The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Antimicrobial resistance among respiratory isolates of Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States
Open accessAbstract
A national surveillance study was conducted to determine trends in antimicrobial resistance patterns among three common causes of community-acquired respiratory tract infections. Fifteen participating U.S. medical centers submitted clinically significant isolates of Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis, and Streptococcus pneumoniae to two central laboratories for testing with a group of 12 antimicrobial agents. The majority of isolates were recovered from adult males greater than 50 years old. Overall, 84.1% of 378 M. catarrhalis and 16.5% of 564 H. influenzae (29.5% of type b strains; 15.0% of non-type b strains) produced beta-lactamase and were thus resistant to penicillin, ampicillin, and amoxicillin. Resistance in H. influenzae to other agents was 2.1% to tetracycline, 0.7% to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, 1.1% to cefaclor, and 0.2% to cefuroxime and amoxicillin-clavulanate, while the M. catarrhalis isolates yielded very low MICs of these latter drugs. As demonstrated in prior studies, erythromycin showed little activity against H. influenzae. Of 487 S. pneumoniae isolates, 1 (0.2%) was penicillin resistant, while 3.8% were relatively resistant to penicillin, 4.5% were resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, 2.3% were resistant to tetracycline, 1.2% were resistant to chloramphenicol, and 0.2% were resistant to erythromycin. Overall, the lowest resistance rates for these common bacterial respiratory pathogens were noted with amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefuroxime, and cefaclor.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The crisis in antibiotic resistance
Neu, H. C. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.257.5073.1064 · Cited by 2,834
Bacterial Infection in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Murphy, T. F., & Sethi, S. (1992) · American Review of Respiratory Disease · doi:10.1164/ajrccm/146.4.1067 · Cited by 580
Doern, G. V., Heilmann, K. P., Huynh, H. K., Rhomberg, P. R., Coffman, S. L., & Brueggemann, A. B. (2001) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.45.6.1721-1729.2001 · Cited by 538
Self-citationTrimethoprim and sulfonamide resistance.
Huovinen, P., Sundström, L., Swedberg, G., & Sköld, O. (1995) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.39.2.279 · Cited by 523
Bacterial resistance to tetracycline: mechanisms, transfer, and clinical significance
Speer, B. S., Shoemaker, N. B., & Salyers, A. A. (1992) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.5.4.387 · Cited by 517
Metadata
- Authors
- Jorgensen, J. H., Doern, G. V., Maher, L. A., Howell, A. W., & Redding, J. S.
- Venue
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1990-11
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2075-2080
- ISSN
- 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6596
- OpenAlex
- W2163920914
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antimicrobial resistance among respiratory isolates of Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aac.34.11.2075
- The paper
- Jorgensen, J. H., Doern, G. V., Maher, L. A., Howell, A. W., & Redding, J. S. (1990). Antimicrobial resistance among respiratory isolates of Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.34.11.2075
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.