The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pharmacokinetics of itraconazole following oral administration to normal volunteers
Open accessAbstract
The pharmacokinetics of itraconazole, an orally effective, broad-spectrum, systemic antifungal agent, were evaluated in five healthy male volunteers. Each subject was studied on days 1 and 15 at the following dosages: 100 mg once daily (regimen A), 200 mg once daily (regimen B), and 200 mg twice daily (regimen C). On each study day, itraconazole was administered with a standardized meal. Plasma samples were collected for 72 h postdose, and 24-h urine specimens were obtained. On day 1 of regimen C, plasma samples were collected following the second dose. Samples were assayed for itraconazole by a sensitive, reverse-phase, high-performance liquid chromatography method. Wide intersubject variations in itraconazole concentration in plasma versus time profiles were observed on all study days. Absorption appeared to be slow, with day 1 mean peak itraconazole concentrations in plasma of 110 ng/ml at 2.8 h (regimen A), 272 ng/ml at 3.0 h (regimen B), and 553 ng/ml at 3.4 h (regimen C). Mean peak itraconazole concentrations in plasma on day 15 were 412 ng/ml at 3.0 h (regimen A), 1,070 ng/ml at 4.4 h (regimen B), and 1,980 ng/ml at 6.0 h (regimen C). The steady state was achieved by day 13. Respective elimination half-lives on days 1 and 15 were 15 and 34 h (regimen A), 20.7, and 36.5 h (regimen B), and 25 and 41.7 h (regimen C), respectively. The areas under the plasma concentration versus time curves (0 to infinity) on day 1 were 1,320 (regimen A), 4,160 (regimen B), and 12,600 ng.h/ml (regimen C). With the exception of one patient on day 15 of regimen C, itraconazole was not detected in the urine. All data support dose-dependent pharmacokinetic behavior for itraconazole.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Patterson, T. F., Thompson, G. R., Denning, D. W., Fishman, J. A., Hadley, S., Herbrecht, R., Kontoyiannis, D. P., Marr, K. A., Morrison, V. A., Nguyen, M. H., et al. (2016) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciw326 · Cited by 2,926
Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillosis
Latgé, J.-P. (1999) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.12.2.310 · Cited by 2,307
Rex, J. H., Pfaller, M. A., Galgiani, J. N., Bartlett, M. S., Espinel-Ingroff, A., Ghannoum, M. A., Lancaster, M., Odds, F. C., Rinaldi, M. G., Walsh, T. J., et al. (1997) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/clinids/24.2.235 · Cited by 855
Self-citationStevens, D. A., Moss, R. B., Kurup, V. P., Knutsen, A. P., Greenberger, P., Judson, M. A., Denning, D. W., Crameri, R., Brody, A. S., Light, M., et al. (2003) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/376525 · Cited by 790
Grant, S. M., & Clissold, S. P. (1990) · Drugs · doi:10.2165/00003495-199039060-00006 · Cited by 661
Metadata
- Authors
- Hardin, T. C., Graybill, J. R., Fetchick, R., Woestenborghs, R., Rinaldi, M. G., & Kuhn, J. G.
- Venue
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1988-09
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1310-1313
- ISSN
- 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6596
- OpenAlex
- W2069193583
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pharmacokinetics of itraconazole following oral administration to normal volunteers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aac.32.9.1310
- The paper
- Hardin, T. C., Graybill, J. R., Fetchick, R., Woestenborghs, R., Rinaldi, M. G., & Kuhn, J. G. (1988). Pharmacokinetics of itraconazole following oral administration to normal volunteers. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.32.9.1310
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.