Inhibition and facilitation of nucleic acid amplification

Abstract

Factors that inhibit the amplification of nucleic acids by PCR are present with target DNAs from many sources. The inhibitors generally act at one or more of three essential points in the reaction in the following ways: they interfere with the cell lysis necessary for extraction of DNA, they interfere by nucleic acid degradation or capture, and they inhibit polymerase activity for amplification of target DNA. Although a wide range of inhibitors is reported, the identities and modes of action of many remain unclear. These effects may have important implications for clinical and public health investigations, especially if the investigations involve food and environmental screening. Common inhibitors include various components of body fluids and reagents encountered in clinical and forensic science (e.g., hemoglobin, urea, and heparin), food constituents (e.g., organic and phenolic compounds, glycogen, fats, and Ca 21 ), and environmental compounds (e.g., phenolic compounds, humic acids, and heavy metals). Other, more widespread inhibitors include constituents of bacterial cells, nontarget DNA and contaminants, and laboratory items such as pollen, glove powder, laboratory plasticware, and cellulose. This review discusses the findings of many studies related to clinical, food, and environmental microbiology, including approaches that have been used to overcome inhibition and facilitate amplification for detection and typing. Few areas of biological science remain untouched by the invention of PCR (34, 81, 99). Other methods for amplifying nucleic acids (72, 123), such as Qb replicase (18), ligase chain reaction (13, 128), single-stranded sequence replication (17, 47), strand displacement amplification (126, 127), and nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (23, 122), have been described, but these methods have received less attention. Problems sometimes occur with PCR, however (124). Despite early indications of great sensitivity, the sensitivity of PCR may be a negative aspect of the procedure, since the most commonly reported problem is false-positive results due to cross-contamination (98, 124). This problem can be overcome by UV irradiation (100), with sodium hypochlorite (92), and by photochemical or enzymic methods (25, 36, 40, 78). One problem that is less discussed is reaction inhibition. This may be total or partial and can manifest itself as complete reaction failure or as reduced sensitivity of detection. In some cases, inhibition may be the cause of false-negative reactions, since few workers incorporate internal controls in each reaction tube. Early evidence of exquisite sensitivity with mammalian cells (53) involving detection of a single molecule of DNA from a hair was not reproduced when PCR was applied to many microbial (and some mammalian) situations, where poor sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility have been reported (16, 82, 86, 129, 132, 134). There may also be potentially important effects in PCR typing reactions (121), and difficulties can occur in post-PCR manipulation (61). Although systematic study of inhibition has seldom been the focus of published investigations, many workers have reported these effects in the course of other studies (12, 19, 21, 124, 129, 132, 133). Considering the prevalence of this problem, it is surprising that few systematic and mechanistic studies of PCR inhibition have been reported. Rossen et al. (97) contributed the most comprehensive study of PCR inhibition, identifying inhibitory factors in foods, bacterial culture media, and various chemical compounds. These inhibitory factors included organic and inorganic chemicals, detergents, antibiotics, buffers, enzymes, polysaccharides, fats, and proteins. This review lists and discusses inhibitors and methods that can overcome the attenuation of amplification in clinical, food, and environmental microbiology. It is beyond the scope of this paper to discuss in detail the various physical, enzymic, and chemical methods used in the extraction, purification, and quantitation of nucleic acids. Those methods are presented and discussed in commercial literature and elsewhere (14, 95, 96, 106, 134).