Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 33

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of Planktonic and Biofilm Cultures of Pseudomonas fluorescens DSM 8341 Cells Grown on Fluoroacetate

Heffernan, Barry, Murphy, Cormac D., Casey, Eoin·2009·Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

Comparisons between the physiological properties of Pseudomonas fluorescens biofilm cells grown in a tubular biofilm reactor and planktonic cells grown in a chemostat were performed. Fluoroacetate was the sole carbon source for all experiments. The performance of cells was assessed using cell cycle kinetics and by determining specific fluoroacetate utilization rates. Cell cycle kinetics were studied by flow cytometry in conjunction with the fluorescent stain propidium iodide. Determination of the DNA content of planktonic and biofilm cultures showed little difference between the two modes of growth. Cultures with comparable specific glycolate utilization rates had similar percentages of cells in the B phase of the cell cycle, indicating similar growth rates. Specific fluoroacetate utilization rates showed the performance of planktonic cells to be superior to that of biofilm cells, with more fluoroacetate utilized per cell at similar specific fluoroacetate loading rates. A consequence of this decreased biofilm performance was the accumulation of glycolate in the effluent of biofilm cultures. This accumulation of glycolate was not observed in the effluent of planktonic cultures. Spatial stratification of oxygen within the biofilm was identified as a possible explanation for the overflow metabolism of glycolate and the decreased performance of the biofilm cells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aem.01530-08

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Duddles, G. A., S. E. Richardson, and E. F. Brath. 1974. Plastic medium trickling filters for biological nitrogen control. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed.46:937-946.
  2. Marais, J. S. C. 1944. Monofluoro-acetic acid, the toxic principle of “gifblaar,” Dichapetalum cymosum. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res.20:67-73.

Cited by

See all 33

Metadata

Authors
Heffernan, B., Murphy, C. D., & Casey, E.
Venue
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
2009-05
Volume
75
Issue
9
Pages
2899-2907
ISSN
  • 0099-2240
  • 1098-5336
Cited by
33
References
37
Language
en
Licence
journals.asm.org/non-commercial-tdm-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Planktonic and Biofilm Cultures of Pseudomonas fluorescens DSM 8341 Cells Grown on Fluoroacetate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.01530-08
The paper
Heffernan, B., Murphy, C. D., & Casey, E. (2009). Comparison of Planktonic and Biofilm Cultures of Pseudomonas fluorescens DSM 8341 Cells Grown on Fluoroacetate. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01530-08

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.