The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of dietary fiber on microbial activity and microbial gas production in various regions of the gastrointestinal tract of pigs
Open accessAbstract
The microbial activity, composition of the gas phase, and gas production rates in the gastrointestinal tract of pigs fed either a low- or a high-fiber diet were investigated. Dense populations of culturable anaerobic bacteria, high ATP concentrations, and high adenylate energy charges were found for the last third of the small intestine, indicating that substantial microbial activity takes place in that portion of the gut. The highest microbial activity (highest bacterium counts, highest ATP concentration, high adenylate energy charge, and low pH) was found in the cecum and proximal colon. Greater microbial activity was found in the stomach and all segments of the hindgut in the pigs fed the high-fiber diet than in the pigs fed the low-fiber diet. Considerable amounts of O2 were found in the stomach (around 5%), while the content of O2 in gas samples taken from all other parts of the gastrointestinal tract was < 1%. The highest concentrations and highest production rates for H2 were found in the last third of the small intestine. No methane could be detected in the stomach or the small intestine. The rate of production and concentration of methane in the cecum and the proximal colon were low, followed by a steady increase in the successive segments of the hindgut. A very good correlation between in vivo and in vitro measurements of methane production was found. The amount of CH4 produced by pigs fed the low-fiber diet was 1.4 liters/day per animal. Substantially larger amounts of CH4 were produced by pigs fed the high-fiber diet (12.5 liters/day)(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The nutritional significance of “dietary fibre” analysis
Bach Knudsen, K. E. (2001) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0377-8401(01)00193-6 · Cited by 513
Engberg, R. M., Hedemann, M. S., Steenfeldt, S., & Jensen, B. B. (2004) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1093/ps/83.6.925 · Cited by 409
Self-citationA human pilot trial of ingestible electronic capsules capable of sensing different gases in the gut
Kalantar-Zadeh, K., Berean, K. J., Ha, N., Chrimes, A. F., Xu, K., Grando, D., Ou, J. Z., Pillai, N., Campbell, J. L., Brkljača, R., et al. (2018) · Nature Electronics · doi:10.1038/s41928-017-0004-x · Cited by 342
Rist, V. T. S., Weiss, E., Eklund, M., & Mosenthin, R. (2013) · Animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731113000062 · Cited by 269
Health‐beneficial effects of probiotics: Its mode of action
OHASHI, Y., & USHIDA, K. (2009) · Animal Science Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1740-0929.2009.00645.x · Cited by 209
Metadata
- Authors
- Jensen, B. B., & Jørgensen, H.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1994-06
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1897-1904
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W1514055214
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of dietary fiber on microbial activity and microbial gas production in various regions of the gastrointestinal tract of pigs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.60.6.1897-1904.1994
- The paper
- Jensen, B. B., & Jørgensen, H. (1994). Effect of dietary fiber on microbial activity and microbial gas production in various regions of the gastrointestinal tract of pigs. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.60.6.1897-1904.1994
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.