Cited by 161Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Plant Pathogen ControlYeasts and Rust Fungi Studies

In Vitro Activities of Anidulafungin against More than 2,500 Clinical Isolates of Candida spp., Including 315 Isolates Resistant to Fluconazole

Open access
Pfaller, M. A., Boyken, L., Hollis, R. J., Messer, S. A., Tendolkar, S., Diekema, D. J.·2005·Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Abstract

Anidulafungin is an echinocandin antifungal agent with potent activity against Candida spp. We assessed the in vitro activity of anidulafungin against 2,235 clinical isolates of Candida spp. using the CLSI broth microdilution method. Anidulafungin was very active against Candida spp. (the MIC at which 90% of strains are inhibited [MIC(90)] was 2 microg/ml when MIC endpoint criteria of partial inhibition [MIC-2] were used). Candida albicans, C. glabrata, C. tropicalis, C. krusei, and C. kefyr were the most susceptible species of Candida (MIC(90), 0.06 to 0.12 microg/ml), and C. parapsilosis, C. lusitaniae, and C. guilliermondii were the least susceptible (MIC(90), 0.5 to 2 microg/ml). In addition, 315 fluconazole-resistant isolates were tested, and 99% were inhibited by < or =1 microg/ml of anidulafungin. These results provide further evidence for the spectrum and potency of anidulafungin activity against a large and geographically diverse collection of clinically important isolates of Candida spp.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jcm.43.11.5425-5427.2005

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Triazole-resistant clinical isolates and laboratory strains that demonstrate increased drug efflux pump expression remain susceptible to the echinocandins in laboratory liquid assays.

    “Triazole-resistant clinical isolates (Pfaller et al., 2005; Messer et al., 2006) and laboratory strains (Niimi et al., 2006) that demonstrate increased drug efflux pump expression remain susceptible to the echinocandins in laboratory liquid assays.”

    From Genetic Drivers of Multidrug Resistance in Candida glabrata (2016) · cites this paper as Pfaller et al., 2005

  • Interpretive breakpoints for fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and flucytosine have been developed by considering data relating MICs to known resistance mechanisms, MIC distribution profiles, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters, and the relationship between in vitro activity and clinical outcomes.

    “Interpretive breakpoints for four systemically active antifungal agents (fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and flucytosine [5FC]) have been developed”
  • These CLSI methods are reproducible and accurate and provide clinically useful information comparable to that of antibacterial testing.

    “These methods are reproducible and accurate and provide clinically useful information that is comparable to that of antibacterial testing (223, 225, 226, 253).”
  • In vitro cross-resistance to voriconazole is distinctly uncommon with C. krusei, in contrast to C. glabrata.

    “In contrast to C. glabrata , however, in vitro cross-resistance to voriconazole is distinctly uncommon with C. krusei (225)”
  • The in vitro activity of voriconazole translates into clinical success in patients infected with C. krusei.

    “It also appears that the in vitro activity of voriconazole translates into clinical success in patients infected with C. krusei (123, 182, 225).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pfaller, M. A., Boyken, L., Hollis, R. J., Messer, S. A., Tendolkar, S., & Diekema, D. J.
Affiliations
  • Departments of Pathology
  • University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
Pfaller, M. A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Published
2005-11
Volume
43
Issue
11
Pages
5425-5427
ISSN
  • 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-660X
OpenAlex
W2098505026
Cited by
161
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
13.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
Keywords
anidulafungin, echinocandins, Candida, antifungal susceptibility, fluconazole resistance, Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, Candida tropicalis, Candida krusei, Candida kefyr, Candida parapsilosis, Candida lusitaniae, Candida guilliermondii, minimum inhibitory concentration, clinical isolates
MeSH terms
Anidulafungin, Antifungal Agents, Candida, Candidiasis, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Peptides, Cyclic, Fluconazole, Drug Resistance, Fungal, Echinocandins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review