The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of Leptospirillum ferrooxidans for Leaching
Open accessAbstract
The importance of Leptospirillum ferrooxidans for leach processes has been evaluated by studying the lithotrophic flora of three mine biotopes and a heap leaching operation, by percolation experiments with inoculated, sterilized ore, and by morphological, physiological, and genetic investigations of pure and mixed cultures of L. ferrooxidans, Thiobacillus ferrooxidans , and Thiobacillus thiooxidans. In biotopes of 20°C or above, Leptospirillum -like bacteria are as abundant as T. ferrooxidans. Leptospirilli represent at least one-half of the ferrous-iron-oxidizing population. Percolation experiments confirmed this result. Leptospirilli were as numerous as T. ferrooxidans. At reduced temperatures, the generation times of leptospirilli increase more so than those of T. ferrooxidans. At 14°C, Leptospirillum grows slowly and T. ferrooxidans dominates the population. Physiological investigations indicate that L. ferrooxidans is a strict chemolithoautotroph, metabolizing only ferrous iron and pyrite. Even an addition of 0.05% (wt/vol) yeast extract inhibited its growth. The maximum ferrous-iron-oxidizing activity of L. ferrooxidans amounts to about 40% of the activity of T. ferrooxidans. After growth on sulfidic ore, both species exhibit reduced iron-oxidizing activities, L. ferrooxidans exhibiting one-third and T. ferrooxidans exhibiting one-seventh of their maximum activities. Surprisingly, the absolute values are similar. For indirect leaching, L. ferrooxidans is as important as T. ferrooxidans. This was confirmed by the results of percolation experiments. L. ferrooxidans together with T. thiooxidans mobilized metals at least as well as T. ferrooxidans did. The best results were obtained with a mixed culture of all three species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Metallurgical recovery of metals from electronic waste: A review
Cui, J., & Zhang, L. (2008) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.02.001 · Cited by 1,770
Microbial communities in acid mine drainage
Baker, B. J., & Banfield, J. F. (2003) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1016/s0168-6496(03)00028-x · Cited by 1,119
Bioleaching: Metal solubilization by microorganisms
Bosecker, K. (1997) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.1997.tb00340.x · Cited by 962
Sulfur chemistry in bacterial leaching of pyrite
Schippers, A., Jozsa, P., & Sand, W. (1996) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.62.9.3424-3431.1996 · Cited by 375
Self-citationGeomicrobiology of pyrite (FeS2) dissolution: Case study at Iron Mountain, California
Katrina J. Edwards, B. M. G. (1999) · Geomicrobiology Journal · doi:10.1080/014904599270668 · Cited by 175
Metadata
- Authors
- Sand, W., Rohde, K., Sobotke, B., & Zenneck, C.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1992-01
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 85-92
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2162339138
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of Leptospirillum ferrooxidans for Leaching. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.58.1.85-92.1992
- The paper
- Sand, W., Rohde, K., Sobotke, B., & Zenneck, C. (1992). Evaluation of Leptospirillum ferrooxidans for Leaching. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.58.1.85-92.1992
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.