The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biological activities of two fungistatic antibiotics produced by Bacillus cereus UW85
Open accessAbstract
Cultures and culture filtrates of Bacillus cereus UW85 suppress damping-off of alfalfa caused by Phytophthora medicaginis. We studied the role in disease suppression of two antibiotics from culture filtrates of UW85 that reversibly inhibited growth of P. medicaginis. We purified the two antibiotics by cation-exchange chromatography and high-voltage paper electrophoresis and showed that one of them, designated zwittermicin A, was an aminopolyol of 396 Da that was cationic at pH 7.0; the second, designated antibiotic B, appeared to be an aminoglycoside containing a disaccharide. Both antibiotics prevented disease of alfalfa seedlings caused by P. medicaginis. Purified zwittermicin A reversibly reduced elongation of germ tubes derived from cysts of P. medicaginis, and antibiotic B caused swelling of the germ tubes. Mutants generated with Tn917 or mitomycin C treatment were screened either for antibiotic accumulation in an agar plate diffusion assay or for the ability to suppress damping-off disease of alfalfa. Of 2,682 mutants screened for antibiotic accumulation, 5 mutants were substantially reduced in antibiotic accumulation and disease-suppressive activity. Of the 1,700 mutants screened for disease-suppressive activity, 3 mutants had reduced activity and they accumulated less of both antibiotics than did the parent strain. The amount of antibiotic accumulated by the mutants was significantly correlated with the level of disease suppression. Addition of either zwittermicin A or antibiotic B to alfalfa plants inoculated with a culture of a nonsuppressive mutant resulted in disease suppression. These results demonstrate that B. cereus UW85 produces two fungistatic antibiotics that contribute to suppression of damping-off disease of alfalfa.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Role of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria in Agricultural Sustainability—A Review
Vejan, P., Abdullah, R., Khadiran, T., Ismail, S., & Nasrulhaq Boyce, A. (2016) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules21050573 · Cited by 1,426
Biocontrol of Soilborne Plant Pathogens.
Handelsman, J., & Stabb, E. V. (1996) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.8.10.1855 · Cited by 624
Self-citationA review on the application of Bacillus as probiotics in aquaculture
Kuebutornye, F. K. A., Abarike, E. D., & Lu, Y. (2019) · Fish & Shellfish Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.fsi.2019.02.010 · Cited by 555
Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani Damping-Off of Tomato with Bacillus subtilis RB14
Asaka, O., & Shoda, M. (1996) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.62.11.4081-4085.1996 · Cited by 508
Phenazines and their role in biocontrol by Pseudomonas bacteria
Chin‐A‐Woeng, T. F. C., Bloemberg, G. V., & Lugtenberg, B. J. J. (2003) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00686.x · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Silo-Suh, L. A., Lethbridge, B. J., Raffel, S. J., He, H., Clardy, J., & Handelsman, J.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1994-06
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2023-2030
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2169919973
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biological activities of two fungistatic antibiotics produced by Bacillus cereus UW85. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.60.6.2023-2030.1994
- The paper
- Silo-Suh, L. A., Lethbridge, B. J., Raffel, S. J., He, H., Clardy, J., & Handelsman, J. (1994). Biological activities of two fungistatic antibiotics produced by Bacillus cereus UW85. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.60.6.2023-2030.1994
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.