The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reassessment of the number of auxiliary genes essential for expression of high-level methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus
Open accessAbstract
A new transposon library constructed in the background of the highly and homogeneously methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain COL yielded 70 independent insertional mutants with reduced levels of antibiotic resistance. Restriction analysis with HindIII, EcoRV, EcoRI, and PstI and then Southern hybridization with probes for the transposon and for the femA-femB gene demonstrated that 41 of the 70 Tn551 mutants carried distinct and novel, as yet undescribed insertion sites, all of which were outside of the mecA gene and were also outside the already-characterized auxiliary genes femA, femB, femC, and femD. All previously described Tn551 mutations of this type were in genes located either on SmaI fragment A or SmaI fragment I. In contrast, inserts of the new library were located in 7 of the 16 SmaI chromosomal fragments, fragments A, B, C, D, E, F, and I. In all of the mutants, expression of methicillin resistance became heterogeneous, and the MIC for the majority of cells was reduced (1.5 to 200 micrograms ml-1) from the homogeneous methicillin MIC (1,600 micrograms ml-1) of the parental cells. Although identification of the exact number of genes inactivated through the new set of transposon inserts will require cloning and sequencing, a rough estimate of this number from mapping data suggests a minimum of at least 10 to 12 new genetic determinants, all of which are needed together with femA, femB, femC, and femD for the optimal expression of methicillin resistance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Navarre, W. W., & Schneewind, O. (1999) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.63.1.174-229.1999 · Cited by 1,391
Howden, B. P., Davies, J. K., Johnson, P. D. R., Stinear, T. P., & Grayson, M. L. (2010) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00042-09 · Cited by 962
Pinho, M. G., de Lencastre, H., & Tomasz, A. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.191260798 · Cited by 384
Self-citationAnchor Structure of Staphylococcal Surface Proteins
Ton-That, H., Faull, K. F., & Schneewind, O. (1997) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.272.35.22285 · Cited by 173
Ray, S. S., Bonanno, J. B., Chen, H., de Lencastre, H., Wu, S., Tomasz, A., & Burley, S. K. (2003) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10272 · Cited by 21
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- de Lencastre, H., & Tomasz, A.
- Venue
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1994-11
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2590-2598
- ISSN
- 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6596
- OpenAlex
- W2101241216
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reassessment of the number of auxiliary genes essential for expression of high-level methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aac.38.11.2590
- The paper
- de Lencastre, H., & Tomasz, A. (1994). Reassessment of the number of auxiliary genes essential for expression of high-level methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.38.11.2590
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.