The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antibiotics and prevention of microbial colonization of catheters
Open accessAbstract
Slime-producing staphylococci frequently colonize catheters, and when they are embedded in biofilm, they become resistant to various antibiotics. In the study that is described, the comparative efficacies of vancomycin, clindamycin, novobiocin, and minocycline, alone or in combination with rifampin, were tested in an in vitro model of colonization. The model consisted of the modified Robbins device with antibiotic-impregnated cement filling the lumen of catheter segments. The synergistic combination of minocycline and rifampin was the most efficacious in preventing bacterial colonization of slime-producing strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus to catheter surfaces. A similar trend was observed when the inhibitory activities of polyurethane catheters coated with minocycline and rifampin were compared with the inhibitory activities of catheters coated with other antimicrobial agents. The inhibitory activities of catheters coated with minocycline and rifampin against S. epidermidis, S. aureus, and Enterococcus faecalis strains, for example, were significantly better than those of catheters coated with vancomycin (P < 0.05). The inhibitory activities of catheters coated with minocycline and rifampin against gram-negative bacilli and Candida albicans were comparable to those of catheters coated with ceftazidime and amphotericin B, respectively. We found that the combination of minocycline and rifampin is unique and highly effective in preventing the colonization of catheters with slime-producing staphylococci and that it also displays a broad-spectrum inhibitory activity against gram-negative bacteria and yeast cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rex, J. H., Bennett, J. E., Sugar, A. M., Pappas, P. G., van der Horst, C. M., Edwards, J. E., Washburn, R. G., Scheld, W. M., Karchmer, A. W., Dine, A. P., et al. (1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199411173312001 · Cited by 1,039
Cited by
Biofilm formation as microbial development
O'Toole, G., Kaplan, H. B., & Kolter, R. (2000) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.49 · Cited by 3,571
Ceri, H., Olson, M. E., Stremick, C., Read, R. R., Morck, D., & Buret, A. (1999) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.37.6.1771-1776.1999 · Cited by 2,155
A Comparison of Two Antimicrobial-Impregnated Central Venous Catheters
Darouiche, R. O., Raad, I. I., Heard, S. O., Thornby, J. I., Wenker, O. C., Gabrielli, A., Berg, J., Khardori, N., Hanna, H., Hachem, R., et al. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199901073400101 · Cited by 804
Self-citationCoumarins: Old Compounds with Novel Promising Therapeutic Perspectives
Riveiro, M., De Kimpe, N., Moglioni, A., Vazquez, R., Monczor, F., Shayo, C., & Davio, C. (2010) · Current Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/092986710790936284 · Cited by 448
Central venous catheter use: Part 1: Mechanical complications
Polderman, K. H., & Girbes, A. R. (2002) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-001-1154-9 · Cited by 377
Metadata
- Authors
- Raad, I., Darouiche, R., Hachem, R., Sacilowski, M., & Bodey, G. P.
- Venue
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1995-11
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2397-2400
- ISSN
- 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6596
- OpenAlex
- W2143508372
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antibiotics and prevention of microbial colonization of catheters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aac.39.11.2397
- The paper
- Raad, I., Darouiche, R., Hachem, R., Sacilowski, M., & Bodey, G. P. (1995). Antibiotics and prevention of microbial colonization of catheters. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.39.11.2397
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.