The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Distribution of Genes Encoding Resistance to Macrolides, Lincosamides, and Streptogramins among Staphylococci
Open accessAbstract
The relative frequency of 10 determinants of resistance to macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramins was investigated by PCR in a series of 294 macrolide-, lincosamide-, and/or streptogramin-resistant clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated in 1995 from 32 French hospitals. Resistance was mainly due to the presence of ermA or ermC genes, which were detected in 259 strains (88%), in particular those resistant to methicillin (78% of the strains). Macrolide resistance due to msrA was more prevalent in coagulase-negative staphylococci (14.6%) than in S. aureus (2.1%). Genes related to linA/linA′ and conferring resistance to lincomycin were detected in one strain of S. aureus and seven strains of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Resistance to pristinamycin and quinupristin-dalfopristin was phenotypically detected in 10 strains of S. aureus and in three strains of coagulase-negative staphylococci; it was always associated with resistance to type A streptogramins encoded by vat or vatB genes and occurred in association with erm genes. The vga gene conferring decreased susceptibility to type A streptogramins was present alone in three strains of coagulase-negative staphylococci and in combination with erm genes in 10 strains of coagulase-negative staphylococci. A combination of vga-vgb-vat and ermA genes was found in a single strain of S. epidermidis .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chopra, I., & Roberts, M. (2001) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.65.2.232-260.2001 · Cited by 4,517
Antimicrobial resistance: the example of Staphylococcus aureus
Lowy, F. D. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci18535 · Cited by 1,445
Leclercq, R. (2002) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/324626 · Cited by 1,102
Self-citationEfflux-mediated antimicrobial resistance
Poole, K. (2005) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dki171 · Cited by 1,082
Strommenger, B., Kettlitz, C., Werner, G., & Witte, W. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.41.9.4089-4094.2003 · Cited by 578
Metadata
- Authors
- Lina, G., Quaglia, A., Reverdy, M.-E., Leclercq, R., Vandenesch, F., & Etienne, J.
- Venue
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1999-05
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1062-1066
- ISSN
- 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6596
- OpenAlex
- W2128432333
- Cited by
- 548
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distribution of Genes Encoding Resistance to Macrolides, Lincosamides, and Streptogramins among Staphylococci. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aac.43.5.1062
- The paper
- Lina, G., Quaglia, A., Reverdy, M.-E., Leclercq, R., Vandenesch, F., & Etienne, J. (1999). Distribution of Genes Encoding Resistance to Macrolides, Lincosamides, and Streptogramins among Staphylococci. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.43.5.1062
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.