Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 361

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Rapid assay for screening and characterizing microorganisms for the ability to degrade polychlorinated biphenyls

Open access
Bedard, D L, Unterman, R, Bopp, L H, Brennan, M J, Haberl, M L, Johnson, C·1986·Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

We designed a rapid assay that assesses the polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB)-degradative competence and congener specificity of aerobic microorganisms, identifies strains capable of degrading highly chlorinated biphenyls, and distinguishes among those that degrade PCBs by alternative pathways. Prior attempts to assay PCB-degradative competence by measuring disappearance of Aroclors (commercial PCB mixtures) have frequently produced false-positive findings because of volatilization, adsorption, or absorption losses. Furthermore, these assays have generally left the chemical nature of the competence obscure because of incomplete gas chromatographic resolution and uncertain identification of Aroclor peaks. We avoided these problems by using defined mixtures of PCB congeners and by adopting incubation and extraction methods that prevent physical loss of PCBs. Our assay mixtures include PCB congeners ranging from dichloro- to hexachlorobiphenyls and representing various structural classes, e.g., congeners chlorinated on a single ring (2,3-dichlorobiphenyl), blocked at 2,3 sites (2,5,2'5'-tetrachlorobiphenyl), blocked at 3,4 sites (4,4'-dichlorobiphenyl), and lacking adjacent unchlorinated sites (2,4,5,2',4',5'-hexachlorobiphenyl). The PCB-degrative ability of microorganisms is assessed by packed-column gas chromatographic analysis of these defined congener mixtures following 24-h incubation with resting cells. When tested with 25 environmental isolates, this assay revealed a broad range of PCB-degradative competence, highlighted differences in congener specificity and in the extent of degradation of individual congeners, predicted degradative competence on commercial PCBs, and (iv) identified strains with superior PCB-degradative ability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aem.51.4.761-768.1986

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 361

Metadata

Authors
Bedard, D. L., Unterman, R., Bopp, L. H., Brennan, M. J., Haberl, M. L., & Johnson, C.
Venue
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
1986-04
Volume
51
Issue
4
Pages
761-768
ISSN
  • 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5336
OpenAlex
W1594688023
Cited by
361
References
0
FWCI
12.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rapid assay for screening and characterizing microorganisms for the ability to degrade polychlorinated biphenyls. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.51.4.761-768.1986
The paper
Bedard, D. L., Unterman, R., Bopp, L. H., Brennan, M. J., Haberl, M. L., & Johnson, C. (1986). Rapid assay for screening and characterizing microorganisms for the ability to degrade polychlorinated biphenyls. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.51.4.761-768.1986

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.