The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reversing Bacterial Resistance to Antibiotics by Phage-Mediated Delivery of Dominant Sensitive Genes
Open accessAbstract
Pathogen resistance to antibiotics is a rapidly growing problem, leading to an urgent need for novel antimicrobial agents. Unfortunately, development of new antibiotics faces numerous obstacles, and a method that resensitizes pathogens to approved antibiotics therefore holds key advantages. We present a proof of principle for a system that restores antibiotic efficiency by reversing pathogen resistance. This system uses temperate phages to introduce, by lysogenization, the genes rpsL and gyrA conferring sensitivity in a dominant fashion to two antibiotics, streptomycin and nalidixic acid, respectively. Unique selective pressure is generated to enrich for bacteria that harbor the phages carrying the sensitizing constructs. This selection pressure is based on a toxic compound, tellurite, and therefore does not forfeit any antibiotic for the sensitization procedure. We further demonstrate a possible way of reducing undesirable recombination events by synthesizing dominant sensitive genes with major barriers to homologous recombination. Such synthesis does not significantly reduce the gene's sensitization ability. Unlike conventional bacteriophage therapy, the system does not rely on the phage's ability to kill pathogens in the infected host, but instead, on its ability to deliver genetic constructs into the bacteria and thus render them sensitive to antibiotics prior to host infection. We believe that transfer of the sensitizing cassette by the constructed phage will significantly enrich for antibiotic-treatable pathogens on hospital surfaces. Broad usage of the proposed system, in contrast to antibiotics and phage therapy, will potentially change the nature of nosocomial infections toward being more susceptible to antibiotics rather than more resistant.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wiegand, I., Hilpert, K., & Hancock, R. E. W. (2008) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.521 · Cited by 6,156
Cited by
Sequence-specific antimicrobials using efficiently delivered RNA-guided nucleases
Citorik, R. J., Mimee, M., & Lu, T. K. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3011 · Cited by 808
Wittebole, X., De Roock, S., & Opal, S. M. (2014) · Virulence · doi:10.4161/viru.25991 · Cited by 599
Temperate and lytic bacteriophages programmed to sensitize and kill antibiotic-resistant bacteria
Yosef, I., Manor, M., Kiro, R., & Qimron, U. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1500107112 · Cited by 483
Self-citationAdvantages and Limitations of Bacteriophages for the Treatment of Bacterial Infections
Principi, N., Silvestri, E., & Esposito, S. (2019) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2019.00513 · Cited by 454
Gu Liu, C., Green, S. I., Min, L., Clark, J. R., Salazar, K. C., Terwilliger, A. L., Kaplan, H. B., Trautner, B. W., Ramig, R. F., & Maresso, A. W. (2020) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.01462-20 · Cited by 409
Metadata
- Authors
- Edgar, R., Friedman, N., Molshanski-Mor, S., & Qimron, U.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2012-02
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 744-751
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2093574752
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reversing Bacterial Resistance to Antibiotics by Phage-Mediated Delivery of Dominant Sensitive Genes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.05741-11
- The paper
- Edgar, R., Friedman, N., Molshanski-Mor, S., & Qimron, U. (2012). Reversing Bacterial Resistance to Antibiotics by Phage-Mediated Delivery of Dominant Sensitive Genes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.05741-11
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.