The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phylogenetic Distribution of Potential Cellulases in Bacteria
Open accessAbstract
Many microorganisms contain cellulases that are important for plant cell wall degradation and overall soil ecosystem functioning. At present, we have extensive biochemical knowledge of cellulases but little is known about the phylogenetic distribution of these enzymes. To address this, we analyzed the distribution of 21,985 genes encoding proteins related to cellulose utilization in 5,123 sequenced bacterial genomes. First, we identified the distribution of glycoside hydrolases involved in cellulose utilization and synthesis at different taxonomic levels, from the phylum to the strain. Cellulose degradation/utilization capabilities appeared in nearly all major groups and resulted in strains displaying various enzyme gene combinations. Potential cellulose degraders, having both cellulases and β-glucosidases, constituted 24% of all genomes whereas potential opportunistic strains, having β-glucosidases only, accounted for 56%. Finally, 20% of the bacteria have no relevant enzymes and do not rely on cellulose utilization. The latter group was primarily connected to specific bacterial lifestyles like autotrophy and parasitism. Cellulose degraders, as well as opportunists, have multiple enzymes with similar functions. However, the potential degraders systematically harbor about twice more β-glucosidases than their potential opportunistic relatives. Although scattered, the distribution of functional types, in bacterial lineages, is not random but mostly follows a Brownian motion evolution model. Degraders form clusters of relatives at the species level, whereas opportunists are clustered at the genus level. This information can form a mechanistic basis for the linking of changes in microbial community composition to soil ecosystem processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
vegan: Community Ecology Package
Oksanen, J., Simpson, G. L., Blanchet, F. G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P. R., O'Hara, R. B., Solymos, P., Stevens, M. H. H., Szoecs, E., et al. (2001) · CRAN: Contributed Packages · doi:10.32614/cran.package.vegan · Cited by 22,615
PHYLIP-Phylogeny inference package (Version 3.2)
Felsenstein, J. (1989) · Cladistics · Cited by 17,682
The Pfam Protein Families Database
Bateman, A. (2002) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/30.1.276 · Cited by 14,000
APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language
Paradis, E., Claude, J., & Strimmer, K. (2004) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412 · Cited by 11,335
Pruesse, E., Quast, C., Knittel, K., Fuchs, B. M., Ludwig, W., Peplies, J., & Glockner, F. O. (2007) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkm864 · Cited by 6,668
The Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes database (CAZy): an expert resource for Glycogenomics
Cantarel, B. L., Coutinho, P. M., Rancurel, C., Bernard, T., Lombard, V., & Henrissat, B. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn663 · Cited by 5,972
The Pfam protein families database
Punta, M., Coggill, P. C., Eberhardt, R. Y., Mistry, J., Tate, J., Boursnell, C., Pang, N., Forslund, K., Ceric, G., Clements, J., et al. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr1065 · Cited by 3,719
A classification of glycosyl hydrolases based on amino acid sequence similarities
Henrissat, B. (1991) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj2800309 · Cited by 3,188
Resistance, resilience, and redundancy in microbial communities
Allison, S. D., & Martiny, J. B. H. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0801925105 · Cited by 3,151
PHYLIP ( PHYLogeny Inference Package)
Cummings, M. P. (2004) · Dictionary of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology · doi:10.1002/9780471650126.dob0534.pub2 · Cited by 3,127
Cited by
Microbiomes in light of traits: a phylogenetic perspective
Martiny, J. B. H., Jones, S. E., Lennon, J. T., & Martiny, A. C. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aac9323 · Cited by 834
Self-citationModeling Soil Processes: Review, Key Challenges, and New Perspectives
Vereecken, H., Schnepf, A., Hopmans, J. W., Javaux, M., Or, D., Roose, T., Vanderborght, J., Young, M. H., Amelung, W., Aitkenhead, M., et al. (2016) · Vadose Zone Journal · doi:10.2136/vzj2015.09.0131 · Cited by 833
López-Mondéjar, R., Zühlke, D., Becher, D., Riedel, K., & Baldrian, P. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep25279 · Cited by 482
Eichorst, S. A., Trojan, D., Roux, S., Herbold, C., Rattei, T., & Woebken, D. (2018) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/1462-2920.14043 · Cited by 359
Common scab disease: structural basis of elicitor recognition in pathogenic Streptomyces species
(2023) · doi:10.1128/spectrum.01975-23 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Berlemont, R., & Martiny, A. C.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2013-03
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1545-1554
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2097597464
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 8.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phylogenetic Distribution of Potential Cellulases in Bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.03305-12
- The paper
- Berlemont, R., & Martiny, A. C. (2013). Phylogenetic Distribution of Potential Cellulases in Bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.03305-12
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.