Elevated prevalence of azole resistant Aspergillus fumigatus in urban versus rural environments in the United Kingdom
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract Azole resistance in the opportunistic pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus is increasing, dominated primarily by two environmentally-associated resistance alleles: TR 34 /L98H and TR 46 /Y121F/T289A. Using an environmental sampling strategy across the South of England we assess the prevalence of azole resistant A. fumigatus (AR Af ) in soil samples collected in both urban and rural locations. We characterise the susceptibility profiles of the resistant isolates to three medical azoles, identify the underlying genetic basis of resistance and investigate their genetic relationships. AR Af was detected in 6.7% of the soil samples, with a higher prevalence in urban (13.8%) compared to rural (1.1%) locations. Nineteen isolates were confirmed to exhibit clinical breakpoints for resistance to at least one of three medical azoles, with 18 isolates exhibiting resistance to itraconazole, four to voriconazole, with two also showing additional elevated minimum inhibitory concentration to posaconazole. Thirteen of the resistant isolates harboured the TR 34 /L98H resistance allele and six isolates carried TR 46 /Y121F/T289A allele. The 19 azole-resistant isolates were spread across five csp1 genetic subtypes, t01, t02, t04B, t09 and t18 with t02 the predominant subtype. Our study demonstrates that AR Af can be easily isolated in the South of England, especially in urban city centres, which appear to play an important role in the epidemiology of environmentally-linked drug resistant A. fumigatus .
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Aspergillus species are common fungi found in the environment, such as soil and air.
“The Aspergillus species [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13] are common fungi found in the environment, such as soil and air [14,15,16,17,18,19].”
From Nationwide Survey about the Occurrence of Aspergillosis in Captive Penguins in Zoos and Aquariums in Japan (2023) · cites this paper as [17]
The Introduction describes A. fumigatus as ubiquitous, with a soil niche and airborne conidia; the Environmental A. fumigatus isolates section also reports its recovery from soil samples. These passages support the claim for A. fumigatus, but do not establish it for Aspergillus species generally. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Possible Environmental Origin of Resistance of <i>Aspergillus fumigatus</i> to Medical Triazoles
Snelders, E., Huis in 't Veld, R. A. G., Rijs, A. J. M. M., Kema, G. H. J., Melchers, W. J. G., & Verweij, P. E. (2009) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00231-09 · Cited by 423 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tackling the emerging threat of antifungal resistance to human health
Fisher, M. C., Alastruey-Izquierdo, A., Berman, J., Bicanic, T., Bignell, E. M., Bowyer, P., Bromley, M., Brüggemann, R., Garber, G., Cornely, O. A., et al. (2022) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-022-00720-1 · Cited by 1,179 · see citing works
Self-citationHow do I manage refractory invasive pulmonary aspergillosis
Vergidis, P., Sendi, P., Alkhateeb, H. B., & Nguyen, M. H. (2024) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2024.01.015 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Itoh, M., Matsumoto, N., Hagino, K., Sawayama, N., Kuwayama, M., Yamada, K., & Toyotome, T. (2023) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani13121913 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sewell, T. R., Zhang, Y., Brackin, A. P., Shelton, J. M. G., Rhodes, J., & Fisher, M. C.
- Affiliations
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Venue
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 9
- ISSN
- 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6596
- PMC
- PMC6709452
- OpenAlex
- W2952920683
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 6.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- RCUK | Medical Research Council (MR/R015600/1)
- RCUK | Natural Environment Research Council (NE/P001165/1)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
- Keywords
- Aspergillus fumigatus, azole resistance, TR34/L98H, environmental prevalence, soil fungi, southern England
- MeSH terms
- Agriculture, Antifungal Agents, Aspergillosis, Aspergillus fumigatus, Azoles, Cities, United Kingdom, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Soil Microbiology, Prevalence, Drug Resistance, Fungal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review