Cited by 52Atmospheric aerosols and cloudsMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols

Colloidal meteorological processes in the formation of precipitation

Open access
Findeisen, Walter, Volken, Esther, Giesche, Alena M., Brönnimann, Stefan·2015·Meteorologische Zeitschrift

Abstract

This paper is the edited translation of the paper by Walter Findeisen "Die kolloidmeteorologischen Vorgänge bei der Niederschlagsbildung" (Colloidal meteorological processes in the formation of precipitation) that was published 1938 in the Meteorologische Zeitschrift 55, 121-133.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1127/metz/2015/0675

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The presence of liquid water provides a continuous vapor source for ice crystal growth via the Wegener-Bergeron-Findeisen (WBF) process, whereby ice crystals grow at the expense of supercooled droplets, enabling rapid glaciation and precipitation initiation.

    “The presence of liquid water provides a continuous vapor source for ice crystal growth via the Wegener-Bergeron-Findeisen (WBF) process, whereby ice crystals grow at the expense of supercooled droplets (Bergeron, 1935; Findeisen et al., 2015; Wegener, 1912), enabling rapid glaciation and precipitation initiation (Fuchs et al., 2025; Ramelli et al., 2024)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 5 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Findeisen, W., Volken, E., Giesche, A. M., & Brönnimann, S.
Affiliations
University of Bern (CH)
Corresponding author
Brönnimann, Stefan
Venue
Meteorologische Zeitschrift
Publisher
Schweizerbart
Published
2015-07-21
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
443-454
ISSN
0941-2948 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1422331571
Cited by
52
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2017: 2
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Meteorologische Zeitschrift (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Keywords
precipitation formation, cloud microphysics, aerosols, cloud condensation nuclei

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review