Cross-ancestry comparison of aptamer and antibody protein measures
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract Measures from affinity-proteomics platforms often correlate poorly, challenging interpretation of protein associations with genetic variants (pQTL) and phenotypes. Here, we examined 2,157 proteins measured on both SomaScan 7k and Olink Explore 3072 across 1,930 participants with genetic similarity to European, African, East Asian, and Admixed American ancestry references. Inter-platform correlation coefficients for these 2,157 proteins followed a bimodal distribution (median r=0.30). Protein measures were associated with variants (pQTLs), and one-third of the pQTL signals were driven by protein-altering variants (PAVs). We highlight 80 proteins that correlate differently across ancestry groups likely due to differing PAV frequencies by ancestry. Furthermore, adjustment for PAVs with opposite directions of effect by platform improved inter-platform protein measure correlation and resulted in more concordant genetic and phenotypic associations. Hence, PAVs need to be accounted for across ancestries to facilitate platform-concordant and accurate protein measurement.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Inter-platform agreement between SomaScan 7k and Olink Explore 3072 is often poor for the 2157 proteins measured on both platforms, with a median Pearson correlation of 0.30. Protein-altering variants, especially those with ancestry-differentiated frequencies, contribute to platform discordance and can be adjusted for to improve cross-platform and downstream genetic/phenotypic concordance.
Key findings
- Among 2157 overlapping proteins in 1930 MESA participants, inter-platform correlations were bimodal with median Pearson’s r = 0.30 (Q1 = 0.02, Q3 = 0.63) for SomaScan ANML-SMP vs. Olink; 80 proteins showed Bonferroni-significant ancestry-heterogeneous inter-platform correlation (Cochran’s Q P < 1.85 × 10⁻⁵, correcting for 2708 probe pairs).
- pQTL mapping identified significant cis-pQTL credible sets for 840 proteins on SomaScan and 1036 on Olink; approximately 25–30% of platform-specific signals were likely driven by protein-altering variants, and 15/19 platform-discordant cis-pQTL credible sets contained a missense variant.
- Proteins with ancestry-heterogeneous correlation were enriched for ancestry-differentiated PAV cis-pQTL: 16% vs. 5.5% of proteins overall.
- Adjusting for platform-discordant PAVs improved inter-platform correlation for 15 proteins (mean r 0.38 to 0.51), improved suPAR correlation from 0.44 to 0.57, and increased concordance of Alzheimer’s disease Mendelian randomization estimates (Pearson’s r 0.48, 0.51 to 0.63 after excluding PAV instruments).
Methods
- Used MESA exam 1 EDTA-plasma samples from 1930 participants assayed on SomaScan 7k and Olink Explore 3072; 1889 unrelated participants with TOPMed whole-genome sequencing were used for pQTL mapping. Ancestry groups were assigned by >0.5 genetic similarity to 1000 Genomes AFR (n = 439), AMR (n = 231), EAS (n = 277), or EUR (n = 939) references; 44 participants were unclassified.
- Compared 2157 proteins measured on both platforms using standardized, inverse-normal-transformed measures; computed Pearson correlations overall and by ancestry, tested heterogeneity with Cochran’s Q, and mapped cis-/trans-pQTL with tensorQTL and SuSiE fine-mapping adjusting for age, sex, site, 10 genotype PCs, and 10 protein PCs.
- Annotated protein-altering variants with VEP, assessed ancestry-differentiated allele frequencies by chi-square, evaluated overlap with GTEx eQTLs, MS-pQTLs, deCODE/UK Biobank pQTLs, and GWAS Catalog variants, and performed exploratory Alzheimer’s disease Mendelian randomization with and without PAV instruments.
Limitations
- Stated in the paper: representation of non-European ancestry groups remains limited; ancestry clusters are continental-level; analyses are restricted to the 2157 proteins measured on both platforms and may not generalize to newer SomaScan 11k or Olink 5k versions; pQTL power, especially for trans-pQTL, is limited by sample size.
- Stated in the paper: inter-platform correlation is used as a proxy for on-target affinity-probe binding, and it remains possible that neither platform provides accurate protein measures; interpreting platform-discordant measures is especially challenging.
- Evident from the text: the study is cross-sectional at MESA exam 1, and the authors note that ancestry-differentiated non-coding cis-pQTL, trans-pQTL, environmental/lifestyle factors, and differential recruitment by site may also contribute to ancestry heterogeneity in platform agreement.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
71 of 76 cited sources checked · 29 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
PAVs may result in pQTL associations that reflect differential probe binding to alternate isoforms rather than differential protein abundances.
“Nevertheless, interpreting cis- and trans-pQTL remains complicated, as PAVs may result in pQTL associations that reflect differential probe binding to alternate isoforms12,17–19 rather than differential protein abundances.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim4 of 4 sources checked- cites [12] Katz, D. H. et al. Proteomic profiling platforms head to head: leveraging genetics and clinical traits to compare aptamer- and antibody-based methods. Sci. Adv. 8, eabm5164 (2022). source
The Results section on platform correlation and cis pQTLs describes associations between genetic variants and protein measurements, while the Discussion treats cis pQTLs as a possible indicator of assay specificity. Our copy does not address whether protein-altering variants produce associations through differential probe binding to alternate isoforms rather than differences in protein abundance (searched: PAVs, isoforms, differential binding). (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [17] Eldjarn, G. H. et al. Large-scale plasma proteomics comparisons through genetics and disease associations. Nature 622, 348–358 (2023). source
The ‘Relationship of pQTLs between platforms’ section says PAV-linked cis-pQTLs are likely to reflect epitope effects rather than variation in protein levels. The Discussion also says the platforms may target different proteoforms, but it does not specifically link PAV-driven binding differences to alternate isoforms. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [18] Suhre, K. et al. A genome-wide association study of mass spectrometry proteomics using a nanoparticle enrichment platform. Nat. Genet. 57, 2987–2996 (2025). source
The Discussion states that PAV-containing peptides can produce an epitope-effect pQTL that does not fully reflect genotype-dependent protein abundance. The Results (Validity of the MSPA score) likewise identify coding variants that could alter epitopes. The paper discusses affinity binders targeting different isoforms as another possible explanation, but does not specifically establish that PAVs cause differential probe binding to alternate isoforms. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [19] Pietzner, M. et al. Mapping the proteo-genomic convergence of human diseases. Science 374, eabj1541 (2021). source
The Results section on cis and trans genetic architecture says PAVs can affect a protein’s binding epitope and that conformation, rather than plasma abundance, may explain some genetic effects. A separate Results section on gene expression and splicing suggests that alternative protein isoforms can have different affinities for the assay reagent. The paper does not link PAVs specifically to differential binding to alternate isoforms. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The detection of a cis-pQTL for a given protein measure is often used as a metric to confirm on-target affinity-probe binding.
“The detection of a cis-pQTL for a given protein measure is often used as a metric to confirm on-target affinity-probe binding12,15,16; existing studies comparing SomaScan and Olink measures have established that the detection of a cis-pQTL is a strong predictor of inter-platform correlation coefficients for a given protein12,15,16.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [12] Katz, D. H. et al. Proteomic profiling platforms head to head: leveraging genetics and clinical traits to compare aptamer- and antibody-based methods. Sci. Adv. 8, eabm5164 (2022). source
- cites [15] Raffield, L. M. et al. Comparison of proteomic assessment methods in multiple cohort studies. Proteomics 20, e1900278 (2020). source
The Discussion says cis-pQTL presence can provide clues to assay specificity and suggests that a probe has at least some binding to its target protein. It does not treat a cis-pQTL as confirmation of on-target binding: it cautions that binding differences can produce spurious pQTLs and that a cis-pQTL does not exclude off-target binding. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [16] Pietzner, M. et al. Synergistic insights into human health from aptamer- and antibody-based proteomic profiling. Nat. Commun. 12, 6822 (2021). source
The Methods (Annotation of pQTLs; page unavailable) describe checking cis-pQTLs for protein-altering variants, but do not say their detection is used to confirm on-target probe binding. The Discussion (page unavailable) says identifying the protein species bound to an affinity reagent may require mass spectrometry. Searches for cis-pQTLs as a binding-specificity or validation metric found no passage establishing the claimed practice. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
As genetic variants may vary in frequency across populations, such variants could drive systematic differences in protein measures.
“As these genetic variants may vary in frequency across populations, such variants could drive systematic differences in protein measures20.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Olson, N. C. et al. Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor: genetic variation and cardiovascular disease risk in black adults. Circ. Genom. Precis. Med. 14, e003421 (2021). source
- Findingown data
Several cis-pQTL signals driven by PAVs-most commonly missense variants-were observed on each platform.
“While the majority of cis-pQTL variants were non-coding on both platforms (Supplementary Fig. 8), we observe several cis-pQTL signals driven by protein altering variants (PAVs—most commonly missense variants) on each platform, raising concerns as to whether the signal captures abundances or differences in isoform, as has been shown in other studies18,24,25.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [18] Suhre, K. et al. A genome-wide association study of mass spectrometry proteomics using a nanoparticle enrichment platform. Nat. Genet. 57, 2987–2996 (2025). source
The Results section, ‘Validity of the MSPA score’ (page not provided), reports candidate epitope-changing coding variants for cis-pQTLs on both SOMAscan and Olink, including detected PAV-containing peptides. This supports the presence of PAV-related signals on both platforms, but the passage does not establish that missense variants were the most common PAVs or that every candidate variant drove its signal. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [24] Pietzner, M. et al. Nanoparticle enriched mass spectrometry proteomics in British South Asians identifies novel variant-protein-disease mechanisms. Preprint at medRxiv, https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.08.12.25333522 (2025). source
The section “Protein altering variants and overlap with tissue gene expression loci explain pQTLs” (page unavailable) reports cis-pQTLs associated with protein-altering variants. “Cross-platform concordance of pQTLs” (page unavailable) also reports PAV-associated cis-pQTLs in comparisons with both Olink HT and SomaLogic 11k. The passages do not establish that missense variants were the most common PAVs on each platform, and they describe associations rather than showing that the PAVs drove those signals. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [25] Wang, Q. S. et al. Platform-dependent effects of genetic variants on plasma APOL1. Preprint at BioRxiv, https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.30.635763 (2025). source
The Introduction reports that APOL1 G1/G2 mutations have pQTL effects on both Olink and SomaLogic, and the Discussion describes a similar effect for V1. The paper supports protein-altering variants affecting measurements on both platforms, but its APOL1-focused analysis does not establish that missense variants are the most common drivers of cis-pQTL signals generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Existing studies comparing SomaScan and Olink measures have established that the detection of a cis-pQTL is a strong predictor of inter-platform correlation coefficients for a given protein.
“The detection of a cis-pQTL for a given protein measure is often used as a metric to confirm on-target affinity-probe binding12,15,16; existing studies comparing SomaScan and Olink measures have established that the detection of a cis-pQTL is a strong predictor of inter-platform correlation coefficients for a given protein12,15,16.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [12] Katz, D. H. et al. Proteomic profiling platforms head to head: leveraging genetics and clinical traits to compare aptamer- and antibody-based methods. Sci. Adv. 8, eabm5164 (2022). source
In Results, ‘Accuracy: Platform correlation and cis pQTLs’ (page unavailable), the paper reports that highly correlated Olink–SomaScan reagent pairs were likely to show cis-pQTLs on both platforms. It also reports that lower-correlation pairs were more likely to show a cis-pQTL on Olink only. The evidence therefore supports an association with detection on both platforms, but not the unqualified claim that detecting a cis-pQTL for a protein measure is a strong predictor of its inter-platform correlation coefficient. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [15] Raffield, L. M. et al. Comparison of proteomic assessment methods in multiple cohort studies. Proteomics 20, e1900278 (2020). source
The Results section reports that proteins with a SOMAscan cis-pQTL were enriched among the more highly correlated SOMAscan–Olink measures. But the Discussion says the Olink–SOMAscan dataset was too small for cis-pQTL analysis, and cautions that a cis-pQTL does not guarantee high inter-assay correlation. The paper therefore supports an association, not the claim that cis-pQTL detection was established as a strong predictor of correlation coefficients. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [16] Pietzner, M. et al. Synergistic insights into human health from aptamer- and antibody-based proteomic profiling. Nat. Commun. 12, 6822 (2021). source
The Results section (‘Shared genetic effects are target-dependent’; page unavailable) reports that lower observational correlation between SomaScan and Olink measures was associated with a higher likelihood of a platform-specific pQTL. That supports a relationship between cross-platform correlation and pQTL agreement, but does not establish that detecting a cis-pQTL is a strong predictor of the correlation coefficient for a protein. (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationreasoning
Comparing affinity-based pQTL to pQTL identified in MS studies may facilitate signal interpretation.
“While MS-based pQTL studies are relatively limited in size and number (with some of the broadest studies, used for pQTL comparison here, currently including 1260 Americans and 1980 proteins18, or 325 participants and ~2800 proteins10), comparing affinity-based pQTL to pQTL identified in MS studies may facilitate signal interpretation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [18] Suhre, K. et al. A genome-wide association study of mass spectrometry proteomics using a nanoparticle enrichment platform. Nat. Genet. 57, 2987–2996 (2025). source
- cites [10] Suhre, K. et al. Nanoparticle enrichment mass-spectrometry proteomics identifies protein-altering variants for precise pQTL mapping. Nat. Commun. 15, 989 (2024). source
- Findingown data
PILRA showed strong platform-discordant measures (Pearson's r = -0.35) across the present and prior studies.
“This protein showed strong platform-discordant measures (Pearson’s r = -0.35) across the present and prior studies16,17 (Fig. 4A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [16] Pietzner, M. et al. Synergistic insights into human health from aptamer- and antibody-based proteomic profiling. Nat. Commun. 12, 6822 (2021). source
In Results (‘Directionally discordant associations at an Alzheimer’s disease locus’; page unavailable), the paper reports opposite genetic-association directions for PILRA measured by Olink and by two SomaScan reagents. That supports platform discordance, but our copy does not report a PILRA Pearson correlation of −0.35 or establish that value across the present and prior studies. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [17] Eldjarn, G. H. et al. Large-scale plasma proteomics comparisons through genetics and disease associations. Nature 622, 348–358 (2023). source
The Inter-platform correlation of levels section reports correlations across proteins, and Methods > Correlation of assays across platforms says the paper used Spearman correlation. Searches for PILRA and the claimed Pearson r = −0.35 found no passage in our copy reporting that protein-specific result or the comparison across the present and prior studies. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationown data
PAV-driven cis-pQTL signals raise concerns as to whether the signal captures protein abundances or differences in isoform.
“While the majority of cis-pQTL variants were non-coding on both platforms (Supplementary Fig. 8), we observe several cis-pQTL signals driven by protein altering variants (PAVs—most commonly missense variants) on each platform, raising concerns as to whether the signal captures abundances or differences in isoform, as has been shown in other studies18,24,25.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [18] Suhre, K. et al. A genome-wide association study of mass spectrometry proteomics using a nanoparticle enrichment platform. Nat. Genet. 57, 2987–2996 (2025). source
The Discussion says PAV-containing peptides can produce a pQTL signal that does not fully reflect genotype-dependent protein abundance. The Results section on protein isoforms separately shows that a SPINK5 pQTL can reflect differences among isoforms, but it does not identify that example as PAV-driven. The source therefore supports both interpretive concerns, but not the specific link between PAV-driven signals and isoform differences. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [24] Pietzner, M. et al. Nanoparticle enriched mass spectrometry proteomics in British South Asians identifies novel variant-protein-disease mechanisms. Preprint at medRxiv, https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.08.12.25333522 (2025). source
- cites [25] Wang, Q. S. et al. Platform-dependent effects of genetic variants on plasma APOL1. Preprint at BioRxiv, https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.30.635763 (2025). source
- Findingown data
The 644 proteins with a cis-pQTL detected on both platforms had higher inter-platform correlation (mean Pearson r = 0.58, SD = 0.20) than proteins with no significant cis-pQTL (mean r = 0.21, SD = 0.30).
“Similar to prior studies12,17, the 644 proteins with a cis-pQTL detected on both platforms had higher inter-platform correlation (mean Pearson’s r = 0.58, SD = 0.20) than proteins with no significant cis-pQTL (mean Pearson’s r = 0.21, SD = 0.30)(Fig. 3C and Supplementary Data 7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [12] Katz, D. H. et al. Proteomic profiling platforms head to head: leveraging genetics and clinical traits to compare aptamer- and antibody-based methods. Sci. Adv. 8, eabm5164 (2022). source
- cites [17] Eldjarn, G. H. et al. Large-scale plasma proteomics comparisons through genetics and disease associations. Nature 622, 348–358 (2023). source
- Findingown data
Platform-concordant cis-pQTL signals were most likely to contain a GTEx v8 eQTL lead variant for the protein-encoding gene in the credible set, compared to platform-specific or platform-discordant signals.
“Consistent with prior reports17,19, we found that platform-concordant cis-pQTL signals were most likely to contain a GTEx v8 eQTL lead variant for the protein-encoding gene in the credible set, compared to platform-specific or platform-discordant signals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [17] Eldjarn, G. H. et al. Large-scale plasma proteomics comparisons through genetics and disease associations. Nature 622, 348–358 (2023). source
The ‘Relationship of pQTLs between platforms’ section reports that some cis-pQTL variants are in high LD with cis-eQTLs for the targeted protein’s gene. The Methods also say the authors checked correspondence with top cis-eQTLs from sources including GTEx. Our copy does not report that platform-concordant signals are more likely than platform-specific or discordant signals to contain a GTEx v8 eQTL lead variant in a credible set. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [19] Pietzner, M. et al. Mapping the proteo-genomic convergence of human diseases. Science 374, eabj1541 (2021). source
The Abstract reports that 64% of pQTLs were consistent across the SomaScan and Olink platforms, and the Results section ‘Shared genetic architecture with gene expression and splicing’ reports GTEx v8 eQTL colocalization for cis-pQTLs (page numbers unavailable). Neither passage compares platform-concordant, platform-specific, and platform-discordant signals for the likelihood that a credible set contains the protein-encoding gene’s eQTL lead variant. The cited paper supports the broader context, but not the specific comparison attributed to it. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
Platform-discordant signals for 2 proteins, APOL1 and PGLYRP2, had evidence of impacting specific peptides but not overall protein abundance in an MS study.
“Platform-discordant signals for 2 proteins, APOL1 and PGLYRP2, had evidence of impacting specific peptides but not overall protein abundance in an MS study10 (Supplementary Data 4, 5, and 8);”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] Suhre, K. et al. Nanoparticle enrichment mass-spectrometry proteomics identifies protein-altering variants for precise pQTL mapping. Nat. Commun. 15, 989 (2024). source
The Results section on robust pQTLs (page not available) shows that a variant can affect a detected peptide without changing overall protein abundance, using F5 as an example. Our copy does not establish that this occurred for the two named proteins, APOL1 and PGLYRP2; searches for both names found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Studies incorporating comparisons to MS protein measures, measures of gene transcript abundance, and/or functional validation have established cases where platform-discordant PAV cis-pQTL reflect differences in probe binding to genetically encoded isoforms, including for uromodulin and apolipoprotein-1.
“While PAVs may certainly alter a protein’s overall abundance through impacts on protein stability and other mechanisms, studies incorporating comparisons to MS protein measures, measures of gene transcript abundance, and/or functional validation have established cases where platform-discordant PAV cis-pQTL reflect differences in probe binding to genetically encoded isoforms, including for uromodul”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [31] Li, Y. et al. Genome-wide studies reveal factors associated with circulating uromodulin and its relationships to complex diseases. JCI Insight 7, e157035 (2022). source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [25] Wang, Q. S. et al. Platform-dependent effects of genetic variants on plasma APOL1. Preprint at BioRxiv, https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.30.635763 (2025). source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
We and others observed a platform-discordant PAV cis-pQTL for PILRA.
“We and others observed a platform-discordant PAV cis-pQTL for this protein16.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] Pietzner, M. et al. Synergistic insights into human health from aptamer- and antibody-based proteomic profiling. Nat. Commun. 12, 6822 (2021). source
- Interpretationcitation
Several putatively impacted proteins are potential biomarkers or drug targets (for example, suPAR and PILRA).
“It remains challenging to establish the pervasiveness of assay-interference effects; however, we note that several putatively impacted proteins are potential biomarkers or drug targets (for example, suPAR32,33 and PILRA27).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [32] Reisinger, A. C. et al. Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) predicts critical illness and kidney failure in patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Sci. Rep. 11, 17476 (2021). source
- cites [33] Jehn, U. et al. Soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is a risk indicator for eGFR loss in kidney transplant recipients. Sci. Rep. 11, 3713 (2021). source
- cites [27] Zhan, H., Cammann, D., Cummings, J. L., Dong, X. & Chen, J. Biomarker identification for Alzheimer’s disease through integration of comprehensive Mendelian randomization and proteomics data. J. Transl. Med. 23, 278 (2025). source
- Findingown data
Nearly twice as many credible sets were observed on Olink compared to SomaScan.
“More proteins showed a cis-pQTL on Olink compared to SomaScan (48% vs. 39%, respectively); additionally, we observed nearly twice as many credible sets on Olink compared to SomaScan (although we note this is only among the 2157 proteins measured on both platforms - we did not consider proteins measured on only one platform).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The platforms followed similar patterns of agreement within each ancestry, with median Pearson r = 0.30 for AFR, 0.28 for AMR, 0.31 for EAS, and 0.32 for EUR.
“Overall, platforms followed similar patterns of agreement within each ancestry, evidenced by similar median correlations and distributions of Pearson’s correlation coefficients observed within each ancestry [median Pearson’s r AFR = 0.30, AMR = 0.28, EAS = 0.31, EUR = 0.32] (Supplementary Fig. 3 and Supplementary Data 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Among the 80 proteins with ancestry-heterogeneous inter-platform correlation estimates, 69 (86%) had a cis-pQTL.
“Bonferroni significance (p < 0.05/2708) | 80 | 69(86%) | 31 (39%) | 45(56%) | 13(16%) | 29(36%) | 16(20%) | 24(30%) | 10(13%)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among the 80 proteins with ancestry-heterogeneous inter-platform correlation estimates, 31 (39%) had a PAV cis-pQTL.
“Bonferroni significance (p < 0.05/2708) | 80 | 69(86%) | 31 (39%) | 45(56%) | 13(16%) | 29(36%) | 16(20%) | 24(30%) | 10(13%)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among all 2157 proteins, 119 (5.5%) had an ancestry-differentiated PAV cis-pQTL.
“All proteins | All proteins | 2157 | 1239 (57%) | 425 (20%) | 563(26%) | 119(5.5%) | 605(28%) | 190(8.8%) | 348(16%) | 58(2.7%)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Among all 2157 proteins, 1239 (57%) had a cis-pQTL on either platform.
“All proteins | All proteins | 2157 | 1239 (57%) | 425 (20%) | 563(26%) | 119(5.5%) | 605(28%) | 190(8.8%) | 348(16%) | 58(2.7%)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among the 80 proteins with ancestry-heterogeneous inter-platform correlation estimates, 13 (16%) had an ancestry-differentiated PAV cis-pQTL.
“Bonferroni significance (p < 0.05/2708) | 80 | 69(86%) | 31 (39%) | 45(56%) | 13(16%) | 29(36%) | 16(20%) | 24(30%) | 10(13%)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among the 80 proteins with ancestry-heterogeneous inter-platform correlation estimates, 45 (56%) had an ancestry-differentiated cis-pQTL.
“Bonferroni significance (p < 0.05/2708) | 80 | 69(86%) | 31 (39%) | 45(56%) | 13(16%) | 29(36%) | 16(20%) | 24(30%) | 10(13%)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Significant cis-pQTL credible sets (containing at least one variant p < 5 × 10−8) were observed for 840 proteins on SomaScan.
“Here, we observed significant credible sets (containing at least one variant p < 5 × 10−8) for 840 proteins on SomaScan (Supplementary Data 4) and 1036 proteins on Olink (see “Methods”, Table 3, Supplementary Data 5 and Fig. 3A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Among all 2157 proteins, 425 (20%) had a cis-pQTL containing a PAV.
“All proteins | All proteins | 2157 | 1239 (57%) | 425 (20%) | 563(26%) | 119(5.5%) | 605(28%) | 190(8.8%) | 348(16%) | 58(2.7%)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Significant cis-pQTL credible sets were observed for 1036 proteins on Olink.
“Here, we observed significant credible sets (containing at least one variant p < 5 × 10−8) for 840 proteins on SomaScan (Supplementary Data 4) and 1036 proteins on Olink (see “Methods”, Table 3, Supplementary Data 5 and Fig. 3A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
80 protein targets exhibited significant differences in inter-platform correlation estimates across ancestries (Cochran's Q P < 1.85 × 10−5, Bonferroni adjustment for 2708 probe pairs).
“While the majority of individual proteins showed similar cross-platform agreement across ancestries, 80 protein targets exhibited significant differences in assay agreement across ancestries (Cochran’s Q P < 1.85 × 10−5, Bonferroni adjustment for the total number of probe pairs (2708)) (Tables 1 and 2; Supplementary Data 3), suggesting systematic differences in measurement accuracy across ancestr”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
More proteins showed a cis-pQTL on Olink compared to SomaScan (48% vs. 39%, respectively) among the 2157 proteins measured on both platforms.
“More proteins showed a cis-pQTL on Olink compared to SomaScan (48% vs. 39%, respectively); additionally, we observed nearly twice as many credible sets on Olink compared to SomaScan (although we note this is only among the 2157 proteins measured on both platforms - we did not consider proteins measured on only one platform).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A higher proportion of secreted proteins had a significant cis-pQTL association compared to intracellular and membrane proteins.
“A higher proportion of secreted proteins had a significant cis-pQTL association compared to intracellular and membrane proteins (Supplementary Fig. 7).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Similar proportions of SomaScan and Olink protein measures were associated with age, sex, BMI, and type 2 diabetes (T2D) case/control status at the Bonferroni significance threshold (P < 1.8 × 10−5).
“Here, similar proportions of SomaScan and Olink protein measures were associated with age, sex, BMI, and type 2 diabetes (T2D) case/control status at the Bonferroni significance threshold (P < 1.8 × 10−5, significant at α = 0.05, with correction for 2708 probe pairs tested) (Supplementary Data 17 and 18).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Adjusting proteins associated with platform-specific pleiotropic trans-pQTL loci had little effect on protein measure correlation.
“Similarly, adjusting proteins associated with platform-specific pleiotropic trans-pQTL loci had little effect on protein measure correlation (Supplementary Note 5, Supplementary Fig. 54).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Proteins with Pearson's correlation r > 0.6 were most likely to show a platform-concordant cis-pQTL signal.
“Similarly, proteins with Pearson’s correlation r > 0.6 were most likely to show a platform-concordant cis-pQTL signal (Supplementary Fig. 11).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Adjustment for protein-altering variants with opposite directions of effect by platform improves inter-platform protein measure correlation.
“Furthermore, adjustment for protein-altering variants with opposite directions of effect by platform improves inter-platform protein measure correlation and results in more concordant genetic and phenotypic associations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Most participants exhibited >0.5 genetic similarity to African (AFR, n = 439), Admixed American (AMR, n = 231), East Asian (EAS, n = 277), or European (EUR, n = 939) 1000 Genomes Project reference populations, based on global ancestry proportion estimates.
“Most participants exhibited >0.5 genetic similarity to African (AFR, n = 439), Admixed American (AMR, n = 231), East Asian (EAS, n = 277), or European (EUR, n = 939) 1000 Genomes Project reference populations, based on global ancestry proportion estimates (Supplementary Data 1), enabling stratification by genetic similarity for some analyses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A small proportion of affinity-identified pQTL (0.4% SomaScan, 0.6% Olink) harbor a previously reported MS-pQTL lead variant in the credible set.
“A small proportion of affinity-identified pQTL (0.4% SomaScan, 0.6% Olink) harbor a previously reported MS-pQTL lead variant in the credible set (Table 3; Supplementary Data 8, 4, and 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Adjustment for protein-altering variants with opposite directions of effect by platform results in more concordant genetic and phenotypic associations.
“Furthermore, adjustment for protein-altering variants with opposite directions of effect by platform improves inter-platform protein measure correlation and results in more concordant genetic and phenotypic associations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For proteins with a platform-discordant PAV, an improved correlation of effect sizes among protein-phenotype associations was observed when using PAV-adjusted measures as input.
“For proteins with a platform-discordant PAV, we observed an improved correlation of effect sizes observed among protein-phenotype associations when using PAV-adjusted measures as input (Supplementary Data 6 and Supplementary Fig. 33).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Adjusting for the PILRA PAV in the cis-pQTL mapping model unmasks and strengthens a second, independent association with the Olink measure of PILRA, driven by non-coding variant chr7:100480786:C:G.
“Finally, adjusting for this PAV in the cis-pQTL mapping model unmasks and strengthens a second, independent association with the Olink measure of PILRA, driven by non-coding variant chr7:100480786:C:G (Supplementary Fig. 15).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
suPAR is associated with an ancestry-differentiated, platform-discordant PAV.
“Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is another protein associated with an ancestry-differentiated, platform-discordant PAV.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Incorporating PAV-adjusted PILRA measures into epidemiological models improved the strength and concordance of downstream PILRA-age associations.
“Furthermore, incorporating PAV-adjusted PILRA measures into epidemiological models improved the strength and concordance of downstream PILRA-age associations (Fig. 4E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
19 proteins had platform-overlapping cis-pQTL credible sets for which lead variants had opposite effect-directions (platform-discordant).
“While most of these signals were led by variants with concordant directions of association across platforms (referred to here as “platform-concordant” signals), we identified 19 proteins with platform-overlapping cis-pQTL credible sets for which lead variants had opposite effect-directions (“platform-discordant”) (Supplementary Fig. 10).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Upon adjusting for copies of the PAV allele, the correlation of residual PILRA measures improved to 0.27.
“Upon adjusting for copies of the PAV allele, the correlation of residual PILRA measures improved to 0.27 (Fig. 4A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Proteins with a platform-concordant, significant cis-pQTL had generally higher inter-platform correlation (median r = 0.61, SD = 0.18) than proteins with a platform-discordant cis-pQTL (median r = 0.40, SD = 0.20) or a cis-pQTL on one platform only (median r = 0.12, SD = 0.28).
“Furthermore, the correlation of proteins with a platform-concordant, significant cis-pQTL was generally higher (median Pearson’s r = 0.61, SD = 0.18) than the correlation of proteins with a platform-discordant cis-pQTL (median Pearson’s r = 0.40, SD = 0.20) or a cis-pQTL on one platform only (median Pearson’s r = 0.12, SD = 0.28) (Fig. 3B, C; Supplementary Data 7 and Supplementary Fig. 11).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Nine trans-pQTL regions were pleiotropic for SomaScan protein measures only (significant trans-pQTL associations with ≥5 proteins on SomaScan, 0 or 1 on Olink), including APOE, F5, and HPX.
“Nine trans-pQTL regions were pleiotropic for SomaScan protein measures only (significant trans-pQTL associations with ≥5 proteins on SomaScan, 0 or 1 on Olink), including APOE, F5, and HPX.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
72 proteins on SomaScan and 84 proteins on Olink were associated with cis-pQTL containing highly ancestry-differentiated PAVs (Chi-Square >202, the 75th X2 percentile among variants tested in MESA).
“Overall, 72 proteins on SomaScan and 84 proteins on Olink were associated with cis-pQTL containing highly ancestry-differentiated PAVs (Chi-Square >202, the 75th X2 percentile among variants tested in MESA).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Among each phenotype, proteins with a Bonferroni significant phenotype association on both platforms were more likely to associate with a cis-pQTL on both platforms.
“Among each phenotype, proteins with a Bonferroni significant phenotype association on both platforms were more likely to associate with a cis-pQTL on both platforms (Supplementary Data 17).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For age, sex, and BMI, a small number of proteins (6 to 25) had platform-discordant, Bonferroni significant associations on both platforms.
“For age, sex, and BMI, we observed a small number of proteins with platform-discordant, Bonferroni significant associations on both platforms (6 to 25, Supplementary Data 17), suggesting that differences in protein measurements may indeed result in differences in epidemiological associations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
18 platform-discordant PAV associations were identified when considering all probes per overlapping protein.
“The 18 platform-discordant PAV associations identified in analyses considering all probes per overlapping protein are displayed in Table 4.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Across all proteins, effect sizes for each phenotype were modestly correlated (Pearson's r of approximately 0.6).
“Across all proteins, effect sizes for each phenotype were modestly correlated (Pearson’s r of approximately 0.6) (Supplementary Fig. 32).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Inter-platform PILRA measure correlation improved most among AMR and EAS participants after PAV adjustment.
“Inter-platform protein measure correlation improved most among AMR and EAS participants (Fig. 4D and Supplementary Fig. 28).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Among the 392 proteins with a cis-pQTL association detected with Olink measures only, 30% were associated with at least one PAV.
“Among the 196 and 392 proteins with a cis-pQTL association detected with SomaScan or Olink measures only, similar proportions were associated with at least one PAV (25% SomaScan, 30% Olink) (Fig. 3C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Among the 80 proteins with Bonferroni-significant heterogeneity in inter-platform correlation estimates between ancestries, the rate of ancestry-differentiated cis-pQTL containing PAVs was higher (16%) than among proteins overall (5.5%, 118/2157).
“Indeed, we observed a higher rate of ancestry-differentiated cis-pQTL containing PAVs among the 80 proteins with Bonferroni-significant heterogeneity in inter-platform correlation estimates between ancestries (Cochran’s Q P < 1.8 × 10−5, significant at α = 0.05, with correction for 2708 probe pairs tested) (16% compared to 5.5% (118/2157) of proteins overall) (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
10 pleiotropic trans-pQTL regions were associated with at least 5 proteins on each platform, including ABO, FUT2, and F12.
“We identified 10 pleiotropic trans-pQTL regions that were associated with at least 5 proteins on each platform (although not necessarily the same proteins on both platforms), including well-characterized ABO, FUT2, and F12.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Approximately 25-30% of the signals on each platform are likely driven by protein-altering variants.
“We evaluate protein measure associations with genetic variants, and find approximately 25-30% of the signals on each platform are likely driven by protein-altering variants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The majority of cis-pQTL credible sets identified on each platform contained a GWAS catalog lead variant.
“The majority of cis-pQTL credible sets identified on each platform contained a GWAS catalog lead variant (Table 3; Supplementary Data 4 and 5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among the 196 proteins with a cis-pQTL association detected with SomaScan measures only, 25% were associated with at least one PAV.
“Among the 196 and 392 proteins with a cis-pQTL association detected with SomaScan or Olink measures only, similar proportions were associated with at least one PAV (25% SomaScan, 30% Olink) (Fig. 3C).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Adjustment for platform-discordant, ancestry-differentiated PAVs generally reduced cross-ancestry heterogeneity in inter-platform correlation estimates.
“Adjustment for platform-discordant, ancestry-differentiated PAVs generally reduced cross-ancestry heterogeneity in inter-platform correlation estimates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Similar proportions of proteins tested in MR on each platform showed significant (p < 0.05) associations with AD.
“Similar proportions of proteins tested in MR on each platform showed significant (p < 0.05) associations with AD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Proteins with cross-ancestry differences in platform agreement were enriched for association with PAVs with ancestry-differentiated allele frequencies.
“Additionally, we established that proteins with cross-ancestry differences in platform agreement were enriched for association with PAVs with ancestry-differentiated allele frequencies, supporting epitope-binding effects as one driver of cross-ancestry differences in platform agreement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Proteins associated with concordant cis-genetic signals exhibited the highest average inter-platform correlation.
“Proteins associated with concordant cis-genetic signals exhibited the highest average inter-platform correlation, increasing confidence that the affinity probes for these proteins captured the same entities and may have high potential for cross-platform meta-analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Among the 2157 proteins with SomaScan 7k and Olink Explore 3072 measures compared here, there is a wide range of inter-platform correlations for given protein measures.
“Among the 2157 proteins with SomaScan 7k and Olink Explore 3072 measures compared here, we observe a wide range of inter-platform correlations for given protein measures, as in prior studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Five proteins in SomaScan MR (CHIT1, GDF-15, HGFAC, HRC, qSOX1) and 5 in Olink MR analyses (OSCAR, LTA, SPINT1, TMPRSS5, TNFRSF13C) were significant in models excluding platform-discordant and platform-specific PAV instruments but were not significant in the model including these instruments as PAVs.
“Furthermore, we observed 5 proteins in SomaScan MR (CHIT1, GDF-15, HGFAC, HRC, qSOX1), and 5 in Olink MR analyses (OSCAR, LTA, SPINT1, TMPRSS5, TNFRSF13C), which were significant in models excluding platform-discordant and platform-specific PAV instruments but were not significant in the model including these instruments as PAVs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
All 5 proteins with opposite directions of AD-MR effect between platforms associated with a platform-discordant or platform-specific PAV on at least one platform.
“Notably, all 5 of these proteins associated with a platform-discordant or platform-specific PAV on at least one platform.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The concordance of significant MR effect estimates increased when excluding first platform-discordant, then platform-discordant and platform-specific PAV instruments from MR analyses (from Pearson's r 0.48, 0.51, to 0.63).
“While we note that less proteins could be tested across analyses excluding PAVs (as these were the only instruments available for some proteins), we observed the concordance of significant MR effect estimates increase (from Pearson’s r 0.48, 0.51, to 0.63, Fig. 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Adjustment for protein principal components improves power for cis-pQTL discovery on both the SomaScan and Olink platforms.
“Here, we show that adjustment for protein PCs improves power for cis-pQTL discovery on both platforms (Supplementary Fig. 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Several later protein principal components likely capture impacts of trans-pQTL on both platforms.
“we performed a GWAS of the first 100 protein PCs on each platform to show that several later PCs likely capture impacts of trans-pQTL (Supplementary Fig. 6)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Adjustment for 10 protein principal components does not maximize cis-pQTL detection.
“While adjustment for 10 protein PCs does not maximize cis-pQTL detection”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The 80 proteins with ancestry-heterogeneous inter-platform correlation estimates suggest systematic differences in measurement accuracy across ancestries, on one or both platforms.
“While the majority of individual proteins showed similar cross-platform agreement across ancestries, 80 protein targets exhibited significant differences in assay agreement across ancestries (Cochran’s Q P < 1.85 × 10−5, Bonferroni adjustment for the total number of probe pairs (2708)) (Tables 1 and 2; Supplementary Data 3), suggesting systematic differences in measurement accuracy across ancestr”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
trans-pQTL associated with several protein measures may reflect non-specific affinity-probe binding or alterations to proteins involved in depositing PTMs that may interfere with affinity-probe binding.
“trans-pQTL associated with several protein measures may, among many other potential mechanisms, reflect non-specific affinity-probe binding or alterations to proteins involved in depositing PTMs that may interfere with affinity-probe binding.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Adjustment for PAVs may improve concordance of protein measures and downstream associations.
“In summary, adjustment for PAVs may improve concordance of protein measures and downstream associations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
cis-pQTL presence/absence may be a strong predictor of inter-platform concordance.
“Although we note that some platform-specific cis-pQTL were observed even for proteins with highly-correlated measures (Fig. 3C and Supplementary Fig. 11) (which may be due to factors such as differences in intra-assay variability, or differing sensitivities for assays to environmental factors interacting with genetic variation to regulate protein abundance), overall, we propose that cis-pQTL pres”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premiseown data
The LOD for an assay may impact protein quantification precision or pQTL detection, particularly for low-abundance proteins.
“The LOD for an assay may impact protein quantification precision or pQTL detection, particularly for low-abundance proteins.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Concordant eQTL evidence may support that pQTL associations detected on one platform only capture true differences in abundance.
“Concordant eQTL evidence may support that pQTL associations detected on one platform only capture true differences in abundance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Adjustment for putative assay interference effects may strengthen the potential to detect true associations with protein abundances, for a subset of proteins.
“demonstrating that adjustment for putative assay interference effects may strengthen the potential to detect true associations with protein abundances, for a subset of proteins.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Differences in protein measurements may result in differences in epidemiological associations.
“For age, sex, and BMI, we observed a small number of proteins with platform-discordant, Bonferroni significant associations on both platforms (6 to 25, Supplementary Data 17), suggesting that differences in protein measurements may indeed result in differences in epidemiological associations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
PAV-driven cis-pQTL associations may reflect assay interference due to different affinities for encoded isoforms, particularly when the association is detected on only one platform or detected on both with different effect directions between platforms.
“As PAVs can impact affinity-probe binding, cis-pQTL associations driven by PAVs may reflect assay interference due to different affinities for encoded isoforms, particularly when the association is detected on only one platform or detected on both with different effect directions between platforms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
80 proteins correlate differently across ancestry groups likely in part due to differing protein-altering variant frequencies by ancestry.
“We highlight 80 proteins that correlate differently across ancestry groups likely in part due to differing protein-altering variant frequencies by ancestry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
MS pQTL findings may be used to better disentangle true biological abundance signals from signals possibly capturing isoform abundance differences, or other effects.
“Hence, MS pQTL findings may be used to better disentangle true biological abundance signals from signals possibly capturing isoform abundance differences, or other effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
PAVs may be one driver of inter-ancestry heterogeneity in cross-platform correlation.
“As PAVs that drive putative epitope effects may differ in frequency between ancestry groups, PAVs may be one driver of inter-ancestry heterogeneity in cross-platform correlation (Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Using protein measures that do not necessarily capture overall protein abundances may mask some associations.
“Proteomics measurements are increasingly used to understand how proteins influence traits and diseases; however, using protein measures that do not necessarily capture overall protein abundances may mask some associations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
If proteomics platforms are employed clinically, failure to account for genetic variation that does not capture overall protein abundance measures may result in systematically different measures among carriers of such genetic variants, thereby creating challenges for downstream applications in disease diagnosis/prognosis.
“Similarly, if proteomics platforms are employed clinically, failure to account for genetic variation that does not capture overall protein abundance measures may result in systematically different measures among carriers of such genetic variants, thereby creating challenges for downstream applications in disease diagnosis/prognosis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: When pQTL are applied as genetic instruments in MR, they capture the effects of overall protein abundances.
- Interpretationown data
Epitope-binding effects are one driver of cross-ancestry differences in platform agreement.
“Additionally, we established that proteins with cross-ancestry differences in platform agreement were enriched for association with PAVs with ancestry-differentiated allele frequencies, supporting epitope-binding effects as one driver of cross-ancestry differences in platform agreement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Genetic variants with different frequencies across ancestries may contribute to cross-ancestry measurement differences.
“We further demonstrate that genetic variants with different frequencies across ancestries may contribute to these measurement differences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Excluding these PAVs as instruments may reveal potentially causal relationships between overall protein abundances and disease outcomes.
“Hence, excluding these PAVs as instruments may reveal potentially causal relationships between overall protein abundances and disease outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: When pQTL are applied as genetic instruments in MR, they capture the effects of overall protein abundances.
- Interpretationreasoning
cis-pQTL driven by coding genetic variation, such as PAVs, may in some cases reflect impacts to the target protein structure that affect protein measurements, particularly for cis-pQTL with platform-discordant directions of effect or platform-specific significance.
“However, cis-pQTL driven by coding genetic variation, such as protein altering variants (PAVs) may, in some cases, reflect impacts to the target protein structure that affect protein measurements, particularly for cis-pQTL with platform-discordant directions of effect or platform-specific significance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Failure to account for assay-interfering PAVs in studies of circulating proteins may hinder the detection of disease-relevant associations or putative biomarkers.
“Failure to account for assay-interfering PAVs in studies of circulating proteins may hinder the detection of disease-relevant associations or putative biomarkers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Environmental or other genetic effects apart from PAVs may contribute to ancestry-heterogeneity in inter-platform correlation.
“However, the improvement in inter-platform correlation across ancestry groups was not linear, and several proteins with ancestry-heterogeneity were also associated with ancestry-differentiated non-coding cis-pQTL or trans-pQTL, further suggesting the interplay of environmental or other genetic effects apart from PAVs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Due to sample size constraints, ancestry clusters are derived at the continental level in this study.
“Due to sample size constraints, ancestry clusters are also derived at the continental level in this study; future studies should consider heterogeneity within continents for cross-platform protein correlation and protein measurement impacting pQTL.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Adjusting for likely assay-interference variants can, in some cases, unmask previously undetected biology.
“Moreover, we demonstrate that adjusting for likely assay-interference variants can, in some cases, unmask previously undetected biology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Including pQTL instruments that do not necessarily capture overall abundance effects, but rather isoform differences, may, in some cases, bias MR results towards the null.
“This suggests that including pQTL instruments that do not necessarily capture overall abundance effects, but rather isoform differences, may, in some cases, bias MR results towards the null.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: When pQTL are applied as genetic instruments in MR, they capture the effects of overall protein abundances.
- Interpretationreasoning
The platform-specific PAV may, in some cases, be masking other signals (for example, from non-coding or regulatory variants) that do reflect differences in overall protein abundance.
“This is particularly surprising, as, in theory, these instruments explain less of total trait variance, supporting that the platform-specific PAV may, in some cases, be masking other signals (for example, from non-coding or regulatory variants) that do reflect differences in overall protein abundance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: When pQTL are applied as genetic instruments in MR, they capture the effects of overall protein abundances.
- Interpretationown data
Excluding platform-specific PAV instruments from MR models may increase power to detect significant associations for a subset of proteins.
“Furthermore, we establish that excluding platform-specific PAV instruments from MR models may increase power to detect significant associations for a subset of proteins.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: When pQTL are applied as genetic instruments in MR, they capture the effects of overall protein abundances.
- Study design and conductown data
The median coefficient of variation for all SomaScan ANML-normalized protein measures in MESA is 2.12 (IQR 1.74, 2.78), based on 1292 samples (646 pairs of split duplicates).
“The median coefficient of variation for all SomaScan ANML-normalized protein measures in MESA is 2.12 (IQR 1.74, 2.78).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 27
- May combine two claims. 45
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationRecent MS-based pQTL studies have suggested that some pQTL may reflect isoform differences.
“Recent MS-based pQTL studies10,18 have further suggested that some pQTL may reflect isoform differences (although these studies are limited in number and generally encompass fewer proteins/participants).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [10] Suhre, K. et al. Nanoparticle enrichment mass-spectrometry proteomics identifies protein-altering variants for precise pQTL mapping. Nat. Commun. 15, 989 (2024). source
- cites [18] Suhre, K. et al. A genome-wide association study of mass spectrometry proteomics using a nanoparticle enrichment platform. Nat. Genet. 57, 2987–2996 (2025). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationProtein quantitative trait loci (pQTL) are commonly detected in large-scale studies.
“Protein quantitative trait loci (pQTL), or associations between circulating protein abundances and genetic variants either within or nearby (cis-) to the protein-encoding gene or elsewhere in the genome (trans-), are commonly detected in large-scale studies1–6.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim5 of 6 sources checked- cites [1] Ferkingstad, E. et al. Large-scale integration of the plasma proteome with genetics and disease. Nat. Genet. 53, 1712–1721 (2021). source
- cites [2] Folkersen, L. et al. Genomic and drug target evaluation of 90 cardiovascular proteins in 30,931 individuals. Nat. Metab. 2, 1135–1148 (2020). source
- cites [3] Said, S. et al. Ancestry diversity in the genetic determinants of the human plasma proteome and associated new drug targets. Preprint at medRxiv, https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.13.23298365 (2023). source
- cites [4] Sun, B. B. et al. Genomic atlas of the human plasma proteome. Nature 558, 73–79 (2018). source
- cites [5] Sun, B. B. et al. Plasma proteomic associations with genetics and health in the UK Biobank. Nature 622, 329–338 (2023). source
- cites [6] Dhindsa, R. S. et al. Rare variant associations with plasma protein levels in the UK Biobank. Nature 622, 339–347 (2023). source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFailure to detect and account for such genetic variation may challenge the interpretation of results obtained across ancestries and introduce a source of bias.
“Failure to detect and account for such genetic variation may challenge the interpretation of results obtained across ancestries and introduce a source of bias21.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Vasbinder, A. et al. Assay-related differences in SuPAR levels: implications for measurement and data interpretation. J. Nephrol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-022-01344-7 (2022). source
The discussion (page not provided) identifies single-nucleotide polymorphisms that alter assay-binding affinity as a measurement limitation and urges caution when interpreting suPAR results. It does not say that failure to account for genetic variation biases comparisons across ancestries; that ancestry-specific extension is unsupported by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationExisting comparisons of SomaScan and Olink platforms have shown that some protein measures are not concordant, with median inter-platform correlation = 0.38-0.50, which challenges the accuracy of protein associations observed.
“However, existing comparisons of SomaScan and Olink platforms have shown that some protein measures are not concordant (median inter-platform correlation = 0.38–0.50)11–16, which challenges the accuracy of protein associations observed, especially as there is no “gold-standard” reference measure for most proteins.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim6 of 6 sources checked- cites [11] Wang, B. et al. Comparative studies of 2168 plasma proteins measured by two affinity-based platforms in 4000 Chinese adults. Nat. Commun. 16, 1869 (2025). source
The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that previous comparisons found moderate inter-platform correlations (median rho ≈ 0.4), and that proteins with lower correlations were more likely to yield platform-specific or discordant associations. It does not give the claimed 0.38–0.50 range; its own study reports a median rho of 0.29. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [12] Katz, D. H. et al. Proteomic profiling platforms head to head: leveraging genetics and clinical traits to compare aptamer- and antibody-based methods. Sci. Adv. 8, eabm5164 (2022). source
- cites [13] Haslam, D. E. et al. Stability and reproducibility of proteomic profiles in epidemiological studies: comparing the Olink and SOMAscan platforms. Proteomics 22, e2100170 (2022). source
- cites [14] Rooney, M. R. et al. Comparison of proteomic measurements across platforms in the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study. Clin. Chem. 69, 68–79 (2023). source
The Results (page unavailable) report poor SomaScan–Olink correlations for 47% of protein pairs, and the Discussion cautions that divergent measurements complicate interpretation of biological associations. The Discussion reports a prior comparison with median r=0.38, but this paper’s own median is 0.53, outside the cited 0.38–0.50 range. It also cautions that disagreement does not establish which assay is more accurate. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [15] Raffield, L. M. et al. Comparison of proteomic assessment methods in multiple cohort studies. Proteomics 20, e1900278 (2020). source
The Results (Summary; page unavailable) report poor concordance for some SomaScan–Olink protein measures, and the Discussion recommends validating key findings with other methods. However, the Results give a median SomaScan–Olink correlation of 0.36, not 0.38–0.50; the reported 0.38 median is for SomaScan versus MSD. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [16] Pietzner, M. et al. Synergistic insights into human health from aptamer- and antibody-based proteomic profiling. Nat. Commun. 12, 6822 (2021). source
May combine two claims.
Premiseown dataThe PILRA protein has been linked to Alzheimer's Disease (AD) in multiple MR studies using Olink pQTL instruments, but different directions of effect for PILRA on AD have been reported across studies using different platform's pQTL instruments.
“The PILRA protein discussed above has been linked to Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) in multiple MR studies using Olink pQTL instruments27–29; however, different directions of effect for PILRA on AD have been reported across studies using different platform’s pQTL instruments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [27] Zhan, H., Cammann, D., Cummings, J. L., Dong, X. & Chen, J. Biomarker identification for Alzheimer’s disease through integration of comprehensive Mendelian randomization and proteomics data. J. Transl. Med. 23, 278 (2025). source
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [28] Debette, S. et al. Proteogenomics in cerebrospinal fluid and plasma reveals new biological fingerprint of cerebral small vessel disease. Res. Sq. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4535534/v1. (2024). source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [29] Zhu, Y., Wang, Y., Cui, Z., Liu, F. & Hu, J. Identification of pleiotropic and specific therapeutic targets for cardio-cerebral diseases: a large-scale proteome-wide mendelian randomization and colocalization study. PLoS ONE 19, e0300500 (2024). source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataProteins with >50% measures above LOD were modestly correlated (N = 1361, median Pearson's r = 0.43, SD = 0.32), while proteins with <50% measures above LOD exhibited low inter-platform correlation (N = 796, median Pearson's r = 0.04, SD = 0.32).
“While proteins with >50% measures above LOD were modestly correlated (N = 1361, median Pearson’s r = 0.43, SD = 0.32), proteins with <50% measures above LOD exhibited low inter-platform correlation (N = 796, median Pearson’s r = 0.04, SD = 0.32), consistent with prior reports (Supplementary Data 15 and 16)26.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Rooney, M. R. et al. Correlations within and between highly multiplexed proteomic assays of human plasma. Clin. Chem. 71, 677–687 (2025). source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPlatform comparisons incorporating MS protein measures are already proving informative to further depict genetically encoded isoform differences and impacts of splicing on detected protein structures.
“Platform comparisons incorporating MS protein measures are already proving informative to further depict genetically encoded isoform differences and impacts of splicing on detected protein structures24,40,41, and will be especially important to expand across ancestrally diverse sets of participants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [24] Pietzner, M. et al. Nanoparticle enriched mass spectrometry proteomics in British South Asians identifies novel variant-protein-disease mechanisms. Preprint at medRxiv, https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.08.12.25333522 (2025). source
The Cross-platform concordance of pQTLs section reports genotype-dependent differences between MS and affinity-based measurements and identifies protein-altering variants as a possible explanation. It raises splicing QTLs producing different isoforms only as another possible explanation; it does not demonstrate effects of splicing on detected protein structures. The Technical variation section also reports little evidence that isoform-specific targeting explains poor cross-platform correlations. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [40] Kirsher, D. Y. et al. Current landscape of plasma proteomics from technical innovations to biological insights and biomarker discovery. Commun. Chem. 8, 279 (2025). source
In Results and discussion, under “Correlations between shared proteins among platforms” (Fig. 4; page not provided), the paper uses MS peptides to compare genetically encoded ApoE isoforms across platforms and assess isoform specificity. It does not report effects of splicing on detected protein structures; a search for alternative splicing found no passage addressing that part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [41] Sissala, N. et al. Comparative evaluation of Olink Explore 3072 and mass spectrometry with peptide fractionation for plasma proteomics. Commun. Chem. 8, 327 (2025). source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitationcis-pQTL presence/absence is thought to provide one predictor of on-target protein measures.
“Here, and across prior studies, cis-pQTL presence/absence is thought to provide one predictor of on-target protein measures12,15,16.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [12] Katz, D. H. et al. Proteomic profiling platforms head to head: leveraging genetics and clinical traits to compare aptamer- and antibody-based methods. Sci. Adv. 8, eabm5164 (2022). source
- cites [15] Raffield, L. M. et al. Comparison of proteomic assessment methods in multiple cohort studies. Proteomics 20, e1900278 (2020). source
- cites [16] Pietzner, M. et al. Synergistic insights into human health from aptamer- and antibody-based proteomic profiling. Nat. Commun. 12, 6822 (2021). source
The Discussion (page unavailable) says that combining genetic variation with protein measurements and phenotypic consequences can provide evidence about the target protein, which supports using genetic signals as one clue. But the paper does not establish cis-pQTL presence or absence alone as a predictor of on-target measurement; its Results also show that cis signals can reflect assay-specific binding effects. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataSimilar proportions of protein measures were associated with any cis-pQTL on each platform (39% SomaScan, 48% Olink), with more distinct cis-pQTL identified for Olink overall.
“We observed similar proportions of protein measures associated with any cis-pQTL on each platform (39% SomaScan, 48% Olink), with more distinct cis-pQTL identified for Olink overall (for the set of 2157 proteins measured on both platforms), consistent with single-ancestry genetic comparisons of earlier versions of SomaScan and Olink platforms12,16,17.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [12] Katz, D. H. et al. Proteomic profiling platforms head to head: leveraging genetics and clinical traits to compare aptamer- and antibody-based methods. Sci. Adv. 8, eabm5164 (2022). source
- cites [16] Pietzner, M. et al. Synergistic insights into human health from aptamer- and antibody-based proteomic profiling. Nat. Commun. 12, 6822 (2021). source
The Results section, “Shared genetic effects are target-dependent” (page unavailable), reports substantial cross-platform agreement in genetic associations, which supports the broad comparison. It does not report the cited 39% and 48% proportions or more distinct cis-pQTLs for Olink; its comparison covers 871 overlapping protein targets rather than 2,157. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [17] Eldjarn, G. H. et al. Large-scale plasma proteomics comparisons through genetics and disease associations. Nature 622, 348–358 (2023). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationExisting affinity-based proteomics studies exploring trans-pQTL often interpret pleiotropic trans-pQTL as biologically relevant signals, which may help confirm appropriate assay performance.
“Existing affinity-based proteomics studies exploring trans-pQTL often interpret pleiotropic trans-pQTL as biologically relevant signals, which may help confirm appropriate assay performance36,37.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [36] Wang, Q. S. et al. Statistically and functionally fine-mapped blood eQTLs and pQTLs from 1,405 humans reveal distinct regulation patterns and disease relevance. Nat. Genet. 56, 2054–2067 (2024). source
In Results, ‘Characterizing the trans-pQTL effects’ (page unavailable), the paper reports a trans-pQTL hotspot at ABO and interprets HLA trans associations through a known molecular interaction. It says the trans-pQTL test-statistic distribution validates its analysis strategy, but does not say that pleiotropic trans-pQTLs confirm appropriate affinity-assay performance or that existing studies often use them for that purpose. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [37] Yao, C. et al. Dynamic role of trans regulation of gene expression in relation to complex traits. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 100, 571–580 (2017). source
The supplied passage and the indexed results contain only URLs, with no section or page text addressing proteomics, pleiotropic trans-pQTL, or assay performance. Searches for those terms and related paraphrases found no passage that could verify the claim from our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the UK BioBank/deCODE SomaScan and Olink platform-comparison, significant platform-specific pleiotropic trans-pQTL were seen at some of the same regions, such as CFH and VTN for SomaScan protein measures, and proteins associated with these loci often showed lower inter-platform correlation compared to other proteins.
“The same trend has been observed in the UK BioBank/deCODE SomaScan and Olink platform-comparison, where significant platform-specific pleiotropic trans-pQTL were seen at some of the same regions, such as complement factor gene CFH and glycoprotein-encoding VTN for SomaScan protein measures, and proteins associated with these loci often showed lower inter-platform correlation compared to other”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] Eldjarn, G. H. et al. Large-scale plasma proteomics comparisons through genetics and disease associations. Nature 622, 348–358 (2023). source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBiological and technical factors can explain the wide range of inter-platform correlation coefficients.
“One prior study demonstrated that biological (such as presence of a trans-membrane domain, protein length) and technical factors (percentage of outlier or below limit of detection protein measures, etc.) can explain this wide range of correlation coefficients16.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] Pietzner, M. et al. Synergistic insights into human health from aptamer- and antibody-based proteomic profiling. Nat. Commun. 12, 6822 (2021). source
The Results section, “Technical factors affecting correlations between protein targets” (page unavailable), says technical factors, missing or extreme measurements, and protein characteristics such as a transmembrane domain help explain varying inter-platform correlations. Its Fig. 2 caption also includes the fraction of measurements below the detection limit among the factors assessed. Our copy does not identify protein length as an explanatory factor, so that example is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe SomaScan assay uses DNA-based slow off-rate modified aptamers (SOMAmer reagents) to quantify the relative abundance of approximately 7000 proteins with high specificity and limits of detection largely comparable to antibody-based assays.
“The assay uses DNA-based slow off-rate modified aptamers (SOMAmerTM reagents) to quantify the relative abundance of approximately 7000 proteins with high specificity and limits of detection largely comparable to antibody-based assays.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim4 of 6 sources checked- cites [40] Kirsher, D. Y. et al. Current landscape of plasma proteomics from technical innovations to biological insights and biomarker discovery. Commun. Chem. 8, 279 (2025). source
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [51] Rohloff, J. C. et al. Nucleic acid ligands with protein-like side chains: modified aptamers and their use as diagnostic and therapeutic agents. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 3, e201 (2014). source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [52] Brody, E. et al. Life’s simple measures: unlocking the proteome. J. Mol. Biol. 422, 595–606 (2012). source
- cites [53] Gold, L. et al. Aptamer-based multiplexed proteomic technology for biomarker discovery. PLoS ONE 5, e15004 (2010). source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [54] Kim, C. H. et al. Stability and reproducibility of proteomic profiles measured with an aptamer-based platform. Sci. Rep. 8, 8382 (2018). source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [55] Williams, S. A. et al. A proteomic surrogate for cardiovascular outcomes that is sensitive to multiple mechanisms of change in risk. Sci. Transl. Med. 14, eabj9625 (2022). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationProteins in plasma samples collected and processed by the MESA exam 1 protocol have been shown to be stable over time.
“Proteins in plasma samples collected in this manner have been shown to be stable over time44.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] Tin, A. et al. Reproducibility and variability of protein analytes measured using a multiplexed modified aptamer assay. J. Appl. Lab. Med. 4, 30–39 (2019). source
The Methods (Study population; page unavailable) describe plasma collected under the ARIC protocol, not the MESA exam 1 protocol. The Discussion (page unavailable) suggests protein analytes were stable over 4–9 weeks, but the Results report significant changes in 23.4% of analytes over approximately 20 years. The paper therefore supports short-term stability in a different sample set, not an unqualified claim of stability over time for MESA-collected samples. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationPlatform-specific and platform-discordant PAVs may bias MR results if used as genetic instruments for circulating protein abundances, in some cases resulting in platform-specific and/or platform-discordant MR estimates.
“We show that platform-specific and platform-discordant PAVs may bias MR results if used as genetic instruments for circulating protein abundances35, in some cases resulting in platform-specific and/or platform-discordant MR estimates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] Lemmelä, S. et al. Integrated analyses of growth differentiation factor-15 concentration and cardiometabolic diseases in humans. eLife 11, e76272 (2022). source
- The authors state this as an assumption: When pQTL are applied as genetic instruments in MR, they capture the effects of overall protein abundances.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationStudying the impact of individual isoforms can be biologically informative in studies of disease, as established with GDF8/11 for cardiovascular events.
“When cis-pQTL do reflect differential binding to encoded isoforms, we note that studying the impact of individual isoforms can be biologically informative in studies of disease, as established with GDF8/11 for cardiovascular events34.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] Walker, R. G. et al. Activated GDF11/8 subforms predict cardiovascular events and mortality in humans. Nat. Commun. 16, 6534 (2025). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOlink Explore 3072 uses 2941 antibody-nucleic acid assay probes to quantify 2172 human protein targets.
“Olink Explore 3072 uses 2941 antibody-nucleic acid assay probes to quantify 2172 human protein targets59,60.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [59] Assarsson, E. et al. Homogenous 96-plex PEA immunoassay exhibiting high sensitivity, specificity, and excellent scalability. PLoS ONE 9, e95192 (2014). source
The Results and Discussion section describes a 96-plex PEA panel with 94 probe pairs, including controls. Our copy does not address Olink Explore 3072 or state that it uses 2,941 probes to quantify 2,172 human protein targets (searched for the product name and both counts). (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [60] Olink. Olink® Explore 3072 User Manual. Accessed from www.olink.com/knowledge/documents 5 Nov 2025.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataInter-platform correlation coefficients for the 2157 proteins measured on both SomaScan 7k and Olink Explore 3072 follow a bimodal distribution with a median Pearson r = 0.30 (Q1 = 0.02, Q3 = 0.63) when comparing SomaScan ANML-SMP measures with Olink.
“Inter-platform correlation coefficients for these 2157 proteins follow a bimodal distribution (median r = 0.30).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data79% and 93% of SomaScan credible sets and 65% and 98% of Olink credible sets reported here were within 1 Mb regions previously reported in deCODE and UK Biobank, respectively.
“79% and 93% of SomaScan credible sets and 65% and 98% of Olink credible sets reported here were within 1 Mb regions previously reported in deCODE and UK Biobank, respectively (Table 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAdjustment for ten protein PCs increases cis-pQTL discovery while minimizing the potential of adjustment for trans-pQTL effects.
“We show that adjustment for ten protein PCs increases cis-pQTL discovery (Supplementary Fig. 5) while minimizing the potential of adjustment for trans-pQTL effects (Supplementary Fig. 6, “Methods”).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataUpon mapping trans-pQTL (pQTL >1 Mb of protein-encoding gene TSS) for SomaScan and Olink protein measures, 424 significant trans-pQTL credible sets were identified for 529 distinct proteins on SomaScan, and 315 for 262 proteins on Olink.
“Upon mapping trans-pQTL (pQTL >1 Mb of protein-encoding gene TSS) for SomaScan and Olink protein measures, we identified 424 significant trans-pQTL credible sets (credible set contains at least one variant with p < 1 × 10−11) for 529 distinct proteins on SomaScan, and 315 for 262 proteins on Olink (Fig. 3A; Table 3; Supplementary Data 9, 10 and 11).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataInter-platform correlation improved for all 15 proteins after PAV adjustment (mean improvement = 0.14).
“Inter-platform correlation improved for all these proteins (mean improvement = 0.14) (Supplementary Fig. 13).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data36% of platform-concordant pQTL credible set pairs, for 207 unique proteins, contained a GTEx eQTL with a concordant direction of effect, compared to 18% and 22% of SomaScan and Olink 'specific' cis-pQTL, respectively.
“Thirty-six percent of platform-concordant pQTL credible set pairs, for 207 unique proteins, contained a GTEx eQTL with a concordant direction of effect, compared to 18% and 22% of SomaScan and Olink “specific” cis-pQTL, respectively (Supplementary Data 7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data9% (13/139) of SomaScan-specific PAV-containing pQTL credible sets also contain a concordant GTEx cis-eQTL, compared to 6% (14/208) of Olink-specific PAV credible sets.
“9% (13/139) of SomaScan-specific PAV-containing pQTL credible sets also contain a concordant GTEx cis-eQTL, compared to 6% (14/208) of Olink-specific PAV credible sets (Supplementary Data 7).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataProteins with a trans-pQTL on both platforms exhibited higher inter-platform correlation (N = 129, mean Pearson's r = 0.55, SD = 0.26) than proteins with a significant trans-pQTL on one platform only (N = 428, median Pearson's r = 0.07, SD = 0.29) and proteins with no trans-pQTL at all (N = 1600, median Pearson's r = 0.34, SD = 0.32).
“While proteins with a trans-pQTL on both platforms exhibited higher inter-platform correlation (N = 129, mean Pearson’s r = 0.55, SD = 0.26) (Fig. 3D, E), proteins with a significant trans-pQTL on one platform only generally exhibited lower inter-platform correlation estimates (N = 428, median Pearson’s r = 0.07, SD = 0.29) than proteins with no trans-pQTL at all (N = 1600, median Pearson’s r = 0.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA platform-discordant cis-pQTL for PILRA is driven by an ancestry-differentiated missense variant rs1859788 G > A (PILRA p.Gly78Arg), with SomaScan B = −1.34 (0.02), p = 1 × 10−300 and Olink B = 0.92 (0.02), p = 2.98 × 10−300, most common among EAS (EAF = 0.60) and AMR (EAF = 0.53) participants compared to AFR (EAF = 0.14) and EUR (EAF = 0.32).
“A platform-discordant cis-pQTL for PILRA is driven by an ancestry-differentiated missense-variant [rs1859788 G > A, PILRA, p.Gly78Arg, SomaScan: B = −1.34 (0.02), p = 1 × 10−300, Olink: B = 0.92 (0.02), p = 2.98 × 10−300] (Supplementary Figs. 15 and 48) most common among EAS (EAF = 0.60) and AMR (EAF = 0.53) participants, compared to AFR (EAF = 0.14) and EUR (EAF = 0.32) participants (Fig. 4B, C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe FUT6; FUT3 region was identified as a platform-specific pleiotropic region for Olink protein measures in the main analysis, but was also pleiotropic for SomaScan protein measures when considering all probes for each protein target.
“The FUT6; FUT3 region was identified as a platform-specific pleiotropic region for Olink protein measures in the main analysis, but was also pleiotropic for SomaScan protein measures when considering all probes for each protein target (Supplementary Data 12 and 13).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA subset of significant cis-pQTL associations was strengthened (8 SomaScan, 4 Olink), and 2 cis-pQTL associations on SomaScan were significant only when adjusting for the platform-discordant PAV.
“We found that a subset of significant cis-pQTL associations was strengthened (8 SomaScan, 4 Olink) (Supplementary Data 21 and 22), and 2 cis-pQTL associations on SomaScan were significant only when adjusting for the platform-discordant PAV (Supplementary Data 23) (Supplementary Figs. 17, 18 and Supplementary Note 3), demonstrating that adjustment for putative assay interference effects may”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong the 15 platform-discordant, PAV-driven cis-pQTL, 4 had a reported genetic effect on transcript abundance in one or more tissues; the eQTL direction of effect agreed with the SomaScan pQTL direction of effect for 2 proteins (CTSS, HDGF) and with Olink cis-pQTL effect-direction for 2 proteins (HNMT, ACP1).
“Among the 15 platform-discordant, PAV-driven cis-pQTL, 4 had a reported genetic effect on transcript abundance in one or more tissues; the eQTL direction of effect agreed with the SomaScan pQTL direction of effect for 2 proteins (CTSS, HDGF) and with Olink cis-pQTL effect-direction for 2 proteins (HNMT, ACP1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataUpon adjusting for copies of the suPAR PAV allele, the correlation of protein measures improved from 0.44 to 0.57, with the largest improvement in inter-platform correlation estimates among individuals of African ancestry (Pearson's r = 0.59 post-PAV adjustment).
“Upon adjusting for copies of the PAV allele, the correlation of protein measures improved from 0.44 to 0.57, with the largest improvement in inter-platform correlation estimates among individuals of African ancestry (Pearson’s r = 0.59 post-PAV adjustment) (Fig. 5C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA platform-discordant cis-pQTL for suPAR is driven by missense variant rs399145 T > C (PLAUR p.Thr86Ala), with SomaScan B = −2.09 (0.070), p = 2.03 × 10−155 and Olink B = 0.61 (0.070), p = 2.58 × 10−17, common among individuals with African ancestry (EAF in MESA participants AFR = 0.10, AMR = 0.009, EAS = 0.000, EUR = 0.004; EAF X2 = 230.7, X2 p = 9.49 × 10−50).
“Additionally, a platform-discordant cis-pQTL driven by a missense variant [rs399145 T > C, PLAUR, p.Thr86Ala SomaScan: B = −2.09 (0.070), p = 2.03 × 10−155, Olink: B = 0.61 (0.070), p = 2.58 × 10−17] (Supplementary Figs. 16, 49) common among individuals with African ancestry [EAF in MESA participants AFR = 0.10, AMR = 0.009, EAS = 0.000, EUR = 0.004, EAF X2 = 230.7 (ancestry-differentiated), X2 p”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe majority (2155/2157) of SomaScan proteins had >50% of measures above the company-reported LOD, while 63% (1361/2157) of Olink proteins measured had >50% of measures above the LOD.
“Here, the majority (2155/2157) of SomaScan proteins had >50% of measures above the company-reported LOD, while 63% (1361/2157) of Olink proteins measured had >50% of measures above the LOD (calculated per company-recommendations) (Supplementary Fig. 12 and Supplementary Data 14).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAdjustment for platform-specific PAVs generally improved protein measure correlation and the strength and concordance of some phenotypic associations, but effects were small if present.
“While adjustment for platform-specific PAVs generally improved protein measure correlation (Supplementary Fig. 14) and the strength and concordance of some phenotypic associations, effects were small if present (Supplementary Figs. 34 and 35).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data83% and 85% of proteins with a cis-pQTL or trans-pQTL detected on Olink had at least 50% of measures above the LOD, respectively.
“83% and 85% of proteins with a cis-pQTL or trans-pQTL detected on Olink had at least 50% of measures above the LOD, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown datasuPAR measures are modestly correlated across all participants (Pearson's r = 0.43), but there is significant heterogeneity in inter-platform correlation estimates between ancestries (Cochran's Q = 55.6, Cochran's Q p = 5.02 × 10−12), with lower correlation estimates among individuals clustering with the AFR ancestry reference population (Pearson's r = 0.24).
“suPAR measures are modestly correlated across all participants (Pearson’s r = 0.43), but there is significant heterogeneity in inter-platform correlation estimates between ancestries (Cochran’s Q = 55.6 , Cochran’s Q p = 5.02 × 10−12), with lower correlation estimates among individuals clustering with the AFR ancestry reference population (Pearson’s r = 0.24, Fig. 5A, D, E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPrior to PAV-adjustment, the mean inter-platform correlation estimate for the 15 proteins was 0.38 (SD = 0.18), with estimates ranging from −0.015 to 0.67; post PAV-adjustment, the mean inter-platform correlation increased to 0.51 (SD = 0.15), with estimates ranging from 0.15 to 0.76.
“Prior to PAV-adjustment, the mean inter-platform correlation estimate for the 15 proteins was 0.38 (SD = 0.18), with estimates ranging from −0.015 to 0.67. Post PAV-adjustment, the mean inter-platform correlation increased to 0.51 (SD = 0.15), with estimates ranging from 0.15 to 0.76 (results for all probes described in Supplementary Note 2 and Supplementary Data 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataProteins associated with a pleiotropic region on both platforms had highly correlated measures (N = 67, median Pearson's r = 0.62, SD = 0.26), while the 136 proteins associated with a trans-pQTL region pleiotropic for SomaScan only exhibited low inter-platform correlation (median Pearson's r = 0.02, SD = 0.21).
“While proteins associated with a pleiotropic region on both platforms had highly correlated measures (N = 67, median Pearson’s r = 0.62, SD = 0.26), the 136 proteins associated with a trans-pQTL region pleiotropic for SomaScan only exhibited low inter-platform correlation (median Pearson’s r = 0.02, SD = 0.21).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt the MESA baseline exam, 53% of participants self-identified as female, 38% as non-Hispanic White, 28% as African American, 12% as Chinese, and 22% as Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino.
“At the baseline exam, 53% of participants self-identified as female, 38% as non-Hispanic White, 28% as African American, 12% as Chinese, and 22% as “Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino””
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhile the majority of the 51 proteins with a nominally significant AD-MR association on both platforms showed concordant directions of MR estimates on each platform, 5 showed opposite directions of effect between analyses with SomaScan versus Olink instruments, including PILRA.
“While the majority of the 51 proteins with a nominally significant AD-MR association on both platforms showed concordant directions of MR estimates on each platform, 5 showed opposite directions of effect between analyses with SomaScan versus Olink instruments, including PILRA (Fig. 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor protein measures associated with platform-discordant PAV cis-pQTL, adjustment for the PAV improved protein measure correlation and resulted in improved strength and concordance of some genetic and epidemiological signals, even unmasking new significant associations.
“Notably, we show that for protein measures associated with platform-discordant PAV cis-pQTL, adjustment for the PAV improved protein measure correlation and resulted in improved strength and concordance of some genetic and epidemiological signals, even unmasking new significant associations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPlatform-shared and/or platform-specific pleiotropic trans-pQTL regions were observed at loci encoding proteins involved in coagulation processes (F12, F5, CPB2), blood type (ABO), fat-transport proteins (APOE), other glycoproteins (HPX, DAG1), and proteins with roles in glycosylation (FUT6, FUT2, HRG, GNPTAB), rather than for transcription factors.
“In a similar vein, we observe platform-shared and/or platform-specific pleiotropic trans-pQTL regions at loci encoding proteins involved in coagulation processes (F12, F5, CPB2), blood type (ABO), fat-transport proteins (APOE), other glycoproteins (HPX, DAG1), and proteins with roles in glycosylation (FUT6, FUT2, HRG, GNPTAB), rather than for transcription factors (as might be expected if a locus”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhile most proteins did not show systematic differences in platform agreement by ancestry, a subset of 80 proteins had significantly heterogeneous correlation across ancestries.
“Importantly, we show that, while most proteins did not show systematic differences in platform agreement by ancestry, a subset of 80 proteins had significantly heterogeneous correlation across ancestries, suggesting that one or both platforms may vary in performance across ancestries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNearly all platform-discordant signals, and ~30% of platform-specific cis-pQTL, are driven by PAVs on each platform, while the majority of platform-concordant and platform-specific cis-pQTL identified are driven by non-coding genetic variants.
“While the majority of platform-concordant and platform-specific cis-pQTL identified are driven by non-coding genetic variants, we find that nearly all the platform-discordant signals, and ~30% of platform-specific cis-pQTL, are driven by PAVs on each platform.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe detection of any platform-shared trans-pQTL association for a protein corresponds with high inter-platform correlation, while proteins associated with regions pleiotropic on SomaScan only had low inter-platform correlation.
“For example, while the detection of any platform-shared trans-pQTL association for a protein corresponds with high inter-platform correlation, proteins associated with regions pleiotropic on SomaScan only had low inter-platform correlation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe improvement in inter-platform correlation across ancestry groups was not linear, and several proteins with ancestry-heterogeneity were also associated with ancestry-differentiated non-coding cis-pQTL or trans-pQTL.
“However, the improvement in inter-platform correlation across ancestry groups was not linear, and several proteins with ancestry-heterogeneity were also associated with ancestry-differentiated non-coding cis-pQTL or trans-pQTL, further suggesting the interplay of environmental or other genetic effects apart from PAVs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown datapQTL mapping was adjusted for age, sex, site, ten genotype PCs, and 10 protein PCs on each platform.
“Here, we performed ancestry-pooled pQTL mapping, with adjustment for age, sex, site, ten genotype principal components (PCs), and 10 protein PCs on each platform.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationown dataAdditional scrutiny of how to best handle protein measures below LOD measures may be necessary for pQTL and other proteomics analyses, especially in cross-platform studies.
“This suggests that additional scrutiny of how to best handle protein measures below LOD measures may be necessary for pQTL and other proteomics analyses, especially in cross-platform studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationown dataProteins with high inter-platform correlation, for example Pearson's r > 0.6, may hold high potential for meta-analysis of pQTL across SomaScan and Olink platforms.
“Although we note that some platform-specific cis-pQTL were observed even for proteins with highly-correlated measures (Fig. 3C and Supplementary Fig. 11) (which may be due to factors such as differences in intra-assay variability, or differing sensitivities for assays to environmental factors interacting with genetic variation to regulate protein abundance), overall, we propose that cis-pQTL pres”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMS-pQTL studies may help differentiate PAV-containing pQTL that do not reflect differences in overall protein abundance, but may reflect differences in specific peptide abundances, altered affinity reagent binding, or technical errors.
“MS-pQTL studies may also help differentiate PAV-containing pQTL that do not reflect differences in overall protein abundance, but may, for example, reflect differences in specific peptide abundances, altered affinity reagent binding, or technical errors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenNegatively correlated protein measures suggest that both platforms measure consistently different, but biologically related values for the same proteins, such as different isoforms.
“While relatively uncommon, negatively correlated protein measures are interesting, as these suggest that both platforms measure consistently different, but biologically related values for the same proteins, such as different isoforms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSuch loci may result in widespread changes to protein glycosylation, which could induce epitope effects for several proteins based on differential binding to proteins with different PTMs.
“Such loci may result in widespread changes to, for instance, protein glycosylation, which could induce epitope effects for several proteins based on differential binding to proteins with different PTMs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThis analysis is limited to the 2157 protein targets measured on both platforms.
“Additionally, this analysis is limited to the 2157 protein targets measured on both platforms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThis study is currently the most diverse platform-comparison, but the representation of non-European ancestry groups remains limited.
“While this study is currently the most diverse platform-comparison, the representation of non-European ancestry groups remains limited.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAdditional factors such as ancestry-differentiated non-coding cis-genetic variation or trans-pQTL, differential recruitment of participants of varied ancestry by site, or other environmental or clinical factors, may also contribute to ancestry-heterogeneity in correlation estimates.
“Although this study focuses on the contribution of coding genetic variation to cross-ancestry differences, additional factors such as ancestry-differentiated non-coding cis-genetic variation or trans-pQTL, differential recruitment of participants of varied ancestry by site, or other environmental or clinical factors, may also contribute to ancestry-heterogeneity in correlation estimates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataAffinity probes for proteins with concordant cis-genetic signals captured the same entities and may have high potential for cross-platform meta-analysis.
“Proteins associated with concordant cis-genetic signals exhibited the highest average inter-platform correlation, increasing confidence that the affinity probes for these proteins captured the same entities and may have high potential for cross-platform meta-analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMESA is a prospective, population-based cohort study of 6814 men and women free of cardiovascular disease at baseline, aged 45 to 84 years, recruited from 6 US clinical centers beginning in 2000.
“MESA is a prospective, population-based cohort study of 6814 men and women free of cardiovascular disease at baseline, aged 45 to 84 years, with recruitment from 6 US clinical centers beginning in 200042.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] Bild, D. E. et al. Multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis: objectives and design. Am. J. Epidemiol. 156, 871–881 (2002). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe pleiotropic associations with coagulation factors may impact protein isoforms or indicate susceptibility of one or both platforms to sample preparation variability.
“Similarly, the pleiotropic associations with coagulation factors may impact protein isoforms or indicate susceptibility of one or both platforms to sample preparation variability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataOne or both platforms may vary in performance across ancestries.
“Importantly, we show that, while most proteins did not show systematic differences in platform agreement by ancestry, a subset of 80 proteins had significantly heterogeneous correlation across ancestries, suggesting that one or both platforms may vary in performance across ancestries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenPower for pQTL (particularly trans-pQTL) discovery is limited by sample size.
“Furthermore, power for pQTL (particularly trans-pQTL) discovery is limited by sample size.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningIt remains possible that neither platform provides accurate protein measures.
“While consistent rank-based protein measures increase confidence in protein measures, it remains possible that neither platform provides accurate protein measures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningWe cannot assume that the same patterns observed in this study hold true in newer versions of SomaScan and Olink platforms.
“We cannot assume that the same patterns observed in this study hold true in these newer versions, particularly as platforms expand into coverage of lower abundance proteins and more intracellular proteins.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThis study represents the first comprehensive comparison of affinity-based protein measure agreement and genetic signals in an ancestrally diverse cohort.
“This study represents the first comprehensive comparison of affinity-based protein measure agreement and genetic signals in an ancestrally diverse cohort.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataDirect relatives were identified with a pedigree and excluded entirely from analyses, resulting in 1889 participants for pQTL mapping.
“Direct relatives were identified with a pedigree and excluded entirely from analyses, resulting in 1889 participants for pQTL mapping.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenPrior to QTL analyses, inverse-normal transformed protein measures from each platform were residualized on participant age, genotypic sex, MESA recruitment site, protein measure plate number, ten genotype principal components, and ten protein principal components.
“Prior to QTL analyses, inverse-normal transformed protein measures from each platform were residualized based on participant age, genotypic sex, MESA recruitment site, protein measure plate number, ten genotype principal components (PCs), and ten protein PCs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenThe observed improvement in cis-pQTL discovery with protein PC adjustment would hold true if the main analysis pipeline were used to define independent loci.
“However, we believe the results observed—where adjustment for protein PCs improved cis-pQTL discovery -- would hold true if using our main analysis pipeline to define independent loci.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataAfter excluding 7 participants with samples flagged by SomaScan for possible measurement errors, 1930 participants were included in the study.
“After excluding 7 participants with samples flagged by SomaScan for possible measurement errors, 1930 participants were included in the study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe tensorQTL trans-pQTL mapping function only outputs variants associated with the protein measure at p < 1 × 10−8, so trans-pQTL summary statistics are available only for those variants.
“We note that, to increase efficiency, the tensorQTL trans-pQTL mapping function only outputs variants associated with the protein measure with a p value < 1 × 10−8; hence, trans-pQTL summary statistics are only available for these variants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
There is no reported method to reconcile protein measure discordance across platforms.
“Additionally, there is no reported method to reconcile protein measure discordance across platforms, preventing effective cross-platform meta-analysis of many protein measures.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Existing comparisons of SomaScan and Olink protein measures are limited to populations of predominantly one ancestry.
“Furthermore, existing comparisons of SomaScan and Olink protein measures are limited to populations of predominantly one ancestry; it remains unknown if assay performance varies across diverse ancestries.”
The paper relies on this without support.
It remains unknown whether assay performance varies across diverse ancestries.
“Furthermore, existing comparisons of SomaScan and Olink protein measures are limited to populations of predominantly one ancestry; it remains unknown if assay performance varies across diverse ancestries.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
When pQTL are applied as genetic instruments in MR, they capture the effects of overall protein abundances.
“When pQTL are applied as genetic instruments in MR, it is generally assumed that they capture the effects of overall protein abundances.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The inter-platform correlation of protein measures serves as a proxy for on-target affinity-probe binding.
“Here, and in prior comparisons, the inter-platform correlation of protein measures serves as a proxy for on-target affinity-probe binding.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Ancestry-differentiated PAV protein count differs by one
MinorThe Results give 118 of 2157 proteins overall, while Table 1 gives 119 for the same category and denominator.
“5.5% (118/2157) of proteins overall”
“| All proteins | All proteins | 2157 | 1239 (57%) | 425 (20%) | 563(26%) | 119(5.5%) | 605(28%) | 190(8.8%) | 348(16%) | 58(2.7%) |”
Olink total target counts conflict
MinorThe platform description gives 2923 distinct human UniProt IDs for Olink Explore 3072, whereas Methods says it quantifies 2172 human protein targets. The text elsewhere identifies 2172 as the number of Olink IDs in the cross-platform comparison, not the platform-wide total.
“The Olink Explore 3072 assay includes 2941 antibody complexes, targeting 2923 distinct human UniProt IDs.”
“Olink Explore 3072 uses 2941 antibody-nucleic acid assay probes to quantify 2172 human protein targets59,60.”
PILRA variant's amino acid change is reversed
MinorThe Results describe rs1859788 as changing glycine to arginine, while the Fig. 4 caption describes the same variant as changing arginine to glycine.
“rs1859788 G > A, PILRA, p.Gly78Arg”
“rs1859788 (chr7:100374211:A:G; p.Arg78Gly)”
Trans-pQTL credible-set and protein counts are reversed
MinorThe Results state that SomaScan had 424 credible sets for 529 proteins, but Table 3 reports 529 credible sets for 424 proteins. The Olink counts, 315 credible sets for 262 proteins, agree across both locations.
“we identified 424 significant trans-pQTL credible sets (credible set contains at least one variant with p < 1 × 10−11) for 529 distinct proteins on SomaScan, and 315 for 262 proteins on Olink”
“| trans-pQTL | N UniProt IDs with a significant trans-pQTL credible set (p < 1 × 10−11) | 424 | 262 | | trans-pQTL | Number of credible sets | 529 | 315 |”
Cites
PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses.
Purcell, S., Neale, B., Todd-Brown, K., Thomas, L., Ferreira, M. A. R., Bender, D., Maller, J., Sklar, P., de Bakker, P. I. W., Daly, M. J., et al. (2007) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/519795 · Cited by 34,089 · see citing works
ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data
Wang, K., Li, M., & Hakonarson, H. H. (2010) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkq603 · Cited by 14,380 · see citing works
Cingolani, P., Platts, A., Wang, L. L., Coon, M., Nguyen, T., Wang, L., Land, S. J., Lu, X., & Ruden, D. M. (2012) · Fly · doi:10.4161/fly.19695 · Cited by 11,816 · see citing works
Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals
Alexander, D. H., Novembre, J., & Lange, K. (2009) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.094052.109 · Cited by 9,898 · see citing works
The Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor
McLaren, W., Gil, L., Hunt, S. E., Riat, H. S., Ritchie, G. R. S., Thormann, A., Flicek, P., & Cunningham, F. (2016) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-016-0974-4 · Cited by 8,099 · see citing works
The GTEx Consortium atlas of genetic regulatory effects across human tissues
The GTEx Consortium, Aguet, F., Anand, S., Ardlie, K. G., Gabriel, S., Getz, G. A., Graubert, A., Hadley, K., Handsaker, R. E., Huang, K. H., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaz1776 · Cited by 5,547 · see citing works
Self-citationMulti-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis: Objectives and Design
Bild, D. E. (2002) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwf113 · Cited by 3,942 · see citing works
A subcellular map of the human proteome
Thul, P. J., Åkesson, L., Wiking, M., Mahdessian, D., Geladaki, A., Ait Blal, H., Alm, T., Asplund, A., Björk, L., Breckels, L. M., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aal3321 · Cited by 2,813 · see citing works
New insights into the genetic etiology of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias
Bellenguez, C., Küçükali, F., Jansen, I. E., Kleineidam, L., Moreno-Grau, S., Amin, N., Naj, A. C., Campos-Martin, R., Grenier-Boley, B., Andrade, V., et al. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01024-z · Cited by 2,498 · see citing works
Genomic atlas of the human plasma proteome
Sun, B. B., Maranville, J. C., Peters, J. E., Stacey, D., Staley, J. R., Blackshaw, J., Burgess, S., Jiang, T., Paige, E., Surendran, P., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0175-2 · Cited by 2,268 · see citing works
Self-citationSequencing of 53,831 diverse genomes from the NHLBI TOPMed Program
Taliun, D., Harris, D. N., Kessler, M. D., Carlson, J., Szpiech, Z. A., Torres, R., Taliun, S. A. G., Corvelo, A., Gogarten, S. M., Kang, H. M., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03205-y · Cited by 2,213 · see citing works
Self-citationYavorska, O. O., & Burgess, S. (2017) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyx034 · Cited by 2,013 · see citing works
Assarsson, E., Lundberg, M., Holmquist, G., Björkesten, J., Bucht Thorsen, S., Ekman, D., Eriksson, A., Rennel Dickens, E., Ohlsson, S., Edfeldt, G., et al. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0095192 · Cited by 1,874 · see citing works
Aptamer-Based Multiplexed Proteomic Technology for Biomarker Discovery
Gold, L., Ayers, D., Bertino, J., Bock, C., Bock, A., Brody, E. N., Carter, J., Dalby, A. B., Eaton, B. E., Fitzwater, T., et al. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015004 · Cited by 1,754 · see citing works
Plasma proteomic associations with genetics and health in the UK Biobank
Sun, B. B., Chiou, J., Traylor, M., Benner, C., Hsu, Y.-H., Richardson, T. G., Surendran, P., Mahajan, A., Robins, C., Vasquez-Grinnell, S. G., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06592-6 · Cited by 1,740 · see citing works
Large-scale integration of the plasma proteome with genetics and disease
Ferkingstad, E., Sulem, P., Atlason, B. A., Sveinbjornsson, G., Magnusson, M. I., Styrmisdottir, E. L., Gunnarsdottir, K., Helgason, A., Oddsson, A., Halldorsson, B. V., et al. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00978-w · Cited by 1,697 · see citing works
The NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog: knowledgebase and deposition resource
Sollis, E., Mosaku, A., Abid, A., Buniello, A., Cerezo, M., Gil, L., Groza, T., Güneş, O., Hall, P., Hayhurst, J., et al. (2023) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1010 · Cited by 1,641 · see citing works
Enhancements to the ADMIXTURE algorithm for individual ancestry estimation
Alexander, D. H., & Lange, K. L. (2011) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-246 · Cited by 1,566 · see citing works
A simple new approach to variable selection in regression, with application to genetic fine mapping
Wang, G., Sarkar, A., Carbonetto, P., & Stephens, M. (2020) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · doi:10.1111/rssb.12388 · Cited by 1,121 · see citing works
Genomic and drug target evaluation of 90 cardiovascular proteins in 30,931 individuals
Folkersen, L., Gustafsson, S., Wang, Q., Hansen, D. H., Hedman, Å. K., Schork, A., Page, K., Zhernakova, D. V., Wu, Y., Peters, J., et al. (2020) · Nature Metabolism · doi:10.1038/s42255-020-00287-2 · Cited by 705 · see citing works
Self-citationMapping the proteo-genomic convergence of human diseases
Pietzner, M., Wheeler, E., Carrasco-Zanini, J., Cortes, A., Koprulu, M., Wörheide, M. A., Oerton, E., Cook, J., Stewart, I. D., Kerrison, N. D., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abj1541 · Cited by 657 · see citing works
GENCODE: reference annotation for the human and mouse genomes in 2023
Frankish, A., Sala, S. C., Diekhans, M., Jungreis, I., Loveland, J. E., Mudge, J. M., Sisu, C., Wright, J. C., Arnan, C., Barnes, I., et al. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1071 · Cited by 617 · see citing works
Large-scale plasma proteomics comparisons through genetics and disease associations
Eldjarn, G. H., Ferkingstad, E., Lund, S. H., Helgason, H., Magnusson, O. T., Gunnarsdottir, K., Olafsdottir, T. A., Halldorsson, B. V., Olason, P. I., Zink, F., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06563-x · Cited by 583 · see citing works
Rohloff, J. C., Gelinas, A. D., Jarvis, T. C., Ochsner, U. A., Schneider, D. J., Gold, L., & Janjic, N. (2014) · Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1038/mtna.2014.49 · Cited by 533 · see citing works
Plasma protein patterns as comprehensive indicators of health
Williams, S. A., Kivimaki, M., Langenberg, C., Hingorani, A. D., Casas, J. P., Bouchard, C., Jonasson, C., Sarzynski, M. A., Shipley, M. J., Alexander, L., et al. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0665-2 · Cited by 506 · see citing works
Self-citationScaling computational genomics to millions of individuals with GPUs
Taylor-Weiner, A. N., Aguet, F., Haradhvala, N. J., Gosai, S. J., Anand, S. K., Kim, J., Ardlie, K., Allen, E. M. V., & Getz, G. A. (2019) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1836-7 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Self-citationSynergistic insights into human health from aptamer- and antibody-based proteomic profiling
Pietzner, M., Wheeler, E., Carrasco-Zanini, J., Kerrison, N. D., Oerton, E., Koprulu, M., Luan, J., Hingorani, A. D., Williams, S. A., Wareham, N. J., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27164-0 · Cited by 234 · cited 10× · see citing works
“We and others observed a platform-discordant PAV cis-pQTL for this protein 16 .”
InfluentialThe Human Genome Diversity Project: past, present and future
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. (2005) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1579 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Katz, D. H., Robbins, J. M., Deng, S., Tahir, U. A., Bick, A. G., Pampana, A., Yu, Z., Ngo, D., Benson, M. D., Chen, Z.-Z., et al. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abm5164 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Self-citationRare variant associations with plasma protein levels in the UK Biobank
Dhindsa, R. S., Burren, O. S., Sun, B. B., Prins, B. P., Matelska, D., Wheeler, E., Mitchell, J., Oerton, E., Hristova, V. A., Smith, K. R., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06547-x · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Comparison of Proteomic Assessment Methods in Multiple Cohort Studies
Raffield, L. M., Dang, H., Pratte, K. A., Jacobson, S., Gillenwater, L. A., Ampleford, E., Barjaktarevic, I., Basta, P., Clish, C. B., Comellas, A. P., et al. (2020) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.201900278 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Self-citationStability and reproducibility of proteomic profiles measured with an aptamer-based platform
Kim, C. H., Tworoger, S. S., Stampfer, M. J., Dillon, S. T., Gu, X., Sawyer, S. J., Chan, A. T., Libermann, T. A., & Eliassen, A. H. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-26640-w · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Haslam, D. E., Li, J., Dillon, S. T., Gu, X., Cao, Y., Zeleznik, O. A., Sasamoto, N., Zhang, X., Eliassen, A. H., Liang, L., et al. (2022) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.202100170 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Self-citationWGSA: an annotation pipeline for human genome sequencing studies
Liu, X., White, S. J., Peng, B., Johnson, A. D., Brody, J. A., Li, A. H., Huang, Z., Carroll, A. W., Wei, P., Gibbs, R. A., et al. (2015) · Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1136/jmedgenet-2015-103423 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Kirsher, D. Y., Chand, S., Phong, A., Nguyen, B., Szoke, B. G., & Ahadi, S. (2025) · Communications Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s42004-025-01665-1 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Dynamic Role of trans Regulation of Gene Expression in Relation to Complex Traits
Yao, C., Joehanes, R., Johnson, A. D., Huan, T., Liu, C., Freedman, J. E., Munson, P. J., Hill, D. E., Vidal, M., & Levy, D. (2017) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.02.003 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Tin, A., Yu, B., Ma, J., Masushita, K., Daya, N., Hoogeveen, R. C., Ballantyne, C. M., Couper, D., Rebholz, C. M., Grams, M. E., et al. (2019) · The Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.1373/jalm.2018.027086 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Self-citationWilliams, S. A., Ostroff, R., Hinterberg, M. A., Coresh, J., Ballantyne, C. M., Matsushita, K., Mueller, C. E., Walter, J., Jonasson, C., Holman, R. R., et al. (2022) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.abj9625 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Self-citationThe end of the start for population sequencing
Birney, E., & Soranzo, N. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/526052a · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Rooney, M. R., Chen, J., Ballantyne, C. M., Hoogeveen, R. C., Tang, O., Grams, M. E., Tin, A., Ndumele, C. E., Zannad, F., Couper, D. J., et al. (2023) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1093/clinchem/hvac186 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Self-citationXu, F., Yu, E. Y.-W., Cai, X., Yue, L., Jing, L., Liang, X., Fu, Y., Miao, Z., Yang, M., Shuai, M., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-36491-3 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Olson, J. L., Bild, D. E., Kronmal, R. A., & Burke, G. L. (2016) · Global Heart · doi:10.1016/j.gheart.2016.08.004 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Wang, B., Pozarickij, A., Mazidi, M., Wright, N., Yao, P., Said, S., Iona, A., Kartsonaki, C., Fry, H., Lin, K., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-56935-2 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Suhre, K., Venkataraman, G. R., Guturu, H., Halama, A., Stephan, N., Thareja, G., Sarwath, H., Motamedchaboki, K., Donovan, M. K. R., Siddiqui, A., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-45233-y · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Life's Simple Measures: Unlocking the Proteome
Brody, E., Gold, L., Mehan, M., Ostroff, R., Rohloff, J., Walker, J., & Zichi, D. (2012) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2012.06.021 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Wang, Q. S., Hasegawa, T., Namkoong, H., Saiki, R., Edahiro, R., Sonehara, K., Tanaka, H., Azekawa, S., Chubachi, S., Takahashi, Y., et al. (2024) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-024-01896-3 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Correlations Within and Between Highly Multiplexed Proteomic Assays of Human Plasma
Rooney, M. R., Chen, J., Ballantyne, C. M., Hoogeveen, R. C., Boerwinkle, E., Yu, B., Walker, K. A., Schlosser, P., Selvin, E., Chatterjee, N., et al. (2025) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1093/clinchem/hvaf030 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationMaster regulator genes and their impact on major diseases
Cai, W., Zhou, W., Han, Z., Lei, J., Zhuang, J., Zhu, P., Wu, X., & Yuan, W. (2020) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.9952 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Lemmelä, S., Wigmore, E. M., Benner, C., Havulinna, A. S., Ong, R. M., Kempf, T., Wollert, K. C., Blankenberg, S., Zeller, T., Peters, J. E., et al. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.76272 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Sissala, N., Babačić, H., Leo, I. R., Cao, X., Forshed, J., Eriksson, L. E., Lehtiö, J., Fredolini, C., Åberg, M., & Pernemalm, M. (2025) · Communications Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s42004-025-01753-2 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Li, Y., Cheng, Y., Consolato, F., Schiano, G., Chong, M. R., Pietzner, M., Nguyen, N. Q. H., Scherer, N., Biggs, M. L., Kleber, M. E., et al. (2022) · JCI Insight · doi:10.1172/jci.insight.157035 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationAssay-related differences in SuPAR levels: implications for measurement and data interpretation
Vasbinder, A., Raffield, L. M., Gao, Y., Engstrom, G., Quyyumi, A. A., Reiner, A. P., Reiser, J., & Hayek, S. S. (2023) · Journal of Nephrology · doi:10.1007/s40620-022-01344-7 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationReisinger, A. C., Niedrist, T., Posch, F., Hatzl, S., Hackl, G., Prattes, J., Schilcher, G., Meißl, A.-M., Raggam, R. B., Herrmann, M., et al. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-96352-1 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Zhan, H., Cammann, D., Cummings, J. L., Dong, X., & Chen, J. (2025) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12967-025-06317-5 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citationCross-cohort analysis of expression and splicing quantitative trait loci in TOPMed
Orchard, P., Blackwell, T. W., Kachuri, L., Castaldi, P. J., Cho, M. H., Christenson, S. A., Durda, P., Gabriel, S., Hersh, C. P., Huntsman, S., et al. (2025) · doi:10.1101/2025.02.19.25322561 · Cited by 17
Self-citationPozarickij, A., Said, S., Lin, K., Morris, S., Edris, A., Iona, A., Kartsonaki, C., Wright, N., Yao, P., Fry, H., et al. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.11.13.23298365 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationCross-cohort analysis of expression and splicing quantitative trait loci in TOPMed
Orchard, P., Blackwell, T. W., Kachuri, L., Castaldi, P. J., Cho, M. H., Christenson, S. A., Durda, P., Gabriel, S., Hersh, C. P., Huntsman, S., et al. (2026) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adx2989 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationOlson, N. C., Raffield, L. M., Moxley, A. H., Miller-Fleming, T. W., Auer, P. L., Franceschini, N., Ngo, D., Thornton, T. A., Lange, E. M., Li, Y., et al. (2021) · Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine · doi:10.1161/circgen.121.003421 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationDias, J., Chen, T., Hua, X., Wang, X., Rodriguez, A. A., Madduri, R., Kraft, P., & Zhang, H. (2025) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.08.006 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Suhre, K., Chen, Q., Halama, A., Mendez, K., Dahlin, A., Stephan, N., Thareja, G., Sarwath, H., Guturu, H., Dwaraka, V. B., et al. (2025) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-025-02413-w · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Zhu, Y., Wang, Y., Cui, Z., Liu, F., & Hu, J. (2024) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0300500 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Jehn, U., Schütte-Nütgen, K., Henke, U., Pavenstädt, H., Suwelack, B., & Reuter, S. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-83333-7 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Wang, N., Ockerman, F. P., Zhou, L. Y., Grove, M. L., Alkis, T., Barnard, J., Bowler, R. P., Clish, C. B., Chung, S., Drzymalla, E., et al. (2025) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.08.022 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationDebette, S., Caro, I., Western, D., Namba, S., Sun, N., Kawaguchi, S., He, Y., Fujita, M., Roshchupkin, G., D'Aoust, T., et al. (2024) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4535534/v1 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationRen, Y., Ruan, P., Segal, M. R., Dobre, M. A., Schelling, J. R., Banerjee, U., Shafi, T., Ganz, P., Dubin, R. F., & the CRIC Study Investigators (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0293945 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationPietzner, M., Williamson, A., Hunt, K. A., Koprulu, M., Kohleick, L., Demircan, K., Genes & Health Research Team, Finer, S., Zanini, J. C., van Heel, D. A., et al. (2025) · doi:10.1101/2025.08.12.25333522 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Activated GDF11/8 subforms predict cardiovascular events and mortality in humans
Walker, R. G., Kato, T., Ben Driss, L., Williams, S. A., Hinterberg, M. A., Janjic, N., Gelinas, A. D., Carpenter, M. A., Kattamuri, C., Walter, J. E., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-61815-w · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationPlatform-dependent effects of genetic variants on plasma APOL1
Wang, Q. S., Huang, J., Chan, L., Haste, N., Olsson, N., Gaun, A., McAllister, F., Madhireddy, D., Baruch, A., Cardone, K. M., et al. (2025) · doi:10.1101/2025.01.30.635763 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mapping the path to clinical implementation of multi-omics
Ismail, S. I., Saad, C., Elrayess, M. A., Khleifat, A. A., Hendi, N. N., Al-Sarraj, Y. A., Badji, R. M., & Al‐Muftah, W. (2026) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-026-02663-2 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Blood protein biomarkers for rheumatoid arthritis patients complicated by interstitial lung disease
Furukawa, H., Hikichi, Y., Kunieda, K., Oka, S., Higuchi, T., Shimada, K., Hashimoto, A., Komiya, A., Matsui, T., Fukui, N., et al. (2026) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2026.1890259 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Proteogenomics in human populations.
Zhai, R.-R., Mälarstig, A., & Shen, X. (2026) · Nature reviews genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-026-00998-4 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Plasma titration provides a physical ruler for cross-platform proteomicsPreprint
Liu, Y., Wang, H., Zhang, Y., Lu, R., Xu, W., Hou, W., Zhu, Y., Li, X., Chen, Q., Gao, Y., et al. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.08.09.740864 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Li, L., Alaa, A., Tan, Y., Demirel, İ., Friedman, S. F., Zha, Q., Tracy, R. P., Taylor, K. D., Yu, B., Ballantyne, C. M., et al. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.05.05.723059
Self-citationPatient cerebral organoids capture Alzheimer’s disease proteomic biomarkers and drug targetsPreprint
Thomson, S., Li, X. C., Walker, S., Tang, T. C. Y., Graham, M. E., Olechnowicz, S. W. Z., Bowden, R. J., Waugh, K. A., Slawson, C. M., Burns, J. M., et al. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.06.22.733874
AART enables fast and accurate cross-platform proteomic translationPreprint
Chen, Y., & Zhang, S. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.06.29.735313
Short-term, Long-term, and Genetic Determinants of Human Plasma Proteome VariabilityPreprint
Benacom, D., Specht, A., Nicholas, J. C., Guillard, R., Gillman, M. G., Dubin, R. F., Ganz, P., Rotter, J. I., Taylor, K. D., Rich, S. S., et al. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.07.30.741635
Self-citationMarshall, W. R., McDonnell, T., Green, D., Sinha, S., & Kalra, P. A. (2026) · Kidney International Reports · doi:10.1016/j.ekir.2026.107016
Wang, S., Han, S., Li, X., & Zhang, H. (2026) · Journal of Future Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jfutfo.2026.09.020
Testican-2: from glomerular activity to circulating biomarker
Luo, J., Sun, H., Jiang, L., & Xiao, X.-H. (2026) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2026.1953293
Azhar, M. A., Ahmed, S., Altuhami, A., Shabab, M., Assiri, A. M., Broering, D. C., & Mir, T. A. (2026) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2026.1987479
- Authors
- Nicholas, J. C., Katz, D. H., Tahir, U. A., Debban, C. L., Aguet, F., Blackwell, T., Bowler, R. P., Broadaway, K. A., Chen, J., Clish, C. B., Coresh, J., Cornell, E., Cruz, D. E., Deo, R., Doyle, M. F., Durda, P., Ekunwe, L., Floyd, J. S., Gill, D., Guo, X., Hoogeveen, R. C., Johnson, C., Lange, L. A., Li, Y., Manning, A., Meigs, J. B., Mi, M. Y., Mychaleckyj, J. C., Olson, N. C., Pratte, K. A., Psaty, B. M., Reiner, A. P., Ruan, P., Sevilla-Gonzalez, M., Shah, A. M., Sun, Q., Tracy, R. P., Wen, J., Wood, A. C., Wilson, J. G., Young, K. L., Yu, B., Rooney, M. R., Manichaikul, A., Dubin, R., Mohlke, K. L., Rich, S. S., Rotter, J. I., Ganz, P., Gerszten, R. E., Taylor, K. D., & Raffield, L. M.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
- University of Virginia (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Cleveland Clinic (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Broad Institute (US)
- University of Vermont (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- The Lundquist Institute (US)
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
- National Jewish Health (US)
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Corresponding author
- Raffield, Laura M.
- ORCID
- Nicholas, Jayna C.
- Katz, Daniel H.
- Tahir, Usman A.
- Bowler, Russell P.
- Broadaway, K. Alaine
- Clish, Clary B.
- Coresh, Josef
- Cruz, Daniel E.
- Deo, Rajat
- Doyle, Margaret F.
- Durda, Peter
- Ekunwe, Lynette
- Floyd, James S.
- Gill, Dipender
- Guo, Xiuqing
- Johnson, Craig
- Li, Yun
- Manning, Alisa
- Meigs, James B.
- Mi, Michael Y.
- Mychaleckyj, Josyf C.
- Olson, Nels C.
- Pratte, Katherine A.
- Psaty, Brucy M.
- Reiner, Alexander P.
- Ruan, Peifeng
- Sevilla-Gonzalez, Magdalena
- Shah, Amil M.
- Sun, Quan
- Tracy, Russell P.
- Wen, Jia
- Wood, Alexis C.
- Wilson, James G.
- Young, Kristin L.
- Yu, Bing
- Rooney, Mary R.
- Manichaikul, Ani
- Dubin, Ruth
- Mohlke, Karen L.
- Rich, Stephen S.
- Rotter, Jerome I.
- Ganz, Peter
- Gerszten, Robert E.
- Taylor, Kent D.
- Raffield, Laura M.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2026-01-22
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1054-1054
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12847899
- OpenAlex
- W7125477295
- Semantic Scholar
- 34de0350635e0cd513653c116d6d27768c13f0a6
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13
- FWCI
- 52.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (1F31HL176194-01A1)
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM135128)
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (R01HL133870, R01DK072193)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
- Keywords
- affinity proteomics, SomaScan, protein-altering variants, genetic variants, phenotypic association, ancestry differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-31.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-31.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review