The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ecophysiological Characterization of Ammonia-Oxidizing Archaea and Bacteria from Freshwater
Open accessAbstract
Aerobic biological ammonia oxidation is carried out by two groups of microorganisms, ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and the recently discovered ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA). Here we present a study using cultivation-based methods to investigate the differences in growth of three AOA cultures and one AOB culture enriched from freshwater environments. The strain in the enriched AOA culture belong to thaumarchaeal group I.1a, with the strain in one enrichment culture having the highest identity with “ Candidatus Nitrosoarchaeum koreensis” and the strains in the other two representing a new genus of AOA. The AOB strain in the enrichment culture was also obtained from freshwater and had the highest identity to AOB from the Nitrosomonas oligotropha group ( Nitrosomonas cluster 6a). We investigated the influence of ammonium, oxygen, pH, and light on the growth of AOA and AOB. The growth rates of the AOB increased with increasing ammonium concentrations, while the growth rates of the AOA decreased slightly. Increasing oxygen concentrations led to an increase in the growth rate of the AOB, while the growth rates of AOA were almost oxygen insensitive. Light exposure (white and blue wavelengths) inhibited the growth of AOA completely, and the AOA did not recover when transferred to the dark. AOB were also inhibited by blue light; however, growth recovered immediately after transfer to the dark. Our results show that the tested AOB have a competitive advantage over the tested AOA under most conditions investigated. Further experiments will elucidate the niches of AOA and AOB in more detail.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Environmental genome shotgun sequencing of the sargasso sea
Venter, J. C., Remington, K., Heidelberg, J. F., Halpern, A. L., Rusch, D., Eisen, J. A., Wu, D., Paulsen, I., Nelson, K. E., Nelson, W., et al. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1093857 · Cited by 4,376
Cited by
Diversity, Physiology, and Niche Differentiation of Ammonia-Oxidizing Archaea
Hatzenpichler, R. (2012) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01960-12 · Cited by 532
Kozlowski, J. A., Stieglmeier, M., Schleper, C., Klotz, M. G., & Stein, L. Y. (2016) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2016.2 · Cited by 389
Self-citationWang, B., Zhao, J., Guo, Z., Ma, J., Xu, H., & Jia, Z. (2015) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2014.194 · Cited by 225
Cai, M., Ng, S.-K., Lim, C. K., Lu, H., Jia, Y., & Lee, P. K. H. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.00280 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- French, E., Kozlowski, J. A., Mukherjee, M., Bullerjahn, G., & Bollmann, A.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2012-08-15
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 5773-5780
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2079766312
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecophysiological Characterization of Ammonia-Oxidizing Archaea and Bacteria from Freshwater. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.00432-12
- The paper
- French, E., Kozlowski, J. A., Mukherjee, M., Bullerjahn, G., & Bollmann, A. (2012). Ecophysiological Characterization of Ammonia-Oxidizing Archaea and Bacteria from Freshwater. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00432-12
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.