The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DNA amplification to enhance detection of genetically engineered bacteria in environmental samples
Open accessAbstract
The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed to amplify a 1.0-kilobase (kb) probe-specific region of DNA from the herbicide-degrading bacterium Pseudomonas cepacia AC1100 in order to increase the sensitivity of detecting the organism by dot-blot analysis. The 1.0-kb region was an integral portion of a larger 1.3-kb repeat sequence which is present as 15 to 20 copies on the P. cepacia AC1100 genome. PCR was performed by melting the target DNA, annealing 24-base oligonucleotide primers to unique sequences flanking the 1.0-kb region, and performing extension reactions with DNA polymerase. After extension, the DNA was again melted, and the procedure was repeated for a total of 25 to 30 cycles. After amplification the reaction mixture was transferred to nylon filters and hybridized against radiolabeled 1.0-kb fragment probe DNA. Amplified target DNA was detectable in samples initially containing as little as 0.3 pg of target. The addition of 20 micrograms of nonspecific DNA isolated from sediment samples did not hinder amplification or detection of the target DNA. The detection of 0.3 pg of target DNA was at least a 10(3)-fold increase in the sensitivity of detecting gene sequences compared with dot-blot analysis of nonamplified samples. PCR performed after bacterial DNA was isolated from sediment samples permitted the detection of as few as 100 cells of P. cepacia AC1100 per 100 g of sediment sample against a background of 10(11) diverse nontarget organisms; that is, P. cepacia AC1100 was positively detected at a concentration of 1 cell per g of sediment. This represented a 10(3)-fold increase in sensitivity compared with nonamplified samples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Primer-Directed Enzymatic Amplification of DNA with a Thermostable DNA Polymerase
Saiki, R. K., Gelfand, D. H., Stoffel, S., Scharf, S. J., Higuchi, R., Horn, G. T., Mullis, K. B., & Erlich, H. A. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2448875 · Cited by 17,719
Saiki, R. K., Scharf, S., Faloona, F., Mullis, K. B., Horn, G. T., Erlich, H. A., & Arnheim, N. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2999980 · Cited by 8,956
Cited by
Microbial degradation of hydrocarbons in the environment
Leahy, J. G., & Colwell, R. R. (1990) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.54.3.305-315.1990 · Cited by 2,572
Inhibition and facilitation of nucleic acid amplification
Wilson, I. G. (1997) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.63.10.3741-3751.1997 · Cited by 2,266
Determination of microbial diversity in environmental samples: pitfalls of PCR-based rRNA analysis
v. Wintzingerode, F. (1997) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0168-6445(97)00057-0 · Cited by 2,063
High diversity in DNA of soil bacteria
Torsvik, V, Goksøyr, J., & Daae, F. L. (1990) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.56.3.782-787.1990 · Cited by 1,740
Tebbe, C. C., & Vahjen, W. (1993) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.59.8.2657-2665.1993 · Cited by 706
Metadata
- Authors
- Steffan, R. J., & Atlas, R. M.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1988-09
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2185-2191
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W1494703094
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DNA amplification to enhance detection of genetically engineered bacteria in environmental samples. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.54.9.2185-2191.1988
- The paper
- Steffan, R. J., & Atlas, R. M. (1988). DNA amplification to enhance detection of genetically engineered bacteria in environmental samples. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.54.9.2185-2191.1988
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.