Cited by 209Probiotics and Fermented FoodsAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyGut microbiota and health

Health‐beneficial effects of probiotics: Its mode of action

Open access
OHASHI, Yuji, USHIDA, Kazunari·2009·Animal Science Journal

Abstract

It is now widely recognized that probiotics have health‐beneficial effects on humans and animals. Probiotics should survive in the intestinal tract to exert beneficial effects on the host's health. To keep a sufficient level of probiotic bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract, a shorter interval between doses may be required. Although adherence to the intestinal epithelial cell and mucus is not a universal property of probiotics, high ability to adhere to the intestinal surface might strongly interfere with infection of pathogenic bacteria and regulate the immune system. The administration of probiotic Lactobacillus stimulated indigenous Lactobacilli and the production of short‐chain fatty acids. This alteration of the intestinal environment should contribute to maintain the host's health. The immunomodulatory effects of probiotics are related to important parts of their beneficial effects. Probiotics may modulate the intestinal immune response through the stimulation of certain cytokine and IgA secretion in intestinal mucosa. The health‐beneficial effects, in particular the immunomodulation effect, of probiotics depend on the strain used. Differences in indigenous intestinal microflora significantly alter the magnitude of the effects of a probiotic. Specific probiotic strains suitable for each animal species and their life stage as well as each individual should be found.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1740-0929.2009.00645.x

Cites

123 of 123 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several reports have documented the ability of probiotic lactobacilli and bifidobacteria to inhibit mucosa colonisation and invasion by pathogenic strains.

    “Several reports have already documented the ability of probiotic lactobacilli and bifidobacteria to inhibit mucosa colonisation and invasion by pathogenic strains (Gopal et al. 2001; Ohashi and Ushida 2009).”

    From Adhesion and aggregation properties of Lactobacillaceae strains as protection ways against enteropathogenic bacteria (2022) · cites this paper as Ohashi and Ushida 2009

    The PROBIOTICS section says that probiotics that adhere to the intestinal surface are expected to interfere with pathogenic bacteria’s adhesion, and ROLE OF INTESTINAL MICROFLORA describes competitive exclusion from intestinal mucus. A cited study’s title in the References reports inhibited attachment and invasion by a Lactobacillus strain, but the review does not establish the claimed inhibition of invasion by both lactobacilli and bifidobacteria. Page numbers are not supplied for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Imaoka A, Matsumoto S, Setoyama H, Okada Y, Umesaki Y. 1996. Proliferative recruitment of intestinal epithelial lymphocytes after microbial colonization of germfree mice. European Journal of Immunology 26, 945-948.
  2. Ohashi Y. 2006. Probiotic bacteria and indigenous intestinal microfllora. Japanese Journal of Lactic Acid Bacteria 17, 118- 124.
  3. Tannock GW. 1995. Role of probiotics. In: Gibson GR, Mac- farlane GT (eds), Human Colonic Bacteria: Role in Nutrition, Physiology and Pathology, pp. 257-271. CRC Press, London.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
OHASHI, Y., & USHIDA, K.
Affiliations
  • Nippon Veterinary and Life Science University (JP)
  • Kyoto Prefectural University (JP)
Corresponding author
OHASHI, Yuji
Venue
Animal Science Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-07-24
Volume
80
Issue
4
Pages
361-371
ISSN
  • 1344-3941 (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-0929
OpenAlex
W2031748680
Cited by
209
References
123
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Animal Science Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
probiotics, mechanism of action, intestinal colonization, Lactobacillus, short-chain fatty acids, immunomodulation, intestinal immune response, cytokines, IgA secretion, strain specificity
MeSH terms
Animals, Gastrointestinal Motility, Humans, Intestinal Mucosa, Swine, Probiotics, Gastrointestinal Tract, Immunomodulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review