The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Toward Homosuccinate Fermentation: Metabolic Engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for Anaerobic Production of Succinate from Glucose and Formate
Open accessAbstract
Previous studies have demonstrated the capability of Corynebacterium glutamicum for anaerobic succinate production from glucose under nongrowing conditions. In this work, we have addressed two shortfalls of this process, the formation of significant amounts of by-products and the limitation of the yield by the redox balance. To eliminate acetate formation, a derivative of the type strain ATCC 13032 (strain BOL-1), which lacked all known pathways for acetate and lactate synthesis (Δ cat Δ pqo Δ pta-ackA Δ ldhA ), was constructed. Chromosomal integration of the pyruvate carboxylase gene pyc P458S into BOL-1 resulted in strain BOL-2, which catalyzed fast succinate production from glucose with a yield of 1 mol/mol and showed only little acetate formation. In order to provide additional reducing equivalents derived from the cosubstrate formate, the fdh gene from Mycobacterium vaccae , coding for an NAD + -coupled formate dehydrogenase (FDH), was chromosomally integrated into BOL-2, leading to strain BOL-3. In an anaerobic batch process with strain BOL-3, a 20% higher succinate yield from glucose was obtained in the presence of formate. A temporary metabolic blockage of strain BOL-3 was prevented by plasmid-borne overexpression of the glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene gapA . In an anaerobic fed-batch process with glucose and formate, strain BOL-3/pAN6- gap accumulated 1,134 mM succinate in 53 h with an average succinate production rate of 1.59 mmol per g cells (dry weight) (cdw) per h. The succinate yield of 1.67 mol/mol glucose is one of the highest currently described for anaerobic succinate producers and was accompanied by a very low level of by-products (0.10 mol/mol glucose).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biorefineries for the production of top building block chemicals and their derivatives
Choi, S., Song, C. W., Shin, J. H., & Lee, S. Y. (2015) · Metabolic Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2014.12.007 · Cited by 516
Production of succinic acid by metabolically engineered microorganisms
Ahn, J. H., Jang, Y.-S., & Lee, S. Y. (2016) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2016.02.034 · Cited by 293
Yin, X., Li, J., Shin, H.-D., Du, G., Liu, L., & Chen, J. (2015) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.04.006 · Cited by 255
Blombach, B., & Takors, R. (2015) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2015.00108 · Cited by 65
NADH gene manipulation for advancing bioelectricity in Clostridium ljungdahlii microbial fuel cells
Han, S., Gao, X.-Y., Ying, H.-J., & Zhou, C. C. (2016) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c5gc02696b · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Litsanov, B., Brocker, M., & Bott, M.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2012-05
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3325-3337
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2094546537
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward Homosuccinate Fermentation: Metabolic Engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for Anaerobic Production of Succinate from Glucose and Formate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.07790-11
- The paper
- Litsanov, B., Brocker, M., & Bott, M. (2012). Toward Homosuccinate Fermentation: Metabolic Engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for Anaerobic Production of Succinate from Glucose and Formate. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.07790-11
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.