The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Low Prevalence of fks1 Hot Spot 1 Mutations in a Worldwide Collection of Candida Strains
Open accessAbstract
We evaluated the prevalence of fks1 hot spot (HS) 1 mutations among 133 Candida strains from six species displaying various caspofungin MIC values (from < or =0.008 to >8 microg/ml). Only 4 (2.9%) strains displayed FKS1 HS1 amino acid substitutions: 1 C. albicans (F641Y) among 32 isolates tested (3.1%), 1 C. glabrata (S645P) among 34 isolates tested (2.9%), and 2 C. tropicalis (F641S) among 12 isolates tested (16.7%). The 4 isolates displaying FKS1 HS1 alterations showed elevated caspofungin MIC results (1 to >8 microg/ml) but lower anidulafungin and micafungin MIC values (0.12 to 4 microg/ml and 0.25 to 4 microg/ml, respectively) in some instances within the wild-type MIC population, as determined using the epidemiologic cutoff values (ECV). Candida krusei, C. parapsilosis, and C. guilliermondii isolates tested showed no FKS1 HS1 alterations regardless of echinocandin MIC result. We additionally analyzed 8 C. albicans and 7 C. glabrata strains for mutations on other HS regions of fks1 and fks2. Three C. glabrata strains showed alterations on FKS2 HS1 (two S645P and one L644W). In general, strains displaying S645P alteration showed higher echinocandin MIC values than strains harboring other mutations. Overall, Candida spp. strains showing caspofungin MIC values within the ECV did not display fks HS mutations. In contrast, strains showing alterations in this region displayed anidulafungin and/or micafungin MIC values within the wild-type population, suggesting that caspofungin could be the most sensitive agent for detection of these resistance mutations. Furthermore, results from this large, geographically diverse Candida spp. collection demonstrated that fks1 HS1 mutations remain uncommon among isolates with various echinocandin MIC levels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Additional resistance mechanisms may remain to be described given that Fks mutations have not been identified in some echinocandin-resistant isolates [20], [37], [40], and that isolates with identical Fks mutations exhibit different resistance phenotypes with distinct responses to cellular perturbations [41].”
From Global Analysis of the Evolution and Mechanism of Echinocandin Resistance in Candida glabrata (2012) · cites this paper as [40]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“It has been suggested that these FKS polymorphisms reduce the affinity to echinocandins of the glucan synthase by two to three orders of magnitude compared to the wild-type enzyme [106,107].”
From Evolutionary Emergence of Drug Resistance in Candida Opportunistic Pathogens (2018) · cites this paper as [106]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Resistance to echinocandin-class antifungal drugs.
Perlin, D. S. (2007) · Drug Resistance Updates · doi:10.1016/j.drup.2007.04.002 · Cited by 512
Turnidge, J. D., Kahlmeter, G., & Kronvall, G. (2006) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01377.x · Cited by 404
Garcia-Effron, G., Katiyar, S. K., Park, S., Edlind, T. D., & Perlin, D. S. (2008) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.00262-08 · Cited by 323
Leaw, S. N., Chang, H. C., Sun, H. S., Barton, R., Bouchara, J.-P., & Chang, T. C. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.44.3.693-699.2006 · Cited by 308
Garcia-Effron, G., Park, S., & Perlin, D. S. (2009) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.01162-08 · Cited by 256
Katiyar, S. K., Pfaller, M. A., & Edlind, T. D. (2006) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.00349-06 · Cited by 189
Self-citationPfaller, M. A., Boyken, L., Hollis, R. J., Messer, S. A., Tendolkar, S., & Diekema, D. J. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.43.11.5425-5427.2005 · Cited by 161
Self-citationThompson, G. R., Wiederhold, N. P., Vallor, A. C., Villareal, N. C., Lewis, J. S., & Patterson, T. F. (2008) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.00473-08 · Cited by 159
Wild-Type MIC Distributions and Epidemiological Cutoff Values for the Echinocandins and Candida spp
Pfaller, M. A., Boyken, L. B., Hollis, R. J., Kroeger, J. S., Messer, S. A., Tendolkar, S., Jones, R. N., Turnidge, J. D., & Diekema, D. J. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.01590-09 · Cited by 154
Self-citationAcquired resistance to echinocandins in Candida albicans: case report and review
Baixench, M.-T., Aoun, N. B. T., Desnos‐Ollivier, M., Garcia‐Hermoso, D., Bretagne, S., Ramires, S., Piketty, C., & Dannaoui, É. (2007) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dkm095 · Cited by 149
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–126 of 126
Clumping Morphology Influences Virulence Uncoupled from Echinocandin Resistance in Candida glabrata
Hu, C., Fong, G. R., Wurster, S., Kontoyiannis, D. P., & Beyda, N. D. (2022) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/spectrum.01837-21 · Cited by 5
Yadav, A., Sah, S. K., Perlin, D. S., & Rustchenko, E. P. (2024) · Journal of Fungi · doi:10.3390/jof10030224 · Cited by 5
Micafungin versus caspofungin in the treatment of Candida glabrata infection: a case report
Yamada, S. M., Tomita, Y., Yamaguchi, T., & Matsuki, T. (2016) · Journal of Medical Case Reports · doi:10.1186/s13256-016-1096-z · Cited by 5
Winkler, M., Deshpande, L. M., Kimbrough, J. H., Karr, M. H., Rhomberg, P. R., Klauer, A. L., & Castanheira, M. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.01129-24 · Cited by 4
Self-citationMultidrug- and Cross-Resistant Candida: the Looming Threat
Lackner, M., Martín‐Vicente, A., & Lass‐Flörl, C. (2014) · Current Fungal Infection Reports · doi:10.1007/s12281-014-0210-1 · Cited by 4
The current place of echinocandins in the treatment and prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections
Veselov, A. V. (2020) · Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.36488/cmac.2020.3.197-209 · Cited by 6
Opciones terapéuticas frente a especies de Candida resistentes a las equinocandinas
Hidalgo, A. P. C., Dueñas, O. H. R., Fandiño, Y. R. M., & Álvarez, C. (2018) · Universitas Médica · doi:10.11144/javeriana.umed59-2.cand · Cited by 7
Halliday, C. L., Slavin, M. A., & Chen, S. C.-A. (2017) · Current Fungal Infection Reports · doi:10.1007/s12281-017-0282-9 · Cited by 4
Presence of L701 M mutation in the FKS1 gene of echinocandin-susceptible Candida krusei isolates
Lallitto, F., Prigitano, A., Mangione, F., Piralla, A., Tamarozzi, F., Marone, P., & Cavanna, C. (2018) · Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease · doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.07.005 · Cited by 3
Increased fungal burden in the gastrointestinal tract of brain-dead organ donors
Nachman, E. J., Ardis, C. K., Ardis, A. K. B., Nieto, J., Bresson, M. M., Robertson, C. M., Seale, M. N., Villafuerte, N. M., Lyu, Z., Preisner, E. C., et al. (2025) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/spectrum.03341-24 · Cited by 2
Luo, Z., Ning, Y., Dai, R., Ainiwaer, A., Li, Y., Zhang, R., Xiao, M., Wang, X., Yang, Y., Huang, Y., et al. (2025) · International Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijmm.2025.151689 · Cited by 3
Bozkurt, N. B., & Kalkancı, A. (2021) · Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences · doi:10.30621/jbachs.920675 · Cited by 2
Capoor, M. R., & Bal, A. M. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-820472-6.00211-5 · Cited by 2
The Impact of Antifungal Drug Resistance in the Clinic
Lewis, R. E., & Kontoyiannis, D. P. (2014) · ASM Press eBooks · doi:10.1128/9781555817176.ch23 · Cited by 2
Mechanisms of Resistance to Antifungal Agents
Perlin, D. S. (2023) · ClinMicroNow · doi:10.1002/9781683670438.mcm0134 · Cited by 2
Mitra, S. (2026) · Future Microbiology · doi:10.1080/17460913.2026.2671628 · Cited by 2
Clinical Relevance of In Vitro Resistance of Echinocandins: a Focus on Candida parapsilosis
Kale-Pradhan, P. B., Wilhelm, S. M., & Johnson, L. B. (2012) · Current Fungal Infection Reports · doi:10.1007/s12281-012-0087-9 · Cited by 1
Use of Novel Tools to Probe Drug Resistance in Fungi
Zhao, Y., & Perlin, D. S. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-0694-9_21 · Cited by 1
Farowski, F., Vehreschild, J. J., Cornely, O. A., & Vehreschild, M. J. G. T. (2010) · Therapy · doi:10.2217/thy.10.45 · Cited by 1
Mechanisms of Resistance to Antifungal Agents
Perlin, D. S. (2023) · ClinMicroNow · doi:10.1002/9781683674849.mcm0134 · Cited by 1
Use of Novel Tools to Probe Drug Resistance in Fungi
Zhao, Y., & Perlin, D. S. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-0667-3_21-1
Perlin, D. S. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46718-4_29
New insights into the echinocandin resistance in Candida spp. in the clinical settingPreprint
Gedeon, A., Kalboussi, Y., Bigot, J., Le, V., Dannaoui, É., Vellaissamy, S., Antignac, M., Petrella, S., Hennequin, C., & Guitard, J. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.04.29.591739
Belgacem, S., Chebil, W., Ferjani, I., Ghedira, D., Mastouri, M., & Babba, H. (2026) · Journal de Mycologie Médicale · doi:10.1016/j.mycmed.2026.101601
Winkler, M., Rhomberg, P. R., Fedler, K. A., Edeker, S., Klauer, A. L., & Castanheira, M. (2026) · Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society · doi:10.1093/jpids/piag053
Self-citationFernández‐Calleja, L., Villar, C. J., & Lombó, F. (2026) · Rhizosphere · doi:10.1016/j.rhisph.2026.101480
Metadata
- Authors
- Castanheira, M., Woosley, L. N., Diekema, D. J., Messer, S. A., Jones, R. N., & Pfaller, M. A.
- Affiliations
- JMI Laboratories (US)
- University of Iowa (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2655-2659
- ISSN
- 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6596
- PMC
- PMC2876398
- OpenAlex
- W2027821217
- Cited by
- 125
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 7.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Pfizer
- Astellas Pharma
- Astellas Pharma Global Development
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Keywords
- Candida, echinocandin resistance, caspofungin, anidulafungin, micafungin, FKS1, FKS2, Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, Candida tropicalis, Candida krusei, Candida parapsilosis, Candida guilliermondii, antifungal susceptibility
- MeSH terms
- Amino Acid Sequence, Antifungal Agents, Base Sequence, Candida, Candida albicans, Candidiasis, DNA, Fungal, Fungal Proteins, Genes, Fungal, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Species Specificity, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, Amino Acid Substitution, Drug Resistance, Fungal, Candida glabrata, Echinocandins, In Vitro Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review