The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Therapy of Experimental Pseudomonas Infections with a Nonreplicating Genetically Modified Phage
Open accessAbstract
Bacteriophage therapy of bacterial infections has received renewed attention owing to the increasing prevalence of antibiotic-resistant pathogens. A side effect of many antibiotics as well as of phage therapy with lytic phage is the release of cell wall components, e.g., endotoxins of gram-negative bacteria, which mediate the general pathological aspects of septicemia. Here we explored an alternative strategy by using genetically engineered nonreplicating, nonlytic phage to combat an experimental Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. An export protein gene of the P. aeruginosa filamentous phage Pf3 was replaced with a restriction endonuclease gene. This rendered the Pf3 variant (Pf3R) nonreplicative and concomitantly prevented the release of the therapeutic agent from the target cell. The Pf3R phage efficiently killed a wild-type host in vitro, while endotoxin release was kept to a minimum. Treatment of P. aeruginosa infections of mice with Pf3R or with a replicating lytic phage resulted in comparable survival rates upon challenge with a minimal lethal dose of 3. However, the survival rate after phage therapy with Pf3R was significantly higher than that with the lytic phage upon challenge with a minimal lethal dose of 5. This higher survival rate correlated with a reduced inflammatory response elicited by Pf3R treatment relative to that with the lytic phage. Therefore, this study suggests that the increased survival rate of Pf3R-treated mice could result from reduced endotoxin release. Thus, the use of a nonreplicating modified phage for the delivery of genes encoding proteins toxic to bacterial pathogens may open up a new avenue in antimicrobial therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: mechanisms and alternative therapeutic strategies
Pang, Z., Raudonis, R., Glick, B. R., Lin, T.-J., & Cheng, Z. (2019) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.11.013 · Cited by 2,306
Dispersing biofilms with engineered enzymatic bacteriophage
Lu, T. K., & Collins, J. J. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0704624104 · Cited by 895
Microbiome therapeutics — Advances and challenges
Mimee, M., Citorik, R. J., & Lu, T. K. (2016) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2016.04.032 · Cited by 317
Revisiting phage therapy: new applications for old resources
Nobrega, F. L., Costa, A. R., Kluskens, L. D., & Azeredo, J. (2015) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2015.01.006 · Cited by 310
Phage therapy: Facts and fiction
Skurnik, M., & Strauch, E. (2006) · International Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijmm.2005.09.002 · Cited by 296
Metadata
- Authors
- Hagens, S., Habel, A., von Ahsen, U., von Gabain, A., & Bläsi, U.
- Venue
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3817-3822
- ISSN
- 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6596
- OpenAlex
- W2163204395
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Therapy of Experimental Pseudomonas Infections with a Nonreplicating Genetically Modified Phage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aac.48.10.3817-3822.2004
- The paper
- Hagens, S., Habel, A., von Ahsen, U., von Gabain, A., & Bläsi, U. (2004). Therapy of Experimental Pseudomonas Infections with a Nonreplicating Genetically Modified Phage. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.48.10.3817-3822.2004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.