The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Propionate Formation from Cellulose and Soluble Sugars by Combined Cultures of Bacteroides succinogenes and Selenomonas ruminantium
Open accessAbstract
Succinate is formed as an intermediate but not as a normal end product of the bovine rumen fermentation. However, numerous rumen bacteria are present, e.g., Bacteroides succinogenes, which produce succinate as a major product of carbohydrate fermentation. Selenomonas ruminantium, another rumen species, produces propionate via the succinate or randomizing pathway. These two organisms were co-cultured to determine if S. ruminantium could decarboxylate succinate produced by B. succinogenes. When energy sources used competitively by both species, i.e. glucose or cellobiose, were employed, no succinate was found in combined cultures, although a significant amount was expected from the numbers of Bacteroides present. The propionate production per S. ruminantium was significantly greater in combined than in single S. ruminantium cultures, which indicated that S. ruminantium was decarboxylating the succinate produced by B. succinogenes. S. ruminantium, which does not use cellulose, grew on cellulose when co-cultured with B. succinogenes. Succinate, but not propionate, was produced from cellulose by B. succinogenes alone. Propionate, but no succinate, accumulated when the combined cultures were grown on cellulose. These interspecies interactions are models for the rumen ecosystem interactions involved in the production of succinate by one species and its decarboxylation to propionate by a second species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Microbial Cellulose Utilization: Fundamentals and Biotechnology
Lynd, L. R., Weimer, P. J., van Zyl, W. H., & Pretorius, I. S. (2002) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.66.3.506-577.2002 · Cited by 4,726
Biotechnology of succinic acid production and markets for derived industrial products
Zeikus, J. G., Jain, M. K., & Elankovan, P. (1999) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s002530051431 · Cited by 962
Why are ruminal cellulolytic bacteria unable to digest cellulose at low pH?
Russell, J. B., & Wilson, D. B. (1996) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(96)76510-4 · Cited by 628
Ionophores: Their Effect on Production Efficiency and Mode of Action
Bergen, W. G., & Bates, D. B. (1984) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas1984.5861465x · Cited by 607
The rumen microbiome: balancing food security and environmental impacts
Mizrahi, I., Wallace, R. J., & Moraïs, S. (2021) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-021-00543-6 · Cited by 490
Metadata
- Authors
- Scheifinger, C. C., & Wolin, M. J.
- Venue
- Applied Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1973-01-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 789-795
- ISSN
- 0003-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1496710101
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Propionate Formation from Cellulose and Soluble Sugars by Combined Cultures of Bacteroides succinogenes and Selenomonas ruminantium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.26.5.789-795.1973
- The paper
- Scheifinger, C. C., & Wolin, M. J. (1973). Propionate Formation from Cellulose and Soluble Sugars by Combined Cultures of Bacteroides succinogenes and Selenomonas ruminantium. Applied Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.26.5.789-795.1973
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.