The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identification of Bacterial Micropredators Distinctively Active in a Soil Microbial Food Web
Abstract
The understanding of microbial interactions and trophic networks is a prerequisite for the elucidation of the turnover and transformation of organic materials in soils. To elucidate the incorporation of biomass carbon into a soil microbial food web, we added 13 C-labeled Escherichia coli biomass to an agricultural soil and identified those indigenous microbes that were specifically active in its mineralization and carbon sequestration. rRNA stable isotope probing (SIP) revealed that uncultivated relatives of distinct groups of gliding bacterial micropredators ( Lysobacter spp., Myxococcales , and the Bacteroidetes ) lead carbon sequestration and mineralization from the added biomass. In addition, fungal populations within the Microascaceae were shown to respond to the added biomass after only 1 h of incubation and were thus surprisingly reactive to degradable labile carbon. This RNA-SIP study identifies indigenous microbes specifically active in the transformation of a nondefined complex carbon source, bacterial biomass, directly in a soil ecosystem.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Potted plants in hospitals as reservoirs of pathogenic fungi
Summerbell, R. C., Krajden, S., & Kane, J. (1989) · Mycopathologia · doi:10.1007/bf00436921 · Cited by 131 · cited 1×
“Information on the ecological role of the Microascaceae in natural habitats is scarce (2), and such fungi are mainly known as opportunistic pathogens (26).”
Background
Cited by
Microbiome definition re-visited: old concepts and new challenges
Berg, G., Rybakova, D., Fischer, D., Cernava, T., Vergès, M.-C. C., Charles, T., Chen, X., Cocolin, L., Eversole, K., Corral, G. H., et al. (2020) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-020-00875-0 · Cited by 2,275
SOM genesis: microbial biomass as a significant source
Miltner, A., Bombach, P., Schmidt-Brücken, B., & Kästner, M. (2012) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10533-011-9658-z · Cited by 1,123
Self-citationSoil protists: a fertile frontier in soil biology research
Geisen, S., Mitchell, E. A. D., Adl, S., Bonkowski, M., Dunthorn, M., Ekelund, F., Fernández, L. D., Jousset, A., Krashevska, V., Singer, D., et al. (2018) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuy006 · Cited by 729
Li, F., Chen, L., Zhang, J., Yin, J., & Huang, S. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.00187 · Cited by 382
Network topology reveals high connectance levels and few key microbial genera within soils
Lupatini, M., Suleiman, A. K. A., Jacques, R. J. S., Antoniolli, Z. I., de Siqueira Ferreira, A., Kuramae, E. E., & Roesch, L. F. W. (2014) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2014.00010 · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Lueders, T., Kindler, R., Miltner, A., Friedrich, M. W., & Kaestner, M.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2006-08
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 5342-5348
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2164239845
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of Bacterial Micropredators Distinctively Active in a Soil Microbial Food Web. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.00400-06
- The paper
- Lueders, T., Kindler, R., Miltner, A., Friedrich, M. W., & Kaestner, M. (2006). Identification of Bacterial Micropredators Distinctively Active in a Soil Microbial Food Web. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00400-06
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
