The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Root Exudates Regulate Soil Fungal Community Composition and Diversity
Open accessAbstract
Plants are in constant contact with a community of soil biota that contains fungi ranging from pathogenic to symbiotic. A few studies have demonstrated a critical role of chemical communication in establishing highly specialized relationships, but the general role for root exudates in structuring the soil fungal community is poorly described. This study demonstrates that two model plant species ( Arabidopsis thaliana and Medicago truncatula ) are able to maintain resident soil fungal populations but unable to maintain nonresident soil fungal populations. This is mediated largely through root exudates: the effects of adding in vitro-generated root exudates to the soil fungal community were qualitatively and quantitatively similar to the results observed for plants grown in those same soils. This effect is observed for total fungal biomass, phylotype diversity, and overall community similarity to the starting community. Nonresident plants and root exudates influenced the fungal community by both positively and negatively impacting the relative abundance of individual phylotypes. A net increase in fungal biomass was observed when nonresident root exudates were added to resident plant treatments, suggesting that increases in specific carbon substrates and/or signaling compounds support an increased soil fungal population load. This study establishes root exudates as a mechanism through which a plant is able to regulate soil fungal community composition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plant sesquiterpenes induce hyphal branching in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
Akiyama, K., Matsuzaki, K.-I., & Hayashi, H. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03608 · Cited by 2,429
PLANT DIVERSITY, SOIL MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES, AND ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION: ARE THERE ANY LINKS?
Zak, D. R., Holmes, W. E., White, D. C., Peacock, A. D., & Tilman, D. (2003) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/02-0433 · Cited by 1,257
Cited by
Turner, T. R., James, E. K., & Poole, P. S. (2013) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-6-209 · Cited by 1,349
Manipulating the soil microbiome to increase soil health and plant fertility
Chaparro, J. M., Sheflin, A. M., Manter, D. K., & Vivanco, J. M. (2012) · Biology and Fertility of Soils · doi:10.1007/s00374-012-0691-4 · Cited by 1,099
Self-citationRhizosphere interactions: root exudates, microbes, and microbial communities
Huang, X.-F., Chaparro, J. M., Reardon, K. F., Zhang, R., Shen, Q., & Vivanco, J. M. (2014) · Botany · doi:10.1139/cjb-2013-0225 · Cited by 824
Self-citationvan der Wal, A., Geydan, T. D., Kuyper, T. W., & de Boer, W. (2013) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/1574-6976.12001 · Cited by 404
Functional Soil Microbiome: Belowground Solutions to an Aboveground Problem
Lakshmanan, V., Selvaraj, G., & Bais, H. P. (2014) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.114.245811 · Cited by 400
Metadata
- Authors
- Broeckling, C. D., Broz, A. K., Bergelson, J., Manter, D. K., & Vivanco, J. M.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 738-744
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2127077289
- Cited by
- 803
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.