The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Protein Binding: Do We Ever Learn?
Open accessAbstract
Although the influence of protein binding (PB) on antibacterial activity has been reported for many antibiotics and over many years, there is currently no standardization for pharmacodynamic models that account for the impact of protein binding of antimicrobial agents in vitro. This might explain the somewhat contradictory results obtained from different studies. Simple in vitro models which compare the MIC obtained in protein-free standard medium versus a protein-rich medium are prone to methodological pitfalls and may lead to flawed conclusions. Within in vitro test systems, a range of test conditions, including source of protein, concentration of the tested antibiotic, temperature, pH, electrolytes, and supplements may influence the impact of protein binding. As new antibiotics with a high degree of protein binding are in clinical development, attention and action directed toward the optimization and standardization of testing the impact of protein binding on the activity of antibiotics in vitro become even more urgent. In addition, the quantitative relationship between the effects of protein binding in vitro and in vivo needs to be established, since the physiological conditions differ. General recommendations for testing the impact of protein binding in vitro are suggested.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pharmacodynamics of Daptomycin in a Murine Thigh Model of Staphylococcus aureus Infection
Louie, A., Kaw, P., Liu, W., Jumbe, N., Miller, M. H., & Drusano, G. L. (2001) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.45.3.845-851.2001 · Cited by 172
Cited by
Accessing analytes in biofluids for peripheral biochemical monitoring
Heikenfeld, J., Jajack, A., Feldman, B., Granger, S. W., Gaitonde, S., Begtrup, G., & Katchman, B. A. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0040-3 · Cited by 758
Guilhaumou, R., Benaboud, S., Bennis, Y., Dahyot-Fizelier, C., Dailly, E., Gandia, P., Goutelle, S., Lefeuvre, S., Mongardon, N., Roger, C., et al. (2019) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/s13054-019-2378-9 · Cited by 543
Tissue Penetration of Antifungal Agents
Felton, T., Troke, P. F., & Hope, W. W. (2014) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00046-13 · Cited by 426
Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Antibacterial Drugs
Nielsen, E. I., & Friberg, L. E. (2013) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.111.005769 · Cited by 332
From Therapeutic Drug Monitoring to Model‐Informed Precision Dosing for Antibiotics
Wicha, S. G., Märtson, A., Nielsen, E. I., Koch, B. C. P., Friberg, L. E., Alffenaar, J., Minichmayr, I. K., & the International Society of Anti‐Infective Pharmacology (ISAP), T. P. S. G. O. T. E. S. O. C. M. (2021) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1002/cpt.2202 · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Zeitlinger, M. A., Derendorf, H., Mouton, J. W., Cars, O., Craig, W. A., Andes, D., & Theuretzbacher, U.
- Venue
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2011-07
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 3067-3074
- ISSN
- 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6596
- OpenAlex
- W2049789253
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protein Binding: Do We Ever Learn? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aac.01433-10
- The paper
- Zeitlinger, M. A., Derendorf, H., Mouton, J. W., Cars, O., Craig, W. A., Andes, D., & Theuretzbacher, U. (2011). Protein Binding: Do We Ever Learn? Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01433-10
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.