The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Antibacterial Action of Structurally Diverse Cationic Peptides on Gram-Positive Bacteria
Open accessAbstract
Antimicrobial cationic peptides are ubiquitous in nature and are thought to be a component of the first line of defense against infectious agents. It is widely believed that the killing mechanism of these peptides on bacteria involves an interaction with the cytoplasmic membrane. Cationic peptides from different structural classes were used in experiments with Staphylococcus aureus and other medically important gram-positive bacteria to gain insight into the mechanism of action. The membrane potential-sensitive fluorophore dipropylthiacarbocyanine was used to assess the interactions of selected antimicrobial peptides with the cytoplasmic membrane of S. aureus . Study of the kinetics of killing and membrane depolarization showed that, at early time points, membrane depolarization was incomplete, even when 90% or more of the bacteria had been killed. CP26, a 26-amino-acid α-helical peptide with a high MIC against S. aureus , still had the ability to permeabilize the membrane. Cytoplasmic-membrane permeabilization was a widespread ability and an action that may be necessary for reaching an intracellular target but in itself did not appear to be the killing mechanism. Transmission electron microscopy of S. aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis treated with CP29 (a 26-amino-acid α-helical peptide), CP11CN (a 13-amino-acid, proline- and tryptophan-rich peptide), and Bac2A-NH 2 (a linearized version of the 12-amino-acid loop peptide bactenecin) showed variability in effects on bacterial structure. Mesosome-like structures were seen to develop in S. aureus , whereas cell wall effects and mesosomes were seen with S. epidermidis . Nuclear condensation and abherrent septation were occasionally seen in S. epidermidis . Our experiments indicated that these peptides vary in their mechanisms of action and that the mechanism of action likely does not solely involve cytoplasmic-membrane permeabilization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bacteriocins: safe, natural antimicrobials for food preservation.
Cleveland, J., Montville, T. J., Nes, I. F., & Chikindas, M. L. (2001) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1605(01)00560-8 · Cited by 1,835
Cationic peptides: effectors in innate immunity and novel antimicrobials
Hancock, R. E. (2001) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(01)00092-5 · Cited by 978
Self-citationAntibacterial agents based on the cyclic d,l-α-peptide architecture
Fernandez-Lopez, S., Kim, H.-S., Choi, E. C., Delgado, M., Granja, J. R., Khasanov, A., Kraehenbuehl, K., Long, G., Weinberger, D. A., Wilcoxen, K. M., et al. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35086601 · Cited by 938
Defensins - Components of the Innate Immune System in Plants
Lay, F., & Anderson, M. (2005) · Current Protein & Peptide Science · doi:10.2174/1389203053027575 · Cited by 494
Evidence of a charge-density threshold for optimum efficiency of biocidal cationic surfaces
Kügler, R., Bouloussa, O., & Rondelez, F. (2005) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/mic.0.27526-0 · Cited by 438
Metadata
- Authors
- Friedrich, C. L., Moyles, D., Beveridge, T. J., & Hancock, R. E. W.
- Venue
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2086-2092
- ISSN
- 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6596
- OpenAlex
- W2130885148
- Cited by
- 464
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antibacterial Action of Structurally Diverse Cationic Peptides on Gram-Positive Bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aac.44.8.2086-2092.2000
- The paper
- Friedrich, C. L., Moyles, D., Beveridge, T. J., & Hancock, R. E. W. (2000). Antibacterial Action of Structurally Diverse Cationic Peptides on Gram-Positive Bacteria. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.44.8.2086-2092.2000
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.