The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Köppen's climate classification map for Brazil
Open accessAbstract
Köppen's climate classification remains the most widely used system by geographical and climatological societies across the world, with well recognized simple rules and climate symbol letters. In Brazil, climatology has been studied for more than 140 years, and among the many proposed methods Köppen's system remains as the most utilized. Considering Köppen's climate classification importance for Brazil (geography, biology, ecology, meteorology, hydrology, agronomy, forestry and environmental sciences), we developed a geographical information system to identify Köppen's climate types based on monthly temperature and rainfall data from 2,950 weather stations. Temperature maps were spatially described using multivariate equations that took into account the geographical coordinates and altitude; and the map resolution (100 m) was similar to the digital elevation model derived from Shuttle Radar Topography Mission. Patterns of rainfall were interpolated using kriging, with the same resolution of temperature maps. The final climate map obtained for Brazil (851,487,700 ha) has a high spatial resolution (1 ha) which allows to observe the climatic variations at the landscape level. The results are presented as maps, graphs, diagrams and tables, allowing users to interpret the occurrence of climate types in Brazil. The zones and climate types are referenced to the most important mountains, plateaus and depressions, geographical landmarks, rivers and watersheds and major cities across the country making the information accessible to all levels of users. The climate map not only showed that the A, B and C zones represent approximately 81%, 5% and 14% of the country but also allowed the identification of Köppen's climates types never reported before in Brazil.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples)
SHAPIRO, S. S., & WILK, M. B. (1965) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591 · Cited by 23,480
Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification
Peel, M. C., Finlayson, B. L., & McMahon, T. A. (2007) · doi:10.5194/hessd-4-439-2007 · Cited by 13,640
Cited by
Monteiro, L. A., Sentelhas, P. C., & Pedra, G. U. (2018) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.5282 · Cited by 150
Self-citationATSS Deep Learning-Based Approach to Detect Apple Fruits
Biffi, L. J., Mitishita, E., Liesenberg, V., Santos, A. A. D., Gonçalves, D. N., Estrabis, N. V., Silva, J. D. A., Osco, L. P., Ramos, A. P. M., Centeno, J. A. S., et al. (2020) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs13010054 · Cited by 77
Penha, J., Landeiro, V. L., Ortega, J. C. G., & Mateus, L. (2017) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1007/s10750-017-3164-9 · Cited by 64
Melo, I., Llusia, D., Bastos, R. P., & Signorelli, L. (2021) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108305 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Alvares, C. A., Stape, J. L., Sentelhas, P. C., de Moraes Gonçalves, J. L., & Sparovek, G.
- Venue
- Meteorologische Zeitschrift
- Publisher
- Schweizerbart
- Published
- 2013-12-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 711-728
- ISSN
- 0941-2948 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W180836830
- Cited by
- 12,125
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 99.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Köppen's climate classification map for Brazil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507
- The paper
- Alvares, C. A., Stape, J. L., Sentelhas, P. C., de Moraes Gonçalves, J. L., & Sparovek, G. (2013). Köppen's climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift. https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.