The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes resistant to macrolides but sensitive to clindamycin: a common resistance pattern mediated by an efflux system
Open accessAbstract
Macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes isolates from Finland, Australia, and the United Kingdom and, more recently, Streptococcus pneumoniae and S. pyogenes strains from the United States were shown to have an unusual resistance pattern to macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramin B antibiotics. This pattern, referred to as M resistance, consists of susceptibility to clindamycin and streptogramin B antibiotics but resistance to 14- and 15-membered macrolides. An evaluation of the macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance phenotypes among our streptococcal strains collected from 1993 to 1995 suggested that this unusual resistance pattern is not rare. Eighty-five percent (n = 66) of the S. pneumoniae and 75% (n = 28) of the S. pyogenes strains in our collection had an M phenotype. The mechanism of M resistance was not mediated by target modification, as isolated ribosomes from a pneumococcal strain bearing the M phenotype were fully sensitive to erythromycin. Further, the presence of an erm methylase was excluded with primers specific for an erm consensus sequence. However, results of studies that determined the uptake and incorporation of radiolabeled erythromycin into cells were consistent with the presence of a macrolide efflux determinant. The putative efflux determinant in streptococci seems to be distinct from the multicomponent macrolide efflux system in coagulase-negative staphylococci. The recognition of the prevalence of the M phenotype in streptococci has implications for sensitivity testing and may have an impact on the choice of antibiotic therapy in clinical practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nomenclature for Macrolide and Macrolide-Lincosamide-Streptogramin B Resistance Determinants
Roberts, M. C., Sutcliffe, J., Courvalin, P., Jensen, L. B., Rood, J., & Seppala, H. (1999) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.43.12.2823 · Cited by 874
Self-citationNatural Products as Platforms To Overcome Antibiotic Resistance
Rossiter, S. E., Fletcher, M. H., & Wuest, W. M. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00283 · Cited by 622
Housekeeping enzymes as virulence factors for pathogens
Pancholi, V., & Chhatwal, G. S. (2003) · International Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1078/1438-4221-00283 · Cited by 251
Translation and Protein Synthesis: Macrolides
Katz, L., & Ashley, G. W. (2005) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr030107f · Cited by 177
Mahmud, Z., Shabnam, S. A., Mishu, I. D., Johura, F.-T., Mannan, S. B., Sadique, A., Islam, L. N., & Alam, M. (2021) · Gene Reports · doi:10.1016/j.genrep.2021.101182 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Sutcliffe, J., Tait-Kamradt, A., & Wondrack, L.
- Venue
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1996-08
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1817-1824
- ISSN
- 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6596
- OpenAlex
- W2127686385
- Cited by
- 619
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes resistant to macrolides but sensitive to clindamycin: a common resistance pattern mediated by an efflux system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aac.40.8.1817
- The paper
- Sutcliffe, J., Tait-Kamradt, A., & Wondrack, L. (1996). Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes resistant to macrolides but sensitive to clindamycin: a common resistance pattern mediated by an efflux system. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.40.8.1817
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.