The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Role of Nutrient Limitation and Stationary-Phase Existence in Klebsiella pneumoniae Biofilm Resistance to Ampicillin and Ciprofloxacin
Open accessAbstract
Biofilms formed by Klebsiella pneumoniae resisted killing during prolonged exposure to ampicillin or ciprofloxacin even though these agents have been shown to penetrate bacterial aggregates. Bacteria dispersed from biofilms into medium quickly regained most of their susceptibility. Experiments with free-floating bacteria showed that stationary-phase bacteria were protected from killing by either antibiotic, especially when the test was performed in medium lacking carbon and nitrogen sources. These results suggested that the antibiotic tolerance of biofilm bacteria could be explained by nutrient limitation in the biofilm leading to stationary-phase existence of at least some of the cells in the biofilm. This mechanism was supported by experimental characterization of nutrient availability and growth status in biofilms. The average specific growth rate of bacteria in biofilms was only 0.032 h −1 compared to the specific growth rate of planktonic bacteria of 0.59 h −1 measured in the same medium. Glucose did not penetrate all the way through the biofilm, and oxygen was shown to penetrate only into the upper 100 μm. The specific catalase activity was elevated in biofilm bacteria to a level similar to that of stationary-phase planktonic cells. Transmission electron microscopy revealed that bacteria were affected by ampicillin near the periphery of the biofilm but were not affected in the interior. Taken together, these results indicate that K. pneumoniae in this system experience nutrient limitation locally within the biofilm, leading to zones in which the bacteria enter stationary phase and are growing slowly or not at all. In these inactive regions, bacteria are less susceptible to killing by antibiotics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bacterial Biofilms: A Common Cause of Persistent Infections
Costerton, J. W., Stewart, P. S., & Greenberg, E. P. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5418.1318 · Cited by 12,167
Self-citationAntibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms
Stewart, P. S., & William Costerton, J. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05321-1 · Cited by 4,585
Self-citationMechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents
Mah, T.-F. C., & O'Toole, G. A. (2001) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0966-842x(00)01913-2 · Cited by 3,921
Lewis, K. (2001) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.45.4.999-1007.2001 · Cited by 1,980
How to optimize the drop plate method for enumerating bacteria
Herigstad, B., Hamilton, M., & Heersink, J. (2001) · Journal of Microbiological Methods · doi:10.1016/s0167-7012(00)00241-4 · Cited by 965
Anderl, J. N., Franklin, M. J., & Stewart, P. S. (2000) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.44.7.1818-1824.2000 · Cited by 958
Self-citationResistance of bacterial biofilms to antibiotics a growth-rate related effect?
BROWN, M. R. W., ALLISON, D. G., & GILBERT, P. (1988) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/22.6.777 · Cited by 545
TUOMANEN, E., COZENS, R., TOSCH, W., ZAK, O., & TOMASZ, A. (1986) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00221287-132-5-1297 · Cited by 477
Theoretical aspects of antibiotic diffusion into microbial biofilms
Stewart, P. S. (1996) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.40.11.2517 · Cited by 471
Self-citationBiofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents
Xu, K. D., McFeters, G. A., & Stewart, P. S. (2000) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00221287-146-3-547 · Cited by 325
Self-citation
Cited by
Roy, R., Tiwari, M., Donelli, G., & Tiwari, V. (2018) · Virulence · doi:10.1080/21505594.2017.1313372 · Cited by 1,523
Signals, Regulatory Networks, and Materials That Build and Break Bacterial Biofilms
Karatan, E., & Watnick, P. (2009) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00041-08 · Cited by 1,048
Rumbaugh, K. P., & Sauer, K. (2020) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-020-0385-0 · Cited by 907
Bacterial Biofilm Eradication Agents: A Current Review
Verderosa, A. D., Totsika, M., & Fairfull-Smith, K. E. (2019) · Frontiers in Chemistry · doi:10.3389/fchem.2019.00824 · Cited by 555
Clinical presentation and treatment of orthopaedic implant‐associated infection
Zimmerli, W. (2014) · Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/joim.12233 · Cited by 481
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderl, J. N., Zahller, J., Roe, F., & Stewart, P. S.
- Venue
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1251-1256
- ISSN
- 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6596
- OpenAlex
- W2143034026
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 4.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role of Nutrient Limitation and Stationary-Phase Existence in Klebsiella pneumoniae Biofilm Resistance to Ampicillin and Ciprofloxacin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aac.47.4.1251-1256.2003
- The paper
- Anderl, J. N., Zahller, J., Roe, F., & Stewart, P. S. (2003). Role of Nutrient Limitation and Stationary-Phase Existence in Klebsiella pneumoniae Biofilm Resistance to Ampicillin and Ciprofloxacin. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.47.4.1251-1256.2003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.