic variation may challenge the interpretation of results obtained across ancestries and introduce a source of bias21.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21] Vasbinder, A. et al. Assay-related differences in SuPAR levels: implications for measurement and data interpretation. J. Nephrol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-022-01344-7 (2022). source

      The discussion (page not provided) identifies single-nucleotide polymorphisms that alter assay-binding affinity as a measurement limitation and urges caution when interpreting suPAR results. It does not say that failure to account for genetic variation biases comparisons across ancestries; that ancestry-specific extension is unsupported by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Existing comparisons of SomaScan and Olink platforms have shown that some protein measures are not concordant, with median inter-platform correlation = 0.38-0.50, which challenges the accuracy of protein associations observed.

    “However, existing comparisons of SomaScan and Olink platforms have shown that some protein measures are not concordant (median inter-platform correlation = 0.38–0.50)11–16, which challenges the accuracy of protein associations observed, especially as there is no “gold-standard” reference measure for most proteins.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim6 of 6 sources checked
    • cites [11] Wang, B. et al. Comparative studies of 2168 plasma proteins measured by two affinity-based platforms in 4000 Chinese adults. Nat. Commun. 16, 1869 (2025). source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that previous comparisons found moderate inter-platform correlations (median rho ≈ 0.4), and that proteins with lower correlations were more likely to yield platform-specific or discordant associations. It does not give the claimed 0.38–0.50 range; its own study reports a median rho of 0.29. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [12] Katz, D. H. et al. Proteomic profiling platforms head to head: leveraging genetics and clinical traits to compare aptamer- and antibody-based methods. Sci. Adv. 8, eabm5164 (2022). source
    • cites [13] Haslam, D. E. et al. Stability and reproducibility of proteomic profiles in epidemiological studies: comparing the Olink and SOMAscan platforms. Proteomics 22, e2100170 (2022). source
    • cites [14] Rooney, M. R. et al. Comparison of proteomic measurements across platforms in the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study. Clin. Chem. 69, 68–79 (2023). source

      The Results (page unavailable) report poor SomaScan–Olink correlations for 47% of protein pairs, and the Discussion cautions that divergent measurements complicate interpretation of biological associations. The Discussion reports a prior comparison with median r=0.38, but this paper’s own median is 0.53, outside the cited 0.38–0.50 range. It also cautions that disagreement does not establish which assay is more accurate. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [15] Raffield, L. M. et al. Comparison of proteomic assessment methods in multiple cohort studies. Proteomics 20, e1900278 (2020). source

      The Results (Summary; page unavailable) report poor concordance for some SomaScan–Olink protein measures, and the Discussion recommends validating key findings with other methods. However, the Results give a median SomaScan–Olink correlation of 0.36, not 0.38–0.50; the reported 0.38 median is for SomaScan versus MSD. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [16] Pietzner, M. et al. Synergistic insights into human health from aptamer- and antibody-based proteomic profiling. Nat. Commun. 12, 6822 (2021). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premiseown data

    The PILRA protein has been linked to Alzheimer's Disease (AD) in multiple MR studies using Olink pQTL instruments, but different directions of effect for PILRA on AD have been reported across studies using different platform's pQTL instruments.

    “The PILRA protein discussed above has been linked to Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) in multiple MR studies using Olink pQTL instruments27–29; however, different directions of effect for PILRA on AD have been reported across studies using different platform’s pQTL instruments.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [27] Zhan, H., Cammann, D., Cummings, J. L., Dong, X. & Chen, J. Biomarker identification for Alzheimer’s disease through integration of comprehensive Mendelian randomization and proteomics data. J. Transl. Med. 23, 278 (2025). source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [28] Debette, S. et al. Proteogenomics in cerebrospinal fluid and plasma reveals new biological fingerprint of cerebral small vessel disease. Res. Sq. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4535534/v1. (2024). source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [29] Zhu, Y., Wang, Y., Cui, Z., Liu, F. & Hu, J. Identification of pleiotropic and specific therapeutic targets for cardio-cerebral diseases: a large-scale proteome-wide mendelian randomization and colocalization study. PLoS ONE 19, e0300500 (2024). source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Proteins with >50% measures above LOD were modestly correlated (N = 1361, median Pearson's r = 0.43, SD = 0.32), while proteins with <50% measures above LOD exhibited low inter-platform correlation (N = 796, median Pearson's r = 0.04, SD = 0.32).

    “While proteins with >50% measures above LOD were modestly correlated (N = 1361, median Pearson’s r = 0.43, SD = 0.32), proteins with <50% measures above LOD exhibited low inter-platform correlation (N = 796, median Pearson’s r = 0.04, SD = 0.32), consistent with prior reports (Supplementary Data 15 and 16)26.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [26] Rooney, M. R. et al. Correlations within and between highly multiplexed proteomic assays of human plasma. Clin. Chem. 71, 677–687 (2025). source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Platform comparisons incorporating MS protein measures are already proving informative to further depict genetically encoded isoform differences and impacts of splicing on detected protein structures.

    “Platform comparisons incorporating MS protein measures are already proving informative to further depict genetically encoded isoform differences and impacts of splicing on detected protein structures24,40,41, and will be especially important to expand across ancestrally diverse sets of participants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [24] Pietzner, M. et al. Nanoparticle enriched mass spectrometry proteomics in British South Asians identifies novel variant-protein-disease mechanisms. Preprint at medRxiv, https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.08.12.25333522 (2025). source

      The Cross-platform concordance of pQTLs section reports genotype-dependent differences between MS and affinity-based measurements and identifies protein-altering variants as a possible explanation. It raises splicing QTLs producing different isoforms only as another possible explanation; it does not demonstrate effects of splicing on detected protein structures. The Technical variation section also reports little evidence that isoform-specific targeting explains poor cross-platform correlations. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [40] Kirsher, D. Y. et al. Current landscape of plasma proteomics from technical innovations to biological insights and biomarker discovery. Commun. Chem. 8, 279 (2025). source

      In Results and discussion, under “Correlations between shared proteins among platforms” (Fig. 4; page not provided), the paper uses MS peptides to compare genetically encoded ApoE isoforms across platforms and assess isoform specificity. It does not report effects of splicing on detected protein structures; a search for alternative splicing found no passage addressing that part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [41] Sissala, N. et al. Comparative evaluation of Olink Explore 3072 and mass spectrometry with peptide fractionation for plasma proteomics. Commun. Chem. 8, 327 (2025). source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    cis-pQTL presence/absence is thought to provide one predictor of on-target protein measures.

    “Here, and across prior studies, cis-pQTL presence/absence is thought to provide one predictor of on-target protein measures12,15,16.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [12] Katz, D. H. et al. Proteomic profiling platforms head to head: leveraging genetics and clinical traits to compare aptamer- and antibody-based methods. Sci. Adv. 8, eabm5164 (2022). source
    • cites [15] Raffield, L. M. et al. Comparison of proteomic assessment methods in multiple cohort studies. Proteomics 20, e1900278 (2020). source
    • cites [16] Pietzner, M. et al. Synergistic insights into human health from aptamer- and antibody-based proteomic profiling. Nat. Commun. 12, 6822 (2021). source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) says that combining genetic variation with protein measurements and phenotypic consequences can provide evidence about the target protein, which supports using genetic signals as one clue. But the paper does not establish cis-pQTL presence or absence alone as a predictor of on-target measurement; its Results also show that cis signals can reflect assay-specific binding effects. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Similar proportions of protein measures were associated with any cis-pQTL on each platform (39% SomaScan, 48% Olink), with more distinct cis-pQTL identified for Olink overall.

    “We observed similar proportions of protein measures associated with any cis-pQTL on each platform (39% SomaScan, 48% Olink), with more distinct cis-pQTL identified for Olink overall (for the set of 2157 proteins measured on both platforms), consistent with single-ancestry genetic comparisons of earlier versions of SomaScan and Olink platforms12,16,17.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [12] Katz, D. H. et al. Proteomic profiling platforms head to head: leveraging genetics and clinical traits to compare aptamer- and antibody-based methods. Sci. Adv. 8, eabm5164 (2022). source
    • cites [16] Pietzner, M. et al. Synergistic insights into human health from aptamer- and antibody-based proteomic profiling. Nat. Commun. 12, 6822 (2021). source

      The Results section, “Shared genetic effects are target-dependent” (page unavailable), reports substantial cross-platform agreement in genetic associations, which supports the broad comparison. It does not report the cited 39% and 48% proportions or more distinct cis-pQTLs for Olink; its comparison covers 871 overlapping protein targets rather than 2,157. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [17] Eldjarn, G. H. et al. Large-scale plasma proteomics comparisons through genetics and disease associations. Nature 622, 348–358 (2023). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Existing affinity-based proteomics studies exploring trans-pQTL often interpret pleiotropic trans-pQTL as biologically relevant signals, which may help confirm appropriate assay performance.

    “Existing affinity-based proteomics studies exploring trans-pQTL often interpret pleiotropic trans-pQTL as biologically relevant signals, which may help confirm appropriate assay performance36,37.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [36] Wang, Q. S. et al. Statistically and functionally fine-mapped blood eQTLs and pQTLs from 1,405 humans reveal distinct regulation patterns and disease relevance. Nat. Genet. 56, 2054–2067 (2024). source

      In Results, ‘Characterizing the trans-pQTL effects’ (page unavailable), the paper reports a trans-pQTL hotspot at ABO and interprets HLA trans associations through a known molecular interaction. It says the trans-pQTL test-statistic distribution validates its analysis strategy, but does not say that pleiotropic trans-pQTLs confirm appropriate affinity-assay performance or that existing studies often use them for that purpose. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [37] Yao, C. et al. Dynamic role of trans regulation of gene expression in relation to complex traits. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 100, 571–580 (2017). source

      The supplied passage and the indexed results contain only URLs, with no section or page text addressing proteomics, pleiotropic trans-pQTL, or assay performance. Searches for those terms and related paraphrases found no passage that could verify the claim from our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the UK BioBank/deCODE SomaScan and Olink platform-comparison, significant platform-specific pleiotropic trans-pQTL were seen at some of the same regions, such as CFH and VTN for SomaScan protein measures, and proteins associated with these loci often showed lower inter-platform correlation compared to other proteins.

    “The same trend has been observed in the UK BioBank/deCODE SomaScan and Olink platform-comparison, where significant platform-specific pleiotropic trans-pQTL were seen at some of the same regions, such as complement factor gene CFH and glycoprotein-encoding VTN for SomaScan protein measures, and proteins associated with these loci often showed lower inter-platform correlation compared to other”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [17] Eldjarn, G. H. et al. Large-scale plasma proteomics comparisons through genetics and disease associations. Nature 622, 348–358 (2023). source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Biological and technical factors can explain the wide range of inter-platform correlation coefficients.

    “One prior study demonstrated that biological (such as presence of a trans-membrane domain, protein length) and technical factors (percentage of outlier or below limit of detection protein measures, etc.) can explain this wide range of correlation coefficients16.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16] Pietzner, M. et al. Synergistic insights into human health from aptamer- and antibody-based proteomic profiling. Nat. Commun. 12, 6822 (2021). source

      The Results section, “Technical factors affecting correlations between protein targets” (page unavailable), says technical factors, missing or extreme measurements, and protein characteristics such as a transmembrane domain help explain varying inter-platform correlations. Its Fig. 2 caption also includes the fraction of measurements below the detection limit among the factors assessed. Our copy does not identify protein length as an explanatory factor, so that example is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The SomaScan assay uses DNA-based slow off-rate modified aptamers (SOMAmer reagents) to quantify the relative abundance of approximately 7000 proteins with high specificity and limits of detection largely comparable to antibody-based assays.

    “The assay uses DNA-based slow off-rate modified aptamers (SOMAmerTM reagents) to quantify the relative abundance of approximately 7000 proteins with high specificity and limits of detection largely comparable to antibody-based assays.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim4 of 6 sources checked
    • cites [40] Kirsher, D. Y. et al. Current landscape of plasma proteomics from technical innovations to biological insights and biomarker discovery. Commun. Chem. 8, 279 (2025). source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [51] Rohloff, J. C. et al. Nucleic acid ligands with protein-like side chains: modified aptamers and their use as diagnostic and therapeutic agents. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 3, e201 (2014). source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [52] Brody, E. et al. Life’s simple measures: unlocking the proteome. J. Mol. Biol. 422, 595–606 (2012). source
    • cites [53] Gold, L. et al. Aptamer-based multiplexed proteomic technology for biomarker discovery. PLoS ONE 5, e15004 (2010). source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [54] Kim, C. H. et al. Stability and reproducibility of proteomic profiles measured with an aptamer-based platform. Sci. Rep. 8, 8382 (2018). source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [55] Williams, S. A. et al. A proteomic surrogate for cardiovascular outcomes that is sensitive to multiple mechanisms of change in risk. Sci. Transl. Med. 14, eabj9625 (2022). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Proteins in plasma samples collected and processed by the MESA exam 1 protocol have been shown to be stable over time.

    “Proteins in plasma samples collected in this manner have been shown to be stable over time44.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [44] Tin, A. et al. Reproducibility and variability of protein analytes measured using a multiplexed modified aptamer assay. J. Appl. Lab. Med. 4, 30–39 (2019). source

      The Methods (Study population; page unavailable) describe plasma collected under the ARIC protocol, not the MESA exam 1 protocol. The Discussion (page unavailable) suggests protein analytes were stable over 4–9 weeks, but the Results report significant changes in 23.4% of analytes over approximately 20 years. The paper therefore supports short-term stability in a different sample set, not an unqualified claim of stability over time for MESA-collected samples. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Platform-specific and platform-discordant PAVs may bias MR results if used as genetic instruments for circulating protein abundances, in some cases resulting in platform-specific and/or platform-discordant MR estimates.

    “We show that platform-specific and platform-discordant PAVs may bias MR results if used as genetic instruments for circulating protein abundances35, in some cases resulting in platform-specific and/or platform-discordant MR estimates.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [35] Lemmelä, S. et al. Integrated analyses of growth differentiation factor-15 concentration and cardiometabolic diseases in humans. eLife 11, e76272 (2022). source
    • The authors state this as an assumption: When pQTL are applied as genetic instruments in MR, they capture the effects of overall protein abundances.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Studying the impact of individual isoforms can be biologically informative in studies of disease, as established with GDF8/11 for cardiovascular events.

    “When cis-pQTL do reflect differential binding to encoded isoforms, we note that studying the impact of individual isoforms can be biologically informative in studies of disease, as established with GDF8/11 for cardiovascular events34.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [34] Walker, R. G. et al. Activated GDF11/8 subforms predict cardiovascular events and mortality in humans. Nat. Commun. 16, 6534 (2025). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Olink Explore 3072 uses 2941 antibody-nucleic acid assay probes to quantify 2172 human protein targets.

    “Olink Explore 3072 uses 2941 antibody-nucleic acid assay probes to quantify 2172 human protein targets59,60.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [59] Assarsson, E. et al. Homogenous 96-plex PEA immunoassay exhibiting high sensitivity, specificity, and excellent scalability. PLoS ONE 9, e95192 (2014). source

      The Results and Discussion section describes a 96-plex PEA panel with 94 probe pairs, including controls. Our copy does not address Olink Explore 3072 or state that it uses 2,941 probes to quantify 2,172 human protein targets (searched for the product name and both counts). (LLM, conf=0.77)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [60] Olink. Olink® Explore 3072 User Manual. Accessed from www.olink.com/knowledge/documents 5 Nov 2025.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Inter-platform correlation coefficients for the 2157 proteins measured on both SomaScan 7k and Olink Explore 3072 follow a bimodal distribution with a median Pearson r = 0.30 (Q1 = 0.02, Q3 = 0.63) when comparing SomaScan ANML-SMP measures with Olink.

    “Inter-platform correlation coefficients for these 2157 proteins follow a bimodal distribution (median r = 0.30).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    79% and 93% of SomaScan credible sets and 65% and 98% of Olink credible sets reported here were within 1 Mb regions previously reported in deCODE and UK Biobank, respectively.

    “79% and 93% of SomaScan credible sets and 65% and 98% of Olink credible sets reported here were within 1 Mb regions previously reported in deCODE and UK Biobank, respectively (Table 3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Adjustment for ten protein PCs increases cis-pQTL discovery while minimizing the potential of adjustment for trans-pQTL effects.

    “We show that adjustment for ten protein PCs increases cis-pQTL discovery (Supplementary Fig. 5) while minimizing the potential of adjustment for trans-pQTL effects (Supplementary Fig. 6, “Methods”).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Upon mapping trans-pQTL (pQTL >1 Mb of protein-encoding gene TSS) for SomaScan and Olink protein measures, 424 significant trans-pQTL credible sets were identified for 529 distinct proteins on SomaScan, and 315 for 262 proteins on Olink.

    “Upon mapping trans-pQTL (pQTL >1 Mb of protein-encoding gene TSS) for SomaScan and Olink protein measures, we identified 424 significant trans-pQTL credible sets (credible set contains at least one variant with p < 1 × 10−11) for 529 distinct proteins on SomaScan, and 315 for 262 proteins on Olink (Fig. 3A; Table 3; Supplementary Data 9, 10 and 11).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Inter-platform correlation improved for all 15 proteins after PAV adjustment (mean improvement = 0.14).

    “Inter-platform correlation improved for all these proteins (mean improvement = 0.14) (Supplementary Fig. 13).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    36% of platform-concordant pQTL credible set pairs, for 207 unique proteins, contained a GTEx eQTL with a concordant direction of effect, compared to 18% and 22% of SomaScan and Olink 'specific' cis-pQTL, respectively.

    “Thirty-six percent of platform-concordant pQTL credible set pairs, for 207 unique proteins, contained a GTEx eQTL with a concordant direction of effect, compared to 18% and 22% of SomaScan and Olink “specific” cis-pQTL, respectively (Supplementary Data 7).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    9% (13/139) of SomaScan-specific PAV-containing pQTL credible sets also contain a concordant GTEx cis-eQTL, compared to 6% (14/208) of Olink-specific PAV credible sets.

    “9% (13/139) of SomaScan-specific PAV-containing pQTL credible sets also contain a concordant GTEx cis-eQTL, compared to 6% (14/208) of Olink-specific PAV credible sets (Supplementary Data 7).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Proteins with a trans-pQTL on both platforms exhibited higher inter-platform correlation (N = 129, mean Pearson's r = 0.55, SD = 0.26) than proteins with a significant trans-pQTL on one platform only (N = 428, median Pearson's r = 0.07, SD = 0.29) and proteins with no trans-pQTL at all (N = 1600, median Pearson's r = 0.34, SD = 0.32).

    “While proteins with a trans-pQTL on both platforms exhibited higher inter-platform correlation (N = 129, mean Pearson’s r = 0.55, SD = 0.26) (Fig. 3D, E), proteins with a significant trans-pQTL on one platform only generally exhibited lower inter-platform correlation estimates (N = 428, median Pearson’s r = 0.07, SD = 0.29) than proteins with no trans-pQTL at all (N = 1600, median Pearson’s r = 0.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A platform-discordant cis-pQTL for PILRA is driven by an ancestry-differentiated missense variant rs1859788 G > A (PILRA p.Gly78Arg), with SomaScan B = −1.34 (0.02), p = 1 × 10−300 and Olink B = 0.92 (0.02), p = 2.98 × 10−300, most common among EAS (EAF = 0.60) and AMR (EAF = 0.53) participants compared to AFR (EAF = 0.14) and EUR (EAF = 0.32).

    “A platform-discordant cis-pQTL for PILRA is driven by an ancestry-differentiated missense-variant [rs1859788 G > A, PILRA, p.Gly78Arg, SomaScan: B = −1.34 (0.02), p = 1 × 10−300, Olink: B = 0.92 (0.02), p = 2.98 × 10−300] (Supplementary Figs. 15 and 48) most common among EAS (EAF = 0.60) and AMR (EAF = 0.53) participants, compared to AFR (EAF = 0.14) and EUR (EAF = 0.32) participants (Fig. 4B, C).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The FUT6; FUT3 region was identified as a platform-specific pleiotropic region for Olink protein measures in the main analysis, but was also pleiotropic for SomaScan protein measures when considering all probes for each protein target.

    “The FUT6; FUT3 region was identified as a platform-specific pleiotropic region for Olink protein measures in the main analysis, but was also pleiotropic for SomaScan protein measures when considering all probes for each protein target (Supplementary Data 12 and 13).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A subset of significant cis-pQTL associations was strengthened (8 SomaScan, 4 Olink), and 2 cis-pQTL associations on SomaScan were significant only when adjusting for the platform-discordant PAV.

    “We found that a subset of significant cis-pQTL associations was strengthened (8 SomaScan, 4 Olink) (Supplementary Data 21 and 22), and 2 cis-pQTL associations on SomaScan were significant only when adjusting for the platform-discordant PAV (Supplementary Data 23) (Supplementary Figs. 17, 18 and Supplementary Note 3), demonstrating that adjustment for putative assay interference effects may”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among the 15 platform-discordant, PAV-driven cis-pQTL, 4 had a reported genetic effect on transcript abundance in one or more tissues; the eQTL direction of effect agreed with the SomaScan pQTL direction of effect for 2 proteins (CTSS, HDGF) and with Olink cis-pQTL effect-direction for 2 proteins (HNMT, ACP1).

    “Among the 15 platform-discordant, PAV-driven cis-pQTL, 4 had a reported genetic effect on transcript abundance in one or more tissues; the eQTL direction of effect agreed with the SomaScan pQTL direction of effect for 2 proteins (CTSS, HDGF) and with Olink cis-pQTL effect-direction for 2 proteins (HNMT, ACP1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Upon adjusting for copies of the suPAR PAV allele, the correlation of protein measures improved from 0.44 to 0.57, with the largest improvement in inter-platform correlation estimates among individuals of African ancestry (Pearson's r = 0.59 post-PAV adjustment).

    “Upon adjusting for copies of the PAV allele, the correlation of protein measures improved from 0.44 to 0.57, with the largest improvement in inter-platform correlation estimates among individuals of African ancestry (Pearson’s r = 0.59 post-PAV adjustment) (Fig. 5C).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A platform-discordant cis-pQTL for suPAR is driven by missense variant rs399145 T > C (PLAUR p.Thr86Ala), with SomaScan B = −2.09 (0.070), p = 2.03 × 10−155 and Olink B = 0.61 (0.070), p = 2.58 × 10−17, common among individuals with African ancestry (EAF in MESA participants AFR = 0.10, AMR = 0.009, EAS = 0.000, EUR = 0.004; EAF X2 = 230.7, X2 p = 9.49 × 10−50).

    “Additionally, a platform-discordant cis-pQTL driven by a missense variant [rs399145 T > C, PLAUR, p.Thr86Ala SomaScan: B = −2.09 (0.070), p = 2.03 × 10−155, Olink: B = 0.61 (0.070), p = 2.58 × 10−17] (Supplementary Figs. 16, 49) common among individuals with African ancestry [EAF in MESA participants AFR = 0.10, AMR = 0.009, EAS = 0.000, EUR = 0.004, EAF X2 = 230.7 (ancestry-differentiated), X2 p”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The majority (2155/2157) of SomaScan proteins had >50% of measures above the company-reported LOD, while 63% (1361/2157) of Olink proteins measured had >50% of measures above the LOD.

    “Here, the majority (2155/2157) of SomaScan proteins had >50% of measures above the company-reported LOD, while 63% (1361/2157) of Olink proteins measured had >50% of measures above the LOD (calculated per company-recommendations) (Supplementary Fig. 12 and Supplementary Data 14).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Adjustment for platform-specific PAVs generally improved protein measure correlation and the strength and concordance of some phenotypic associations, but effects were small if present.

    “While adjustment for platform-specific PAVs generally improved protein measure correlation (Supplementary Fig. 14) and the strength and concordance of some phenotypic associations, effects were small if present (Supplementary Figs. 34 and 35).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    83% and 85% of proteins with a cis-pQTL or trans-pQTL detected on Olink had at least 50% of measures above the LOD, respectively.

    “83% and 85% of proteins with a cis-pQTL or trans-pQTL detected on Olink had at least 50% of measures above the LOD, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    suPAR measures are modestly correlated across all participants (Pearson's r = 0.43), but there is significant heterogeneity in inter-platform correlation estimates between ancestries (Cochran's Q = 55.6, Cochran's Q p = 5.02 × 10−12), with lower correlation estimates among individuals clustering with the AFR ancestry reference population (Pearson's r = 0.24).

    “suPAR measures are modestly correlated across all participants (Pearson’s r = 0.43), but there is significant heterogeneity in inter-platform correlation estimates between ancestries (Cochran’s Q = 55.6 , Cochran’s Q p = 5.02 × 10−12), with lower correlation estimates among individuals clustering with the AFR ancestry reference population (Pearson’s r = 0.24, Fig. 5A, D, E).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Prior to PAV-adjustment, the mean inter-platform correlation estimate for the 15 proteins was 0.38 (SD = 0.18), with estimates ranging from −0.015 to 0.67; post PAV-adjustment, the mean inter-platform correlation increased to 0.51 (SD = 0.15), with estimates ranging from 0.15 to 0.76.

    “Prior to PAV-adjustment, the mean inter-platform correlation estimate for the 15 proteins was 0.38 (SD = 0.18), with estimates ranging from −0.015 to 0.67. Post PAV-adjustment, the mean inter-platform correlation increased to 0.51 (SD = 0.15), with estimates ranging from 0.15 to 0.76 (results for all probes described in Supplementary Note 2 and Supplementary Data 6).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Proteins associated with a pleiotropic region on both platforms had highly correlated measures (N = 67, median Pearson's r = 0.62, SD = 0.26), while the 136 proteins associated with a trans-pQTL region pleiotropic for SomaScan only exhibited low inter-platform correlation (median Pearson's r = 0.02, SD = 0.21).

    “While proteins associated with a pleiotropic region on both platforms had highly correlated measures (N = 67, median Pearson’s r = 0.62, SD = 0.26), the 136 proteins associated with a trans-pQTL region pleiotropic for SomaScan only exhibited low inter-platform correlation (median Pearson’s r = 0.02, SD = 0.21).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    At the MESA baseline exam, 53% of participants self-identified as female, 38% as non-Hispanic White, 28% as African American, 12% as Chinese, and 22% as Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino.

    “At the baseline exam, 53% of participants self-identified as female, 38% as non-Hispanic White, 28% as African American, 12% as Chinese, and 22% as “Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino””
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    While the majority of the 51 proteins with a nominally significant AD-MR association on both platforms showed concordant directions of MR estimates on each platform, 5 showed opposite directions of effect between analyses with SomaScan versus Olink instruments, including PILRA.

    “While the majority of the 51 proteins with a nominally significant AD-MR association on both platforms showed concordant directions of MR estimates on each platform, 5 showed opposite directions of effect between analyses with SomaScan versus Olink instruments, including PILRA (Fig. 6).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For protein measures associated with platform-discordant PAV cis-pQTL, adjustment for the PAV improved protein measure correlation and resulted in improved strength and concordance of some genetic and epidemiological signals, even unmasking new significant associations.

    “Notably, we show that for protein measures associated with platform-discordant PAV cis-pQTL, adjustment for the PAV improved protein measure correlation and resulted in improved strength and concordance of some genetic and epidemiological signals, even unmasking new significant associations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Platform-shared and/or platform-specific pleiotropic trans-pQTL regions were observed at loci encoding proteins involved in coagulation processes (F12, F5, CPB2), blood type (ABO), fat-transport proteins (APOE), other glycoproteins (HPX, DAG1), and proteins with roles in glycosylation (FUT6, FUT2, HRG, GNPTAB), rather than for transcription factors.

    “In a similar vein, we observe platform-shared and/or platform-specific pleiotropic trans-pQTL regions at loci encoding proteins involved in coagulation processes (F12, F5, CPB2), blood type (ABO), fat-transport proteins (APOE), other glycoproteins (HPX, DAG1), and proteins with roles in glycosylation (FUT6, FUT2, HRG, GNPTAB), rather than for transcription factors (as might be expected if a locus”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    While most proteins did not show systematic differences in platform agreement by ancestry, a subset of 80 proteins had significantly heterogeneous correlation across ancestries.

    “Importantly, we show that, while most proteins did not show systematic differences in platform agreement by ancestry, a subset of 80 proteins had significantly heterogeneous correlation across ancestries, suggesting that one or both platforms may vary in performance across ancestries.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Nearly all platform-discordant signals, and ~30% of platform-specific cis-pQTL, are driven by PAVs on each platform, while the majority of platform-concordant and platform-specific cis-pQTL identified are driven by non-coding genetic variants.

    “While the majority of platform-concordant and platform-specific cis-pQTL identified are driven by non-coding genetic variants, we find that nearly all the platform-discordant signals, and ~30% of platform-specific cis-pQTL, are driven by PAVs on each platform.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The detection of any platform-shared trans-pQTL association for a protein corresponds with high inter-platform correlation, while proteins associated with regions pleiotropic on SomaScan only had low inter-platform correlation.

    “For example, while the detection of any platform-shared trans-pQTL association for a protein corresponds with high inter-platform correlation, proteins associated with regions pleiotropic on SomaScan only had low inter-platform correlation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The improvement in inter-platform correlation across ancestry groups was not linear, and several proteins with ancestry-heterogeneity were also associated with ancestry-differentiated non-coding cis-pQTL or trans-pQTL.

    “However, the improvement in inter-platform correlation across ancestry groups was not linear, and several proteins with ancestry-heterogeneity were also associated with ancestry-differentiated non-coding cis-pQTL or trans-pQTL, further suggesting the interplay of environmental or other genetic effects apart from PAVs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    pQTL mapping was adjusted for age, sex, site, ten genotype PCs, and 10 protein PCs on each platform.

    “Here, we performed ancestry-pooled pQTL mapping, with adjustment for age, sex, site, ten genotype principal components (PCs), and 10 protein PCs on each platform.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationown data

    Additional scrutiny of how to best handle protein measures below LOD measures may be necessary for pQTL and other proteomics analyses, especially in cross-platform studies.

    “This suggests that additional scrutiny of how to best handle protein measures below LOD measures may be necessary for pQTL and other proteomics analyses, especially in cross-platform studies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationown data

    Proteins with high inter-platform correlation, for example Pearson's r > 0.6, may hold high potential for meta-analysis of pQTL across SomaScan and Olink platforms.

    “Although we note that some platform-specific cis-pQTL were observed even for proteins with highly-correlated measures (Fig. 3C and Supplementary Fig. 11) (which may be due to factors such as differences in intra-assay variability, or differing sensitivities for assays to environmental factors interacting with genetic variation to regulate protein abundance), overall, we propose that cis-pQTL pres”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    MS-pQTL studies may help differentiate PAV-containing pQTL that do not reflect differences in overall protein abundance, but may reflect differences in specific peptide abundances, altered affinity reagent binding, or technical errors.

    “MS-pQTL studies may also help differentiate PAV-containing pQTL that do not reflect differences in overall protein abundance, but may, for example, reflect differences in specific peptide abundances, altered affinity reagent binding, or technical errors.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Negatively correlated protein measures suggest that both platforms measure consistently different, but biologically related values for the same proteins, such as different isoforms.

    “While relatively uncommon, negatively correlated protein measures are interesting, as these suggest that both platforms measure consistently different, but biologically related values for the same proteins, such as different isoforms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Such loci may result in widespread changes to protein glycosylation, which could induce epitope effects for several proteins based on differential binding to proteins with different PTMs.

    “Such loci may result in widespread changes to, for instance, protein glycosylation, which could induce epitope effects for several proteins based on differential binding to proteins with different PTMs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    This analysis is limited to the 2157 protein targets measured on both platforms.

    “Additionally, this analysis is limited to the 2157 protein targets measured on both platforms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    This study is currently the most diverse platform-comparison, but the representation of non-European ancestry groups remains limited.

    “While this study is currently the most diverse platform-comparison, the representation of non-European ancestry groups remains limited.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Additional factors such as ancestry-differentiated non-coding cis-genetic variation or trans-pQTL, differential recruitment of participants of varied ancestry by site, or other environmental or clinical factors, may also contribute to ancestry-heterogeneity in correlation estimates.

    “Although this study focuses on the contribution of coding genetic variation to cross-ancestry differences, additional factors such as ancestry-differentiated non-coding cis-genetic variation or trans-pQTL, differential recruitment of participants of varied ancestry by site, or other environmental or clinical factors, may also contribute to ancestry-heterogeneity in correlation estimates.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Affinity probes for proteins with concordant cis-genetic signals captured the same entities and may have high potential for cross-platform meta-analysis.

    “Proteins associated with concordant cis-genetic signals exhibited the highest average inter-platform correlation, increasing confidence that the affinity probes for these proteins captured the same entities and may have high potential for cross-platform meta-analysis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    MESA is a prospective, population-based cohort study of 6814 men and women free of cardiovascular disease at baseline, aged 45 to 84 years, recruited from 6 US clinical centers beginning in 2000.

    “MESA is a prospective, population-based cohort study of 6814 men and women free of cardiovascular disease at baseline, aged 45 to 84 years, with recruitment from 6 US clinical centers beginning in 200042.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [42] Bild, D. E. et al. Multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis: objectives and design. Am. J. Epidemiol. 156, 871–881 (2002). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The pleiotropic associations with coagulation factors may impact protein isoforms or indicate susceptibility of one or both platforms to sample preparation variability.

    “Similarly, the pleiotropic associations with coagulation factors may impact protein isoforms or indicate susceptibility of one or both platforms to sample preparation variability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    One or both platforms may vary in performance across ancestries.

    “Importantly, we show that, while most proteins did not show systematic differences in platform agreement by ancestry, a subset of 80 proteins had significantly heterogeneous correlation across ancestries, suggesting that one or both platforms may vary in performance across ancestries.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Power for pQTL (particularly trans-pQTL) discovery is limited by sample size.

    “Furthermore, power for pQTL (particularly trans-pQTL) discovery is limited by sample size.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    It remains possible that neither platform provides accurate protein measures.

    “While consistent rank-based protein measures increase confidence in protein measures, it remains possible that neither platform provides accurate protein measures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    We cannot assume that the same patterns observed in this study hold true in newer versions of SomaScan and Olink platforms.

    “We cannot assume that the same patterns observed in this study hold true in these newer versions, particularly as platforms expand into coverage of lower abundance proteins and more intracellular proteins.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    This study represents the first comprehensive comparison of affinity-based protein measure agreement and genetic signals in an ancestrally diverse cohort.

    “This study represents the first comprehensive comparison of affinity-based protein measure agreement and genetic signals in an ancestrally diverse cohort.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Direct relatives were identified with a pedigree and excluded entirely from analyses, resulting in 1889 participants for pQTL mapping.

    “Direct relatives were identified with a pedigree and excluded entirely from analyses, resulting in 1889 participants for pQTL mapping.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Prior to QTL analyses, inverse-normal transformed protein measures from each platform were residualized on participant age, genotypic sex, MESA recruitment site, protein measure plate number, ten genotype principal components, and ten protein principal components.

    “Prior to QTL analyses, inverse-normal transformed protein measures from each platform were residualized based on participant age, genotypic sex, MESA recruitment site, protein measure plate number, ten genotype principal components (PCs), and ten protein PCs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    The observed improvement in cis-pQTL discovery with protein PC adjustment would hold true if the main analysis pipeline were used to define independent loci.

    “However, we believe the results observed—where adjustment for protein PCs improved cis-pQTL discovery -- would hold true if using our main analysis pipeline to define independent loci.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    After excluding 7 participants with samples flagged by SomaScan for possible measurement errors, 1930 participants were included in the study.

    “After excluding 7 participants with samples flagged by SomaScan for possible measurement errors, 1930 participants were included in the study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The tensorQTL trans-pQTL mapping function only outputs variants associated with the protein measure at p < 1 × 10−8, so trans-pQTL summary statistics are available only for those variants.

    “We note that, to increase efficiency, the tensorQTL trans-pQTL mapping function only outputs variants associated with the protein measure with a p value < 1 × 10−8; hence, trans-pQTL summary statistics are only available for these variants.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
67 of 67
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is no reported method to reconcile protein measure discordance across platforms.

    “Additionally, there is no reported method to reconcile protein measure discordance across platforms, preventing effective cross-platform meta-analysis of many protein measures.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Existing comparisons of SomaScan and Olink protein measures are limited to populations of predominantly one ancestry.

    “Furthermore, existing comparisons of SomaScan and Olink protein measures are limited to populations of predominantly one ancestry; it remains unknown if assay performance varies across diverse ancestries.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    It remains unknown whether assay performance varies across diverse ancestries.

    “Furthermore, existing comparisons of SomaScan and Olink protein measures are limited to populations of predominantly one ancestry; it remains unknown if assay performance varies across diverse ancestries.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    When pQTL are applied as genetic instruments in MR, they capture the effects of overall protein abundances.

    “When pQTL are applied as genetic instruments in MR, it is generally assumed that they capture the effects of overall protein abundances.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The inter-platform correlation of protein measures serves as a proxy for on-target affinity-probe binding.

    “Here, and in prior comparisons, the inter-platform correlation of protein measures serves as a proxy for on-target affinity-probe binding.”
5 of 5

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Ancestry-differentiated PAV protein count differs by one

    Minor

    The Results give 118 of 2157 proteins overall, while Table 1 gives 119 for the same category and denominator.

  • Olink total target counts conflict

    Minor

    The platform description gives 2923 distinct human UniProt IDs for Olink Explore 3072, whereas Methods says it quantifies 2172 human protein targets. The text elsewhere identifies 2172 as the number of Olink IDs in the cross-platform comparison, not the platform-wide total.

  • PILRA variant's amino acid change is reversed

    Minor

    The Results describe rs1859788 as changing glycine to arginine, while the Fig. 4 caption describes the same variant as changing arginine to glycine.

  • Trans-pQTL credible-set and protein counts are reversed

    Minor

    The Results state that SomaScan had 424 credible sets for 529 proteins, but Table 3 reports 529 credible sets for 424 proteins. The Olink counts, 315 credible sets for 262 proteins, agree across both locations.

4 of 4

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nicholas, J. C., Katz, D. H., Tahir, U. A., Debban, C. L., Aguet, F., Blackwell, T., Bowler, R. P., Broadaway, K. A., Chen, J., Clish, C. B., Coresh, J., Cornell, E., Cruz, D. E., Deo, R., Doyle, M. F., Durda, P., Ekunwe, L., Floyd, J. S., Gill, D., Guo, X., Hoogeveen, R. C., Johnson, C., Lange, L. A., Li, Y., Manning, A., Meigs, J. B., Mi, M. Y., Mychaleckyj, J. C., Olson, N. C., Pratte, K. A., Psaty, B. M., Reiner, A. P., Ruan, P., Sevilla-Gonzalez, M., Shah, A. M., Sun, Q., Tracy, R. P., Wen, J., Wood, A. C., Wilson, J. G., Young, K. L., Yu, B., Rooney, M. R., Manichaikul, A., Dubin, R., Mohlke, K. L., Rich, S. S., Rotter, J. I., Ganz, P., Gerszten, R. E., Taylor, K. D., & Raffield, L. M.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • University of Vermont (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • The Lundquist Institute (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
  • National Jewish Health (US)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Raffield, Laura M.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2026-01-22
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
1054-1054
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7125477295
Cited by
13
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 13
FWCI
52.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (1F31HL176194-01A1)
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM135128)
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (R01HL133870, R01DK072193)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
Keywords
affinity proteomics, SomaScan, protein-altering variants, genetic variants, phenotypic association, ancestry differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-31.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-31.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review