Cited by 1Tuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Targeting mycobacterial transpeptidases: evaluating the roles of Ldt and PBP inhibition in suppressing Mycobacterium smegmatis

Open access
de Munnik, Mariska, Calvopiña, Karina, Rabe, Patrick, Schofield, Christopher J.·2025·Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

β-lactams demonstrate promising in vitro activity against Mycobacterium species and are being explored for tuberculosis treatment; however, evidence of their in vivo efficacy versus Mycobacterium tuberculosis remains limited. To achieve broad clinically relevant potency, optimization of the classical β-lactam scaffolds or development of new or non-β-lactam inhibitors for mycobacterial transpeptidases is likely required. In mycobacteria, potential targets of β-lactams include l,d -transpeptidases (Ldts) and penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs). Reports suggest that dual inhibition of Ldts and PBPs may be necessary to achieve effective anti-mycobacterial activity, yet the specific contributions of Ldt and PBP inhibition to the β-lactam antibacterial mechanisms are poorly understood. We used fluorogenic substrate mimics to investigate the effects of β-lactams and reported Ldt Mt2 inhibitors on Mycobacterium smegmatis ( Msm ), assessing their impacts on Ldt and PBP transpeptidase activities in living cells. The results reveal a statistically significant correlation between both Ldt and PBP inhibition and Msm growth suppression; under the tested conditions, a stronger correlation between Ldt inhibition and Msm growth suppression was observed. Notably, apparent inhibition of both PBPs and Ldts was observed with all active inhibitors, though β-lactams manifest increased potency of PBP inhibition. The combination of the β-lactams meropenem and faropenem with selected Ldt Mt2 inhibitors manifested an additive inhibitory effect against Msm . Our results highlight the importance of further optimizing β-lactam efficacy versus mycobacterial PBPs and Ldt transpeptidases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aac.00126-25

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 77

  1. 10.1101/cshperspect.a025247 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1128/AAC.18.1.148 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00105.x · DOI
  4. 10.1038/ja.2014.94 · DOI
  5. 10.1126/science.1167498 · DOI
  6. 10.2217/fmb-2019-0318 · DOI
  7. 10.1002/iub.1875 · DOI
  8. 10.5588/ijtld.16.0498 · DOI
  9. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01833 · DOI
  10. 10.1021/acsinfecdis.9b00112 · DOI
  11. 10.1021/acsinfecdis.1c00570 · DOI
  12. 10.7554/eLife.37516 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1128/JB.00239-08 · DOI
  14. 10.1021/bi00714a008 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/nm.2120 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1038/nchembio.2237 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/febs.14010 · DOI
  18. 10.1128/AAC.01663-13 · DOI
  19. 10.1074/jbc.M111.239988 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/31159 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1984.tb01477.x · DOI
  22. 10.1099/mic.0.078980-0 · DOI
  23. 10.1099/mic.0.27629-0 · DOI
  24. 10.1128/jb.145.1.333-340.1981 · DOI
  25. 10.1128/mBio.02133-16 · DOI
  26. 10.1093/jac/dks395 · DOI
  27. 10.1093/cid/ciab535 · DOI
  28. 10.1128/aac.00034-24 · DOI
  29. 10.1056/NEJMc1513236 · DOI
  30. 10.3390/ijms17030373 · DOI
  31. 10.1183/13993003.00214-2016 · DOI
  32. 10.1021/acsinfecdis.0c00809 · DOI
  33. 10.1021/acschembio.9b00427 · DOI
  34. 10.1039/d2sc06858c · DOI
  35. 10.1039/d3cc02932h · DOI
  36. 10.1021/bi100232q · DOI
  37. 10.1021/bi500339j · DOI
  38. 10.1021/ja9818001 · DOI
  39. 10.1021/ja7111146 · DOI
  40. 10.1128/AAC.11.5.852 · DOI
  41. 10.1128/JB.187.6.1892-1900.2005 · DOI
  42. 10.1128/AAC.26.4.580 · DOI
  43. 10.1128/AAC.14.3.414 · DOI
  44. 10.1128/AAC.48.12.4589-4596.2004 · DOI
  45. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01976 · DOI
  46. 10.1073/pnas.1205073109 · DOI
  47. 10.1038/s41429-020-0320-7 · DOI
  48. 10.1371/journal.pone.0122076 · DOI
  49. CLSI. 2023. Performance standards for susceptibility testing of Mycobacteria, Nocardia spp., and other aerobic actinomycetes. 2nd ed. CLSI Supplement M24S. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.
  50. 10.1055/s-0030-1250736 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)65573-5 · DOI
  52. 10.1128/JB.01795-14 · DOI
  53. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05491.x · DOI
  54. 10.1128/jb.179.19.6005-6009.1997 · DOI
  55. 10.1021/jm9009718 · DOI
  56. 10.1042/bj2920735 · DOI
  57. 10.1039/d4sc04937c · DOI
  58. 10.1093/jac/12.2.119 · DOI
  59. 10.1128/AAC.21.6.950 · DOI
  60. 10.1101/cshperspect.a017822 · DOI
  61. 10.1128/jb.00424-22 · DOI
  62. 10.1021/acsinfecdis.9b00234 · DOI
  63. 10.1128/AAC.39.12.2620 · DOI
  64. 10.1107/S0907444912048998 · DOI
  65. 10.1128/AAC.00665-12 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1128/msphere.00039-22 · DOI
  67. 10.1128/AAC.03461-14 · DOI
  68. 10.1124/mol.119.118042 · DOI
  69. 10.1016/0041-3879(70)90073-5 · DOI
  70. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.05.009 · DOI
  71. 10.1002/cbic.201900379 · DOI
  72. 10.1042/bj2700525 · DOI
  73. 10.1002/hlca.19540370231 · DOI
  74. 10.1002/anie.201809424 · DOI
  75. 10.1038/nmeth.1318 · DOI
  76. 10.1016/j.mex.2021.101543 · DOI
  77. 10.1093/jac/45.2.159 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
de Munnik, M., Calvopiña, K., Rabe, P., & Schofield, C. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Diamond Light Source (GB)
Corresponding author
Schofield, Christopher J.
Venue
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Published
2025-10
Volume
69
Issue
10
Pages
e0012625-e0012625
ISSN
  • 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-6596
OpenAlex
W4414167047
Cited by
1
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/M011224/1)
  • Tres Cantos Open Lab Foundation (TC297)
  • Wellcome Trust (106244/Z/14/Z, 227298/Z/23/Z)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Microbiology (medical) › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
Mycobacterium smegmatis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, beta-lactam antibiotics, L,D-transpeptidase, penicillin-binding proteins, meropenem, faropenem, tuberculosis drug targets, cell growth inhibition
MeSH terms
Meropenem, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bacterial Proteins, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Peptidyl Transferases, Mycobacterium smegmatis, Penicillin-Binding Proteins, beta-Lactams

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review